Abeler, Johannes, Falk, Armin, Goette, Lorenz and Huffman, David 2011. “Reference Points and Effort Provision,” American Economic Review 101:470–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcock, John 2009. Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach. 9th edn. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Alterman, Rachelle 2010. Takings International: A Comparative Perspective on Land Use Regulations and Compensation Rights. Chicago: American Bar Association Publishing.Google Scholar

Arieli, Dan and Simonson, Itamar 2003. “Buying, Bidding, Playing, or Competing? Value Assessment and Decision Dynamics in Online Auctions,” Journal of Consumer Psychology 13:113–23.Google Scholar

Baron, Jonathan and Ritov, Ilana 1994. “Reference Points and Omission Bias,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59:475–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barros, D. Benjamin 2006. “Home as a Legal Concept,” Santa Clara Law Review 46:255–306.Google Scholar

Beggan, James K. 1992. “On the Social Nature of Nonsocial Perception: The Mere Ownership Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62:229–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belk, Russell W. 1988. “Possessions and the Extended Self,” Journal of Consumer Research 15:139–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumenthal, Jeremy A. 2007. “Emotional Paternalism,” Florida State University Law Review 35:1–72.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, Jeremy A. 2009. “‘To Be Human:’ A Psychological Perspective on Property Law,” Tulane Law Review 83:609–44.Google Scholar

Bradbury, Jack W. and Vehrencamp, Sandra L. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Brenner, Lyle, Rottenstreich, Yuval, Sood, Sanjay and Bilgin, Baler 2007. “On the Psychology of Loss Aversion: Possession, Valence, and Reversals of the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Consumer Research 34:369–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byun, Sang-Eun and Sternquist, Brenda 2008. “The Antecedents of In-Store Hoarding: Measurement and Application in the Fast Fashion Retail Environment,” The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 18:133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byun, Sang-Eun and Sternquist, Brenda 2012. “Here Today, Gone Tomorrow: Consumer Reactions to Perceived Limited Availability,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 20:223–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, Colin 1995. “Individual Decision Making,” in Kagel, John H. and Roth, Alvin E. (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press, pp. 587–703.Google Scholar

Camerer, Colin, Babcock, Linda, Loewenstein, George and Thaler, Richard 1997. “Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a Time,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112:407–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, David and Knetsch, Jack L. 1992. “Judicial Choice and Disparities between Measures of Economic Values,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 30:737–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly and Rochberg-Halton, Eugene 1981. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobbs, Dan B. 2000. The Law of Torts. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 1989. “Bringing Culture and Human Frailty to Rational Actors: A Critique of Classical Law and Economics,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 65:23–56.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1979. “Possession as the Root of Title,” Georgia Law Review 13:1221–43.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1998. “Possession,” in Newman, Peter (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and The Law, vol. 3. New York: Stockton Press. pp. 62–68.Google Scholar

Feldman, Yuval, Schurr, Amos and Teichman, Doron 2013. “Reference Points and Contractual Choices: An Experimental Examination,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10:512–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fennell, Lee Anne 2003. “Death, Taxes, and Cognition,” North Carolina Law Review 81:567–652.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton R. 1997. Friedman on Leases. 4th edn. New York: Practicing Law Institute.Google Scholar

Galin, Amira, Gross, Miron, Kela-Egozi, Irit and Sapir, Sigal 2006. “The Endowment Effect on Academic Chores Trade-Off (ACTO),” Theory and Decision 60:335–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godsil, Rachel D. 2004. “Viewing the Cathedral from Behind the Color Line: Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Environmental Racism,” Emory Law Journal 53:1807–85.Google Scholar

Hammack, Judd and Brown, Gardner M. Jr. 1974. Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bioeconomic Analysis. Washington DC: RFF Press.Google Scholar

