Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:00:18.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - The notion of investment in recent practice

from PART III - The changing landscape of investment arbitration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Rudolf Dolzer
Affiliation:
Director Institute for International Law University of Bonn Germany
Steve Charnovitz
Affiliation:
George Washington University, Washington DC
Debra P. Steger
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Peter Van den Bossche
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Building bridges: a profile of Justice Feliciano

In several respects, Justice Feliciano's personality and career embody at the highest level what it may mean in our contemporary world ‘to live greatly in the law’. After the Marrakesh Agreement had successfully strengthened the rule of law in international trade law through the establishment of a formalized dispute settlement mechanism, Justice Feliciano was chosen to be one of the first members of the Appellate Body. This choice was far from self-evident, in as much as Justice Feliciano not only came from the developing world and had the confidence of colleagues and governments from the developing world, but moreover, had no special experience in matters of international trade law. And as the new WTO was a first step towards institution-building for a globalized economy, the experiment of introducing a global rule of law for the trade sector depended, to a large extent, on the success in the initial period of the new dispute settlement system charged with the application and interpretation of new and old rules. Today, ten years after Marrakesh, the WTO dispute settlement system is often considered the most successful effort in the globalizing world to establish the rule of law, all the problems in detail notwithstanding. From 1995 to 2001, Justice Feliciano was a member of the Appellate Body, serving as its Chair from 2000 to 2001.

Remarkably enough, Justice Feliciano's experience in international economic law is not limited to trade law.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law in the Service of Human Dignity
Essays in Honour of Florentino Feliciano
, pp. 261 - 275
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×