Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:41:51.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2009

Edited by
Timothy Shopen
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Language Typology and Syntactic Description , pp. 382 - 410
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbi, Anvitaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSemantic Universals in Indian Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalShimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.Google Scholar
Abbott, Miriam. 1991. Macushi. In Desmond, C. Derbyshire and Geoffrey, K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. iiiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton, 23–160.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Farrell, and Gert, Webelhuthseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1998separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Theory of Predicatesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Adams, Karen L. 1989separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSystems of Numeral Classification in the Mon-Khmer, Nicobarese and Aslian subfamilies of Austroasiatic. Pacific Linguistics Series. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Adams, V. 1973separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAn Introduction to Modern English Word-Formationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon: Longmans.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1990separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSovremennyj Ivrit (Modern Hebrew). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalClassifiers in Tarianaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAnthropological Linguistics 36, 407–65.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1998. Warekena. In Derbyshire, D. C. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. ivseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 215–439.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999aseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTariana Texts and Cultural Context. Lincom Europa Languages of the World / Materials 7. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999bseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSerial verb constructions and verb compounding: evidence from Tariana (North Arawak)separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudies in Language 23, 479–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999c. Double marking of syntactic function in Tariana. In Rakhilina, E. V. and Testelets, Y. G. (eds.), Typology and Linguistic Theory. From Description to Explanationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMoscow: Languages of Russian Culture, 114–22.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999d. The Arawak language family. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, A. Y. (eds.), The Amazonian Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 65–105.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalClassifiers: A Typology of Noun Classification Devicesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Tarianaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. Unpublished msseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNoun phrase structure in Paumari: an interaction of gender and noun classseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAustralian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., and Diana, Greenseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1998separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPalikur and the typology of classifiersseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAnthropological Linguistics 40, 429–80.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., and Robert, M. W. Dixonseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1998separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDependencies between grammatical systemsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 74, 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algeo, J. 1977separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBlends, a structural and systemic viewseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmerican Speech 82, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Keithseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1977separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalClassifiersseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 53, 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpher, Barryseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalFeminine as the unmarked grammatical gender: buffalo girls are no foolsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAustralian Journal of Linguistics 7, 169–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsina, Alexseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1999separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalWhere's the Mirror Principle?Linguistic Review 16, first person–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsina, Alex, Joan, Bresnan, and Peter, Sells (eds.). 1997separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalComplex Predicatesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Ambrazas, V., P. Bernadišienė, and Z. Dumašiūtė. 1971separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLietuviu̧ kalbos gramatika, vol. ii: Morfologijaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalVilnius: Mintis.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. L. 1989separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalComaltepec Chinantec Syntax. Studies in Chinantec Languages 3. Dallas and Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen-C., and Comrie, B. (eds.). 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTense and Aspect in Eight Languages of Cameroon. Publications in Linguistics 99. Dallas and Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen-R. 1985a. Typological distinctions in word formation. In Timothy, Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. iii: Grammatical Categories and the Lexiconseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–56.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen-R. 1985b. Inflectional morphology. In Timothy, Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. iii: Grammatical Categories and the Lexiconseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 150–201.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen-R. 1990. Sapir's approach to typology and current issues in morphology. In Dressler, W. U., Luschützky, H. C., Pfeiffer, O. E., and Remison, J. R. (eds.), Contemporary Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 277–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen-R. 1992separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA-morphous Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, Haruoseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1970separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNez Perce Grammar. University of California Publications in Linguistics 62. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press. Reprinted 1973.Google Scholar
Aoki, Haruo. 1994. Symbolism in Nez Perce. In Hinton, L., Nichols, J., and Ohala, J. J. (eds.), Sound Symbolismseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15–22.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalWord Formation in Generative Grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1992a. Stems in Latin verbal morphology. In Aronoff, M. (ed.), Morphology Nowseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAlbany: State University of New York Press, 5–32.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1992b. Noun classes in Arapesh. In Geert, Booij and Jaap, Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDordrecht: Kluwer, 21–32.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMorphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 22. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1998. Gender agreement as morphology. In Geert, Booij, Angela, Ralli, and Sergio, Scalise (eds.), Proceedings of the First Mediterranean Conference of Morphology (Mytilene, Greece, Sept. 19–21 1997)separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPatras: University of Patras, 7–18.Google Scholar
