Abdulghani, Roeslan (1964) The Bandung Spirit, Jakarta: Prapantja.Google Scholar

Abernathy, David B. (2000) The Dynamics of Global Dominance, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (1996) ‘The Periphery As the Core: The Third World and Security Studies’, in Krause, Keith and Williams, Michael (eds.), Critical Security Studies, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 299–327.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2000) ‘Ethnocentrism and Emancipatory IR Theory’, in Arnold, Samantha and Bier, J. Marshall (eds.), (Dis)placing Security: Critical Re-evaluations of the Boundaries of Security Studies, Toronto: Centre for International and Security Studies, York University, 1–18.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2001a) Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2001b) ‘Human Security: East versus West’, International Journal, 56:3, 442–60.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2004) ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism’, International Organization, 58:2, 239–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2009) Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2011a) ‘Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West’, Millennium, 39:3, 619–37.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2011b) ‘Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule-making in the Third World’, International Studies Quarterly, 55:1, 95–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2013a) ‘Imagining Global IR Out of India’, keynote speech to Annual International Studies Conference, 10–12 December, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2013b) ‘The R2P and Norm Diffusion: Towards a Framework of Norm Circulation’, Global Responsibility to Protect, 5:4, 466–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2014a) ‘Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies’, International Studies Quarterly, 58:4, 647–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2014b) The End of American World Order, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2014c) ‘International Relations: A Dying Discipline’, World Policy Blog, 2 May, www.worldpolicy.org/blog/2014/05/02/international-studies-dying-discipline (Accessed 27 May 2018).Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2014d) ‘International Relations Theory and the Rise of Asia’, in Pekkanen, Saadia, Ravenhill, John and Foot, Rosemary (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 120–37.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2015) ‘Identity without Exceptionalism: Challenges for Asian Political and International Studies’, Asian Political and International Studies Review 1, 1–11.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2016) ‘Idea-shift: How Ideas from the Rest Are Reshaping Global Order’, Third World Quarterly, 37:7, 1156–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2017) East of India, South of China: Sino-Indian Encounters in Southeast Asia, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2018) Constructing Global Order: Agency and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (2007a) ‘Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7:3, 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (eds.) (2007b) ‘Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? Reflections on and from Asia’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, special issue, 7:3, 285–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (eds.) (2010) Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (2017) ‘Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? Ten Years On’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 17:3, 341–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav and Alastair Iain, Johnston (eds.) (2007) Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Adachi, Mineichiro and Visscher, Charles De (1923) ‘Examen de l’organisation et des statuts de la Société des Nations’, Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international, 30, 22–64.Google Scholar

Adebajo, Adekeye and Landsberg, Chris (2001) ‘The Heirs of Nkrumah: Africa’s New Interventionists’, Pugwash Occasional Papers, 2:1, 17 pp.Google Scholar

Adem, Seifudein (2017) ‘Was Ali Mazrui Ahead of His Time’, in Njogu, Kimani and Adem, Seifudein (eds.), Perspectives on Culture and Globalization: The Intellectual Legacy of Ali A. Mazrui, Nairobi: Twaweza Communications, 243–59.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel (1997) ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations, 3:3, 319–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (eds.) (1998) Security Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agathangelou, Anna M. and Ling, L. H. M. (2004) ‘The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism’, International Studies Review, 6:4, 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agathangelou, Anna M. and Ling, L. H. M. (2009) Transforming World Politics: From Empire to Multiple Worlds, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmad, Aijaz (1997) ‘Postcolonial Theory and the “Post-” Condition’, in Panitch, Leo (ed.), Ruthless Criticism of All that Exists, The Socialist Register 1997, London: Merlin Press, 353–81.Google Scholar

Ahrari, M. Ehsan (2001) ‘Iran, China and Russia: The Emerging Anti-US Nexus?’, Security Dialogue, 32:4, 453–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alagappa, Muthiah (2011) ‘International Relations Studies in Asia: Distinctive Trajectories’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11:2, 193–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Mathias and Buzan, Barry (2017) ‘On the Subject Matter of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 43:5, 898–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allinson, Jamie C. and Anievas, Alexander (2010) ‘The Uneven and Combined Development of the Meiji Restoration: A Passive Revolutionary Road to Capitalist Modernity’, Capital & Class, 34:3, 469–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambrosio, Thomas (2001) ‘Russia’s Quest for Multipolarity: A Response to US Foreign Policy’, European Security, 10:1, 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amin, Samir (1972) ‘Underdevelopment and Dependence in Black Africa: Origins and Contemporary Forms’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 10:4, 503–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Benedict (2006) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Angell, Norman (1909) The Great Illusion (Original title: Europe’s Optical Illusion), London: Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent & Co.Google Scholar

Aning, Kwesi and Edu-Afful, Fiifi (2016) ‘African Agency in R2P: Interventions by African Union and ECOWAS in Mali, Cote D’ivoire, and Libya’, International Studies Review, 18:1, 120–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonius, George ([1938] 2001) The Arab Awakening: The Story of the Arab National Movement, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Appadorai, A. (1979) ‘The Asian Relations Conference in Perspective’, International Studies, 18:3, 275–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariga, Nagao (1896) La guerre sino-japonaise au point de vue du droit international, Paris: A. Pedone.Google Scholar

Armstrong, David (1998) ‘Globalization and the Social State’, Review of International Studies, 24:4, 461–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashley, Richard K. (1980) The Political Economy of War and Peace, London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar

Ashley, Richard K. (1996) ‘The Achievements of Poststructuralism’, in Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 240–53.Google Scholar

Ashworth, Lucian M. (2002) ‘Did the Realist–Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? A Revisionist History of International Relations’, International Relations, 16:1, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, Lucian M. (2008) ‘Feminism, War and the Prospects of International Government – Helena Swanwick and the Lost Feminists of Interwar International Relations’, Limerick Papers in Politics and Public Administration, 2, 18 pp.Google Scholar

Ashworth, Lucian M. (2013) ‘Mapping a New World: Geography and the Interwar Study of International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly, 57:1, 138–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, Lucian M. (2014) A History of International Thought: From the Origins of the Modern State to Academic International Relations, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, Lucian M. (2017) ‘Women of the Twenty Years Crisis: The Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) and the Problem of Collective Security’, Paper for the BISA Conference, Brighton, 14–16 June.Google Scholar

Ashworth, William (1975) A Short History of the International Economy since 1850, 3rd edn., London: Longman.Google Scholar

Axline, W. Andrew (1977) ‘Underdevelopment, Dependence, and Integration: The Politics of Regionalism in the Third World’, International Organization, 31:1, 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aydin, Cemil (2007) The Politics of Anti-Westernism in Asia, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aydinli, Ersel and Mathews, Julie (2008) ‘Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory out of Anatolia’, Review of International Studies, 34:4, 693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aydinli, Ersel and Mathews, Julie (2009) ‘Turkey: Towards Homegrown Theorizing and Building a Disciplinary Community’, in Tickner, Arlene B. and Wæver, Ole (eds.), International Relations Scholarship around the World, Abingdon: Routledge, 208–22.Google Scholar

Ayoob, Mohammed (1984) ‘Security in the Third World: The Worm about to Turn’, International Affairs, 60:1, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayoob, Mohammed (1986) ‘Regional Security and the Third World’, in Ayoob, Mohammed (ed.), Regional Security in the Third World: Case Studies from Southeast Asia and the Middle East, London: Croom Helm, 3–27.Google Scholar

Ayoob, Mohammed (1991) ‘The Security Problematic of the Third World’, World Politics, 43:2, 257–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayoob, Mohammed (1995) The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Azar, Edward and Moon, Chung-in (eds.) (1988) National Security in the Third World, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Bailey, S. H. (1932) The Framework of International Society, London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar

Bairoch, Paul (1981) ‘The Main Trends in National Economic Disparities since the Industrial Revolution’, in Bairoch, Paul and Lévy-Leboyer, Maurice (eds.), Disparities in Economic Development since the Industrial Revolution, London: Macmillan, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bairoch, Paul (1982) ‘International Industrialization Levels from 1750–1980’, Journal of European Economic History, 11:2, 269–333.Google Scholar

Baldwin, David (ed.) (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard (2016) The Great Convergence, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banks, Michael (1985) ‘The Inter-Paradigm Debate’, in Light, Margot and Groom, John R. (eds.), International Relations: A Handbook of Current Theory, London: Frances Pinter, 7–26.Google Scholar

Barkawi, Tarak and Laffey, Mark (eds.) (2001) Democracy, Liberalism, and War: Rethinking the Democratic Peace Debate, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel (1998) ‘The Evolution of the Constitution of Sovereignty and the Emergence of Human Rights Norms’, Millennium, 27:2, 229–52.Google Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel (2010) Realist Constructivism: Rethinking International Relations Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, Michael (1995) ‘Sovereignty, Nationalism, and Regional Order in the Arab States System’, International Organization, 49:3, 479–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, Michael (1998) Dialogues in Arab Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Barone, Charles A. (1985) Marxist Thought on Imperialism: Survey and Critique, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batabyal, Rakesh (2015) JNU: The Making of a University, New Delhi: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Bayly, Martin J. (2017a) ‘Imagining New Worlds: Forging “Non-Western” International Relations in Late Colonial India’, British Academy Review, 30, 50–3.Google Scholar

Bayly, Martin J. (2017b) ‘Global at Birth: The Multiple Beginnings of International Relations’, unpublished manuscript, 28 pp.Google Scholar

Bayly, Susan (2004) ‘Imagining “Greater India”: French and Indian Visions of Colonialism in the Indic Mode’, Modern Asian Studies, 38:3, 703–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behera, Navnita Chadha (2007) ‘Re-imagining IR in India’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7:3, 341–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behera, Navnita Chadha (2009) ‘South Asia: A “Realist” Past and Alternative Futures’, in Tickner, Arlene B. and Wæver, Ole (eds.), International Relations Scholarship around the World, Abingdon: Routledge, 134–57.Google Scholar

Behera, Navnita Chadha (2010) ‘Re-imagining IR in India’, in Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (eds.), Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, London: Routledge, 92–116.Google Scholar

Belich, James (2009) Replenishing the Earth: The Settler Revolution and the Rise of the Anglo-World, 1783–1939, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Duncan (2007) The Idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860–1900, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Duncan (2013) ‘Race and International Relations: Introduction’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 26:1, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Sydney Smith (1859) Colonial Administration of Great Britain, London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans and Roberts.Google Scholar

Benedick, Richard E. (1991) Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bernal-Meza, Raúl (2016) ‘Contemporary Latin American Thinking on International Relations: Theoretical, Conceptual and Methodological Contributions’, Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional, 59:1, 1–32.Google Scholar

Bertucci, Mariano E., Hayes, Jarrod and James, Patrick (2018) ‘Constructivism in International Relations: The Story So Far’, in James, Patrick, Bertucci, Mariano E. and Hayes, Jarrod (eds.), Constructivism Reconsidered: Past, Present and Future, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 15–31.Google Scholar

The Bhagavad-Gita (1986) Translated by Barbara Stoler Miller, New York: Bantam Dell.Google Scholar

Biersteker, Thomas (2009) ‘The Parochialism of Hegemony: Challenges for “American” International Relations’, in Tickner, Arlene B. and Wæver, Ole (eds.), International Relations Scholarship around the World, Abingdon: Routledge, 308–27.Google Scholar

Bilgin, Pinar (2004a) Regional Security in the Middle East: A Critical Perspective, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bilgin, Pinar (2004b) ‘International Politics of Women’s (In)security: Rejoinder to Mary Caprioli’, Security Dialogue, 35:4, 499–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bilgin, Pinar (2008) ‘Thinking Past “Western” IR?’, Third World Quarterly, 29:1, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bilgin, Pinar (2013) ‘Pinar Bilgin on Non-Western IR, Hybridity, and the One- Toothed Monster called Civilization’, Theory Talks (forum), 20 December, www.files.ethz.ch/isn/175508/Theory%20Talk61_Bilgin.pdf (Accessed 23 September 2016).Google Scholar

Bischoff, Paul-Henri, Aning, Kwesi and Acharya, Amitav (2016) ‘Africa in Global International Relations: Emerging Approaches to Theory and Practice, an Introduction’, in Bischoff, Paul-Henri, Aning, Kwesi and Acharya, Amitav (eds.), Africa in Global International Relations: Emerging Approaches to Theory and Practice, London: Routledge, 1–21.Google Scholar

Bloch, Ivan (1898) La Guerre Future (English title: Is War Now Impossible?) Paris: Guillaumin et C. Editeurs.Google Scholar

Booth, Ken (1975) ‘The Evolution of Strategic Thinking’, in Baylis, John, Booth, Ken, Garnett, John and Williams, Phil, Contemporary Strategy: Theories and Policies, London: Croom Helm, 22–49.Google Scholar

Booth, Ken (1996) ‘75 Years On: Rewriting the Subject’s Past – Reinventing its Future’, in Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 328–39.Google Scholar

Bostrum, Nick (2014) Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bostrum, Nick and Ćirković, Milan M. (eds.) (2008) Global Catastrophic Risks, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouchet, Nicolas (2013) ‘Bill Clinton’, in Cox, Michael, Lynch, Timothy J. and Bouchet, Nicolas (eds.), US Foreign Policy and Democracy Promotion: From Theodore Roosevelt to Barack Obama, Abingdon: Routledge, 159–77.Google Scholar

Bowden, Brett (2009) The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea, Kindle edn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowman, Isaiah (1921) The New World: Problems in Political Geography, Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book Company.Google Scholar

Brewin, Christopher (1995) ‘Arnold Toynbee, Chatham House, and Research in a Global Context’, in Long, David and Wilson, Peter (eds.), Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridgman, Raymond L. (1905) World Organization, Boston: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard (1946) The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order, New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Brown, Michael E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M. and Miller, Steven E. (1996) Debating the Democratic Peace, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Philip Marshall (1923) International Society: Its Nature and Interests, New York: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

