Barbé, Esther and Herranz Surralés, Anna, ‘The Power and Practice of the European Parliament in Security Policies’, in Peters, Dirk, Wagner, Wolfgang and Deitelhoff, Nicole (eds.), The Parliamentary Control of European Security Policy (Oslo: ARENA, 2008), 77–107.Google Scholar

Berman, Ayelet and Wessel, Ramses A., ‘The International Legal Form and Status of Informal International Lawmaking Bodies: Consequences for Accountability’, in Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A. and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blokker, Niels, ‘Proliferation of International Organizations: An Exploratory Introduction’, in Blokker, Niels and Schermers, Henry (eds.), Proliferation of International Organizations: Legal Issues (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogdandy, Armin von, Dann, Philipp and Goldmann, Matthias, ‘Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities’, in von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp and Goldmann, Matthias (eds.), The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions: Advancing International Institutional Law (Heidelberg: Springer, 2010), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bovens, Mark, ‘Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework’, European Law Journal 13 (2007), 447–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bovens, Mark, ‘Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism’, West European Politics 33 (2010), 946–67.Google Scholar

Bovens, Mark, Curtin, Deirdre and ‘t Hart, Paul, ‘Studying the Real World of EU Accountability: Framework and Design’, in Bovens, Mark, Curtin, Deirdre and ‘t Hart, Paul (eds.), The Real World of EU Accountability (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), 31–62.Google Scholar

Bovens, Mark, Schillemans, Thomas and Goodin, Robert E., ‘Public Accountability’, in Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert E. and Schillemans, Thomas (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 1–20.Google Scholar

Busuioc, Madalina E. and Lodge, Martin, ‘The Reputational Basis of Public Accountability’, Governance 29 (2015), 247–63.Google Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre, ‘Holding (Quasi-)Autonomous EU Administrative Actors to Public Account’, European Law Journal 13 (2007), 523–41.Google Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre, Papadopolous, Yannis and Peter, Mair, ‘Positioning Accountability in European Governance: An Introduction’, West European Politics 33 (2010), 929–45.Google Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre and Nollkaemper, André, ‘Conceptualizing Accountability in International and European Law’, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 36 (2005), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dann, Philipp, ‘Accountability in Development Aid Law: The World Bank, UNDP and Emerging Structures of Transnational Oversight’, Archiv Des Völkerrechts 44 (2006), 381–404.Google Scholar

Daugirdas, Kristina, ‘Reputation and the Responsibility of International Organizations’, European Journal of International Law 25 (2015), 991–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dekker, Ige F., ‘Making Sense of Accountability in International Institutional Law’, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 36 (2005), 83–118.Google Scholar

Dyrberg, Peter, ‘Accountability and Legitimacy: What is the Contribution of Transparency’, in Arnull, Anthony and Wincott, Daniel (eds.), Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 81–96.Google Scholar

Farrall, Jeremy M., ‘Rule of Accountability or Rule of Law? Regulating the UN Security Council’s Accountability Deficits’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law 19 (2014), 389–408.Google Scholar

Fastenrath, Ulrich and Weigelt, Katja, ‘Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), VII: 1040–55.Google Scholar

Fisher, Elizabeth, ‘The European Union in the Age of Accountability’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (2004), 495–515.Google Scholar

Grant, Ruth W. and Keohane, Robert O., ‘Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’, American Political Science Review 99 (2005), 29–43.Google Scholar

Harlow, Carol, ‘Accountability and Constitutional Law’, in Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert E. and Schillemans, Thomas (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 195–210.Google Scholar

Harlow, Carol, Accountability in the European Union (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Henderson, Christian, ‘Authority without Accountability? The UN Security Council’s Authorization Method and Institutional Mechanisms of Accountability’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law 19 (2014), 489–509.Google Scholar

Huff, Ariella, ‘Problems and Patterns in Parliamentary Scrutiny of the CFSP and CSDP’, OPAL Online Paper Series 14 (2013), 1–28.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., ‘Accountability in World Politics’, Scandinavian Political Studies 29 (2006), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., ‘Global Governance and Democratic Accountability’, Miliband Lecture at the London School of Economics and Political Science, 17 May 2002.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Steward, Richard B., ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (2005), 15–61.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Institutional Ambivalence by Design: Soft Organizations in International Law’, Nordic Journal of International Law 70 (2001), 403–21.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew, ‘Why the European Union Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation’, Working Paper 52, in CES Working Paper Series (Harvard University: Centre for European Studies, 1994), 1–78.Google Scholar

Moser, Carolyn, EU Civilian Crisis Management – Law and Practice of Accountability (Utrecht: Utrecht University, 2018)Google Scholar

Mulgan, Richard, ‘“Accountability”: An Ever-Expanding Concept?’, Public Administration 78 (2000), 555–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina, ‘Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: Lessons Learned’, Study Report 4/2011, Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD), 2011.Google Scholar

Nothelle, Andreas, ‘The Parliamentary Assembly: Driving Reform’, in University of Hamburg, Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2006 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2007), 347–73.Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S., Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: PublicAffairs, 2004).Google Scholar

Papadopolous, Yannis, ‘Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multilevel Governance’, European Law Journal 13 (2007), 469–86.Google Scholar

Patil, Shefali V., Vieider, Ferdinand and Tetlock, Philip E., ‘Process versus Outcome Accountability’, in Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert E. and Schillemans, Thomas (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 69–89.Google Scholar

Reinisch, August, ‘Securing the Accountability of International Organizations’, Global Governance 7 (2001), 131–49.Google Scholar

Rosén, Guri, ‘EU Confidential: The European Parliament’s Involvement in EU Security and Defence Policy’, Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (2015), 383–98.Google Scholar

Rosenau, James N., ‘Change, Complexity, and Governance in Globalizing Space’, in Pierre, Jon (ed.), Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 167–200.Google Scholar

Rosenau, James N., ‘Governance in the Twenty-First Century’, Global Governance 1 (1995), 13–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schedler, Andreas, ‘Conceptualizing Accountability’, in Schedler, Andreas, Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F. (eds.), The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999), 13–28.Google Scholar

Tan, Celine, ‘Mandating Rights and Limiting Mission Creep: Holding the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund Accountable for Human Rights Violations’, Human Rights and International Legal Discourse 2 (2008), 79–116.Google Scholar

Thompson, Dennis F., ‘Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands’, American Political Science Review 74 (1980), 905–16.Google Scholar

Tichy, Helmut and Köhler, Ulrike, ‘Legal Personality or Not – The Recent Attempts to Improve the Status of the OSCE’, in Buffard, Isabelle, Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Wittich, Stephan (eds.), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), 455–78.Google Scholar

Whitman, Richard G., ‘Norms, Power and Europe: A New Agenda for Study of the EU and International Relations’, in Whitman, Richard G. (ed.), Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives (Houndsmills, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 1–22.Google Scholar

Wincott, Daniel, ‘The Governance White Paper, the Commission and the Search for Legitimacy’, in Arnull, Anthony and Wincott, Daniel (eds.), Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 379–98.Google Scholar

Zyl, Albert van, ‘How Civil Society Organizations Close the Gap between Transparency and Accountability’, Governance 27 (2014), 347–56.Google Scholar