Ashby, William, John, W. DuBois, and Lorraine, Kumpf (eds.). In pressseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPreferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Functionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Aske, Jonseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1989separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPath predicates in English and Spanish: a closer lookseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalProceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, first person–14.Google Scholar
Askedal, John O. 1973separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNeutrum Plural mit persönlichem Bezug im Deutschen: unter Berücksichtigung des germanischen Ursprungs. Germanistische Schriftenreihe der norwegischen Universitäten und Hochschulen 4. Trondheim: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Augustine, separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1960separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Confessions of St Augustine. Trans. and intro. John, K. Ryanseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGarden City: Image (Doubleday).Google Scholar
Austin, Peterseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1981separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Diyari, South Australiaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. 1991. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Booij, G. and Marle, J. (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDordrecht: Foris Publications, 109–49.Google Scholar
Baker, Markseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1985separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistic Inquiry 16, 373–415.Google Scholar
Baker, Markseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1988separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalIncorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changingseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalChicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Markseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Polysynthesis Parameterseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peterseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1997separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Language of Our Own: The Genesis of Michif, the Mixed Cree–French Language of the Canadian Métis. Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 10. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter, and Robert Papen. 1997. Michif: a mixed language based on Cree and French. In Sarah, G. Thomason (ed.), Contact Languages: A Wider Perspectiveseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 295–364.Google Scholar
Baltaxe, Christiane A. M. 1978separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalFoundations of Distinctive Feature Theoryseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBaltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Bani, Ephraimseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGarka a ipika: masculine and feminine grammatical gender in Kala Lagaw Yaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAustralian Journal of Linguistics 7, 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Janet 1984separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalEvidentials in the Tuyuca verbseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalInternational Journal of American Linguistics 50, 255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Janet 1990. Classifiers in Tuyuca. In Doris, L. Payne (ed.), Amazonian Linguistics: Studies in Lowland South American Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAustin: University of Texas Press, 273–92.Google Scholar
Baskakov, N. A. 1963separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNogajsko-russkij slovar'. Moscow: Gosudarstvenn izdatel'stvo inostrannyx i nacional'nyx slovarej.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalEnglish Word-formationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1988separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalIntroducing Linguistic Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalEdinburgh: EdinburghUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1991. Scalar productivity and -lily adverbs. In Booij, G. and Marle, J. (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDordrecht: Foris Publications, 185–91.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1996separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNo phonetic iconicity in evaluative morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudia Linguistica 50, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1997. Derivational paradigms. In Booij, G. and Marle, J. (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1997separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDordrecht: Kluwer, 243–56.Google Scholar
Bauer, Winifred (with William, Parker and Te, Kareongawai Evans). 1993separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMaoriseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, Robert. 1976separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOnce more on the analysis of -ed-adjectivesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalJournal of Linguistics 12, 155–7.Google Scholar
Beard, Robert. 1998. Derivation. In Spencer, A. and Zwicky, A. M. (eds.), The Handbook of Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Blackwell, 44–65.Google Scholar
Bearth, Thomasseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1971separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalL'énoncé Toura (Côte d'Ivoire)separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNorman: Sunner Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Becker, A. L. 1975separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA linguistic image of nature: the Burmese numerative classifier systemseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics 165, 109–21.Google Scholar
Bello, A. 1972separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los Americanosseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCaracas: Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
Bennett, Michael, and Barbara, Parteeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1972separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalToward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in Englishseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBloomington, IN: Indiana Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1959. Les Relations de temps dans le verbe français. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 54, 237–50. Reprinted 1971, as The correlation of tense in the French verb. In Problems in General Linguistics. Trans. Meek, Mary Elizabethseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCoral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press, 205–15.Google Scholar
Berlin, B. 1994. Evidence for pervasive synesthetic sound symbolism in ethnozoological nomenclature. In Hinton, L., Nichols, J., and Ohala, J. J. (eds.), Sound Symbolismseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 76–93.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. 1976. On derived and deriving nominals in modern Hebrew. In Cole, P. (ed.), Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics: The Transformational–Generative Approach. North-Holland Linguistic Series 32. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 57–98.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. 1978separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalModern Hebrew Structureseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTel Aviv: University Publishing Projects.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A., and Dan, Slobinseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalRelating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Studyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalIn the vestibule of meaning: transitivity inversion as a morphological phenomenonseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudies in Language 19, 73–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 1999. Indexability effects in Himalayan languages. Paper presented at the 4th Meeting of the European Project on Himalayan Languages, Heidelberg, June 1998, and at the Workshop on Himalayan languages, Santa Barbara, June 1999.