Brown, William (2012) ‘A Question of Agency: Africa in International Politics’, Third World Quarterly, 33:10, 1889–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brownlie, Ian ([1966] 1998) Principles of Public International Law, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brynjolfsson, Eric and McAfee, Andrew (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Buell, Raymond Leslie (1925) International Relations, New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Bukharin, Nikolai (1916) Imperialism and World Economy, London: Martin Lawrence.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley (1966) ‘International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach’, World Politics, 18:3, 361–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, Hedley (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, Hedley (1984) ‘The Revolt against the West’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.), The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 217–28.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (1984a) ‘Introduction’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.), The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–9.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.) (1984b) The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Burchill, Scott and Linklater, Andrew (2013) ‘Introduction’, in Burchill, Scott, Linklater, Andrew, Devetak, Richard, Donnelly, Jack, Nardin, Terry, Paterson, Matthew, Reus-Smit, Christian and True, Jacqui (eds.), Theories of International Relations, 5th edn., New York: Macmillan Palgrave, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Dell Marie (2010) ‘What Is at Stake in the Third Debate and Why Does It Matter for International Theory?’, E-International Relations, 16 January, www.e-ir.info/2010/01/16/what-is-at-stake-in-the-third-debate-and-why-does-it-matter-for-international-theory/ (Accessed 27 May 2018).Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry (1973) ‘The British Peace Movement from 1919 to 1939’, London University, PhD thesis.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry (1983) People, States and Fear, Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry ([1991] 2007) People, States and Fear, Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry (2004a) The United States and the Great Powers, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry (2004b) From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry (2006) ‘Will the “Global War on Terrorism” Be the New Cold War?’, International Affairs, 82:6, 1101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry (2011) ‘A World Order without Superpowers: Decentred Globalism’, International Relations, 25:1, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry (2012) ‘The South Asian Security Complex in a Decentering World Order: Reconsidering Regions and Powers Ten Years On’, International Studies, 48:1, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry (2013) ‘Review of The Social Evolution of International Politics,’ International Affairs, 89:5, 1304–5.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry (2014) An Introduction to the English School of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry (2017) ‘Revisiting World Society’, International Politics, 55:1, 125–40.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry (2018) ‘Nuclear Weapons and Deterrence in the Post-Western World Order’, International Security Studies, 1, 53–73 (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry (forthcoming) ‘The Dual Encounter: Parallels in the Rise of China (1978–) and Japan (1868–1945)’, in Inoguchi, Takashi (ed.), Sage Handbook of Asian Foreign Policy.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Hansen, Lene (2009) The Evolution of International Security Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Herring, Eric (1998) The Arms Dynamic in World Politics, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George (2014a) ‘Rethinking Benchmark Dates in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 20:2, 437–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George (2014b) ‘Capitalism and the Emergent World Order’, International Affairs, 90:1, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George (2015a) The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George (2015b) ‘Twentieth Century Benchmark Dates in International Relations: The Three World Wars in Historical Perspective’, International Security Studies (Beijing), 1:1, 39–58.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George (2018) ‘The English School: History and Primary Institutions as Empirical IR Theory?’, in Thompson, William R. (ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Empirical International Relations Theories, New York: Oxford University Press, 783–99.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Little, Richard (2000) International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Little, Richard (2010) ‘The Historical Expansion of International Society’, in Denemark, Robert Allen (ed.), The International Studies Encyclopedia, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Little, Richard (2014) ‘The Historical Expansion of International Society’ in Navari, Cornelia and Green, Daniel M. (eds.), Guide to the English School in International Studies, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 59–75.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Schouenborg, Laust (2018) Global International Society: A New Framework for Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Wæver, Ole (2003) Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole and Wilde, Jaap de (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Caballero-Anthony, Mely (ed.) (2015) An Introduction to Non-Traditional Security Studies, London: Sage.Google Scholar

Caballero-Anthony, Mely, Emmers, Ralf and Acharya, Amitav (eds.) (2006), Non-Traditional Security in Asia: Dynamics of Securitisation, London: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Calhoun, Craig (2017) ‘Nation and Imagination: How Benedict Anderson Revolutionized Political Theory’, ABC, 9 May, www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2017/05/09/4665722.htm (Accessed 27 May 2018).Google Scholar

Campbell, David (1998) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and Politics of Identity, 2nd and revised edn., Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, David (2013) ‘Poststructuralism’, in Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve (eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 223–46.Google Scholar

Cardoso, Fernando and Faletto, Enzo (1972) Dependency and Development in Latin America, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Carozza, Paolo G. (2003) ‘From Conquest to Constitutions: Retrieving a Latin American Tradition of the Idea of Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 25:2, 281–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, Ted Galen (1991) ‘The New World Disorder’, Foreign Policy, 84, 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, E. H. ([1939] 2016) The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, E. H. (1946) The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 2nd edn., London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, E. H. (1964) The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 2nd edn., New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Carvalho, Benjamin de, Leira, Halvard and Hobson, John (2011) ‘The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919’, Millennium, 39:3, 735–58.Google Scholar

Castle, David Barton (2000) ‘Leo Stanton Rowe and the Meaning of Pan-Americanism’, in Sheinin, David (ed.), Beyond the Ideal: Pan Americanism in International Affairs, Westport, CT: Praeger, 33–44.Google Scholar

Cerny, Phil (1993) ‘“Plurilateralism”: Structural Differentiation and Functional Conflict in the Post-Cold War World Order’, Millennium, 22:1, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Césaire, Aimé (1955) Discourse on Colonialism, translated by J. Pinkham, New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Cha, Victor D. (1997) ‘Realism, Liberalism, and the Durability of the US–South Korean Alliance’, Asian Survey, 37:7, 609–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cha, Victor (1999) ‘Engaging China: Seoul–Beijing Detente and Korean Security’, Survival, 41:1, 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cha, Victor (2000) ‘Abandonment, Entrapment, and Neoclassical Realism in Asia: The United States, Japan and Korea’, International Studies Quarterly, 44:2, 261–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cha, Victor (2010) ‘Powerplay: Origins of the US Alliance System in Asia’, International Security, 34:3, 158–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Chan, Stephen, Mandaville, Peter G. and Bleiker, Roland (eds.) (2001) The Zen of International Relations: IR Theory from East to West, New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chatterjee, M. N. (1916) ‘The World and the Next War: An Eastern Viewpoint’, Journal of Race Development, 6:4, 388–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chatterjee, Partha (1993) The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey (2013) ‘Theoretical Pluralism in IR: Possibilities and Limits’, in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, 2nd edn., London: Sage, 220–41.Google Scholar

Chibber, Vivek (2013) ‘How Does the Subaltern Speak?’, Jacobin, 21 April, www.jacobinmag.com/2013/04/how-does-the-subaltern-speak (Accessed 17 May 2018).Google Scholar

Chong, Alan (2012) ‘Premodern Southeast Asia as a Guide to International Relations between Peoples: Prowess and Prestige in ‘‘Intersocietal Relations’’ in the Sejarah Melayu’, Alternatives, 37:2, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chong, Alan (2017) ‘Empire of the Mind: José Rizal and Proto-nationalism in the Philippines’, in Bilgin, Pinar and Ling, L. H. M. (eds.), Asia in International Relations: Unlearning Imperial Power Relations, London: Routledge, 160–71.Google Scholar

Chowdhry, Geeta and Nair, Sheila (eds.) (2004) Power, Postcolonialism, and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender, and Class, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Christensen, Jens (1998) ‘Internettets Verden’ [The World of the Internet], Samvirke, 4 (April), 106–12.Google Scholar

Cintra, Jose Thiago (1989) ‘Regional Conflicts: Trends in a Period of Transition’, Adelphi Papers, 29:237, 94–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claassen, Casper Hendrik (2011) ‘The Africanist Delusion: In Defence of the Realist Tradition and the Neo-Neo Synthesis’, Journal of Politics and Law, 4:1, 181–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Ian (1997) Globalization and Fragmentation: International Relations in the Twentieth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Ian (1999) Globalization and International Relations Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Ian (2007) International Legitimacy and World Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Ian (2011) Hegemony in International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clausewitz, Carl von ([1832] 1968) On War, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Clodfelter, Michael (2002) Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1500–2000, 2nd edn., London: McFarland & Co.Google Scholar

Cochran, Molly (2008) ‘The Ethics of the English School’, in Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 286–97.Google Scholar

Cohen, Benjamin J. (2007) ‘The Transatlantic Divide: Why Are American and British IPE so Different?’, Review of International Political Economy, 14:2, 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Benjamin J. (2008) International Political Economy: An Intellectual History, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Benjamin (2014) International Political Economy, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Cohen, Raymond and Westbrook, Raymond (2000) Amarna Diplomacy: The Beginnings of International Relations, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Raymond and Westbrook, Raymond (eds.) (2008) Isaiah’s Vision of Peace in Biblical and Modern International Relations: Swords into Plowshares, New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colgan, Jeff D. (2016) ‘Where Is International Relations Going? Evidence from Graduate Training’, International Studies Quarterly, 60:3, 486–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Michael (2011) Empire, Nationalism and the Postcolonial World, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copeland, Dale (2010) ‘Realism and Neorealism in the Study of Regional Conflict’, Paper presented at conference on ‘When Regions Transform’, McGill University, 9 April.Google Scholar

