Suggested Further Reading
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2020
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Mary Wollstonecraft in Context , pp. 332 - 351Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Primary Sources
Gordon, Charlotte, Romantic Outlaws: The Extraordinary Lives of Mary Wollstonecraft and Mary Shelley (London: Hutchinson, 2015).Google Scholar
Holmes, Richard, Footsteps: Adventures of a Romantic Biographer (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986), 90–132.Google Scholar
St. Clair, William, The Godwins and the Shelleys: The Biography of a Family (London: Faber, 1990).Google Scholar
Wardle, Ralph, Mary Wollstonecraft: A Critical Biography (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1951).Google Scholar
Brant, Clare, Eighteenth-Century Letters and British Culture (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar
Favret, Mary, Romantic Correspondence: Women, Politics and the Fiction of Letters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Gilroy, Amanda and Verhoeven, W. M., eds., Epistolary Histories: Letters, Fiction, Culture (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Horrocks, Ingrid, Women Wanderers and the Writing of Mobility, 1784–1814 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
How, James S., Epistolary Spaces: English Letter-Writing from the Foundation of the Post Office to Richardson’s “Clarissa” (Abingdon: Ashgate, 2003).Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Whyman, Susan E., The Pen and the People: English Letter Writers 1660–1800 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Ayres, Brenda, Betwixt and Between: The Biographies of Mary Wollstonecraft (New York: Anthem Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Carlson, Julie A., England’s First Family of Writers: Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin, Mary Shelley (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
St. Clair, William, The Godwins and the Shelleys: A Biography of a Family (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Sunstein, Emily, A Different Face: The Life of Mary Wollstonecraft (Boston: Little, Brown, & Company, 1975).Google Scholar
Todd, Janet, Death and the Maidens: Fanny Wollstonecraft and the Shelley Circle (London: Profile Books, 2007).Google Scholar
Todd, Janet, Mary Wollstonecraft: A Revolutionary Life (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Tomalin, Claire, The Life and Death of Mary Wollstonecraft (New York: Harcourt, 1975).Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Helen, Romanticism, Publishing and Dissent: Joseph Johnson and the Cause of Liberty (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004).Google Scholar
Bugg, John, ed., The Joseph Johnson Letterbook (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Chard, Leslie F., “Bookseller to Publisher: Joseph Johnson and the English Book Trade, 1760 to 1810,” The Library, 5th series, 32 (1977), 138–54.Google Scholar
Chard, Leslie F., “Joseph Johnson: Father of the Book Trade,” Bulletin of the New York Public Library, 79 (1975), 51–82.Google Scholar
Chard, Leslie F., “Joseph Johnson in the 1790s,” Wordsworth Circle, 33 (2002), 95–100.Google Scholar
Raven, James, The Business of Books: Booksellers and the English Book Trade (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Smyser, Jane Worthington, “The Trial and Imprisonment of Joseph Johnson, Bookseller,” Bulletin of the New York Public Library, 77 (1974), 418–35.Google Scholar
Tyson, Gerald. P., Joseph Johnson: A Liberal Publisher (Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Gordon, Charlotte, Romantic Outlaws: The Extraordinary Lives of Mary Wollstonecraft and Mary Shelley (London: Hutchinson, 2015).Google Scholar
Holmes, Richard, Footsteps: Adventures of a Romantic Biographer (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986), 90–132.Google Scholar
St. Clair, William, The Godwins and the Shelleys: The Biography of a Family (London: Faber, 1990).Google Scholar
Wardle, Ralph, Mary Wollstonecraft: A Critical Biography (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1951).Google Scholar
Brant, Clare, Eighteenth-Century Letters and British Culture (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar
Favret, Mary, Romantic Correspondence: Women, Politics and the Fiction of Letters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Gilroy, Amanda and Verhoeven, W. M., eds., Epistolary Histories: Letters, Fiction, Culture (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Horrocks, Ingrid, Women Wanderers and the Writing of Mobility, 1784–1814 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
How, James S., Epistolary Spaces: English Letter-Writing from the Foundation of the Post Office to Richardson’s “Clarissa” (Abingdon: Ashgate, 2003).Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Whyman, Susan E., The Pen and the People: English Letter Writers 1660–1800 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Ayres, Brenda, Betwixt and Between: The Biographies of Mary Wollstonecraft (New York: Anthem Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Carlson, Julie A., England’s First Family of Writers: Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin, Mary Shelley (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
St. Clair, William, The Godwins and the Shelleys: A Biography of a Family (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Sunstein, Emily, A Different Face: The Life of Mary Wollstonecraft (Boston: Little, Brown, & Company, 1975).Google Scholar
Todd, Janet, Death and the Maidens: Fanny Wollstonecraft and the Shelley Circle (London: Profile Books, 2007).Google Scholar
Todd, Janet, Mary Wollstonecraft: A Revolutionary Life (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Tomalin, Claire, The Life and Death of Mary Wollstonecraft (New York: Harcourt, 1975).Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Helen, Romanticism, Publishing and Dissent: Joseph Johnson and the Cause of Liberty (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004).Google Scholar
Bugg, John, ed., The Joseph Johnson Letterbook (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Chard, Leslie F., “Bookseller to Publisher: Joseph Johnson and the English Book Trade, 1760 to 1810,” The Library, 5th series, 32 (1977), 138–54.Google Scholar
Chard, Leslie F., “Joseph Johnson: Father of the Book Trade,” Bulletin of the New York Public Library, 79 (1975), 51–82.Google Scholar
Chard, Leslie F., “Joseph Johnson in the 1790s,” Wordsworth Circle, 33 (2002), 95–100.Google Scholar
Raven, James, The Business of Books: Booksellers and the English Book Trade (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Smyser, Jane Worthington, “The Trial and Imprisonment of Joseph Johnson, Bookseller,” Bulletin of the New York Public Library, 77 (1974), 418–35.Google Scholar
Tyson, Gerald. P., Joseph Johnson: A Liberal Publisher (Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, “Wollstonecraft in Europe, 1792–1904: A Revisionist Reception History,” History of European Ideas, 39:4 (2013), 503–27.Google Scholar
Janes, R. M., “On the Reception of Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 39:2 (1978), 293–302.Google Scholar
Jump, Harriet Devine, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Critics, 1788–2001, 2 vols. (London: Routledge Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Cora, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s Reception and Legacies,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 246–70.Google Scholar
McInnes, Andrew, Wollstonecraft’s Ghost: The Fate of the Female Philosopher in the Romantic Period (London: Routledge Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Smith, Abigail M., “The reception of the life and work of Mary Wollstonecraft in the early American republic,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Aberdeen (2009).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, “Wollstonecraft in Europe, 1792–1904: A Revisionist Reception History,” History of European Ideas, 39:4 (2013), 503–27.Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt and Carey, Christine, “Wollstonecraft’s Philosophical Impact on Nineteenth-Century American Women’s Rights Advocates,” American Journal of Political Science, 48:4 (2004), 707–22.Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, Wilkerson, Christine Carey, and Kozlow, Elizabeth N., “Wollstonecraft as an International Feminist Meme,” Journal of Women’s History, 26:2 (2014), 13–38.Google Scholar
Bour, Isabelle, “The Boundaries of Sensibility: 1790s French Translations of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Women’s Writing, 11:3 (2004), 493–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bour, Isabelle, “Une Maria inédite: La réception de The Wrongs of Woman De Mary Wollstonecraft en France,” XVII–XVIII, HS3 (2013), 133–41.Google Scholar
Kirkley, Laura, “Feminism in Translation: Re-Writing the Rights of Woman,” in Toremans, Tom and Verschueren, Walter, eds., Crossing Cultures: Nineteenth-Century Anglophone Literature in the Low Countries (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2009), 189–200.Google Scholar
Brody, Miriam, Mary Wollstonecraft: Mother of Women’s Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Carlson, Julie A., England’s First Family of Writers: Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin, Mary Shelley (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Charlotte, Romantic Outlaws: The Extraordinary Lives of Mary Wollstonecraft and Mary Shelley (New York: Penguin Random House, 2015).Google Scholar
Gordon, Lyndall, Vindication: A Life of Mary Wollstonecraft (New York: Harper Collins, 2005).Google Scholar
Todd, Janet, Mary Wollstonecraft: A Revolutionary Life (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2015).Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Mitzi, “Sensibility and the ‘Walk of Reason’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Literary Reviews as Cultural Critique,” in Conger, Syndy McMillen, ed., Sensibility in Transformation (London and Toronto: Associated University Presses, 1990), 120–44.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Daniel, The Burke–Wollstonecraft Debate: Savagery, Civilization, and Democracy (Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Press, 2007).Google Scholar
O’Neill, Daniel, Romantic Narrative: Shelley, Hays, Godwin, Wollstonecraft (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Steiner, Enit Karafili, ed., Called to Civil Existence: Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (Amsterdam: New York: Rodopi, 2014).Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, “Wollstonecraft in Europe, 1792–1904: A Revisionist Reception History,” History of European Ideas, 39:4 (2013), 503–27.Google Scholar
Janes, R. M., “On the Reception of Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 39:2 (1978), 293–302.Google Scholar
Jump, Harriet Devine, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Critics, 1788–2001, 2 vols. (London: Routledge Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Cora, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s Reception and Legacies,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 246–70.Google Scholar
McInnes, Andrew, Wollstonecraft’s Ghost: The Fate of the Female Philosopher in the Romantic Period (London: Routledge Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Smith, Abigail M., “The reception of the life and work of Mary Wollstonecraft in the early American republic,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Aberdeen (2009).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, “Wollstonecraft in Europe, 1792–1904: A Revisionist Reception History,” History of European Ideas, 39:4 (2013), 503–27.Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt and Carey, Christine, “Wollstonecraft’s Philosophical Impact on Nineteenth-Century American Women’s Rights Advocates,” American Journal of Political Science, 48:4 (2004), 707–22.Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, Wilkerson, Christine Carey, and Kozlow, Elizabeth N., “Wollstonecraft as an International Feminist Meme,” Journal of Women’s History, 26:2 (2014), 13–38.Google Scholar
Bour, Isabelle, “The Boundaries of Sensibility: 1790s French Translations of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Women’s Writing, 11:3 (2004), 493–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bour, Isabelle, “Une Maria inédite: La réception de The Wrongs of Woman De Mary Wollstonecraft en France,” XVII–XVIII, HS3 (2013), 133–41.Google Scholar
Kirkley, Laura, “Feminism in Translation: Re-Writing the Rights of Woman,” in Toremans, Tom and Verschueren, Walter, eds., Crossing Cultures: Nineteenth-Century Anglophone Literature in the Low Countries (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2009), 189–200.Google Scholar
Brody, Miriam, Mary Wollstonecraft: Mother of Women’s Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Carlson, Julie A., England’s First Family of Writers: Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin, Mary Shelley (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Charlotte, Romantic Outlaws: The Extraordinary Lives of Mary Wollstonecraft and Mary Shelley (New York: Penguin Random House, 2015).Google Scholar
Gordon, Lyndall, Vindication: A Life of Mary Wollstonecraft (New York: Harper Collins, 2005).Google Scholar
Todd, Janet, Mary Wollstonecraft: A Revolutionary Life (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2015).Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Mitzi, “Sensibility and the ‘Walk of Reason’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Literary Reviews as Cultural Critique,” in Conger, Syndy McMillen, ed., Sensibility in Transformation (London and Toronto: Associated University Presses, 1990), 120–44.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Daniel, The Burke–Wollstonecraft Debate: Savagery, Civilization, and Democracy (Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Press, 2007).Google Scholar
O’Neill, Daniel, Romantic Narrative: Shelley, Hays, Godwin, Wollstonecraft (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Steiner, Enit Karafili, ed., Called to Civil Existence: Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (Amsterdam: New York: Rodopi, 2014).Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Craciun, Adriana and Lokke, Kari, eds., Rebellious Hearts: British Women Writers and the French Revolution (Albany,: SUNY Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Baker, Keith Michael, “Fixing the French Constitution,” in Inventing the French Revolution Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990), 252–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doody, Margaret, “English Women Novelists and the French Revolution,” in Les femmes en Angleterre et dans les colonies américaines au VXVIIe–XVIIIe siècles: actes du colloque tenu á Paris le 24 et 25 octobre (Lille: Université de Lille III, 1975), 176–98.Google Scholar
Furniss, Tom, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s French Revolution,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 59–81.Google Scholar
Jones, Vivien, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s French Revolution,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 59–80.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Catharine, Observations on the Right Honourable Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France (London: C. Dilly, 1790). Reprinted by Online Library of Liberty, http://oll.libertyfund.org.Google Scholar
Ozouf, Mona, Festivals and the French Revolution, translated by Sheridan, Alan (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques, The Names of History: On the Poetics of Knowledge, translated by Meletry, Hassan (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Williams, Helen Maria, Letters Written in France, edited by Freistat, Neil and Lanseer, Susan S. (Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Woodward, Lionel D., Une Anglaise Amie de la Révolution: Helène-Marie Williams et ses amis (Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honoré Chamption, 1930).Google Scholar
Andrews, Donna T., “Popular Culture and Public Debate: London 1780,” The Historical Journal, 39:2 (1996), 405–23.Google Scholar
Davis, Michael T., London Corresponding Society, 1792–1799, 6 vols. (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2002).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Unbounded Attachment: Sentiment and Politics in the Age of the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mee, Jon, Print, Publicity, and Popular Radicalism in the 1790s: The Laurel of Liberty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, David, “Caleb Williams and the Philomaths: Recalibrating Political Justice for the Nineteenth Century,” Nineteenth-Century Literature, 66:4 (2012), 423–48.Google Scholar