Bickel, Balthasarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2000aseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOn the syntax of agreement in Tibeto-Burmanseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudies in Language 24, 583–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2000bseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPerson and evidence in Himalayan languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23, first person–12.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2001. Die Kategorie der Person in den Sprachen der Welt. Handout of talk given at the University of Zurich, 11 May 2001.
Bickel, Balthasarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2002. Belhare. In Graham, Thurgood and Randy, J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon: Curzon Press, 546–70.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Walter, Bisang, and Yogendra, P. Yadavaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1999separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalFace vs. empathy: the social foundations of Maithili verb agreementseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics 37, 481–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, and Johanna Nichols. 2001. Syntactic ergativity in light verb complements. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Bidot, Emileseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1925separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLa clef du genre des substantifs français. (Méthode dispensant d'avoir recours au dictionnaire.) Poitiers: Imprimerie nouvelle.Google Scholar
Biggs, Bruceseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1969separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLet's Learn Maoriseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalWellington, New Zealand: Reed.Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert L. 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTime and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspectseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York and Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walterseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1993separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalClassifiers, quantifiers and class nouns in Hmongseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudies in Language 17, first person–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCaseseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Bloomfield, L. 1933separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguageseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz, and Deloria, Ella C.separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1941separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDakota Grammar. Memoirs of the National Academy of Science 23.2. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. 1950separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalRime, assonance, and morpheme analysisseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalWord 6, 117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. 1974separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOne subjunctive or two?Hispania 57, 462–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1988. On the morphological parallelism between compounds and constructs. In Booij, G. and Marle, J. (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1988separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDordrecht: Foris Publications, 45–65.Google Scholar
Borrego, J., and Asencio, J. G.separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalEl subjuntivo: valores y usosseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMadrid: Sociedad General Española de librería.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa. 1981. Beyond communicative adequacy: from piecemeal knowledge to an integrated system in the child's acquisition of language. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 20.
Branch, Michael. 1987. Finnish. In Bernard, Comrie (ed.), The World's Major Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon and Sydney: Croom Helm, 593–617.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Sam, A. Mchomboseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTopic, pronoun, and agreement in Chichewaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 63, 741–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Sam, A. Mchomboseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Lexical Integrity Principle: evidence from Bantuseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNatural Language and Linguistic Theory 13, 181–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, Sylvia M. 1964separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Southern Sierra Miwok Languageseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstanseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1998separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDefining ‘subgender’: virile and devirilised nouns in Polishseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLingua 104, 187–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Leslie P. 1984separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Alamblak Language of Papua New Guinea East Sepik. Pacific Linguistics Series C81. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Bruce, Leslie P. 1988separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSerialization: from syntax to lexiconseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudies in Language 12, 19–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, W. 1936separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe preterite and the perfect tenses in present-day Englishseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalJournal of English and Germanic Philology 35, 363–82.Google Scholar
Buechel, Eugeneseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1939separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Lakotaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSaint Francis SD: Rosebud Educational Society.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1980. What's a possible inflectional category? Unpublished paper.
Bybee, Joanseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1985separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMorphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Formseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, and Östen, Dahlseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1989separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the worldseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudies in Language 13, 51–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, and Suzanne, Fleischmanseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalModality in Grammar and Discourse. Typological Studies in Language 32. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere, Perkins, and William, Pagliucaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the Worldseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalChicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cannon, Garlandseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBlends in English word formationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics 24, 725–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1991. Inflection classes: two questions with one answer. In Frans, Plank (ed.), Paradigms: The Economy of Inflectionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 213–53.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrewseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1992separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCurrent Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrewseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalInflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrastseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 70, 737–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallaceseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1970separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMeaning and the Structure of Languageseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalChicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallaceseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1980. Consequential verbs in the Northern Iroquoian languages and elsewhere. In Kathryn, Klar, Margaret, Langdon, and Shirley, Silver (eds.), American Indian and Indoeuropean Studies: Papers in Honor of Madison S. Beelerseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Hague, New York: Mouton, 43–9.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1997. Florescence as a force in grammaticalization. Paper presented at Symposium on Grammaticalization in the Americas. Rice University. April 1997.