Cornelissen, Scarlett, Cheru, Fantu and Shaw, Timothy M. (2012) ‘Introduction: Africa and International Relations in the 21st Century: Still Challenging Theory?’, in Cornelissen, Scarlett, Cheru, Fantu and Shaw, Timothy M. (eds.), Africa and International Relations in the 21st Century, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Michael (2001) ‘Introduction’, in Carr, E. H. (ed.), The Twenty Years Crisis, Basingstoke: Palgrave, ix–ixxxii.Google Scholar

Cox, Robert W. (1980) ‘The Crisis of World Order and the Problem of International Organization’, International Journal, 35:2, 370–95.Google Scholar

Cox, Robert W. (1981) ‘Social Forces, States and World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium, 10:2, 126–55.Google Scholar

Cox, Robert W. (1986) ‘Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, in Keohane, Robert O. (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 204–54.Google Scholar

Cox, Robert W. (1987) Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Robert W. (1992a) ‘Multilateralism and World Order’, Review of International Studies, 18:2, 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Robert W. (1992b) ‘Towards a Post-Hegemonic Conceptualization of World Order: Reflections on the Relevancy of Ibn Khaldun’, in Rosenau, James and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto (eds.), Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 132–59.Google Scholar

Cox, Robert W. (1993) ‘Production and Security’, in Dewitt, David, Haglund, David and Kirton, John (eds.), Building a New Global Order: Emerging Trends in International Security, Toronto: Oxford University Press, 141–58.Google Scholar

Cox, Robert W. (2002) ‘Universality in International Studies’, in Harvey, Frank P. and Brecher, Michael (eds.), Critical Perspectives in International Studies, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 45–55.Google Scholar

Cox, Robert and Sinclair, Timothy J. (1996) Approaches to World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Wayne S. and Nossal, Kim Richard (2009) ‘The “Crimson World”: The Anglo Core, the Post-Imperial Non-Core, and the Hegemony of American IR’, in Tickner, Arlene B. and Wæver, Ole (eds.), International Relations Scholarship around the World, Abingdon: Routledge, 287–307.Google Scholar

Crawford, Robert M. A. (2001) ‘International Relations as an Academic Discipline: If It’s Good for America, Is It Good for the World?’, in Crawford, Robert A. and Jarvis, Darryl S. L. (eds.), International Relations – Still an American Social Science? Toward Diversity in International Thought, New York: State University of New York Press, 1–23.Google Scholar

Cui, Shunji and Buzan, Barry (2016) ‘Great Power Management in International Society’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 9:2, 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cumings, Bruce (1984) ‘The Origins and Development of the North East Asian Political Economy: Industrial Sectors, Product Cycles, and Political Consequences’, International Organization, 38:1, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curtin, Philip D. (2000) The World and the West: The European Challenge and the Overseas Response in the Age of Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalai Lama (2005) The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality, New York: Morgan Road Books.Google Scholar

Darby, Phillip (2004) ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’, Millennium, 33:1, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Datta-Ray, Deep K. (2015) The Making of Indian Diplomacy: A Critique of Eurocentrism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davenport, Andrew (2011) ‘Marxism in IR: Condemned to a Realist Fate?’, European Journal of International Relations, 19:1, 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Thomas (2013) NGOs: A New History of Transnational Civil Society, London: Hurst.Google Scholar

Deloffre, Maryam Zarnegar (2014) ‘Will AFRICOM’s Ebola Response Be Watershed Moment for International Action on Human Security?’, The Washington Post, 29 September.Google Scholar

Der Derian, James (2003) ‘The Question of Information Technology’, Millennium, 32:3, 441–56.Google Scholar

Deudney, Daniel H. (2007) Bounding Power, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Deudney, Daniel and Ikenberry, G. John (1999) ‘The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order’, Review of International Studies, 25:2, 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutsch, Karl W. (1961) ‘Security Communities’, in Rosenau, James (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy: A Reader in Research and Theory, New York: Free Press, 98–105.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Karl W. and Singer, J. David (1969) ‘Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability’, in Rosenau, James N. (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy: A Reader in Research and Theory, New York: Free Press, 315–24.Google Scholar

Devetak, Richard (1996a) ‘Critical Theory’, in Burchill, Scott and Linklater, Andrew (eds.), Theories of International Relations, New York: St Martin’s Press, 145–78.Google Scholar

Devetak, Richard (1996b) ‘Postmodernism’, in Burchill, Scott and Linklater, Andrew (eds.), Theories of International Relations, New York: St Martin’s Press, 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Wilde, Jaap (1991) Saved from Oblivion: Interdependence Theory in the First Half of the 20th Century – A Study on the Causality between War and Complex Interdependence, Aldershot, Hampshire: Dartmouth Publishing.Google Scholar

Dibb, Paul (1986) The Soviet Union: The Incomplete Superpower, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickinson, G. Lowes (1916) The European Anarchy, London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Dikötter, Frank (2011) Mao’s Great Famine, Kindle edn., London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Dikötter, Frank (2016) The Cultural Revolution: A People’s History, 1962–1976, New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif (1999) ‘Is There History after Eurocentrism? Globalism, Postcolonialism, and the Disavowal of History’, Cultural Critique, 42, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dominguez, Jorge I. (2007) ‘International Cooperation in Latin America: The Design of Regional Institutions by Slow Accretion’, in Acharya, Amitav and Johnston, Alastair Iain (eds.), Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 83–128.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack (1998) ‘Human Rights: A New Standard of Civilization?’, International Affairs, 74:1, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donnelly, Jack (2000) Realism and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dougherty, James E. and Pfalzgraff, Robert L., Jr. (1997) Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey, New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Douhet, Giulio ([1921] 1998) The Command of the Air, Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

Doyle, Michael (1986) ‘Liberalism and World Politics’, American Political Science Review, 80:4, 1151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreyer, June Teufel (2016) Middle Kingdom and Empire of the Rising Sun: Sino-Japanese Relations, Past and Present, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Drulák, Petr, Karlas, Jan and Königová, Lucie (2009) ‘Central and Eastern Europe: Between Continuity and Change’, in Tickner, Arlene B. and Wæver, Ole (eds.), International Relations Scholarship around the World, Abingdon: Routledge, 242–60.Google Scholar

Duara, Prasenjit (2003) Sovereignty and Authenticity: Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern, Kindle edn., Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Du Bois, W. E. B. ([1940] 1992) The Dusk of Dawn: An Essay toward an Autobiography, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Duffy, Charles A. and Feld, Werner J. (1980) ‘Whither Regional Integration Theory’, in Boyd, Gavin and Feld, Werner J. (eds.), Comparative Regional Systems: West and East Europe, North America, the Middle East, and Developing Countries, New York: Pergamon Press, 497–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, Kevin (2001) ‘Introduction: Africa and International Relations Theory’, in Dunn, Kevin and Shaw, Timothy (eds.), Africa’s Challenge to International Relations Theory, New York: Palgrave, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, Tim (1995) ‘The Social Construction of International Society’, European Journal of International Relations, 1:3, 367–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, Tim (1998) Inventing International Society: A History of the English School, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, Tim (2003) ‘Society and Hierarchy in International Relations’, International Relations, 17:3, 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, Tim and Reus-Smit, Christian (eds.) (2017) The Globalization of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, Tim and Wheeler, Nicholas J. (1999) Human Rights in Global Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, Tim, Hansen, Lene and Wight, Colin (2013) ‘The End of International Relations Theory?’, European Journal of International Relations, 19:3, 405–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagleton, Clyde (1932) International Government, New York: Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar

The Economist (2009) ‘Raúl Prebisch: Latin America’s Keynes’, 5 March, www.economist.com/node/13226316 (Accessed 27 May 2018).Google Scholar

Elam, J. Daniel (2017) ‘Anticolonialism’, Global South Studies: A Collective Publication with The Global South, https://globalsouthstudies.as.virginia.edu/key-concepts/anticolonialism (Accessed 18 May 2018).Google Scholar

Engelbrecht, H. C. and Hanighen, F. C. (1934) Merchants of Death: A Study of the International Armaments Industry, New York: Dodd, Mead and Company.Google Scholar

EU (2016) Syrian Refugees, http://syrianrefugees.eu (Accessed 7 October 2017).Google Scholar

EUISS (2012) Global Trends 2030 – Citizens in an Interconnected and Polycentric World, Paris: EUISS, http://espas.eu/orbis/sites/default/files/espas_files/about/espas_report_ii_01_en.pdf, (Accessed 27 May 2018).Google Scholar

Eun, Yong-Soo (2016) Pluralism and Engagement in the Discipline of International Relations, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eurostat (2017) ‘Gini Coefficient of Equivalised Disposable Income – EU-SILC Survey’, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=ilc_di12 (Accessed 4 October 2017).Google Scholar

Falkner, Robert (2016) ‘The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics’, International Affairs, 92:5, 1107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falkner, Robert and Buzan, Barry (2017) ‘The Emergence of Environmental Stewardship as a Primary Institution of Global International Society’, European Journal of International Relations, doi: 10.1177/1354066117741948.Google Scholar

Fanon, Frantz (1965) The Wretched of the Earth, New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

Farrell, Henry (2009) ‘What’s Wrong with International Political Economy’, The Monkey Cage, 4 March, http://themonkeycage.org/2009/03/whats_wrong_with_international/ (Accessed 27 May 2018).Google Scholar

Fearon, James and Wendt, Alexander (2002) ‘Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View’, in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage, 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenby, Jonathan (2013) The Penguin History of Modern China: The Fall and Rise of a Great Power 1850 to the Present, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Yale H. and Mansbach, Richard W. (2014) ‘Reflections on the “Third Debate”’, symposium, 20 March, www.isanet.org/Publications/ISQ/Posts/ID/312/Reflections-on-the-Third-Debate, (Accessed 27 May 2018).Google Scholar

Fierke, Karin M. (1999) ‘Dialogues of Manoeuvre and Entanglement: NATO, Russia and the CEECs’, Millennium, 28:1, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn (1999) ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, in Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O. and Krasner, Stephen D. (eds.), Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 247–77.Google Scholar

Flockhart, Trine (2016) ‘The Coming Multi-Order World’, Contemporary Security Policy, 37:1, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foot, Rosemary and Walter, Andrew (2011) China, the United States and Global Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Foreman-Peck, James (1982) A History of the World Economy: International Economic Relations since 1850, Brighton: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Frank, Andre Gunder (1966) ‘The Development of Underdevelopment’, Monthly Review, 18:4, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, Andre Gunder (1971) Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Frank, Andre Gunder and Gills, Barry K. (1992) ‘The Five Thousand Year Old World System: An Interdisciplinary Introduction’, Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 18:1, 1–79.Google Scholar

Fraser, C. Gerald (1989) ‘C. L. R. James, Historian, Critic and Pan-Africanist, Is Dead at 88’, New York Times, 2 June, www.nytimes.com/1989/06/02/obituaries/c-l-r-james-historian-critic-and-pan-africanist-is-dead-at-88.html (Accessed 27 May 2018).Google Scholar

Frasson-Quenoz, Florent (2015) ‘Latin American Thinking in International Relations Reloaded’, Oasis, 23, 53–75.Google Scholar

Friedman, Edward (2000) ‘Immanuel Kant’s Relevance to an Enduring Asia-Pacific Peace’, in Friedman, Edward and McCormick, Barrett L. (eds.), What If China Doesn’t Democratize? Implications for War and Peace, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 224–58.Google Scholar

Friedrichs, Jörg (2004) European Approaches to International Relations Theory: A House with Many Mansions, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedrichs, Jörg and Wæver, Ole (2009) ‘Western Europe: Structure and Strategy at the National and Regional Levels’, in Tickner, Arlene B. and Wæver, Ole (eds.), International Relations Scholarship around the World, Abingdon: Routledge, 261–86.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis (1992) The End of History and the Last Man, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Fukuzawa, Yukichi ([1875] 2009) Bunmeiron no Gairyaku (An Outline of a Theory of Civilization), translated by David A. Dilworth and G. Cameron Hurst III, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Fuller, J. F. C. (1945) Armament and History: The Influence of Armament on History from the Dawn of Classical Warfare to the End of the Second World War, New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar

Funtecha, Henry F. (2008) ‘Rizal as a Political Scientist’, 14 August, http://knightsofrizal.org/?p=354 (Accessed 27 May 2018).Google Scholar

Gaddis, John Lewis (1986) ‘The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in the Post-War International System’, International Security, 10:4, 99–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaddis, John Lewis (1992/3) ‘International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War’, International Security, 17:3, 5–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galtung, Johan (1971) ‘A Structural Theory of Structural Imperialism’, Journal of Peace Research, 8:2, 81–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganguli, Birendranath (1965) Dadabhai Naoroji and the Drain Theory, New York: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar

Gao, Bai (2013) ‘From Maritime Asia to Continental Asia: China’s Responses to the Challenge of the Trans-Pacific Partnership’, 22 pp., https://fsi.fsi.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/evnts/media/Gao.TPP_paper.pdf (Accessed 18 October 2017).Google Scholar

Garver, John W. (2016) China’s Quest: The History of the Foreign Relations of the People’s Republic of China, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gautam, Pradeep Kumar (2015) ‘Kautilya’s Arthasastra: Contemporary Issues and Comparison’, IDSA Monograph Series no. 47, New Delhi: Institute of Defence Studies and Analysis.Google Scholar

Geis, Anna (2013) ‘The “Concert of Democracies”: Why Some States Are More Equal than Others’, International Politics, 50:2, 257–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, Stephen (1991) American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gill, Stephen and Law, David (eds.) (1988) The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilpin, Robert (1975) US Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment, New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilpin, Robert (1981) War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilpin, Robert (1987) The Political Economy of International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilpin, Robert (2001) Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleditsch, Nils Petter (1992) ‘Democracy and Peace’, Journal of Peace Research, 29:4, 369–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Global Governance (2014) ‘Principles from the Periphery: The Neglected Southern Sources of Global Norms’, Global Governance, special section, 20:3, 359–417.Google Scholar

Goebel, Michael (2015) Anti-Imperial Metropolis: Interwar Paris and the Seeds of Third World Nationalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gong, Gerrit W. (1984) The Standard of ‘Civilisation’ in International Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Gong, Gerrit W. (2002) ‘Standards of Civilization Today’, in Mozaffari, Mehdi (ed.), Globalization and Civilizations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gordon, Lincoln (1961) ‘Economic Regionalism Reconsidered’, World Politics, 13:2, 231–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goto-Jones, Christopher S. (2005) Political Philosophy in Japan: Nishida, The Kyoto School and Co-Prosperity, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Grant, A. J. (1916) ‘War and Peace since 1815’, in Grant, A. J., Greenwood, Arthur, Hughes, J. D. I., Kerr, P. H. and Urquhart (eds.), F. F., An Introduction to International Relations, London: Macmillan, 1–36.Google Scholar

