Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:01:17.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9.1 - Public administration: an alternative view

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Bjørn Lomborg
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Chapter 9 by Susan Rose-Ackerman is a tour de force. It contains a comprehensive survey of the literature and a careful description of the main challenges for institutional reform in Latin America. Since the chapter is so comprehensive, it is almost impossible to focus on something that was not already mentioned in it and to prepare an alternative view highlighting the chapter's weaknesses.

An easy but, in my view, unfair way to criticize the chapter would be to say that the discussion of solutions to the challenge is short and lacks a detailed CBA. This would be unfair because the challenge that Rose-Ackerman was faced with was almost mission impossible. In fact, I can think of five types of challenges for a project like that of the Copenhagen Consensus. (1) There are challenges for which we know the solution and for which we also know how to estimate their costs and benefits (think about preventing the spread of a disease for which there is a known vaccine). (2) There are also challenges for which we do not know the exact solution but for which we have an idea of what may work well and, if we knew the solution, it would be easy to estimate its costs and the benefits (think about preventing the spread of a disease for which we still do not have a vaccine).

Type
Chapter
Information
Latin American Development Priorities
Costs and Benefits
, pp. 591 - 620
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, and Robinson, James, 2001. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91: 1369–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azfar, Omar, Kahkonen, Satu, and Meagher, Patrick, 2001. “Conditions for Effective Decentralized Governance: A Synthesis of Research Findings.” University of Maryland, mimeo
Besley, Timothy and Burgess, Robin, 2002. “The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 1415–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunetti, Aymo and Weder, Beatrice, 2003. “A Free Press is Bad News for Corruption.” Journal of Public Economics 87: 1801–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delpla, Jacques and Wyplosz, Charles, 2007. La fin des privilèges. Paris: HachetteGoogle Scholar
Di Tella, Rafael and Schargrodsky, Ernesto, 2003. “The Role of Wages and Auditing During a Crackdown on Corruption in the City of Buenos Aires.” Journal of Law and Economics 46: 269–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, Raymond and Gatti, Roberta, 2002. “Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence across Countries.” Journal of Public Economics 83: 325–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausmann, Ricardo, Rodrik, Dani, and Velasco, Andres, 2005. “Growth Diagnostics.” Harvard University, mimeo
,Inter-American Development Bank, 2005. The Politics of Policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel, Kraay, Aart, and Mastruzzi, Massimo, 2006. “Governance Matters V: Governance Indicators for 1996–2005.” World Bank, mimeo
Kaufman, Daniel, Kraay, Aart, and Zoido-Lobatón, Pablo, 1999. “Governance Matters.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2196
Landsburg, Steven, 1995. The Armchair Economist. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Nupia, Oskar, 2005. “Decentralization, Corruption, and Political Accountability in Developing Countries.” Universitiat Pompeu Fabra, mimeo
Ordoñez, Guillermo, 2001. “Let the Mouse Hunt the Cat: A Way to Evade Evasion Corrupting Corruption.” UCLA, mimeo
Panizza, Ugo, 1999. “On the Determinants of Fiscal Centralization: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Public Economics 74: 97–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panizza, Ugo 2000. “The Public Sector Premium and the Gender Gap in Latin America: Evidence from the 1980s and 1990s.” IDB Research Department, Working Paper 431
Panizza, Ugo 2001a. “Public Sector Wages and Bureaucratic Quality: Evidence from Latin America.” Economia 2: 97–151Google Scholar
Panizza, Ugo 2001b. “Electoral Rules, Political Systems and Institutional Quality.” Economics and Politics 13: 311–42Google Scholar
Panizza, Ugo 2002. “The Strange Case of the Public Sector Premium.” Public Finance and Management 2: 334–5Google Scholar
Panizza, Ugo 2007. “Comment on ‘Judicial Reform in Developing Economies: Opportunities and Constraints,’ by M. Stephenson, and ‘Transforming Judicial Systems in Europe and Central Asia,’ by J. Andersen and C. Gray.” Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Europe. Washington, DC: World BankGoogle Scholar
Panizza, Ugo and Qiang, Christine Zhen-Wei, 2005. “Public–Private Wage Differential and Gender Gap in Latin America: Spoiled Bureaucrat and Exploited Women?Journal of Socio-Economics 34: 810–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Tabellini, Guido, and Trebbi, Francesco, 2003. “Electoral Rules and Corruption.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 958–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, James and Evans, Peter, 2000. “Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries.” Journal of Public Economics 75: 49–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanatini, Francesca, Prati, Alessandro, and Tabellini, Guido, 2005. “Why are some Public Agencies Less Corrupt than Others? Lessons for Institutional Reform from Survey Data.” International Monetary Fund, mimeo
Seddon-Wallack, Jessica, Gaviria, Alejandro, Panizza, Ugo, and Stein, Ernesto, 2003. “Political Particularism Around the World.” World Bank Economic Review 17: 133–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzi, Vito, 1996. “Fiscal Federalism and Efficiency: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects.” In Bruno, M. and Pleskovic, B., eds., Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics. Washington, DC: World BankGoogle Scholar
Tiebout, Charles, 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulchin, Joseph and Selee, Andrew, 2004. Decentralization and Democratic Governance in Latin America. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson CenterGoogle Scholar
,UNCTAD, 2006. Trade and Development Report. Geneva: UNCTADGoogle Scholar
Rijckeghem, Caroline and Weder, Beatrice, 2001. “Bureaucratic Corruption and the Rate of Temptation: Do Wages in the Civil Service Affect Corruption and By How Much?”Journal of Development Economics 65: 307–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×