Chafe, Wallace, and Johanna, Nichols (eds.). 1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalEvidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Advances in Discourse Processes 20. Norwood, NJ:Ablex.Google Scholar
Chapman, Shirley, and Desmond C. Derbyshire. 1991. Paumarí. In Desmond, C. Derbyshire and Geoffrey, K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. iiiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 161–352.Google Scholar
Chini, Marinaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1993separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAspetti teorico-descrittivi e tipologici della categoria del genere grammaticaleseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLingua e Stile 28, 455–86.Google Scholar
Chini, Marinaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGenere grammaticale e acquisizione: aspetti della morfologia nominale in italiano L2separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMilan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja, and Melissa, Bowermanseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLearning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patternsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCognition 41, 83–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, R. (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalWaltham, MA; Ginn, 184–221.Google Scholar
Cohn, Dorritseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1978separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTransparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fictionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPrinceton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernardseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1976aseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAspectseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernardseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1976bseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe syntax of action nominalizations: a cross-language studyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLingua 40, 177–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernardseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1981aseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage Universals and Linguistic Typologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernardseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1981bseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOn Reichenbach's approach to tenseseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalProceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 24–30.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernardseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1985separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTenseseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernardseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1986aseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTense in indirect speechseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalFolia Linguistica 20, 265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1986b. Conditionals: a typology. In Elizabeth, C. Traugott, Meeulen, A., Reilly, J. S., and Ferguson, C. A. (eds.), On Conditionalsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–99.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, and Maria, Polinsky. 1998. Gender in a historical perspective: radial categories meet language change. In Carol, F. Justus and Edgar, C. Polomé (eds.), Language Change and Typological Variation: In Honor of Winfred P. Lehmann on the Occasion of His 83rd Birthday, vol. ii: Grammatical Universals and Typology. Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph 31. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man, 566–89.Google Scholar
Cook, Eung- , and Wilhelm, A.separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1998separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNoun incorporation. New evidence from Athapascanseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudies in Language 22, 49–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1982separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGender in Russian: an account of gender specification and its relationship to declensionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalRussian Linguistics 6, 197–232.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGenderseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2000a. Four inflectional phenomena and the notion ‘possible lexical item’. Paper presented at Northwest Slavic Linguistics Conference. Berkeley. March 2000.
Corbett, Greville G. 2000bseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNumberseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2003. Types of typology, illustrated from gender systems. In Frans, Plank (ed.), Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 289–334.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2006separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAgreementseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G., and Norman M. Fraser. 2000. Default genders. In Barbara, Unterbeck, Matti, Rissanen, Terttu, Nevalainen, and Mirja, Saari (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 55–97.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G., and Marianne, Mithunseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1996separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAssociative forms in a typology of number systems: evidence from Yup'ikseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalJournal of Linguistics 32, first person–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G., and Alfred, D. Mtenjeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGender agreement in Chichewaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudies in African Linguistics 18, first person–38.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. (ed.). 1986 Direct and Indirect Speech. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 31. Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette G. 1977separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Structure of Jacaltecseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAustin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Colette G. 1994. Classifer languages. In Asher, R. E and Simpson, J. M. Y. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. iiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Pergamon, 565–9.Google Scholar
Craig, Colette G. 1986. Noun Classes and Categorization: Proceedings of a Symposium on Categorization and Noun Classification, Eugene, Oregon, October 1983. Typological Studies in Language 7. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTypology and Universalsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crowhurst, Megan J. 1989separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalUm-infixation and prefixation in Toba Batakseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 74, 590–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Terry, T. 1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSerial verbs in Paameseseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudies in Language 11, 35–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Terry, T. 1992separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAn Introduction to Historical Linguistics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy Jowanseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2002separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalConjunct/disjunct marking in Awa Pitseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics 40, 611–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1984. Temporal distance: remoteness distinctions in tense, and aspect systems. In Brian, Butterworth, Bernard, Comrie, and Östen, Dahl (eds.), Explanations for Language Universalsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton, 105–22.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östenseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1985separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTense and Aspect Systemsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2000. Animacy and the notion of semantic gender. In Barbara, Unterbeck, Matti, Rissanen, Terttu, Nevalainen, and Mirja, Saari (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 99–115.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Amy L. 1986. Plains Cree morphosyntax. person (in chapter 1)h.D. dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
Daniel, Michael. 2000. Nouns vs. adverbs: Bagvalal evidence for part-of-speech typology. Paper presented at First Chicago Conference on Caucasia. May 1999.