Grant, A. J., Greenwood, Arthur, Hughes, J. D. I., Kerr, P. H. and Urquhart, F. F. (1916) An Introduction to International Relations, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S. (2012) War, Peace and International Relations: An Introduction to Strategic History, 2nd edn., Kindle edn., London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gray, Jack (2002) Rebellions and Revolutions: China from the 1800s to 2000, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Arthur (1916) ‘International Economic Relations’, in Grant, A. J., Greenwood, Arthur, Hughes, J. D. I., Kerr, P. H. and Urquhart (eds.), F. F., An Introduction to International Relations, London: Macmillan, 66–112.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Ted, Feiverson, Harold A. and Taylor, Theodore B. (1977) Nuclear Proliferation: Motivations, Capabilities and Strategies for Control, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Grieco, Joseph M. (1993) ‘Understanding the Problem of International Cooperation: The Limits of Neoliberal Institutionalism and the Future of Realist Theory’, in Baldwin, David (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, 301–38.Google Scholar

Grovogui, Siba N. (2013) ‘Postcolonialism’, in Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve (eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 247–65.Google Scholar

Grunberg, Isabelle (1990) ‘Exploring the Myth of Hegemonic Stability’, International Organization, 44:4, 431–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guardian Datablog (2012) Developing Economies to Eclipse West by 2060, OECD Forecasts, www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/datablog/2012/nov/09/developing-economies-overtake-west-2050-oecd-forecasts (Accessed 27 May 2018).Google Scholar

Guha, Ranajit (1982) Subaltern Studies: Writings on South Asian History and Society, vol. 1, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Guimarães, Samuel Pinheiro (2005) Cinco Siglod de Periferia, Buenos Aires: Prometeo.Google Scholar

Gusterson, Hugh (1999) ‘Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination’, Cultural Anthropology, 14:1, 111–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guzzini, Stefano (ed.) (2013) The Return of Geopolitics in Europe?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haas, Ernst B. (1964) Beyond the Nation State, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Haas, Ernst B. (1973) ‘The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joys and Anguish of Pretheorising’, in Falk, Richard A. and Mendlovitz, Saul H. (eds.), Regional Politics and World Order, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 103–31.Google Scholar

Haas, Ernst B. (1975) The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory, Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar

Haas, Michael (1995) ‘When Democracies Fight One Another, Just What Is the Punishment for Disobeying the Law?’, paper presented at the 91st annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August, Chicago.Google Scholar

Haas, Michael (2016) International Relations Theory: Competing Empirical Paradigms, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Hacke, Christian and Puglierin, Jana (2007) ‘John H. Herz: Balancing Utopia and Reality’, International Relations, 21:3, 367–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagmann, Jonas and Biersteker, Thomas J. (2014) ‘Beyond the Published Discipline: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of International Studies’, European Journal of International Relations, 20:2, 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagström, Linus (2015) ‘The “Abnormal” State: Identity, Norm/Exception and Japan’, European Journal of International Relations, 21:1, 122–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, Fred (1999) Revolutions and World Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, Lene and Nissenbaum, Helen (2009) ‘Digital Disaster, Cyber Security, and the Copenhagen School’, International Studies Quarterly, 53:4, 1155–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, Roger D. (1969) ‘Regional Integration: Reflections on a Decade of Theoretical Efforts’, World Politics, 21:2, 242–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harootunian, H. D. (2002) ‘Postcoloniality’s Unconscious/Area Studies’ Desire’, in Miyaoshi, Masao and Harootunian, H. D. (eds.), Learning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 150–74.Google Scholar

Hashmi, Sohail H. (2009) ‘Islam, the Middle East and the Pan-Islamic Movement’, in Buzan, Barry and Gonzalez-Pelaez, Ana (eds.), International Society and the Middle East, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 170–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heatley, David P. (1919) Diplomacy and the Study of International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Heeren, A. H. L. (1834) A Manual of the History of the Political System of Europe and Its Colonies, From Its Formation at the Close of the Fifteenth Century, to Its Re-establishment upon the Fall of Napoleon, Oxford: D. A. Talboys.Google Scholar

Held, David, McGrew, Anthony, Goldblatt, David and Perraton, Jonathan (1999) Global Transformations, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Helleiner, Eric (2014) ‘Southern Pioneers of International Development’, Global Governance, 20:3, 375–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helleiner, Eric (2017) ‘The Latin American Origins of Bretton Woods’, in Margulis, Matias E. (ed.), The Global Political Economy of Raúl Prebisch, New York: Routledge, 78–94.Google Scholar

Helleiner, Eric and Rosales, Antulio (2017) ‘Toward Global IPE: The Overlooked Significance of the Haya-Mariátegui Debate’, International Studies Review, 19:4, 667–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hemmer, Christopher and Katzenstein, Peter J. (2002) ‘Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism’, International Organization, 56:3, 575–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, Errol (2013) ‘Hidden in Plain Sight: Racism in International Relations Theory’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 26:1, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgott, Richard and Stubbs, Richard (1995) ‘Competing Conceptions of Economic Regionalism: APEC versus EAEC in the Asia Pacific’, Review of International Political Economy, 2:3, 516–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgott, Richard and Watson, Matthew (2007) ‘All at Sea in a Barbed Wire Canoe: Professor Cohen’s Transatlantic Voyage in IPE’, Review of International Political Economy, 15:1, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirst, Paul and Thompson, Grahame (1996) Globalisation in Question, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hobden, Stephen and Wyn Jones, Richard (2008) ‘Marxist Theories of International Relations’, in Baylis, John, Smith, Steve and Owens, Patricia (eds.), Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, 4th edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 142–59.Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A. (1902) Imperialism: A Study, New York: James Pott & Co.Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A. (1915) Towards International Government, London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Hobson, John M. (2004) The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobson, John M. (2010) ‘Back to the Future of Nineteenth Century Western International Thought?’, in Lawson, George, Armbruster, Chris and Cox, Michael (eds.), The Global 1989, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobson, John M. (2012) The Eurocentric Origins of International Relations: Western International Theory, 1760–2010, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hodges, Michael (1978) ‘Integration Theory’, in Taylor, Trevor (ed.), Approaches and Theory in International Relations, London: Longman, 237–56.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Stanley (1977) ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’, Daedalus, 106:3, 41–60.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Stanley (1991) ‘Watch Out for a New World Disorder’, International Herald Tribune, 26 February.Google Scholar

Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Holsti, Kalevi J. (1985) The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Relations Theory, Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Holsti, Kalevi J. (2001) ‘Along the Road to International Theory in the Next Millennium: Four Travelogues’, in Crawford, Robert A. and Jarvis, Darryl S. L. (eds.), International Relations – Still an American Social Science? Toward Diversity in International Thought, New York: State University of New York Press, 73–99.Google Scholar

Holsti, Kalevi J. (2004) Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holsti, Ole R. (2014) ‘Present at the Creation’, address at the annual meeting of ISA/West, Pasadena, CA, September 27, www.isanet.org/Portals/0/Documents/Institutional/Holsti_ISA_West.pdf (Accessed 27 May 2018).Google Scholar

Homer-Dixon, Thomas, Walker, Brian, Biggs, Reinette, Crépin, Anne-Sophie, Folke, Carl, Lambin, Eric F., Peterson, Garry D., Rockström, Johan, Scheffer, Marten, Steffen, Will and Troell, Max (2015) ‘Synchronous Failure: The Emerging Causal Architecture of Global Crisis’, Ecology and Society, 20:3, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopf, Ted (1998) ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, 23:1, 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, Michael (1981) War and the Liberal Conscience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Howland, Douglas (2016) International Law and Japanese Sovereignty, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hosoya, Yuichi (2009) ‘Kokusaiseijishi no keifugaku – sengo Nihon no Ayumi wo chushin ni’ [On the genealogy of International Political History: Postwar Japan’s path and before), in Nihon Kokusai Seiji Gakkai [Japan Association of International Relations] ed., Rekishi no nakano kokusaiseiji [Historical Approaches to International Politics], Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar

Hula, Erich (1942) Pan-Americanism: Its Utopian and Realistic Elements, Washington, DC: American Council on Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P. (1991) ‘America’s Changing Strategic Interests’, Survival, 33:1, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P. (1999) ‘The Lonely Superpower’, Foreign Affairs, 78:2, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurrell, Andrew (2007) On Global Order: Power, Values and the Constitution of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurrell, Andrew and Woods, Ngaire (1995) ‘Globalization and Inequality’, Millennium, 24:3, 447–70.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John (2009) ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics, 7:1, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John (2011) Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John and Mastanduno, Michael (2003) ‘Conclusion: Images of Order in the Asia-Pacific and the Role of the United States’, in Ikenberry, G. John and Mastanduno, Michael (eds.), International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, New York: Columbia University Press, 421–39.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2006) Forging a World of Liberty under Law: US National Security in the 21st Century, Princeton: Princeton Project Papers, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs.Google Scholar

Inoguchi, Takashi (2007) ‘Are There Any Theories of International Relations in Japan?’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7:3, 369–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inoguchi, Takashi (2009) ‘Japan, Korea, and Taiwan: Are One Hundred Flowers about to Blossom?’, in Tickner, Arlene B. and Wæver, Ole (eds.), International Relations Scholarship around the World, Abingdon: Routledge, 86–102.Google Scholar

Inter-Agency Network on Women and Gender Equality (1999) ‘Final Communiqué, Women’s Empowerment in the Context of Human Security’, 7–8 December, ESCAP, Bangkok, Thailand, www.un.org/womenwatch/ianwge/collaboration/finalcomm1999.htm (Accessed 2 June 2018).Google Scholar

International Institute for Strategic Studies (1971) The Military Balance, vol. 71, London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar

IOM (International Organization for Migration) (2014) Afghanistan Migration Profile, https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/mp_afghanistan_0.pdf (Accessed 7 October 2017).Google Scholar

IOM (International Organization for Migration) (2015) Global Migration Flows, www.iom.int/world-migration (Accessed 7 October 2017).Google Scholar

IOM (2017) Global Migration Trends 2015 Factsheet, http://publications.iom.int/system/files/global_migration_trends_2015_factsheet.pdf (Accessed 7 October 2017).Google Scholar

Ireland, Alleyne (1899) Tropical Colonization: An Introduction to the Study of the Subject, New York: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar

Jackson, Gregory and Deeg, Richard (2006) ‘How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analyses of Capitalist Diversity’, Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Discussion Paper 06/2, 48 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2010) The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics, Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2014) ‘The “Third Debate” 25 Years Later’, symposium, 20 March, www.isanet.org/Publications/ISQ/Posts/ID/297/The-Third-Debate-25-Years-Later [Unpaginated essay] (Accessed 27 May 2018).Google Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H. (2013) ‘International Theory in a Post-Paradigmatic Era: From Substantive Wagers to Scientific Ontologies’, European Journal of International Relations, 19:3, 543–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Robert H. (1990) ‘Martin Wight, International Theory and the Good Life’, Millennium, 19:2, 261–72.Google Scholar

Jackson, Robert H. (2000) The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

James, C. L. R. (1933) The Case for West-Indian Self Government, London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar

James, C. L. R. ([1937] 2017) World Revolution, 1917–1936: The Rise and Fall of the Communist International, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, C. L. R. ([1938] 1989) The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution, 2nd edn., New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Jansen, Jan C. and Osterhammel, Jürgen (2017) Decolonization: A Short History, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Jansen, Marius B. (2000) The Making of Modern Japan, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert (1994) ‘Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and Scientific Study of International Politics’, Social Research, 61:4, 853–76.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert (1999) ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’, International Security, 24:1, 42–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joas, Hans (2003) War and Modernity, translated by Rodney Livingstone, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Job, Brian L. (ed.) (1991) The (In)security Dilemma: National Security of Third World States, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Johnston, Alastair Iain (1998) Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Johnston, Alastair Iain (2012) ‘What (If Anything) Does East Asia Tell Us about International Relations Theory?’, Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joll, James (1982) ‘The Ideal and the Real: Changing Concepts of the International System, 1815–1982’, International Affairs, 58:2, 210–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jomini, Antoine-Henri ([1838] 1854) The Art of War, translated by Major O. F. Winship and Lieut. E. E. McLean, New York: G. P. Putnam.Google Scholar

Kacowicz, Arie M. (2005) The Impact of Norms in International Society: The Latin American Experience, 1881–2001, Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar

Kacowicz, Arie M. (2009) ‘Israel: The Development of a Discipline in a Unique Setting’, in Tickner, Arlene B. and Wæver, Ole (eds.), International Relations Scholarship around the World, Abingdon: Routledge, 191–207.Google Scholar

Kahler, Miles (1993) ‘International Relations: An American Social Science or an International One’, in Miller, Linda B. and Smith, Michael Joseph (eds.), Ideas and Ideals: Essays on Politics in Honor of Stanley Hoffmann, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 395–414.Google Scholar

Kahler, Miles (1997) ‘Inventing International Relations: International Relations after 1945’, in Doyle, Michael W. and Ikenberry, G. John (eds.), New Thinking in International Relations Theory, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 20–53.Google Scholar

Kang, David C. (2003) ‘Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks’, International Security, 27:4, 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, David C. (2005) ‘Hierarchy in Asian International Relations: 1300–1900’, Asian Security, 11:1, 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, Yuwei ([1935] 1958) Da Tong Shu/Ta T’ung Shu (The Great Harmony), translated by Laurence G. Thompson, London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Morton A. (1966) ‘The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations’, World Politics, 19:1, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kapoor, Ilan (2002) ‘Capitalism, Culture, Agency: Dependency versus Postcolonial Theory’, Third World Quarterly, 23:4, 647–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kapstein, Ethan B. and Mastanduno, Michael (eds.) (1999) Unipolar Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Karim, Azhari (2007) ‘ASEAN: Association to Community: Constructed in the Image of Malaysia’s Global Diplomacy’, in Baginda, Abdul Razak (ed.), Malaysia’s Foreign Policy: Continuity and Change, Singapore: Marshall Cavendish, 109–32.Google Scholar

Karl, Rebecca (1998) ‘Creating Asia: China in the World at the Beginning of Twentieth Century’, The American Historical Review, 103:4, 1096–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. (2010) ‘A World of Plural and Pluralist Civilizations: Multiple Actors, Traditions and Practices’, in Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.), Civilizations in World Politics, London: Routledge, 1–40.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. (2012) ‘Many Wests and Polymorphic Globalism’, in Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.), Anglo-America and Its Discontents: Civilizational Identities beyond West and East, London and New York: Routledge, 207–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O. and Krasner, Stephen D. (eds.) (1999) Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kaushik, Ashok (ed.) (2007) Srimad Bhagavad Gita, English translation by Janak Datta, 7th edn., New Delhi: Star Publications.Google Scholar

Kawata, Tadashi and Ninomiya, Saburo (1964) ‘The Development of the Study of International Relations in Japan’, The Developing Economies, 2:2, 190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kayaoğlu, Turan (2010a) Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, Ottoman Empire and China, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kayaoğlu, Turan (2010b) ‘Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory’, International Studies Review, 12:2, 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kedourie, Eli (2018) ‘Jamāl al-Dı̄n al-Afghānı̄’, Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2 March, www.britannica.com/biography/Jamal-al-Din-al-Afghani (Accessed 27 May 2018).Google Scholar