Thale, Mary, “The Case of the British Inquisition: Monday and Women in Mid-Eighteenth-Century London Debating Societies,” Albion, 31:1 (1999), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thale, Mary, “Women in London Debating Societies in 1780,” Gender & History, 7:1 (1995), 5–24.Google Scholar
Andrew, Donna T., “Popular Culture and Public Debate: London 1780,” Historical Journal, 39 (1996), 405–23.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Helen, Romanticism, Publishing and Dissent: Joseph Johnson and the Cause of Liberty (London: Palgrave, 2003).Google Scholar
Chernock, Arianne, Men and the Making of Modern British Feminism (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Unbounded Attachment: Sentiment and Politics in the Age of the French Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Mee, Jon, Print, Publicity, and Popular Radicalism in the 1790s: The Laurel of Liberty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Thale, Mary, “London Debating Societies in the 1790s,” Historical Journal, 32 (1989), 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thale, Mary, “Women in London Debating Societies in 1780,” Gender & History, 7 (1995), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, G. P., Joseph Johnson: A Liberal Publisher (Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Barrell, John, Imagining the King’s Death: Figurative Treason, Fantasies of Regicide, 1793–1796 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn, Romantics, Rebels, and Reactionaries: English Literature and Its Background, 1760–1830 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Gilmartin, Kevin, Writing Against Revolution: Literary Conservatism in Britain, 1790–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Grenby, M. O., The Anti-Jacobin Novel: British Conservatism and the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Simpson, David, Romanticism, Nationalism, and the Revolt Against Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Craciun, Adriana, British Women Writers and the French Revolution: Citizens of the World (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).Google Scholar
Craciun, Adriana and Lokke, Kari, eds., Rebellious Hearts: British Women Writers and the French Revolution (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Garnai, Amy, Revolutionary Imaginings: Charlotte Smith, Mary Robinson, Elizabeth Inchbald (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Unbounded Attachment: Sentiment and Politics in the Age of the French Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia, Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s – Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, Austen (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Labbe, Jacqueline, ed., The History of British Women’s Writing, Vol. 5, 1750–1830 (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Walker, Gina Luria, Mary Hays (1759–1843): The Growth of a Woman’s Mind (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).Google Scholar
Ascarelli, Miriam, “A Feminist Connection: Jane Austen and Mary Wollstonecraft,” Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal On-Line, 25:1 (2004), n.p.Google Scholar
Chalk, Danielle Leigh, “Comparative Gender in Maria Edgeworth’s Belinda,” Studies in Literary Imagination, 47:2 (2014), 131–52.Google Scholar
Chandler, Anne, “Maria Edgeworth on Citizenship: Rousseau, Darwin, and Feminist Pessimism in Practical Education,” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 35:1 (2016), 93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLucia, JoEllen M., “A Delicate Debate: Mary Wollstonecraft, the Bluestockings, and the Progress of Women,” in Steiner, Enit Karafili, ed., Called to Civil Existence: Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (New York: Editions Rodopi, 2014), 113–30.Google Scholar
DeRosa, Robin, “A Criticism of Contradiction: Anna Leticia Barbauld and the ‘Problem’ of Nineteenth-Century Women’s Writing,” in Shifrin, Susan, ed., Women as Sites of Culture: Women’s Roles in Cultural Formation from the Renaissance to the Twentieth Century (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002), 221–31.Google Scholar
Evans, Rachel, “The Rationality and Femininity of Mary Wollstonecraft and Jane Austen,” Journal of International Women’s Studies, 7:3 (2006), 17–23.Google Scholar
Garner, Naomi Jayne, “‘Seeing through a Glass Darkly’: Wollstonecraft and the Confinements of Eighteenth-Century Femininity,” Journal of International Women’s Studies, 11:3 (2009), 81–95.Google Scholar
Russo, Stephanie, Women in Revolutionary Debate: From Burney to Austen (Houten: HES & De Graaf, 2012).Google Scholar
Weiss, Deborah, “The Extraordinary Ordinary Belinda: Maria Edgeworth’s Female Philosopher,” Eighteenth Century Fiction, 19:4 (2007), 441–61.Google Scholar
Grogan, Claire, Politics and Genre in the Works of Elizabeth Hamilton, 1756–1816 (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar
London, April, “Jane West and the Politics of Reading,” in Ribeiro, Alvara S. J. and Basker, James G., eds., Tradition in Transition: Women Writers, Marginal Texts, and the Eighteenth-Century Canon (Oxford: Clarendon, 1996), 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stott, Anne, “Evangelicalism and Enlightenment: The Educational Agenda of Hannah More,” in Hilton, Mary and Shefrin, Jill, eds., Educating the Child in Enlightenment Britain: Beliefs, Cultures, Practices. Ashgate Studies in Childhood, 1700 to the Present (Abingdon: Ashgate, 2009), 41–55.Google Scholar
Wood, Lisa, Modes of Discipline: Women, Conservatism, and the Novel after the French Revolution. Bucknell Studies in Eighteenth-Century Literature and Culture (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Wood, Lisa “The Evangelical Novel,” in Downie, J. A., ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Eighteenth-Century Novel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 521–35.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan, Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Knott, Sarah and Taylor, Barbara, eds., Enlightenment and Feminism (London: Palgrave, 2005).Google Scholar
O’Brien, Karen, Naratives of Enlightenment: Cosmopolitan History from Voltaire to Gibbon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomaselli, Sylvana, “The Enlightenment Debate on Women,” in Hyland, Paul with Gomez, Olga and Greensides, Francesca, eds., The Enlightenment: A Sourcebook and Reader, reprint of 1985 edition (Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2003), 400–04.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, Sylvana“The Role of Woman in Enlightenment Conjectural Histories,” in Bödeker, Hans Erich and Steinbrügge, Leiselotte, eds., Conceptualizing Women in Enlightenment Thought. Penser la femme au siècle des Lumières (Berlin: Verlag Arno Spitz, 2001).Google Scholar
Andrew, Edward, Conscience and Its Critics: Protestant Conscience, Enlightenment Reason, and Modern Subjectivity (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Andrews, Stuart, Unitarian Radicalism: Political Rhetoric, 1770–1814 (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., “Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthwoman,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 50:1 (1989), 95–115.Google Scholar
Barlow, Richard Burgess, Citizenship and Conscience: A Study in the Theory and Practice of Religious Toleration in England During the Eighteenth Century (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Bradley, James, Religion, Revolution and English Radicalism: Non-Conformity in Eighteenth-Century Politics and Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Helen, Romanticism, Publishing and Dissent: Joseph Johnson and the Cause of Liberty (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D., The Language of Liberty 1660–1832: Political Discourse and Social Dynamics in the Anglo-American World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Gillespie, Katharine, Domesticity and Dissent in the Seventeenth Century: English Women’s Writing and the Public Sphere (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud, Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Hickman, Louise, Eighteenth-Century Dissent and Cambridge Platonism: Reconceiving the Philosophy of Religion (London: Routledge, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Felicity, and Inkster, Ian, eds., Religious Dissent and the Aikin–Barbauld Circle, 1740–1860 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Keeble, Neil H., The Literary Culture of Nonconformity in Later Seventeenth-Century England (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Lincoln, Anthony, Some Political and Social Ideas of English Dissent, 1763–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938).Google Scholar
Lovegrove, Deryck, Established Church, Sectarian People: Itinerancy and the Transformation of English Dissent, 1780–1830 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Mee, Jon, Romanticism, Enthusiasm, and Regulation: Poetics and the Policing of Culture in the Romantic Period (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Ready, Kathryn, “Dissenting Heads and Hearts: Joseph Priestley, Anna Barbauld, and Conflicting Attitudes towards Devotion within Rational Dissent,” Journal of Religious History, 34:2 (2010), 174–90.Google Scholar
Richey, Russell E., “The Origins of British Radicalism: The Changing Rationale for Dissent,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 7:2 (1973–74), 179–92.Google Scholar
Rivers, Isabel, Reason, Grace, and Sentiment: A Study of the Language of Religion and Ethics in England, 1660–1780, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Seed, John, Dissenting Histories: Religious Division and the Politics of Memory in Eighteenth-Century England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, “The Religious Foundations of Mary Wollstonecraft’s Feminism,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Stephen and Wykes, David, eds., Parliament and Dissent (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Valenze, Deborah M., Prophetic Sons and Daughters: Female Preaching and Popular Religion in Industrial England (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Watts, Michael R., The Dissenters, 3 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986–2015).Google Scholar
Watts, Ruth, Gender, Power and the Unitarians in England, 1760–1860 (London: Longman, 1998).Google Scholar
White, Daniel E., Early Romanticism and Religious Dissent (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Whitehouse, Tessa, The Textual Culture of English Protestant Dissent, 1720–1800 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
The Confessions: and Correspondence, Including the Letters to Malesherbes, edited by Kelly, Christopher, Masters, Roger D., and Stillman, Peter G. and translated by Kelly, Christopher (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1995).Google Scholar
Discourse on the Origins of Inequality (Second Discourse); Polemics; and Political Economy, edited by Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, translated by Masters, Roger D., Kelly, Christopher, and Bush, Judith R. (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1992).Google Scholar
Emile, or, On Education: Includes Emile and Sophie, or, The Solitaries, edited by Kelly, Christopher and Bloom, Allan, translated by Kelly, Christopher and Bloom, Allan (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 2010).Google Scholar
Julie, or, The New Heloise: Letters of Two Lovers Who Live in a Small Town at the Foot of the Alps, edited by Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, translated by Steward, Philip and Vaché, Jean (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1997).Google Scholar
The Reveries of the Solitary Walker; Botanical Writings; and, Letters to Franquières, edited by Kelly, Christopher and Butterworth, Charles E., translated by Book, Alexandra, and Marshall, Terence E. (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 2000).Google Scholar
The Social Contract; Discourse on the Virtue Most Necessary for a Hero; Political Fragments; and, Geneva Manuscript, edited by Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, translated by Bush, Judith R., Masters, Roger D., and Kelly, Christopher (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1994).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, Family Feuds: Wollstonecraft, Burke, and Rousseau (Albany: SUNY Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Morwenna, “Educational Relationships: Rousseau, Wollstonecraft and Social Justice,” Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48:2 (2014), 339–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy, “Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft on the Sexual Politics of Republican Motherhood,” Southeastern Political Review, 27:3 (1999), 469–90.Google Scholar
Reuter, Martina, “‘Like a Fanciful Kind of Half Being’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Criticism of Jean-Jacques Rousseau,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 29:4 (2014), 925–41.Google Scholar
Schulman, Alex, “Gothic Piles and Endless Forests: Wollstonecraft between Burke and Rousseau,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 41:1 (2007), 41–54.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Trouille, Mary Seidman, Sexual Politics in the Enlightenment: Women Writers Read Rousseau (Albany: SUNY Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., “Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthwoman,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 50 (1989), 95–115.Google Scholar
Boulton, James T., The Language of Politics in the Age of Wilkes and Burke (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963), 164–76, 231–32.Google Scholar
Bromwich, David, “Wollstonecraft as a Critic of Burke,” Political Theory, 23 (1995), 617–34.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund, The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, 9 vols., general editor Paul Langford (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989–2015).Google Scholar
Furniss, Tom, “Gender in Revolution: Edmund Burke and Mary Wollstonecraft,” in Everest, Kelvin, ed., Revolution in Writing: British Literary Responses to the French Revolution (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991), 65–100.Google Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy, Rebel Writer: Mary Wollstonecraft and Enlightenment Politics (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Conniff, James, “Edmund Burke and His Critics: The Case of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 60 (1999), 299–318.Google Scholar
Halidanius, Lena, Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism: Independence, Rights, and the Experience of Unfreedom (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2015).Google Scholar
Jump, Harriet Devine, “A Vindication of the Rights of Men (1790),” in Mary Wollstonecraft: Writer (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994), 50–64.Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, “From the Rights of Men to Revolutionary Feminism,” in Revolutionary Feminism: The Mind and Career of Mary Wollstonecraft (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992), 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Daniel, The Burke–Wollstonecraft Debate: Savagery, Civilization, and Democracy (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Paulson, Ronald, “Burke, Paine, and Wollstonecraft: The Sublime and the Beautiful,” in Representations of Revolution (1789–1820) (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983), 57–87.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia, A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn, “Godwin, Burke, and Caleb Williams,” Essays in Criticism, 32 (1982), 237–57.Google Scholar
Claeys, Gregory, “The Concept of ‘Political Justice’ in Godwin’s Political Justice: A Reconsideration,” Political Theory, 11 (1983), 565–84.Google Scholar
Clark, John P., The Philosophical Anarchism of William Godwin (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela, “Godwin, Political Justice,” in Clemit, Pamela, ed., The Cambridge Companion to British Literature of the French Revolution in the 1790s (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela, “Readers Respond to Godwin: Romantic Republicanism in Letters,” European Romantic Review, 20 (2009), 701–09.Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela, The Godwinian Novel: The Rational Fictions of Godwin, Brockden Brown, Mary Shelley (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993, reprinted 2001).Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela, “The Signal of Regard: William Godwin’s Correspondence Networks,” European Romantic Review, 30 (2019).Google Scholar
Fleisher, David, William Godwin: A Study in Liberalism (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1951).Google Scholar
Handwerk, Gary, “Of Caleb’s Guilt and Godwin’s Truth: Ideology and Ethics in Caleb Williams,” English Literary History, 60 (1993), 939–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, Robert, “The Foundations of Godwinian Impartiality,” Utilitas, 18 (2006), 134–53.Google Scholar
Maniquis, Robert M., and Myers, Victoria, eds., Godwinian Moments: From the Enlightenment to Romanticism (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Monro, D. H., Godwin’s Moral Philosophy: An Interpretation of William Godwin (London: Oxford University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Myers, Mitzi, “Godwin’s Memoirs of Wollstonecraft: The Shaping of Self and Subject,” Studies in Romanticism, 20 (1981), 299–316.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Eliza, Stark, Helen, and Turner, Beatrice, eds., New Approaches to William Godwin: Forms, Fears, Futures (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).Google Scholar
Scrivener, Michael H., “Godwin’s Philosophy: A Revaluation,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 39 (1978), 615–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., “Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthwoman,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 50:1 (1989), 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergès, Sandrine, Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Bergès, Sandrine and Coffee, Alan, eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016). See particularly the contributions by Brace, L., Pettit, P., James, S., Halldenius, L., and Coffee, A..Google Scholar
Coffee, Alan, “Freedom as Independence: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Grand Blessing of Life,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 29:4 (2014), 908–24.Google Scholar
Coffee, Alan, “Mary Wollstonecraft, Freedom and the Enduring Power of Social Domination,” European Journal of Political Theory, 12:2 (2013), 116–35.Google Scholar
Conniff, James, “Edmund Burke and his Critics: The Case of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 60:2 (1999), 299–318.Google Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy, Rebel Writer: Mary Wollstonecraft and Enlightenment Politics (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism: Independence, Rights and the Experience of Unfreedom (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2015).Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “Mary Wollstonecraft and Freedom as Independence,” in Broad, Jacqueline and Detlefsen, Karen, eds., Women and Liberty, 1600–1800. Philosophical Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s Feminist Critique of Property: On Becoming a Thief from Principle,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 29:4 (2014), 942–57.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “Representation in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Political Philosophy,” in Bergès, Sandrine and Coffee, Alan, eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 166–82.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “The Political Conditions for Free Agency: The Case of Mary Wollstonecraft,” in Skinner, Quentin and van Gelderen, Martin, eds., Freedom and the Construction of Europe, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 2: 227–43.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “The Primacy of Right: On the Triad of Liberty, Equality and Virtue in Wollstonecraft’s Political Thought,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 15:1 (2007), 75–99.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, “Reason and Sensibility: The Ideal of Women’s Self-Governance in the Writings of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 8:4 (1993), 181–203.Google Scholar
Neill, Anna, “Civilization and the Rights of Woman: Liberty and Captivity in the Work of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Women’s Writing, 8:1 (2001), 99–118.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Daniel, The Burke–Wollstonecraft Debate: Savagery, Civilization, and Democracy (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Reuter, Martina, “Revolution, Virtue and Duty: Aspects of Politics, Religion and Morality in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Thought,” in Mjaaland, Marius Timmann, Sigurdson, Ola, and Thorgeirsdottir, Sigridur, eds., The Body Unbound: Philosophical Perspectives on Politics, Embodiment and Religion (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010), 107–22.Google Scholar
Sapir, Virginia, A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, “Freedom as the Absence of Arbitrary Power,” in Laborde, Cecile and Maynor, John, eds., Republicanism and Political Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008), 83–101.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Unbounded Attachment: Sentiment and Politics in the Age of the French Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Jones, Vivian, ed., Women and Literature in Britain, 1700–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Knott, Sarah and Taylor, Barbara, eds., Women, Gender and Enlightenment (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J., Borderlines: The Shiftings of Gender in British Romanticism (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986).Google Scholar
Hodson, Jane, Language and Revolution in Burke, Wollstonecraft, Paine and Godwin (London: Ashgate, 2007).Google Scholar
Barker, Hannah, Family and Business during the Industrial Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Brewer, John and Staves, Susan, eds., Early Modern Conceptions of Property (London and New York: Routledge 1995).Google Scholar
Erickson, Amy Louise, Women and Property in Early Modern England (London and New York: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Skinner, Gillian, “Women’s Status as Legal and Civic Subjects: ‘A Worse Condition than Slavery Itself’?” in Jones, Vivien, ed., Women and Literature in Britain 1700–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 91–111.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael, “Property, Community and Citizenship”, in Goldie, Mark and Wokler, Robert, eds., The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 465–94.Google Scholar
Staves, Susan, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akamatsu, Junko, “Revisiting Ecclesiastical Adultery Cases in Eighteenth-Century England,” Journal of Women’s History, 28 (2016), 13–37.Google Scholar
Bailey, Joanne, Unquiet Lives: Marriage and Marriage Breakdown in England, 1660–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Doggett, Maeve, Marriage, Wife-Beating and the Law in Victorian England (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1992).Google Scholar
Dolan, Frances E., “Battered Women, Petty Traitors, and the Legacy of Coverture,” Feminist Studies, 29 (2003), 249–77.Google Scholar
Probert, Rebecca, Marriage Law and Practice in the Long Eighteenth Century: A Reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Probert, Rebecca, The Legal Regulation of Cohabitation: From Fornicators to Family, 1600–2010 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence, Road to Divorce: A History of the Making and Breaking of Marriage in England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Wright, Danaya C., “The Crisis of Child Custody: A History of the Birth of Family Law in England,” Columbia Journal of Gender and the Law, 11 (2002), 175–270.Google Scholar
Andrew, Donna T., Philanthropy and Police: London Charity in the Eighteenth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Carey, Brycchan, British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility: Writing, Sentiment, and Slavery, 1760–1807 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapp, Elizabeth J and Jeffrey, Julie Roy, eds., Women, Dissent, and Antislavery in Britain and America, 1790–1865 (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Ferguson, Moira, Subject to Others: British Women Writers and Colonial Slavery 1670–1784 (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Hersch, B. G., The Slavery of Sex: Feminist-Abolitionists in America (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Holcomb, Julie L., “Blood-Stained Sugar: Gender, Commerce and the British Slave-Trade Debates,” Slavery & Abolition, 35:4 (2014), 611–28.Google Scholar
Howard, Carol, “Wollstonecraft’s Thoughts on Slavery and Corruption,” The Eighteenth Century, 45:1 (2004), 61–86Google Scholar
Macdonald, D. L., “Master, Slave and Mistress in Wollstonecraft’s Vindication,” Enlightenment and Dissent, 11 (1992), 46–57.Google Scholar
Matthews, Gelien, Caribbean Slave Revolts and the British Abolitionist Movement (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Midgley, Clare, Gender and Imperialism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Midgley, Clare, Women Against Slavery: The British Campaigns, 1780–1870 (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Oldfield, J. R., Popular Politics and British Anti-Slavery: The Mobilisation of Public Opinion Against the Slave Trade 1787–1807 (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
Page, Anthony, “‘A Species of Slavery’: Richard Price’s Rational Dissent and Antislavery,” Slavery & Abolition, 32:1 (2011), 53–73.Google Scholar
Sinha, Manish, The Slave’s Cause: A History of Abolition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Yellin, J. F., Women and Sisters: Antislavery Feminists in American Culture (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
DeLucia, JoEllen M., “A Delicate Debate: Mary Wollstonecraft, the Bluestockings, and the Progress of Women,” in Steiner, Enit Karafili, ed., Called to Civil Existence: Mary Wollstonecraft’s “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman” (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 113–30.Google Scholar
Eaton, Barbara, Yes Papa! Mrs Chapone and the Bluestocking Circle (London: Francis Boutle Publishers, 2012).Google Scholar
Eger, Elizabeth, Bluestockings: Women of Reason from Enlightenment to Romanticism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Small Change: Women, Learning, Patriotism, 1750–1810 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, general ed., Bluestocking Feminism: Writings of the Bluestocking Circle, 1738–1785, 6 vols. (London: Pickering & Chatto, 1999).Google Scholar
Myers, Sylvia Harcstarck, The Bluestocking Circle: Women, Friendship, and the Life of the Mind in Eighteenth-Century England (Oxford: Clarendon, 1990).Google Scholar
O’Brien, Karen, Women and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohl, Nicole and Schellenberg, Betty A., eds., Reconsidering the Bluestockings (San Marino: Huntington Library, 2003).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Betty A., Literary Coteries and the Making of English Print Culture, 1740–1790 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Zuk, Rhoda, ed. Catherine Talbot & Hester Chapone, vol. 3 of Bluestocking Feminism: Writings of the Bluestocking Circle, 1738–1785 (London: Pickering & Chatto, 1999).Google Scholar
Eaton, Barbara, Yes Papa! Mrs Chapone and the Bluestocking Circle (London: Francis Boutle Publishers, 2012).Google Scholar
Eger, Elizabeth, Bluestockings: Women of Reason from Enlightenment to Romanticism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
Jones, Vivien, ed., Women in the Eighteenth-Century: Constructions of Femininity (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Knott, Sarah and Taylor, Barbara, eds., Women, Gender and Enlightenment (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Betty A., Literary Coteries and the Making of English Print Culture, 1740–1790 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Hanley, Kirstin Collins, Mary Wollstonecraft, Pedagogy, and the Practice of Feminism (New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Jones, Vivien, “Mary Wollstonecraft and the Literature of Advice and Instruction,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 119–40.Google Scholar
Myers, Mitzi, “Impeccable Governesses, Rational Dames, and Moral Mothers: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Female Tradition in Georgian Children’s Books,” Children’s Literature, 14 (1986), 31–59.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan, “Mary Wollstonecraft on Education,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 24–41.Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Benedict, Barbara M., Framing Feeling: Sentiment and Style in English Prose Fiction, 1745–1800 (New York: AMS Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Brissenden, R. F., Virtue in Distress: Studies in the Novel of Sentiment from Richardson to Sade (New York: Harper and Row, 1974).Google Scholar
Crane, R. S., “Suggestions toward a Genealogy of the ‘Man of Feeling’” ELH, 1:3 (1934), 205–30.Google Scholar
De Bruyn, Frans, “Latitudinarianism and its Importance as a Precursor of Sensibility,” Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 80:3 (1981), 349–68.Google Scholar
Dwyer, John, Virtuous Discourse: Sensibility and Community in Late Eighteenth-Century Scotland (Edinburgh: L. Donald Publishers, 1987).Google Scholar
Ellis, Markman, The Politics of Sensibility: Race, Gender, and Commerce in the Sentimental Novel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Ellison, Julie K., Cato’s Tears and the Making of Anglo-American Emotion (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Goring, Paul, The Rhetoric of Sensibility in Eighteenth-Century Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Gross, Daniel M., The Secret History of Emotion: From Aristotle’s Rhetoric to Modern Brain Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Small Change: Women, Learning, Patriotism, 1750–1810 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia, Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre, “Personal Effects and Sentimental Fictions,” Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 12:2 (2000), 345–68.Google Scholar
Mullan, John, Sentiment and Sociability: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Pinch, Adela, Strange Fits of Passion: Epistemologies of Emotion, Hume to Austen (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Rousseau, G. S., “Nerves, Spirits, and Fibres: Towards Defining the Origins of Sensibility,” in Brissenden, R. F. and Eade, J. C., eds., Studies in the Eighteenth Century III (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Terada, Rei. Feeling in Theory: Emotion after the “Death of the Subject” (Cambridge: Harvard, University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Van Sant, Ann Jessie, Eighteenth-Century Sensibility and the Novel: The Senses in Social Context (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Yousef, Nancy, “‘Emotions that Reason Deepens’: Second Thoughts about Affect,” Nineteenth-Century Gender Studies, 11:3 (2015), 61–73.Google Scholar
Gilmartin, Kevin, Writing Against Revolution. Literary Conservatism in Britain, 1790–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Grenby, M. O., The Anti-Jacobin Novel: British Conservatism and the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Haywood, Ian, The Revolution in Popular Literature: Print, Politics and the People, 1790–1860 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, Women, Writing and Revolution 1790–1827 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mee, Jon, Print, Publicity, and Popular Radicalism in the 1790s: The Laurel of Liberty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Erickson, Lee, The Economy of Literary Form: English Literature and the Industrialization of Publishing, 1800–1850 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Grenby, M. O., The Anti-Jacobin Novel: British Conservatism and the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, English Fiction of the Romantic Period, 1789–1830 (London and New York: Longman, 1989).Google Scholar
Rooney, Morgan, The French Revolution Debate and the British Novel, 1790–1814 (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Verhoeven, W. M, general ed., Anti-Jacobin Novels, 10 vols. (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2005).Google Scholar
Chandler, Anne, “Wollstonecraft’s Original Stories: Animal Objects and the Subject of Fiction,” Eighteenth-Century Novel, 2 (2002), 325–51.Google Scholar
Franklin, Caroline, Mary Wollstonecraft: A Literary Life (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004).Google Scholar
Klemann, Heather, “How to Think with Animals in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Original Stories and The Wrongs of Woman; or, Maria,” Lion and the Unicorn, 39:1 (2015), 1–22.Google Scholar
Myers, Mitzi, “Impeccable Governesses, Rational Dames, and Moral Mothers: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Female Tradition in Georgian Children’s Books,” Children’s Literature, 14 (1989), 31–59.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan, “Mary Wollstonecraft in Education,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 24–41.Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Clery, E. J., The Rise of Supernatural Fiction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Gamer, Michael, Romanticism and the Gothic: Genre, Reception, and Canon Formation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Saggini, Francesca, The Gothic Novel and the Stage: Romantic Appropriations (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2015).Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Wright, Angela and Townsend, Dale, eds., Romantic Gothic: An Edinburgh Companion (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Bohls, Elizabeth, Women Travel Writers and the Language of Aesthetics, 1716–1818 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Dekker, George, Fictions of Romantic Tourism: Radcliffe, Scott, and Mary Shelley (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Dolan, Brian, Ladies of the Grand Tour: British Women in Pursuit of Enlightenment and Adventure in Eighteenth-Century Europe (New York: HarperCollins, 2001).Google Scholar
Durie, Alastair J., Scotland for the Holidays: A History of Tourism in Scotland, 1780–1939 (East Linton: Tuckwell Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Hagglun, Betty, Tourists and Travelers: Women’s Non-Fictional Writing about Scotland, 1770–1830 (Bristol: Channel View Publications, 2010).Google Scholar
Siskin, Clifford, The Work of Writing: Literature and Social Change in Britain, 1700–1830 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Williams, William H. A., Creating Irish Tourism: The First Century, 1750–1850 (London: Anthem Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Furniss, Tom, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s French Revolution,” in Johnson, Claudia L., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Phillips, Mark Salber, Society and Sentiment: Genres of Historical Writing in Britain (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Rendall, Jane, “‘The Grand Causes Which Combine to Carry Mankind Forward’: Wollstonecraft, History, and Revolution,” Women’s Writing, 4:2 (1997), 155–72.Google Scholar
Schama, Simon, Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution (New York: Vintage, 1990).Google Scholar
Oliver, Susan, “Silencing Joseph Johnson and the Analytical Review,” Wordsworth Circle, 40 (2009), 96–102.Google Scholar
Stewart, Sally, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s Contributions to the Analytical Review,” Essays in Literature, 11 (1984), 187–99.Google Scholar
Waters, Mary, British Women Writers and the Profession of Literary Criticism, 1789–1832 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, Wollstonecraft, Mill, and Women’s Human Rights (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, Wilkerson, Christine Carey, and Kozlow, Elizabeth N., “Wollstonecraft as an International Feminist Meme,” Journal of Women’s History, 26:2 (2014), 13–38.Google Scholar
Favret, Mary A., “A Short Residence: Traveling with Mary Wollstonecraft,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 209–27.Google Scholar
Hufton, Olwen, The Prospect Before Her: A History of Women in Western Europe, 1500–1800 (New York: Vintage, 1995).Google Scholar
Craciun, Adriana and Lokke, Kari, eds., Rebellious Hearts: British Women Writers and the French Revolution (Albany,: SUNY Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Baker, Keith Michael, “Fixing the French Constitution,” in Inventing the French Revolution Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990), 252–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doody, Margaret, “English Women Novelists and the French Revolution,” in Les femmes en Angleterre et dans les colonies américaines au VXVIIe–XVIIIe siècles: actes du colloque tenu á Paris le 24 et 25 octobre (Lille: Université de Lille III, 1975), 176–98.Google Scholar
Furniss, Tom, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s French Revolution,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 59–81.Google Scholar
Jones, Vivien, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s French Revolution,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 59–80.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Catharine, Observations on the Right Honourable Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France (London: C. Dilly, 1790). Reprinted by Online Library of Liberty, http://oll.libertyfund.org.Google Scholar
Ozouf, Mona, Festivals and the French Revolution, translated by Sheridan, Alan (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques, The Names of History: On the Poetics of Knowledge, translated by Meletry, Hassan (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Williams, Helen Maria, Letters Written in France, edited by Freistat, Neil and Lanseer, Susan S. (Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Woodward, Lionel D., Une Anglaise Amie de la Révolution: Helène-Marie Williams et ses amis (Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honoré Chamption, 1930).Google Scholar
Andrews, Donna T., “Popular Culture and Public Debate: London 1780,” The Historical Journal, 39:2 (1996), 405–23.Google Scholar
Davis, Michael T., London Corresponding Society, 1792–1799, 6 vols. (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2002).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Unbounded Attachment: Sentiment and Politics in the Age of the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mee, Jon, Print, Publicity, and Popular Radicalism in the 1790s: The Laurel of Liberty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, David, “Caleb Williams and the Philomaths: Recalibrating Political Justice for the Nineteenth Century,” Nineteenth-Century Literature, 66:4 (2012), 423–48.Google Scholar
Thale, Mary, “The Case of the British Inquisition: Monday and Women in Mid-Eighteenth-Century London Debating Societies,” Albion, 31:1 (1999), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thale, Mary, “Women in London Debating Societies in 1780,” Gender & History, 7:1 (1995), 5–24.Google Scholar
Andrew, Donna T., “Popular Culture and Public Debate: London 1780,” Historical Journal, 39 (1996), 405–23.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Helen, Romanticism, Publishing and Dissent: Joseph Johnson and the Cause of Liberty (London: Palgrave, 2003).Google Scholar
Chernock, Arianne, Men and the Making of Modern British Feminism (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Unbounded Attachment: Sentiment and Politics in the Age of the French Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Mee, Jon, Print, Publicity, and Popular Radicalism in the 1790s: The Laurel of Liberty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Thale, Mary, “London Debating Societies in the 1790s,” Historical Journal, 32 (1989), 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thale, Mary, “Women in London Debating Societies in 1780,” Gender & History, 7 (1995), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, G. P., Joseph Johnson: A Liberal Publisher (Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Barrell, John, Imagining the King’s Death: Figurative Treason, Fantasies of Regicide, 1793–1796 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn, Romantics, Rebels, and Reactionaries: English Literature and Its Background, 1760–1830 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Gilmartin, Kevin, Writing Against Revolution: Literary Conservatism in Britain, 1790–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Grenby, M. O., The Anti-Jacobin Novel: British Conservatism and the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Simpson, David, Romanticism, Nationalism, and the Revolt Against Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Craciun, Adriana and Lokke, Kari, eds., Rebellious Hearts: British Women Writers and the French Revolution (Albany,: SUNY Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Baker, Keith Michael, “Fixing the French Constitution,” in Inventing the French Revolution Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990), 252–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doody, Margaret, “English Women Novelists and the French Revolution,” in Les femmes en Angleterre et dans les colonies américaines au VXVIIe–XVIIIe siècles: actes du colloque tenu á Paris le 24 et 25 octobre (Lille: Université de Lille III, 1975), 176–98.Google Scholar
Furniss, Tom, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s French Revolution,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 59–81.Google Scholar
Jones, Vivien, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s French Revolution,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 59–80.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Catharine, Observations on the Right Honourable Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France (London: C. Dilly, 1790). Reprinted by Online Library of Liberty, http://oll.libertyfund.org.Google Scholar
Ozouf, Mona, Festivals and the French Revolution, translated by Sheridan, Alan (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques, The Names of History: On the Poetics of Knowledge, translated by Meletry, Hassan (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Williams, Helen Maria, Letters Written in France, edited by Freistat, Neil and Lanseer, Susan S. (Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Woodward, Lionel D., Une Anglaise Amie de la Révolution: Helène-Marie Williams et ses amis (Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honoré Chamption, 1930).Google Scholar
Andrews, Donna T., “Popular Culture and Public Debate: London 1780,” The Historical Journal, 39:2 (1996), 405–23.Google Scholar
Davis, Michael T., London Corresponding Society, 1792–1799, 6 vols. (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2002).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Unbounded Attachment: Sentiment and Politics in the Age of the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mee, Jon, Print, Publicity, and Popular Radicalism in the 1790s: The Laurel of Liberty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, David, “Caleb Williams and the Philomaths: Recalibrating Political Justice for the Nineteenth Century,” Nineteenth-Century Literature, 66:4 (2012), 423–48.Google Scholar
Thale, Mary, “The Case of the British Inquisition: Monday and Women in Mid-Eighteenth-Century London Debating Societies,” Albion, 31:1 (1999), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thale, Mary, “Women in London Debating Societies in 1780,” Gender & History, 7:1 (1995), 5–24.Google Scholar
Andrew, Donna T., “Popular Culture and Public Debate: London 1780,” Historical Journal, 39 (1996), 405–23.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Helen, Romanticism, Publishing and Dissent: Joseph Johnson and the Cause of Liberty (London: Palgrave, 2003).Google Scholar
Chernock, Arianne, Men and the Making of Modern British Feminism (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Unbounded Attachment: Sentiment and Politics in the Age of the French Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Mee, Jon, Print, Publicity, and Popular Radicalism in the 1790s: The Laurel of Liberty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Thale, Mary, “London Debating Societies in the 1790s,” Historical Journal, 32 (1989), 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thale, Mary, “Women in London Debating Societies in 1780,” Gender & History, 7 (1995), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, G. P., Joseph Johnson: A Liberal Publisher (Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Barrell, John, Imagining the King’s Death: Figurative Treason, Fantasies of Regicide, 1793–1796 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn, Romantics, Rebels, and Reactionaries: English Literature and Its Background, 1760–1830 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Gilmartin, Kevin, Writing Against Revolution: Literary Conservatism in Britain, 1790–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Grenby, M. O., The Anti-Jacobin Novel: British Conservatism and the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Simpson, David, Romanticism, Nationalism, and the Revolt Against Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Craciun, Adriana, British Women Writers and the French Revolution: Citizens of the World (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).Google Scholar
Craciun, Adriana and Lokke, Kari, eds., Rebellious Hearts: British Women Writers and the French Revolution (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Garnai, Amy, Revolutionary Imaginings: Charlotte Smith, Mary Robinson, Elizabeth Inchbald (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Unbounded Attachment: Sentiment and Politics in the Age of the French Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia, Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s – Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, Austen (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Labbe, Jacqueline, ed., The History of British Women’s Writing, Vol. 5, 1750–1830 (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Walker, Gina Luria, Mary Hays (1759–1843): The Growth of a Woman’s Mind (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).Google Scholar
Ascarelli, Miriam, “A Feminist Connection: Jane Austen and Mary Wollstonecraft,” Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal On-Line, 25:1 (2004), n.p.Google Scholar
Chalk, Danielle Leigh, “Comparative Gender in Maria Edgeworth’s Belinda,” Studies in Literary Imagination, 47:2 (2014), 131–52.Google Scholar
Chandler, Anne, “Maria Edgeworth on Citizenship: Rousseau, Darwin, and Feminist Pessimism in Practical Education,” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 35:1 (2016), 93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLucia, JoEllen M., “A Delicate Debate: Mary Wollstonecraft, the Bluestockings, and the Progress of Women,” in Steiner, Enit Karafili, ed., Called to Civil Existence: Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (New York: Editions Rodopi, 2014), 113–30.Google Scholar
DeRosa, Robin, “A Criticism of Contradiction: Anna Leticia Barbauld and the ‘Problem’ of Nineteenth-Century Women’s Writing,” in Shifrin, Susan, ed., Women as Sites of Culture: Women’s Roles in Cultural Formation from the Renaissance to the Twentieth Century (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002), 221–31.Google Scholar
Evans, Rachel, “The Rationality and Femininity of Mary Wollstonecraft and Jane Austen,” Journal of International Women’s Studies, 7:3 (2006), 17–23.Google Scholar
Garner, Naomi Jayne, “‘Seeing through a Glass Darkly’: Wollstonecraft and the Confinements of Eighteenth-Century Femininity,” Journal of International Women’s Studies, 11:3 (2009), 81–95.Google Scholar
Russo, Stephanie, Women in Revolutionary Debate: From Burney to Austen (Houten: HES & De Graaf, 2012).Google Scholar
Weiss, Deborah, “The Extraordinary Ordinary Belinda: Maria Edgeworth’s Female Philosopher,” Eighteenth Century Fiction, 19:4 (2007), 441–61.Google Scholar
Grogan, Claire, Politics and Genre in the Works of Elizabeth Hamilton, 1756–1816 (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar
London, April, “Jane West and the Politics of Reading,” in Ribeiro, Alvara S. J. and Basker, James G., eds., Tradition in Transition: Women Writers, Marginal Texts, and the Eighteenth-Century Canon (Oxford: Clarendon, 1996), 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stott, Anne, “Evangelicalism and Enlightenment: The Educational Agenda of Hannah More,” in Hilton, Mary and Shefrin, Jill, eds., Educating the Child in Enlightenment Britain: Beliefs, Cultures, Practices. Ashgate Studies in Childhood, 1700 to the Present (Abingdon: Ashgate, 2009), 41–55.Google Scholar
Wood, Lisa, Modes of Discipline: Women, Conservatism, and the Novel after the French Revolution. Bucknell Studies in Eighteenth-Century Literature and Culture (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Wood, Lisa “The Evangelical Novel,” in Downie, J. A., ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Eighteenth-Century Novel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 521–35.Google Scholar
Craciun, Adriana, British Women Writers and the French Revolution: Citizens of the World (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).Google Scholar
Craciun, Adriana and Lokke, Kari, eds., Rebellious Hearts: British Women Writers and the French Revolution (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Garnai, Amy, Revolutionary Imaginings: Charlotte Smith, Mary Robinson, Elizabeth Inchbald (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Unbounded Attachment: Sentiment and Politics in the Age of the French Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia, Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s – Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, Austen (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Labbe, Jacqueline, ed., The History of British Women’s Writing, Vol. 5, 1750–1830 (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Walker, Gina Luria, Mary Hays (1759–1843): The Growth of a Woman’s Mind (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).Google Scholar
Ascarelli, Miriam, “A Feminist Connection: Jane Austen and Mary Wollstonecraft,” Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal On-Line, 25:1 (2004), n.p.Google Scholar
Chalk, Danielle Leigh, “Comparative Gender in Maria Edgeworth’s Belinda,” Studies in Literary Imagination, 47:2 (2014), 131–52.Google Scholar
Chandler, Anne, “Maria Edgeworth on Citizenship: Rousseau, Darwin, and Feminist Pessimism in Practical Education,” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 35:1 (2016), 93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLucia, JoEllen M., “A Delicate Debate: Mary Wollstonecraft, the Bluestockings, and the Progress of Women,” in Steiner, Enit Karafili, ed., Called to Civil Existence: Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (New York: Editions Rodopi, 2014), 113–30.Google Scholar
DeRosa, Robin, “A Criticism of Contradiction: Anna Leticia Barbauld and the ‘Problem’ of Nineteenth-Century Women’s Writing,” in Shifrin, Susan, ed., Women as Sites of Culture: Women’s Roles in Cultural Formation from the Renaissance to the Twentieth Century (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002), 221–31.Google Scholar
Evans, Rachel, “The Rationality and Femininity of Mary Wollstonecraft and Jane Austen,” Journal of International Women’s Studies, 7:3 (2006), 17–23.Google Scholar
Garner, Naomi Jayne, “‘Seeing through a Glass Darkly’: Wollstonecraft and the Confinements of Eighteenth-Century Femininity,” Journal of International Women’s Studies, 11:3 (2009), 81–95.Google Scholar
Russo, Stephanie, Women in Revolutionary Debate: From Burney to Austen (Houten: HES & De Graaf, 2012).Google Scholar
Weiss, Deborah, “The Extraordinary Ordinary Belinda: Maria Edgeworth’s Female Philosopher,” Eighteenth Century Fiction, 19:4 (2007), 441–61.Google Scholar
Grogan, Claire, Politics and Genre in the Works of Elizabeth Hamilton, 1756–1816 (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar
London, April, “Jane West and the Politics of Reading,” in Ribeiro, Alvara S. J. and Basker, James G., eds., Tradition in Transition: Women Writers, Marginal Texts, and the Eighteenth-Century Canon (Oxford: Clarendon, 1996), 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stott, Anne, “Evangelicalism and Enlightenment: The Educational Agenda of Hannah More,” in Hilton, Mary and Shefrin, Jill, eds., Educating the Child in Enlightenment Britain: Beliefs, Cultures, Practices. Ashgate Studies in Childhood, 1700 to the Present (Abingdon: Ashgate, 2009), 41–55.Google Scholar
Wood, Lisa, Modes of Discipline: Women, Conservatism, and the Novel after the French Revolution. Bucknell Studies in Eighteenth-Century Literature and Culture (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Wood, Lisa “The Evangelical Novel,” in Downie, J. A., ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Eighteenth-Century Novel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 521–35.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan, Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Knott, Sarah and Taylor, Barbara, eds., Enlightenment and Feminism (London: Palgrave, 2005).Google Scholar
O’Brien, Karen, Naratives of Enlightenment: Cosmopolitan History from Voltaire to Gibbon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomaselli, Sylvana, “The Enlightenment Debate on Women,” in Hyland, Paul with Gomez, Olga and Greensides, Francesca, eds., The Enlightenment: A Sourcebook and Reader, reprint of 1985 edition (Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2003), 400–04.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, Sylvana“The Role of Woman in Enlightenment Conjectural Histories,” in Bödeker, Hans Erich and Steinbrügge, Leiselotte, eds., Conceptualizing Women in Enlightenment Thought. Penser la femme au siècle des Lumières (Berlin: Verlag Arno Spitz, 2001).Google Scholar
Andrew, Edward, Conscience and Its Critics: Protestant Conscience, Enlightenment Reason, and Modern Subjectivity (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Andrews, Stuart, Unitarian Radicalism: Political Rhetoric, 1770–1814 (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., “Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthwoman,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 50:1 (1989), 95–115.Google Scholar
Barlow, Richard Burgess, Citizenship and Conscience: A Study in the Theory and Practice of Religious Toleration in England During the Eighteenth Century (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Bradley, James, Religion, Revolution and English Radicalism: Non-Conformity in Eighteenth-Century Politics and Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Helen, Romanticism, Publishing and Dissent: Joseph Johnson and the Cause of Liberty (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D., The Language of Liberty 1660–1832: Political Discourse and Social Dynamics in the Anglo-American World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Gillespie, Katharine, Domesticity and Dissent in the Seventeenth Century: English Women’s Writing and the Public Sphere (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud, Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Hickman, Louise, Eighteenth-Century Dissent and Cambridge Platonism: Reconceiving the Philosophy of Religion (London: Routledge, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Felicity, and Inkster, Ian, eds., Religious Dissent and the Aikin–Barbauld Circle, 1740–1860 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Keeble, Neil H., The Literary Culture of Nonconformity in Later Seventeenth-Century England (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Lincoln, Anthony, Some Political and Social Ideas of English Dissent, 1763–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938).Google Scholar
Lovegrove, Deryck, Established Church, Sectarian People: Itinerancy and the Transformation of English Dissent, 1780–1830 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Mee, Jon, Romanticism, Enthusiasm, and Regulation: Poetics and the Policing of Culture in the Romantic Period (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Ready, Kathryn, “Dissenting Heads and Hearts: Joseph Priestley, Anna Barbauld, and Conflicting Attitudes towards Devotion within Rational Dissent,” Journal of Religious History, 34:2 (2010), 174–90.Google Scholar
Richey, Russell E., “The Origins of British Radicalism: The Changing Rationale for Dissent,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 7:2 (1973–74), 179–92.Google Scholar
Rivers, Isabel, Reason, Grace, and Sentiment: A Study of the Language of Religion and Ethics in England, 1660–1780, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Seed, John, Dissenting Histories: Religious Division and the Politics of Memory in Eighteenth-Century England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, “The Religious Foundations of Mary Wollstonecraft’s Feminism,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Stephen and Wykes, David, eds., Parliament and Dissent (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Valenze, Deborah M., Prophetic Sons and Daughters: Female Preaching and Popular Religion in Industrial England (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Watts, Michael R., The Dissenters, 3 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986–2015).Google Scholar
Watts, Ruth, Gender, Power and the Unitarians in England, 1760–1860 (London: Longman, 1998).Google Scholar
White, Daniel E., Early Romanticism and Religious Dissent (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Whitehouse, Tessa, The Textual Culture of English Protestant Dissent, 1720–1800 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
The Confessions: and Correspondence, Including the Letters to Malesherbes, edited by Kelly, Christopher, Masters, Roger D., and Stillman, Peter G. and translated by Kelly, Christopher (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1995).Google Scholar
Discourse on the Origins of Inequality (Second Discourse); Polemics; and Political Economy, edited by Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, translated by Masters, Roger D., Kelly, Christopher, and Bush, Judith R. (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1992).Google Scholar
Emile, or, On Education: Includes Emile and Sophie, or, The Solitaries, edited by Kelly, Christopher and Bloom, Allan, translated by Kelly, Christopher and Bloom, Allan (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 2010).Google Scholar
Julie, or, The New Heloise: Letters of Two Lovers Who Live in a Small Town at the Foot of the Alps, edited by Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, translated by Steward, Philip and Vaché, Jean (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1997).Google Scholar
The Reveries of the Solitary Walker; Botanical Writings; and, Letters to Franquières, edited by Kelly, Christopher and Butterworth, Charles E., translated by Book, Alexandra, and Marshall, Terence E. (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 2000).Google Scholar
The Social Contract; Discourse on the Virtue Most Necessary for a Hero; Political Fragments; and, Geneva Manuscript, edited by Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, translated by Bush, Judith R., Masters, Roger D., and Kelly, Christopher (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1994).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, Family Feuds: Wollstonecraft, Burke, and Rousseau (Albany: SUNY Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Morwenna, “Educational Relationships: Rousseau, Wollstonecraft and Social Justice,” Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48:2 (2014), 339–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy, “Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft on the Sexual Politics of Republican Motherhood,” Southeastern Political Review, 27:3 (1999), 469–90.Google Scholar
Reuter, Martina, “‘Like a Fanciful Kind of Half Being’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Criticism of Jean-Jacques Rousseau,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 29:4 (2014), 925–41.Google Scholar
Schulman, Alex, “Gothic Piles and Endless Forests: Wollstonecraft between Burke and Rousseau,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 41:1 (2007), 41–54.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Trouille, Mary Seidman, Sexual Politics in the Enlightenment: Women Writers Read Rousseau (Albany: SUNY Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., “Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthwoman,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 50 (1989), 95–115.Google Scholar
Boulton, James T., The Language of Politics in the Age of Wilkes and Burke (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963), 164–76, 231–32.Google Scholar
Bromwich, David, “Wollstonecraft as a Critic of Burke,” Political Theory, 23 (1995), 617–34.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund, The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, 9 vols., general editor Paul Langford (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989–2015).Google Scholar
Furniss, Tom, “Gender in Revolution: Edmund Burke and Mary Wollstonecraft,” in Everest, Kelvin, ed., Revolution in Writing: British Literary Responses to the French Revolution (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991), 65–100.Google Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy, Rebel Writer: Mary Wollstonecraft and Enlightenment Politics (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Conniff, James, “Edmund Burke and His Critics: The Case of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 60 (1999), 299–318.Google Scholar
Halidanius, Lena, Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism: Independence, Rights, and the Experience of Unfreedom (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2015).Google Scholar
Jump, Harriet Devine, “A Vindication of the Rights of Men (1790),” in Mary Wollstonecraft: Writer (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994), 50–64.Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, “From the Rights of Men to Revolutionary Feminism,” in Revolutionary Feminism: The Mind and Career of Mary Wollstonecraft (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992), 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Daniel, The Burke–Wollstonecraft Debate: Savagery, Civilization, and Democracy (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Paulson, Ronald, “Burke, Paine, and Wollstonecraft: The Sublime and the Beautiful,” in Representations of Revolution (1789–1820) (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983), 57–87.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia, A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn, “Godwin, Burke, and Caleb Williams,” Essays in Criticism, 32 (1982), 237–57.Google Scholar
Claeys, Gregory, “The Concept of ‘Political Justice’ in Godwin’s Political Justice: A Reconsideration,” Political Theory, 11 (1983), 565–84.Google Scholar
Clark, John P., The Philosophical Anarchism of William Godwin (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela, “Godwin, Political Justice,” in Clemit, Pamela, ed., The Cambridge Companion to British Literature of the French Revolution in the 1790s (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela, “Readers Respond to Godwin: Romantic Republicanism in Letters,” European Romantic Review, 20 (2009), 701–09.Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela, The Godwinian Novel: The Rational Fictions of Godwin, Brockden Brown, Mary Shelley (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993, reprinted 2001).Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela, “The Signal of Regard: William Godwin’s Correspondence Networks,” European Romantic Review, 30 (2019).Google Scholar
Fleisher, David, William Godwin: A Study in Liberalism (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1951).Google Scholar
Handwerk, Gary, “Of Caleb’s Guilt and Godwin’s Truth: Ideology and Ethics in Caleb Williams,” English Literary History, 60 (1993), 939–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, Robert, “The Foundations of Godwinian Impartiality,” Utilitas, 18 (2006), 134–53.Google Scholar
Maniquis, Robert M., and Myers, Victoria, eds., Godwinian Moments: From the Enlightenment to Romanticism (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Monro, D. H., Godwin’s Moral Philosophy: An Interpretation of William Godwin (London: Oxford University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Myers, Mitzi, “Godwin’s Memoirs of Wollstonecraft: The Shaping of Self and Subject,” Studies in Romanticism, 20 (1981), 299–316.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Eliza, Stark, Helen, and Turner, Beatrice, eds., New Approaches to William Godwin: Forms, Fears, Futures (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).Google Scholar
Scrivener, Michael H., “Godwin’s Philosophy: A Revaluation,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 39 (1978), 615–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., “Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthwoman,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 50:1 (1989), 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergès, Sandrine, Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Bergès, Sandrine and Coffee, Alan, eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016). See particularly the contributions by Brace, L., Pettit, P., James, S., Halldenius, L., and Coffee, A..Google Scholar
Coffee, Alan, “Freedom as Independence: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Grand Blessing of Life,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 29:4 (2014), 908–24.Google Scholar
Coffee, Alan, “Mary Wollstonecraft, Freedom and the Enduring Power of Social Domination,” European Journal of Political Theory, 12:2 (2013), 116–35.Google Scholar
Conniff, James, “Edmund Burke and his Critics: The Case of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 60:2 (1999), 299–318.Google Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy, Rebel Writer: Mary Wollstonecraft and Enlightenment Politics (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism: Independence, Rights and the Experience of Unfreedom (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2015).Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “Mary Wollstonecraft and Freedom as Independence,” in Broad, Jacqueline and Detlefsen, Karen, eds., Women and Liberty, 1600–1800. Philosophical Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s Feminist Critique of Property: On Becoming a Thief from Principle,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 29:4 (2014), 942–57.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “Representation in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Political Philosophy,” in Bergès, Sandrine and Coffee, Alan, eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 166–82.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “The Political Conditions for Free Agency: The Case of Mary Wollstonecraft,” in Skinner, Quentin and van Gelderen, Martin, eds., Freedom and the Construction of Europe, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 2: 227–43.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “The Primacy of Right: On the Triad of Liberty, Equality and Virtue in Wollstonecraft’s Political Thought,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 15:1 (2007), 75–99.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, “Reason and Sensibility: The Ideal of Women’s Self-Governance in the Writings of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 8:4 (1993), 181–203.Google Scholar
Neill, Anna, “Civilization and the Rights of Woman: Liberty and Captivity in the Work of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Women’s Writing, 8:1 (2001), 99–118.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Daniel, The Burke–Wollstonecraft Debate: Savagery, Civilization, and Democracy (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Reuter, Martina, “Revolution, Virtue and Duty: Aspects of Politics, Religion and Morality in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Thought,” in Mjaaland, Marius Timmann, Sigurdson, Ola, and Thorgeirsdottir, Sigridur, eds., The Body Unbound: Philosophical Perspectives on Politics, Embodiment and Religion (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010), 107–22.Google Scholar
Sapir, Virginia, A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, “Freedom as the Absence of Arbitrary Power,” in Laborde, Cecile and Maynor, John, eds., Republicanism and Political Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008), 83–101.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Unbounded Attachment: Sentiment and Politics in the Age of the French Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Jones, Vivian, ed., Women and Literature in Britain, 1700–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Knott, Sarah and Taylor, Barbara, eds., Women, Gender and Enlightenment (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J., Borderlines: The Shiftings of Gender in British Romanticism (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan, Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Knott, Sarah and Taylor, Barbara, eds., Enlightenment and Feminism (London: Palgrave, 2005).Google Scholar
O’Brien, Karen, Naratives of Enlightenment: Cosmopolitan History from Voltaire to Gibbon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomaselli, Sylvana, “The Enlightenment Debate on Women,” in Hyland, Paul with Gomez, Olga and Greensides, Francesca, eds., The Enlightenment: A Sourcebook and Reader, reprint of 1985 edition (Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2003), 400–04.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, Sylvana“The Role of Woman in Enlightenment Conjectural Histories,” in Bödeker, Hans Erich and Steinbrügge, Leiselotte, eds., Conceptualizing Women in Enlightenment Thought. Penser la femme au siècle des Lumières (Berlin: Verlag Arno Spitz, 2001).Google Scholar
Andrew, Edward, Conscience and Its Critics: Protestant Conscience, Enlightenment Reason, and Modern Subjectivity (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Andrews, Stuart, Unitarian Radicalism: Political Rhetoric, 1770–1814 (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., “Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthwoman,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 50:1 (1989), 95–115.Google Scholar
Barlow, Richard Burgess, Citizenship and Conscience: A Study in the Theory and Practice of Religious Toleration in England During the Eighteenth Century (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Bradley, James, Religion, Revolution and English Radicalism: Non-Conformity in Eighteenth-Century Politics and Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Helen, Romanticism, Publishing and Dissent: Joseph Johnson and the Cause of Liberty (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D., The Language of Liberty 1660–1832: Political Discourse and Social Dynamics in the Anglo-American World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Gillespie, Katharine, Domesticity and Dissent in the Seventeenth Century: English Women’s Writing and the Public Sphere (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud, Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Hickman, Louise, Eighteenth-Century Dissent and Cambridge Platonism: Reconceiving the Philosophy of Religion (London: Routledge, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Felicity, and Inkster, Ian, eds., Religious Dissent and the Aikin–Barbauld Circle, 1740–1860 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Keeble, Neil H., The Literary Culture of Nonconformity in Later Seventeenth-Century England (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Lincoln, Anthony, Some Political and Social Ideas of English Dissent, 1763–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938).Google Scholar
Lovegrove, Deryck, Established Church, Sectarian People: Itinerancy and the Transformation of English Dissent, 1780–1830 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Mee, Jon, Romanticism, Enthusiasm, and Regulation: Poetics and the Policing of Culture in the Romantic Period (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Ready, Kathryn, “Dissenting Heads and Hearts: Joseph Priestley, Anna Barbauld, and Conflicting Attitudes towards Devotion within Rational Dissent,” Journal of Religious History, 34:2 (2010), 174–90.Google Scholar
Richey, Russell E., “The Origins of British Radicalism: The Changing Rationale for Dissent,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 7:2 (1973–74), 179–92.Google Scholar
Rivers, Isabel, Reason, Grace, and Sentiment: A Study of the Language of Religion and Ethics in England, 1660–1780, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Seed, John, Dissenting Histories: Religious Division and the Politics of Memory in Eighteenth-Century England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, “The Religious Foundations of Mary Wollstonecraft’s Feminism,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Stephen and Wykes, David, eds., Parliament and Dissent (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Valenze, Deborah M., Prophetic Sons and Daughters: Female Preaching and Popular Religion in Industrial England (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Watts, Michael R., The Dissenters, 3 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986–2015).Google Scholar
Watts, Ruth, Gender, Power and the Unitarians in England, 1760–1860 (London: Longman, 1998).Google Scholar
White, Daniel E., Early Romanticism and Religious Dissent (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Whitehouse, Tessa, The Textual Culture of English Protestant Dissent, 1720–1800 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
The Confessions: and Correspondence, Including the Letters to Malesherbes, edited by Kelly, Christopher, Masters, Roger D., and Stillman, Peter G. and translated by Kelly, Christopher (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1995).Google Scholar
Discourse on the Origins of Inequality (Second Discourse); Polemics; and Political Economy, edited by Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, translated by Masters, Roger D., Kelly, Christopher, and Bush, Judith R. (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1992).Google Scholar
Emile, or, On Education: Includes Emile and Sophie, or, The Solitaries, edited by Kelly, Christopher and Bloom, Allan, translated by Kelly, Christopher and Bloom, Allan (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 2010).Google Scholar
Julie, or, The New Heloise: Letters of Two Lovers Who Live in a Small Town at the Foot of the Alps, edited by Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, translated by Steward, Philip and Vaché, Jean (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1997).Google Scholar
The Reveries of the Solitary Walker; Botanical Writings; and, Letters to Franquières, edited by Kelly, Christopher and Butterworth, Charles E., translated by Book, Alexandra, and Marshall, Terence E. (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 2000).Google Scholar
The Social Contract; Discourse on the Virtue Most Necessary for a Hero; Political Fragments; and, Geneva Manuscript, edited by Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, translated by Bush, Judith R., Masters, Roger D., and Kelly, Christopher (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1994).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, Family Feuds: Wollstonecraft, Burke, and Rousseau (Albany: SUNY Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Morwenna, “Educational Relationships: Rousseau, Wollstonecraft and Social Justice,” Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48:2 (2014), 339–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy, “Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft on the Sexual Politics of Republican Motherhood,” Southeastern Political Review, 27:3 (1999), 469–90.Google Scholar
Reuter, Martina, “‘Like a Fanciful Kind of Half Being’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Criticism of Jean-Jacques Rousseau,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 29:4 (2014), 925–41.Google Scholar
Schulman, Alex, “Gothic Piles and Endless Forests: Wollstonecraft between Burke and Rousseau,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 41:1 (2007), 41–54.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Trouille, Mary Seidman, Sexual Politics in the Enlightenment: Women Writers Read Rousseau (Albany: SUNY Press, 1997).Google Scholar
The Confessions: and Correspondence, Including the Letters to Malesherbes, edited by Kelly, Christopher, Masters, Roger D., and Stillman, Peter G. and translated by Kelly, Christopher (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1995).Google Scholar
Discourse on the Origins of Inequality (Second Discourse); Polemics; and Political Economy, edited by Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, translated by Masters, Roger D., Kelly, Christopher, and Bush, Judith R. (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1992).Google Scholar
Emile, or, On Education: Includes Emile and Sophie, or, The Solitaries, edited by Kelly, Christopher and Bloom, Allan, translated by Kelly, Christopher and Bloom, Allan (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 2010).Google Scholar
Julie, or, The New Heloise: Letters of Two Lovers Who Live in a Small Town at the Foot of the Alps, edited by Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, translated by Steward, Philip and Vaché, Jean (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1997).Google Scholar
The Reveries of the Solitary Walker; Botanical Writings; and, Letters to Franquières, edited by Kelly, Christopher and Butterworth, Charles E., translated by Book, Alexandra, and Marshall, Terence E. (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 2000).Google Scholar
The Social Contract; Discourse on the Virtue Most Necessary for a Hero; Political Fragments; and, Geneva Manuscript, edited by Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, translated by Bush, Judith R., Masters, Roger D., and Kelly, Christopher (Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, 1994).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, Family Feuds: Wollstonecraft, Burke, and Rousseau (Albany: SUNY Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Morwenna, “Educational Relationships: Rousseau, Wollstonecraft and Social Justice,” Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48:2 (2014), 339–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy, “Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft on the Sexual Politics of Republican Motherhood,” Southeastern Political Review, 27:3 (1999), 469–90.Google Scholar
Reuter, Martina, “‘Like a Fanciful Kind of Half Being’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Criticism of Jean-Jacques Rousseau,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 29:4 (2014), 925–41.Google Scholar
Schulman, Alex, “Gothic Piles and Endless Forests: Wollstonecraft between Burke and Rousseau,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 41:1 (2007), 41–54.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Trouille, Mary Seidman, Sexual Politics in the Enlightenment: Women Writers Read Rousseau (Albany: SUNY Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., “Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthwoman,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 50 (1989), 95–115.Google Scholar
Boulton, James T., The Language of Politics in the Age of Wilkes and Burke (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963), 164–76, 231–32.Google Scholar
Bromwich, David, “Wollstonecraft as a Critic of Burke,” Political Theory, 23 (1995), 617–34.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund, The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, 9 vols., general editor Paul Langford (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989–2015).Google Scholar
Furniss, Tom, “Gender in Revolution: Edmund Burke and Mary Wollstonecraft,” in Everest, Kelvin, ed., Revolution in Writing: British Literary Responses to the French Revolution (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991), 65–100.Google Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy, Rebel Writer: Mary Wollstonecraft and Enlightenment Politics (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Conniff, James, “Edmund Burke and His Critics: The Case of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 60 (1999), 299–318.Google Scholar
Halidanius, Lena, Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism: Independence, Rights, and the Experience of Unfreedom (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2015).Google Scholar
Jump, Harriet Devine, “A Vindication of the Rights of Men (1790),” in Mary Wollstonecraft: Writer (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994), 50–64.Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, “From the Rights of Men to Revolutionary Feminism,” in Revolutionary Feminism: The Mind and Career of Mary Wollstonecraft (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992), 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Daniel, The Burke–Wollstonecraft Debate: Savagery, Civilization, and Democracy (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Paulson, Ronald, “Burke, Paine, and Wollstonecraft: The Sublime and the Beautiful,” in Representations of Revolution (1789–1820) (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983), 57–87.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia, A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Butler, Marilyn, “Godwin, Burke, and Caleb Williams,” Essays in Criticism, 32 (1982), 237–57.Google Scholar
Claeys, Gregory, “The Concept of ‘Political Justice’ in Godwin’s Political Justice: A Reconsideration,” Political Theory, 11 (1983), 565–84.Google Scholar
Clark, John P., The Philosophical Anarchism of William Godwin (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela, “Godwin, Political Justice,” in Clemit, Pamela, ed., The Cambridge Companion to British Literature of the French Revolution in the 1790s (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela, “Readers Respond to Godwin: Romantic Republicanism in Letters,” European Romantic Review, 20 (2009), 701–09.Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela, The Godwinian Novel: The Rational Fictions of Godwin, Brockden Brown, Mary Shelley (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993, reprinted 2001).Google Scholar
Clemit, Pamela, “The Signal of Regard: William Godwin’s Correspondence Networks,” European Romantic Review, 30 (2019).Google Scholar
Fleisher, David, William Godwin: A Study in Liberalism (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1951).Google Scholar
Handwerk, Gary, “Of Caleb’s Guilt and Godwin’s Truth: Ideology and Ethics in Caleb Williams,” English Literary History, 60 (1993), 939–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, Robert, “The Foundations of Godwinian Impartiality,” Utilitas, 18 (2006), 134–53.Google Scholar
Maniquis, Robert M., and Myers, Victoria, eds., Godwinian Moments: From the Enlightenment to Romanticism (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Monro, D. H., Godwin’s Moral Philosophy: An Interpretation of William Godwin (London: Oxford University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Myers, Mitzi, “Godwin’s Memoirs of Wollstonecraft: The Shaping of Self and Subject,” Studies in Romanticism, 20 (1981), 299–316.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Eliza, Stark, Helen, and Turner, Beatrice, eds., New Approaches to William Godwin: Forms, Fears, Futures (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).Google Scholar
Scrivener, Michael H., “Godwin’s Philosophy: A Revaluation,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 39 (1978), 615–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., “Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthwoman,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 50:1 (1989), 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergès, Sandrine, Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Bergès, Sandrine and Coffee, Alan, eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016). See particularly the contributions by Brace, L., Pettit, P., James, S., Halldenius, L., and Coffee, A..Google Scholar
Coffee, Alan, “Freedom as Independence: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Grand Blessing of Life,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 29:4 (2014), 908–24.Google Scholar
Coffee, Alan, “Mary Wollstonecraft, Freedom and the Enduring Power of Social Domination,” European Journal of Political Theory, 12:2 (2013), 116–35.Google Scholar
Conniff, James, “Edmund Burke and his Critics: The Case of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 60:2 (1999), 299–318.Google Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy, Rebel Writer: Mary Wollstonecraft and Enlightenment Politics (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism: Independence, Rights and the Experience of Unfreedom (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2015).Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “Mary Wollstonecraft and Freedom as Independence,” in Broad, Jacqueline and Detlefsen, Karen, eds., Women and Liberty, 1600–1800. Philosophical Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s Feminist Critique of Property: On Becoming a Thief from Principle,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 29:4 (2014), 942–57.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “Representation in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Political Philosophy,” in Bergès, Sandrine and Coffee, Alan, eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 166–82.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “The Political Conditions for Free Agency: The Case of Mary Wollstonecraft,” in Skinner, Quentin and van Gelderen, Martin, eds., Freedom and the Construction of Europe, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 2: 227–43.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena, “The Primacy of Right: On the Triad of Liberty, Equality and Virtue in Wollstonecraft’s Political Thought,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 15:1 (2007), 75–99.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, “Reason and Sensibility: The Ideal of Women’s Self-Governance in the Writings of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 8:4 (1993), 181–203.Google Scholar
Neill, Anna, “Civilization and the Rights of Woman: Liberty and Captivity in the Work of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Women’s Writing, 8:1 (2001), 99–118.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Daniel, The Burke–Wollstonecraft Debate: Savagery, Civilization, and Democracy (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Reuter, Martina, “Revolution, Virtue and Duty: Aspects of Politics, Religion and Morality in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Thought,” in Mjaaland, Marius Timmann, Sigurdson, Ola, and Thorgeirsdottir, Sigridur, eds., The Body Unbound: Philosophical Perspectives on Politics, Embodiment and Religion (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010), 107–22.Google Scholar
Sapir, Virginia, A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, “Freedom as the Absence of Arbitrary Power,” in Laborde, Cecile and Maynor, John, eds., Republicanism and Political Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008), 83–101.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Unbounded Attachment: Sentiment and Politics in the Age of the French Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Jones, Vivian, ed., Women and Literature in Britain, 1700–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Knott, Sarah and Taylor, Barbara, eds., Women, Gender and Enlightenment (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J., Borderlines: The Shiftings of Gender in British Romanticism (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986).Google Scholar
Hodson, Jane, Language and Revolution in Burke, Wollstonecraft, Paine and Godwin (London: Ashgate, 2007).Google Scholar
Barker, Hannah, Family and Business during the Industrial Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Brewer, John and Staves, Susan, eds., Early Modern Conceptions of Property (London and New York: Routledge 1995).Google Scholar
Erickson, Amy Louise, Women and Property in Early Modern England (London and New York: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Skinner, Gillian, “Women’s Status as Legal and Civic Subjects: ‘A Worse Condition than Slavery Itself’?” in Jones, Vivien, ed., Women and Literature in Britain 1700–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 91–111.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael, “Property, Community and Citizenship”, in Goldie, Mark and Wokler, Robert, eds., The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 465–94.Google Scholar
Staves, Susan, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akamatsu, Junko, “Revisiting Ecclesiastical Adultery Cases in Eighteenth-Century England,” Journal of Women’s History, 28 (2016), 13–37.Google Scholar
Bailey, Joanne, Unquiet Lives: Marriage and Marriage Breakdown in England, 1660–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Doggett, Maeve, Marriage, Wife-Beating and the Law in Victorian England (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1992).Google Scholar
Dolan, Frances E., “Battered Women, Petty Traitors, and the Legacy of Coverture,” Feminist Studies, 29 (2003), 249–77.Google Scholar
Probert, Rebecca, Marriage Law and Practice in the Long Eighteenth Century: A Reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Probert, Rebecca, The Legal Regulation of Cohabitation: From Fornicators to Family, 1600–2010 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence, Road to Divorce: A History of the Making and Breaking of Marriage in England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Wright, Danaya C., “The Crisis of Child Custody: A History of the Birth of Family Law in England,” Columbia Journal of Gender and the Law, 11 (2002), 175–270.Google Scholar
Andrew, Donna T., Philanthropy and Police: London Charity in the Eighteenth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Carey, Brycchan, British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility: Writing, Sentiment, and Slavery, 1760–1807 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapp, Elizabeth J and Jeffrey, Julie Roy, eds., Women, Dissent, and Antislavery in Britain and America, 1790–1865 (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Ferguson, Moira, Subject to Others: British Women Writers and Colonial Slavery 1670–1784 (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Hersch, B. G., The Slavery of Sex: Feminist-Abolitionists in America (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Holcomb, Julie L., “Blood-Stained Sugar: Gender, Commerce and the British Slave-Trade Debates,” Slavery & Abolition, 35:4 (2014), 611–28.Google Scholar
Howard, Carol, “Wollstonecraft’s Thoughts on Slavery and Corruption,” The Eighteenth Century, 45:1 (2004), 61–86Google Scholar
Macdonald, D. L., “Master, Slave and Mistress in Wollstonecraft’s Vindication,” Enlightenment and Dissent, 11 (1992), 46–57.Google Scholar
Matthews, Gelien, Caribbean Slave Revolts and the British Abolitionist Movement (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Midgley, Clare, Gender and Imperialism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Midgley, Clare, Women Against Slavery: The British Campaigns, 1780–1870 (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Oldfield, J. R., Popular Politics and British Anti-Slavery: The Mobilisation of Public Opinion Against the Slave Trade 1787–1807 (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
Page, Anthony, “‘A Species of Slavery’: Richard Price’s Rational Dissent and Antislavery,” Slavery & Abolition, 32:1 (2011), 53–73.Google Scholar
Sinha, Manish, The Slave’s Cause: A History of Abolition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Yellin, J. F., Women and Sisters: Antislavery Feminists in American Culture (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
DeLucia, JoEllen M., “A Delicate Debate: Mary Wollstonecraft, the Bluestockings, and the Progress of Women,” in Steiner, Enit Karafili, ed., Called to Civil Existence: Mary Wollstonecraft’s “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman” (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 113–30.Google Scholar
Eaton, Barbara, Yes Papa! Mrs Chapone and the Bluestocking Circle (London: Francis Boutle Publishers, 2012).Google Scholar
Eger, Elizabeth, Bluestockings: Women of Reason from Enlightenment to Romanticism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Small Change: Women, Learning, Patriotism, 1750–1810 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, general ed., Bluestocking Feminism: Writings of the Bluestocking Circle, 1738–1785, 6 vols. (London: Pickering & Chatto, 1999).Google Scholar
Myers, Sylvia Harcstarck, The Bluestocking Circle: Women, Friendship, and the Life of the Mind in Eighteenth-Century England (Oxford: Clarendon, 1990).Google Scholar
O’Brien, Karen, Women and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohl, Nicole and Schellenberg, Betty A., eds., Reconsidering the Bluestockings (San Marino: Huntington Library, 2003).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Betty A., Literary Coteries and the Making of English Print Culture, 1740–1790 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Zuk, Rhoda, ed. Catherine Talbot & Hester Chapone, vol. 3 of Bluestocking Feminism: Writings of the Bluestocking Circle, 1738–1785 (London: Pickering & Chatto, 1999).Google Scholar
Eaton, Barbara, Yes Papa! Mrs Chapone and the Bluestocking Circle (London: Francis Boutle Publishers, 2012).Google Scholar
Eger, Elizabeth, Bluestockings: Women of Reason from Enlightenment to Romanticism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
Jones, Vivien, ed., Women in the Eighteenth-Century: Constructions of Femininity (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Knott, Sarah and Taylor, Barbara, eds., Women, Gender and Enlightenment (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Betty A., Literary Coteries and the Making of English Print Culture, 1740–1790 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Hanley, Kirstin Collins, Mary Wollstonecraft, Pedagogy, and the Practice of Feminism (New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Jones, Vivien, “Mary Wollstonecraft and the Literature of Advice and Instruction,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 119–40.Google Scholar
Myers, Mitzi, “Impeccable Governesses, Rational Dames, and Moral Mothers: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Female Tradition in Georgian Children’s Books,” Children’s Literature, 14 (1986), 31–59.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan, “Mary Wollstonecraft on Education,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 24–41.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986).Google Scholar
Hodson, Jane, Language and Revolution in Burke, Wollstonecraft, Paine and Godwin (London: Ashgate, 2007).Google Scholar
Barker, Hannah, Family and Business during the Industrial Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Brewer, John and Staves, Susan, eds., Early Modern Conceptions of Property (London and New York: Routledge 1995).Google Scholar
Erickson, Amy Louise, Women and Property in Early Modern England (London and New York: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Skinner, Gillian, “Women’s Status as Legal and Civic Subjects: ‘A Worse Condition than Slavery Itself’?” in Jones, Vivien, ed., Women and Literature in Britain 1700–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 91–111.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael, “Property, Community and Citizenship”, in Goldie, Mark and Wokler, Robert, eds., The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 465–94.Google Scholar
Staves, Susan, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akamatsu, Junko, “Revisiting Ecclesiastical Adultery Cases in Eighteenth-Century England,” Journal of Women’s History, 28 (2016), 13–37.Google Scholar
Bailey, Joanne, Unquiet Lives: Marriage and Marriage Breakdown in England, 1660–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Doggett, Maeve, Marriage, Wife-Beating and the Law in Victorian England (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1992).Google Scholar
Dolan, Frances E., “Battered Women, Petty Traitors, and the Legacy of Coverture,” Feminist Studies, 29 (2003), 249–77.Google Scholar
Probert, Rebecca, Marriage Law and Practice in the Long Eighteenth Century: A Reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Probert, Rebecca, The Legal Regulation of Cohabitation: From Fornicators to Family, 1600–2010 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence, Road to Divorce: A History of the Making and Breaking of Marriage in England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Wright, Danaya C., “The Crisis of Child Custody: A History of the Birth of Family Law in England,” Columbia Journal of Gender and the Law, 11 (2002), 175–270.Google Scholar
Andrew, Donna T., Philanthropy and Police: London Charity in the Eighteenth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Carey, Brycchan, British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility: Writing, Sentiment, and Slavery, 1760–1807 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapp, Elizabeth J and Jeffrey, Julie Roy, eds., Women, Dissent, and Antislavery in Britain and America, 1790–1865 (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Ferguson, Moira, Subject to Others: British Women Writers and Colonial Slavery 1670–1784 (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Hersch, B. G., The Slavery of Sex: Feminist-Abolitionists in America (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Holcomb, Julie L., “Blood-Stained Sugar: Gender, Commerce and the British Slave-Trade Debates,” Slavery & Abolition, 35:4 (2014), 611–28.Google Scholar
Howard, Carol, “Wollstonecraft’s Thoughts on Slavery and Corruption,” The Eighteenth Century, 45:1 (2004), 61–86Google Scholar
Macdonald, D. L., “Master, Slave and Mistress in Wollstonecraft’s Vindication,” Enlightenment and Dissent, 11 (1992), 46–57.Google Scholar
Matthews, Gelien, Caribbean Slave Revolts and the British Abolitionist Movement (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Midgley, Clare, Gender and Imperialism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Midgley, Clare, Women Against Slavery: The British Campaigns, 1780–1870 (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Oldfield, J. R., Popular Politics and British Anti-Slavery: The Mobilisation of Public Opinion Against the Slave Trade 1787–1807 (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
Page, Anthony, “‘A Species of Slavery’: Richard Price’s Rational Dissent and Antislavery,” Slavery & Abolition, 32:1 (2011), 53–73.Google Scholar
Sinha, Manish, The Slave’s Cause: A History of Abolition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Yellin, J. F., Women and Sisters: Antislavery Feminists in American Culture (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
DeLucia, JoEllen M., “A Delicate Debate: Mary Wollstonecraft, the Bluestockings, and the Progress of Women,” in Steiner, Enit Karafili, ed., Called to Civil Existence: Mary Wollstonecraft’s “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman” (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 113–30.Google Scholar
Eaton, Barbara, Yes Papa! Mrs Chapone and the Bluestocking Circle (London: Francis Boutle Publishers, 2012).Google Scholar
Eger, Elizabeth, Bluestockings: Women of Reason from Enlightenment to Romanticism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Small Change: Women, Learning, Patriotism, 1750–1810 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, general ed., Bluestocking Feminism: Writings of the Bluestocking Circle, 1738–1785, 6 vols. (London: Pickering & Chatto, 1999).Google Scholar
Myers, Sylvia Harcstarck, The Bluestocking Circle: Women, Friendship, and the Life of the Mind in Eighteenth-Century England (Oxford: Clarendon, 1990).Google Scholar
O’Brien, Karen, Women and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohl, Nicole and Schellenberg, Betty A., eds., Reconsidering the Bluestockings (San Marino: Huntington Library, 2003).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Betty A., Literary Coteries and the Making of English Print Culture, 1740–1790 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Zuk, Rhoda, ed. Catherine Talbot & Hester Chapone, vol. 3 of Bluestocking Feminism: Writings of the Bluestocking Circle, 1738–1785 (London: Pickering & Chatto, 1999).Google Scholar
Eaton, Barbara, Yes Papa! Mrs Chapone and the Bluestocking Circle (London: Francis Boutle Publishers, 2012).Google Scholar
Eger, Elizabeth, Bluestockings: Women of Reason from Enlightenment to Romanticism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
Jones, Vivien, ed., Women in the Eighteenth-Century: Constructions of Femininity (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Knott, Sarah and Taylor, Barbara, eds., Women, Gender and Enlightenment (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Betty A., Literary Coteries and the Making of English Print Culture, 1740–1790 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Hanley, Kirstin Collins, Mary Wollstonecraft, Pedagogy, and the Practice of Feminism (New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Jones, Vivien, “Mary Wollstonecraft and the Literature of Advice and Instruction,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 119–40.Google Scholar
Myers, Mitzi, “Impeccable Governesses, Rational Dames, and Moral Mothers: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Female Tradition in Georgian Children’s Books,” Children’s Literature, 14 (1986), 31–59.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan, “Mary Wollstonecraft on Education,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 24–41.Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Benedict, Barbara M., Framing Feeling: Sentiment and Style in English Prose Fiction, 1745–1800 (New York: AMS Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Brissenden, R. F., Virtue in Distress: Studies in the Novel of Sentiment from Richardson to Sade (New York: Harper and Row, 1974).Google Scholar
Crane, R. S., “Suggestions toward a Genealogy of the ‘Man of Feeling’” ELH, 1:3 (1934), 205–30.Google Scholar
De Bruyn, Frans, “Latitudinarianism and its Importance as a Precursor of Sensibility,” Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 80:3 (1981), 349–68.Google Scholar
Dwyer, John, Virtuous Discourse: Sensibility and Community in Late Eighteenth-Century Scotland (Edinburgh: L. Donald Publishers, 1987).Google Scholar
Ellis, Markman, The Politics of Sensibility: Race, Gender, and Commerce in the Sentimental Novel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Ellison, Julie K., Cato’s Tears and the Making of Anglo-American Emotion (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Goring, Paul, The Rhetoric of Sensibility in Eighteenth-Century Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Gross, Daniel M., The Secret History of Emotion: From Aristotle’s Rhetoric to Modern Brain Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Small Change: Women, Learning, Patriotism, 1750–1810 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia, Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre, “Personal Effects and Sentimental Fictions,” Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 12:2 (2000), 345–68.Google Scholar
Mullan, John, Sentiment and Sociability: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Pinch, Adela, Strange Fits of Passion: Epistemologies of Emotion, Hume to Austen (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Rousseau, G. S., “Nerves, Spirits, and Fibres: Towards Defining the Origins of Sensibility,” in Brissenden, R. F. and Eade, J. C., eds., Studies in the Eighteenth Century III (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Terada, Rei. Feeling in Theory: Emotion after the “Death of the Subject” (Cambridge: Harvard, University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Van Sant, Ann Jessie, Eighteenth-Century Sensibility and the Novel: The Senses in Social Context (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Yousef, Nancy, “‘Emotions that Reason Deepens’: Second Thoughts about Affect,” Nineteenth-Century Gender Studies, 11:3 (2015), 61–73.Google Scholar
Gilmartin, Kevin, Writing Against Revolution. Literary Conservatism in Britain, 1790–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Grenby, M. O., The Anti-Jacobin Novel: British Conservatism and the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Haywood, Ian, The Revolution in Popular Literature: Print, Politics and the People, 1790–1860 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, Women, Writing and Revolution 1790–1827 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mee, Jon, Print, Publicity, and Popular Radicalism in the 1790s: The Laurel of Liberty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Erickson, Lee, The Economy of Literary Form: English Literature and the Industrialization of Publishing, 1800–1850 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Grenby, M. O., The Anti-Jacobin Novel: British Conservatism and the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, English Fiction of the Romantic Period, 1789–1830 (London and New York: Longman, 1989).Google Scholar
Rooney, Morgan, The French Revolution Debate and the British Novel, 1790–1814 (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Verhoeven, W. M, general ed., Anti-Jacobin Novels, 10 vols. (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2005).Google Scholar
Chandler, Anne, “Wollstonecraft’s Original Stories: Animal Objects and the Subject of Fiction,” Eighteenth-Century Novel, 2 (2002), 325–51.Google Scholar
Franklin, Caroline, Mary Wollstonecraft: A Literary Life (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004).Google Scholar
Klemann, Heather, “How to Think with Animals in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Original Stories and The Wrongs of Woman; or, Maria,” Lion and the Unicorn, 39:1 (2015), 1–22.Google Scholar
Myers, Mitzi, “Impeccable Governesses, Rational Dames, and Moral Mothers: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Female Tradition in Georgian Children’s Books,” Children’s Literature, 14 (1989), 31–59.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan, “Mary Wollstonecraft in Education,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 24–41.Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Clery, E. J., The Rise of Supernatural Fiction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Gamer, Michael, Romanticism and the Gothic: Genre, Reception, and Canon Formation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Saggini, Francesca, The Gothic Novel and the Stage: Romantic Appropriations (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2015).Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Wright, Angela and Townsend, Dale, eds., Romantic Gothic: An Edinburgh Companion (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Bohls, Elizabeth, Women Travel Writers and the Language of Aesthetics, 1716–1818 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Dekker, George, Fictions of Romantic Tourism: Radcliffe, Scott, and Mary Shelley (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Dolan, Brian, Ladies of the Grand Tour: British Women in Pursuit of Enlightenment and Adventure in Eighteenth-Century Europe (New York: HarperCollins, 2001).Google Scholar
Durie, Alastair J., Scotland for the Holidays: A History of Tourism in Scotland, 1780–1939 (East Linton: Tuckwell Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Hagglun, Betty, Tourists and Travelers: Women’s Non-Fictional Writing about Scotland, 1770–1830 (Bristol: Channel View Publications, 2010).Google Scholar
Siskin, Clifford, The Work of Writing: Literature and Social Change in Britain, 1700–1830 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Williams, William H. A., Creating Irish Tourism: The First Century, 1750–1850 (London: Anthem Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Furniss, Tom, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s French Revolution,” in Johnson, Claudia L., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Phillips, Mark Salber, Society and Sentiment: Genres of Historical Writing in Britain (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Rendall, Jane, “‘The Grand Causes Which Combine to Carry Mankind Forward’: Wollstonecraft, History, and Revolution,” Women’s Writing, 4:2 (1997), 155–72.Google Scholar
Schama, Simon, Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution (New York: Vintage, 1990).Google Scholar
Oliver, Susan, “Silencing Joseph Johnson and the Analytical Review,” Wordsworth Circle, 40 (2009), 96–102.Google Scholar
Stewart, Sally, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s Contributions to the Analytical Review,” Essays in Literature, 11 (1984), 187–99.Google Scholar
Waters, Mary, British Women Writers and the Profession of Literary Criticism, 1789–1832 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, Wollstonecraft, Mill, and Women’s Human Rights (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, Wilkerson, Christine Carey, and Kozlow, Elizabeth N., “Wollstonecraft as an International Feminist Meme,” Journal of Women’s History, 26:2 (2014), 13–38.Google Scholar
Favret, Mary A., “A Short Residence: Traveling with Mary Wollstonecraft,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 209–27.Google Scholar
Hufton, Olwen, The Prospect Before Her: A History of Women in Western Europe, 1500–1800 (New York: Vintage, 1995).Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Benedict, Barbara M., Framing Feeling: Sentiment and Style in English Prose Fiction, 1745–1800 (New York: AMS Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Brissenden, R. F., Virtue in Distress: Studies in the Novel of Sentiment from Richardson to Sade (New York: Harper and Row, 1974).Google Scholar
Crane, R. S., “Suggestions toward a Genealogy of the ‘Man of Feeling’” ELH, 1:3 (1934), 205–30.Google Scholar
De Bruyn, Frans, “Latitudinarianism and its Importance as a Precursor of Sensibility,” Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 80:3 (1981), 349–68.Google Scholar
Dwyer, John, Virtuous Discourse: Sensibility and Community in Late Eighteenth-Century Scotland (Edinburgh: L. Donald Publishers, 1987).Google Scholar
Ellis, Markman, The Politics of Sensibility: Race, Gender, and Commerce in the Sentimental Novel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Ellison, Julie K., Cato’s Tears and the Making of Anglo-American Emotion (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Goring, Paul, The Rhetoric of Sensibility in Eighteenth-Century Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Gross, Daniel M., The Secret History of Emotion: From Aristotle’s Rhetoric to Modern Brain Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Guest, Harriet, Small Change: Women, Learning, Patriotism, 1750–1810 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia, Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre, “Personal Effects and Sentimental Fictions,” Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 12:2 (2000), 345–68.Google Scholar
Mullan, John, Sentiment and Sociability: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Pinch, Adela, Strange Fits of Passion: Epistemologies of Emotion, Hume to Austen (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Rousseau, G. S., “Nerves, Spirits, and Fibres: Towards Defining the Origins of Sensibility,” in Brissenden, R. F. and Eade, J. C., eds., Studies in the Eighteenth Century III (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Terada, Rei. Feeling in Theory: Emotion after the “Death of the Subject” (Cambridge: Harvard, University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Van Sant, Ann Jessie, Eighteenth-Century Sensibility and the Novel: The Senses in Social Context (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Yousef, Nancy, “‘Emotions that Reason Deepens’: Second Thoughts about Affect,” Nineteenth-Century Gender Studies, 11:3 (2015), 61–73.Google Scholar
Gilmartin, Kevin, Writing Against Revolution. Literary Conservatism in Britain, 1790–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Grenby, M. O., The Anti-Jacobin Novel: British Conservatism and the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Haywood, Ian, The Revolution in Popular Literature: Print, Politics and the People, 1790–1860 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, Women, Writing and Revolution 1790–1827 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mee, Jon, Print, Publicity, and Popular Radicalism in the 1790s: The Laurel of Liberty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Erickson, Lee, The Economy of Literary Form: English Literature and the Industrialization of Publishing, 1800–1850 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Grenby, M. O., The Anti-Jacobin Novel: British Conservatism and the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary, English Fiction of the Romantic Period, 1789–1830 (London and New York: Longman, 1989).Google Scholar
Rooney, Morgan, The French Revolution Debate and the British Novel, 1790–1814 (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Verhoeven, W. M, general ed., Anti-Jacobin Novels, 10 vols. (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2005).Google Scholar
Chandler, Anne, “Wollstonecraft’s Original Stories: Animal Objects and the Subject of Fiction,” Eighteenth-Century Novel, 2 (2002), 325–51.Google Scholar
Franklin, Caroline, Mary Wollstonecraft: A Literary Life (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004).Google Scholar
Klemann, Heather, “How to Think with Animals in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Original Stories and The Wrongs of Woman; or, Maria,” Lion and the Unicorn, 39:1 (2015), 1–22.Google Scholar
Myers, Mitzi, “Impeccable Governesses, Rational Dames, and Moral Mothers: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Female Tradition in Georgian Children’s Books,” Children’s Literature, 14 (1989), 31–59.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan, “Mary Wollstonecraft in Education,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 24–41.Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J., The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Clery, E. J., The Rise of Supernatural Fiction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Gamer, Michael, Romanticism and the Gothic: Genre, Reception, and Canon Formation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Saggini, Francesca, The Gothic Novel and the Stage: Romantic Appropriations (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2015).Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Wright, Angela and Townsend, Dale, eds., Romantic Gothic: An Edinburgh Companion (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Bohls, Elizabeth, Women Travel Writers and the Language of Aesthetics, 1716–1818 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Dekker, George, Fictions of Romantic Tourism: Radcliffe, Scott, and Mary Shelley (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Dolan, Brian, Ladies of the Grand Tour: British Women in Pursuit of Enlightenment and Adventure in Eighteenth-Century Europe (New York: HarperCollins, 2001).Google Scholar
Durie, Alastair J., Scotland for the Holidays: A History of Tourism in Scotland, 1780–1939 (East Linton: Tuckwell Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Hagglun, Betty, Tourists and Travelers: Women’s Non-Fictional Writing about Scotland, 1770–1830 (Bristol: Channel View Publications, 2010).Google Scholar
Siskin, Clifford, The Work of Writing: Literature and Social Change in Britain, 1700–1830 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Williams, William H. A., Creating Irish Tourism: The First Century, 1750–1850 (London: Anthem Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Furniss, Tom, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s French Revolution,” in Johnson, Claudia L., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Phillips, Mark Salber, Society and Sentiment: Genres of Historical Writing in Britain (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Rendall, Jane, “‘The Grand Causes Which Combine to Carry Mankind Forward’: Wollstonecraft, History, and Revolution,” Women’s Writing, 4:2 (1997), 155–72.Google Scholar
Schama, Simon, Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution (New York: Vintage, 1990).Google Scholar
Oliver, Susan, “Silencing Joseph Johnson and the Analytical Review,” Wordsworth Circle, 40 (2009), 96–102.Google Scholar
Stewart, Sally, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s Contributions to the Analytical Review,” Essays in Literature, 11 (1984), 187–99.Google Scholar
Waters, Mary, British Women Writers and the Profession of Literary Criticism, 1789–1832 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, Wollstonecraft, Mill, and Women’s Human Rights (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, Wilkerson, Christine Carey, and Kozlow, Elizabeth N., “Wollstonecraft as an International Feminist Meme,” Journal of Women’s History, 26:2 (2014), 13–38.Google Scholar
Favret, Mary A., “A Short Residence: Traveling with Mary Wollstonecraft,” in Johnson, Claudia L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 209–27.Google Scholar
Hufton, Olwen, The Prospect Before Her: A History of Women in Western Europe, 1500–1800 (New York: Vintage, 1995).Google Scholar