Heyman, James E., Orhun, Yesim and Ariely, Dan 2004. “Auction Fever: The Effect of Opponents and Quasi-Endowment on Product Valuations,” Journal of Interactive Marketing 18:7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, Elizabeth and Spitzer, Matthew 1993. “Willingness to Pay vs. Willingness to Accept: Legal and Economic Implications,” Washington University Law Review 71:59–114.Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell 1881. The Common Law. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Isoni, Andrea, Loomes, Graham and Sugden, Robert 2011. “The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap, the ‘Endowment Effect’, Subject misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Comment,” American Economic Review 101:991–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jolls, Christine and Sunstein, Cass R. 2006. “Debiasing Through Law,” Journal of Legal Studies 35:199–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel 1992. “Reference Points, Anchors, Norms, and Mixed Feelings,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51:296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L. and Thaler, Richard H. 1986. “Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics,” in Reder, Robin M. and Hogarth, Melvin R. (eds.), Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology. University of Chicago Press, pp. 101–16.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L. and Thaler, Richard H. 1990. “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem,” Journal of Political Economy 98:1325–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L. and Thaler, Richard H. 1991. “The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5:193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L. and Thaler, Richard H. 2008. “The Endowment Effect: Evidence of Losses Valued More than Gains,” in Plott, Charles R. and Smith, Vernon L. (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, vol. 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland publishing, pp. 939–55.Google Scholar

Keeton, W. Page, Dobbs, Dan B., Keeton, Robert E. and Owen, David G. 1984. Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts. 5th edn. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Kelly, James J. Jr. 2006. “‘We Shall Not Be Moved’: Urban Communities, Eminent Domain and the Socioeconomics of Just Compensation,” St. John's L. Rev. 80:923–90.Google Scholar

Knetsch, Jack L. and Sinden, J. A. 1984. “Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99:507–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knetsch, Jack L. and Wong, Wei-Kang 2009. “The Endowment Effect and the Reference State: Evidence and Manipulations,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 71:407–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korobkin, Russell B. 1998. “The Status Quo Bias and Contract Default Rules,” Cornell Law Review 83:608–87.Google Scholar

Korobkin, Russell B. 2003. “The Endowment Effect and Legal Analysis,” Northwestern University Law Review 97:1227–93.Google Scholar

Lemley, Mark A. 2005. “Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding,” Texas Law Review 83:1031–76.Google Scholar

Lewinsohn-Zamir, Daphna 1996. “Compensation for Injuries to Land Caused by Planning Authorities: Towards a Comprehensive Theory,” University of Toronto Law Journal 46:47–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewinsohn-Zamir, Daphna 2001. “Contemporary Property Law Scholarship: A Comment,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 2:97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewinsohn-Zamir, Daphna 2003. “The Objectivity of Well-Being and the Objectives of Property Law,” New York University Law Review 78:1669–1754.Google Scholar

Marzilli Ericson, Keith M. and Fuster, Andreas 2011. “Expectations as Endowments: Evidence on Reference-Dependent Preferences from Exchange and Valuation Experiments,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126:1879–1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 1985. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Adverse Possession,” Northwestern University Law Review 79:1122–54.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 2005. The Kelo Decision: Investigating Takings of Homes and Other Private Property: Hearing Before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. 109^th Congress 122 (testimony of Merrill, Thomas W., Professor, Columbia University Law School).Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I. 1967. “Property, Utility and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of ‘Just Compensation’ Law,” Harvard Law Review 80:1165–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morewedge, Carey K., Shu, Linda L, Gilbert, Daniel T. and Wilson, Timothy D. 2009. “Bad Riddance or Good Rubbish? Ownership and not Loss Aversion Causes the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45:947–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nadler, Janice, and Seidman Diamond, Shari 2008. “Eminent Domain and the Psychology of Property Rights: Proposed Use, Subjective Attachment, and Taker Identity,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 5:713–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ortona, Guido and Scacciati, Francesco 1992. “New Experiments on the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Economic Psychology 13:277–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peck, Joann and Shu, Suzanne B. 2009. “The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership,” Journal of Consumer Research 36:434–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peck, Joann, Barger, Victor A. and Webb, Andrea 2013. “In Search of a Surrogate for Touch: The Effect of Haptic Imagery on Perceived Ownership,” Journal of Consumer Psychology 23:189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierce, Jon L., Kostova, Tatiana and Dirks, Kurt T. 2003. “The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research,” Review of General Psychology 7:84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plott, Charles R. and Zeiler, Kathryn 2005. “The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap, the ‘Endowment Effect’, Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations,” American Economic Review 95:530–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plott, Charles R., and Zeiler, Kathryn 2007. “Exchange Asymmetries Incorrectly Interpreted as Evidence of Endowment Effect Theory and Prospect Theory?,” American Economic Review 97:1449–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 2011. Economic Analysis of Law. 8th edn. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

Reb, Jochen and Connolly, Terry 2007. “Possession, Feelings of Ownership and the Endowment Effect,” Judgment and Decision Making 2:107–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reich, Charles 1964. “The New Property,” Yale Law Journal 73:733–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritov, Ilana and Baron, Jonathan 1990. “Reluctance to Vaccinate: Omission Bias and Ambiguity,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 3:263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritov, Ilana and Baron, Jonathan 1992. “Status-Quo and Omission Biases,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5:49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 1985. “Possession as the Origin of Property,” University of Chicago Law Review 52:73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 2000. “Left Brain, Right Brain and History in the New Law and Economics of Property,” Oregon Law Review 79:417–92.Google Scholar

Schoshinski, Robert S. 1980. American Law of Landlord and Tenant. Rochester: The Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Sen, Sankar and Johnson, Eric J. 1997. “Mere-Possession Effects without Possession in Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research. 24:105–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Serkin, Christopher 2009. “Existing Uses and the Limits of Land Use Regulations,” New York University Law Review 84:1222–91.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Scott and McClennen, Edward F. 1998. “Law-and-Economics from a Philosophical Perspective,” in Newman, Peter (ed.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, vol. 2, New York: Macmillan Reference Limited, pp. 460–65.Google Scholar

Shavell, Steven 2004. Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shu, Suzzane B. and Peck, Joann 2011. “Psychological Ownership and Affective Reaction: Emotional Attachment Process Variables and the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Consumer Psychology 21:439–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stake, Jeffrey E. 2001. “The Uneasy Case for Adverse Possession,” Georgetown Law Journal 89:2419–74.Google Scholar

Sterk, Stewart E. 1987. “Neighbors in American Land Law,” Columbia Law Review 87:55–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, Stephanie M. 2009. “Residential Protectionism and the Legal Mythology of Home,” Michigan Law Review 107:1093–1144.Google Scholar

Stern, Stephanie M. 2010. “The Inviolate Home: Housing Exceptionalism in the Fourth Amendment,” Cornell Law Review 95:905–56.Google Scholar

Stern, Stephanie M. 2011. “Reassessing the Citizen Virtues of Homeownership,” Columbia Law Review 111:890–938.Google Scholar

Strahilevitz, Michal A. and Loewenstein, George 1998. “The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects,” Journal of Consumer Research 25:276–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. 2002. “Switching the Default Rule,” New York University Law Review 77:106–34.Google Scholar

Tom, Gail, Lopez, Stephanie and Demir, Kivilcim 2006. “A Comparison of the Effect of Retail Purchase and Direct Marketing on the Endowment Effect,” Psychology and Marketing 23:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Dijk, Eric and van Knippenberg, Daan 1996. “Buying and Selling Exchange Goods: Loss Aversion and the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Economic Psychology 17:517–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Dijk, Eric and van Knippenberg, Daan 1998. “Trading Wine: On the Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and the Comparability of Consumer Goods,” Journal of Economic Psychology 19:485–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolf, James R., Arkes, Hal R. and Muhanna, Waleed A. 2008. “The Power of Touch: An Examination of the Effect of Duration of Physical Contact on the Valuation of Objects,” Judgment and Decision Making 3:476–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zamir, Eyal 2012. “Loss Aversion and the Law,” Vanderbilt Law Review 65:829–94.Google Scholar