Keeley, James F. (1990) ‘Toward a Foucauldian Analysis of Regimes’, International Organization, 44:1, 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keene, Edward (2002) Beyond the Anarchical Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keenleyside, T. A. (1982) ‘Nationalist Indian Attitudes towards Asia: A Troublesome Legacy for Post-Independence Indian Foreign Policy’, Pacific Affairs, 55:2, 210–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keith, A. Berriedale (1924) The Constitution, Administration and Laws of the Empire, London: W. Collins Sons & Co.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Dane (1996) ‘Imperial History and Post-Colonial Theory’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 24:3, 345–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. (1989) International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. and Martin, Lisa L. (1995) ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’, International Security, 19:1, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S. (1977) Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S. (2000) ‘Globalization: What’s New? What’s Not? (And So What)’, Foreign Policy, 118, 104–19.Google Scholar

Kerr, P. H. (1916) ‘Political Relations between Advanced and Backward Peoples’, in Grant, A. J., Greenwood, Arthur, Hughes, J. D. I., Kerr, P. H. and Urquhart, F. F., An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, London: Macmillan, 141–82.Google Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles P. (1973) The World in Depression, 1929–39, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O. and Verba, Sidney (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kissinger, Henry (2011) On China, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Knutsen, Torbjørn (2016) A History of International Relations Theory, 3rd edn., Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Kohli, Atul (2004) State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kokubun, Ryosei, Soeya, Yoshihide, Takahara, Akio and Kawashima, Shin (2017) Japan–China Relations in the Modern Era, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti (2001) The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Köstem, Seçkin (2015) ‘International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book’, All Azimuth, 4:1, 59–66.Google Scholar

Koyama, Hitomi and Buzan, Barry (2018) ‘Rethinking Japan in Mainstream International Relations’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, lcy013, doi: 10.1093/irap/lcy013, 25 May, 1–28 (Accessed 27 June 2018).Google Scholar

Kramer, Martin (1993) ‘Arab Nationalism: Mistaken Identity’, Daedalus, 122:3, 171–206.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen (1976) ‘State Power and the Structure of International Trade’, World Politics, 28:3, 317–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krippendorff, Ekkehart (1989) ‘The Dominance of American Approaches in International Relations’, in Dyer, Hugh C. and Mangasarian, Leon (eds.), The Study of International Relations: The State of the Art, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krishna, Sankaran (1993) ‘The Importance of Being Ironic: A Postcolonial View on Critical International Relations Theory’, Alternatives, 18:3, 385–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kristensen, Peter Marcus (2015) ‘Revisiting the “American Social Science” – Mapping the Geography of International Relations’, International Studies Perspectives, 16:3, 246–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kristensen, Peter Marcus (2018) ‘International Relations at the End: A Sociological Autopsy’, International Studies Quarterly, sqy002, doi: 10.1093/isq/sqy002, 3 May, 1–10 (Accessed 27 June 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuga, Katsunan ([1893] 1968) Gensei oyobi Kokusa Ron (On the International), in Kuga Katsunan Zenshu (Collected Complete works of Kuga Katsunan), Tokyo: Misuzu Shobo, 123–81.Google Scholar

Kupchan, Charles A. (2012) No One’s World: The West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuru, Deniz (2016) ‘Historicising Eurocentrism and anti-Eurocentrism in IR: A Revisionist Account of Disciplinary Self-Reflexivity’, Review of International Studies, 42:2, 351–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuru, Deniz (2017) ‘Who F(o)unded IR: American Philanthropists and the Discipline of International Relations in Europe’, International Relations, 31:1, 42–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuryla, Peter (2016) ‘Pan-Africanism’, Encyclopaedia Britannica, www.britannica.com/topic/Pan-Africanism (Accessed 30 March 2018).Google Scholar

LadwigIII, Walter C. (2009) ‘Delhi’s Pacific Ambition: Naval Power, “Look East”, and India’s Emerging Influence in the Asia-Pacific’, Asian Security, 55:2, 87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lake, David A. (2008) ‘International Political Economy: A Maturing Interdiscipline’, in Wittman, Donald A. and Weingast, Barry R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 757–77.Google Scholar

Lake, David A. (2011) ‘Why “Isms” are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress’, International Studies Quarterly, 55:2, 465–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lapid, Yosef (1989) ‘The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-positivist Era’, International Studies Quarterly, 33:3, 235–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, T. J. (1919) The Society of Nations: Its Past, Present, and Possible Future, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lawson, George (2012) ‘The Eternal Divide? History and International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 18:2, 203–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawson, George and Hobson, John M. (2008) ‘What Is History in International Relations?’, Millennium, 37:2, 415–35.Google Scholar

Layne, Christopher (1993) ‘The Unipolar Illusion: Why Other Great Powers Will Rise’, International Security, 17:4, 5–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Layne, Christopher (2006) ‘The Unipolar Illusion Revisited: The Coming End of the United States’ Unipolar Moment’, International Security, 31:2, 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

League of Arab States (1955) The Report of the Arab League on the Bandung Conference, Cairo: League of the Arab States.Google Scholar

Lebedeva, Marina M. (2004) ‘International Relations Studies in the USSR/Russia: Is There a Russian National School of IR Studies?’, Global Society, 18:3, 263–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich ([1916] 1975) Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism, Peking: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar

Leonard, Thomas (2000) ‘The New Pan Americanism in US–Central American Relations, 1933–1954’, in Sheinin, David (ed.), Beyond the Ideal: Pan Americanism in International Affairs, Westport, CT: Praeger, 95–114.Google Scholar

Levy, Jack S. (1989) ‘The Causes of Wars: A Review of Theories and Evidence’, in Tetlock, Philip E., Husbands, Jo L., Jervis, Robert, Stern, Paul C. and Tilly, Charles (eds.), Behavior, Society and Nuclear War, vol. 1, New York: Oxford University Press, 209–333.Google Scholar

Liddell Hart, Basil (1946) The Revolution in Warfare, London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Lindberg, Leon N. and Scheingold, Stuart A. (1971) Regional Integration: Theory and Research, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ling, L. H. M. (2002) Postcolonial International Relations: Conquest and Desire between Asia and the West, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Ling, L. H. M. (2010) ‘Journeys beyond the West: World Orders and a 7th-Century, Buddhist Monk’, Review of International Studies, 36:S1, 225–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linklater, Andrew (1996) ‘The Achievements of Critical Theory’, in Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 279–98.Google Scholar

Linklater, Andrew (2001) ‘Marxism’, in Burchill, Scott, Devetak, Richard, Linklater, Andrew, Paterson, Matthew, Reus-Smit, Christian and True, Jacqui, Theories of International Relations, 2nd edn., Basingstoke: Palgrave, 129–54.Google Scholar

Little, Richard (2008) ‘The Expansion of the International Society in Heeren’s Account of the European States-System’, SPAIS Working Paper no. 07–08, University of Bristol, 20 pp.Google Scholar

Little, Richard and Smith, Mike (1980) Perspectives on World Politics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lobell, Steven E., Ripsman, Norrin M. and Taliaferro, Jeffrey W. (eds.) (2009) Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lockey, Joseph Byrne (1920) Pan-Americanism: Its Beginnings, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Long, David (1995) ‘Conclusion: Inter-War Idealism, Liberal Internationalism, and Contemporary International Theory’, in Long, David and Wilson, Peter (eds.), Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed, Oxford: Clarendon, 302–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, David (2006) ‘Who Killed the International Studies Conference?’, Review of International Studies, 32:4, 603–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar