12 - Disciplining the Sciences in Conflict Zones: Pre-Classical Mechanics between the Sovereign State and the Reformed Catholic Religion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 April 2021
Summary
Abstract
Traditionally, the early modern period is characterized by a process whereby religion, politics, and science are gradually separated into independent cultural spheres. This account conceives of the process of modernity in terms of ‘total conflicts’ between abstract institutions (‘the state’, the ‘Church’, ‘science’), stemming from the demand for freedom of each of these institutions to determine their own norms of behaviour and thought within their own boundaries. The account I offer, in contrast, emphasizes the centrality of the rise of ‘sovereign’ states enhancing the creation of specific networks of interdependencies between rulers, the carriers of religion, and professional artists and scientists. However, interdependence also entailed ‘conflict zones’, where boundary work between political, religious, and scientific discourses was carried out.
Keywords: Jean Bodin, Paolo Casati, sovereignty, Catholicism, conflict zones.
It would be no exaggeration to say that we are witnessing today a crisis which seems to undermine the very foundations of our civilization. The world order of sovereign, independent states is being questioned under the pressure of globalization from the outside and nationalistic-populism from within. While globalization demands surrendering sovereign power in favour of intense international collaboration, large segments of society experience it as unwelcome interference in their well-being, expressing growing distrust in parties and in bureaucratic and intellectual elites that tend to support globalization. Moreover, distrust of the elites also means that the fact-based truths upon which modern political and scientific discourses have been founded since the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries are being undermined. Thus, overriding scepticism towards the liberal democratic process—based on rational and free debate—that has shaped modern sovereign states for a long time is rapidly growing, while quasi-authoritarian regimes, basing themselves on strong nationalist sentiments of the demos and striving for ethnic homogeneity, also confer new power upon religious establishments. These phenomena seem to shake the socio-political, cultural, and intellectual order known as modernity.
The present civilization crisis, as I understand it, provides us with an opportunity to revisit the political, social, and intellectual processes that took shape in 1550–1650, giving birth to the idea of sovereign states and their relation to religion and science, namely to the roots of the consensus around the modern world which is now being shaken.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Making Truth in Early Modern Catholicism , pp. 305 - 330Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2021