Davies, Johnseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1981separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalKobonseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Davis, John. 1973. A partial grammar of simplex and complex sentences in Luiseño. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
De Reuse, W. J. 1994. Noun incorporation. In Asher, R. E. and Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. ixseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Pergamom Press, 2842–7.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaatseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTense in English: Its Structure and Use in Discourseseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scottseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1981separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAn interpretation of split ergativity and related patternsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 57, 626–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scottseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1990separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalErgativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetanseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCognitive Linguistics first person, 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scottseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1992separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burmanseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalActa Linguistica Hafniensia 25, 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scottseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1996separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe bipartite stem belt: disentangling areal and genetic correspondencesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalProceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Historical Issues in Native American Languages, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scottseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1999separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLexical prefixes and the bipartite stem construction in Klamathseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalInternational Journal of American Linguistics 65, 56–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dench, Alan, and Nicholas, Evansseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1988separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMultiple case-marking in Australian languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAustralian Journal of Linguistics 8, first person–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dench, Alan Charlesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMartuthunira: A Language of the Pilbara Region of Western Australia. Pacific Linguistics Series C125. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C., and Doris L. Payne. 1990. Noun classification systems of Amazonian languages. In Doris, L. Payne (ed.), Amazonian Linguistics: Studies in Lowland South American Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAustin: University of Texas Press, 243–71.Google Scholar
Di, Sciullo, Anne-Marie, , and Edwin, Williamsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOn the Definition of Wordseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Díaz-Valenzuela, O. 1942separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Spanish Subjunctiveseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPhiladelphia: David McKay.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Connieseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2000separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMirativity in Tsafikiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudies in Language 24, 379–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Dyirbal Language of North Queenslandseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1977separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Yidiɲseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1980separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Languages of Australiaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1982separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalWhere Have All the Adjectives Gone? and Other Essays in Semantics and Syntaxseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1988separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Boumaa Fijianseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalChicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalErgativityseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalFusional development of gender marking in Jarawara possessed nounsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalInternational Review of American Linguistics 61, 263–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon R. M. W. and A. Y. Aikhenvald. 1997. A typology of argument-determined constructions. In Haiman, J., Bybee, J., and Thompson, S. (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Typeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 71–113.Google Scholar
Dixon R. M. W. and A. Y. Aikhenvald. 2002. Word: a typological framework. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, A. Y. (eds.), Word: A Cross-linguistic Typologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–41.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W., and Vogel, A.separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalReduplication in Jarawaraseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguages of the World 10, 24–31.Google Scholar
Douglas, W. H. 1981. Watjarri. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Barry, J. Blake (eds.), Handbook of Australian Languages, vol. iiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: Benjamins, 197–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalWord Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and Montague's PTQ. Synthese Language Library 7. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThematic proto-roles and argument selectionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 67, 547–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1987. Word formation as a part of natural morphology. In Dressler, W. U.Mayerthaler, W., Panagl, O., and Wurzel, W. U. (eds.), Leitmotifs in Natural Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U., and Merlini, L. Barbaresiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMorphopragmatics: Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German, and Other Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1989separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPlural wordsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics 27, 865–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2000. A comparison of preverbs in Kutenai and Algonquian. In David, Pentland (ed.), Proceedings of the 29th Algonquian Conferenceseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalWinnipeg: University of Manitoba Press. 63–94.Google Scholar
Dunn, Michael. 1999. A grammar of Chukchi. person (in chapter 2)h. D. thesis. Australian National University.
DuPonceau, Peter S. 1819separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalReport of the Historical and Literary Committeeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTransactions of the American Philosophical Society first person, ⅹⅶ–ⅹⅼⅵ.Google Scholar
Durie, Mark. 1995. Towards a typology of verb serialization. Seminar paper presented at Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts. Australian National University. March 1995.
Durie, Mark. 1997. Grammatical structures in verb serialization. In Alsina, A., Bresnan, J., and Sells, P. (eds.), Complex Predicatesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStanford: CSLI, 289–354.Google Scholar
Eliot, C. N. E. 1890separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Finnish Grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Ephratt, M. 1997separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe psycholinguistic status of the root in Modern Hebrewseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalFolia Linguistica 31, 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, Olofseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1979separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalScandinavian gender agreement revisitedseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalJournal of Linguistics 15, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, Urs. 1991. Temps et aspect kak. In Anderson, S. C. and Comrie, B. (eds.), Tense and Aspect in Eight Languages of Cameroon. Publication in Linguistics 99. Dallas and Artington: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Artington, 17–45.Google Scholar
Ettinger, S. 1974separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDiminutiv- und Augmentativebildung: Regeln und Restriktionenseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 54separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTübingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar
Evans, D. Simonseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1970separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Middle Welshseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDublin: Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1991. A draft grammar of Mayali. Ms. University of Melbourne.
Evans, Nicholasseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe problem of body parts and noun class membership in Australian languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalUniversity of Melbourne Working Papers in Linguistics 14, first person–8.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholasseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995aseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Kayardild: With Historical–comparative notes on Tangkic. Mouton Grammar Library 15. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1995b. Current issues in the phonology of Australian languages. In John, A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theoryseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon: Blackwell, 723–61.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1996. The syntax and semantics of body part incorporation in Mayali. In Chappell, H. and McGregor, W. (eds.), The Grammar of Inalienability: A Typological Perspective on Body Part Terms and the Part–whole Relationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 65–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1997. Head classes and agreement classes in the Mayali dialect chain. In Mark, Harvey and Nicholas, Reid (eds.), Nominal Classification in Aboriginal Australia. Studies in Language Companion Series 37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 105–46.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholasseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1999separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalWhy argument affixes in polysynthetic languages are not pronouns: evidence from Bininj Gun-wokseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 52, 255–81.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, Dunstan, Brown, and Greville, G. Corbettseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2002separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe semantics of gender in Mayali: partially parallel systems and formal implementationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 78, 109–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Roger, and Gerald, Gazdarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1996separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDATR: a language for lexical knowledge representationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalComputational Linguistics 22, 167–216.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 1986. Pirahã. In Derbyshire, D. and Pullum, G. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. iseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 200–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 1989separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalClitic doubling, reflexives, and word order alternations in Yaguaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 65, 339–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terjeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1977separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalEmbedded clause reduction and Scandinavian gender agreementseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalJournal of Linguistics 13, 239–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabb, Nigel. 1998. Compounding. In Spencer, A. and Zwicky, A. M. (eds.), The Handbook of Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Blackwell, 66–83.Google Scholar
Fähnrich, Heinz. 1991. Old Georgian. In Alice, C. Harris (ed.), The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus vol. i: The Kartvelian Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDelmar, NY: Caravan, 129–217.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1971. Theoretical implications of some global phenomena in Syntax. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, San Diego.
Ferguson, Charles A. 1964separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBaby talk in six languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 66, 103–14.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A., ter Meeulen, J. S. Reilly, and E. C. Traugott. 1986. Overview. In Traugott, E. C., Meeulen, A., Reilly, J. S., and Ferguson, C. A. (eds.), On Conditionalsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Bach, E. and Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theoryseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Hoer, Rinehart and Winston, 1–88.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. The case for Case reopened. In Peter, Cole and Jerrold, Sadock (eds.), Grammatical Relationsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSyntax and Semantics 8separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Academic Press, 59–81.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanneseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1990separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fictionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAustin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1991. Toward a theory of tense–aspect in narrative discourse. In Jadranka, Gvozdanović and Janssen, Theo A. J. M. (with Östen Dashl) (eds.), The Function of Tense in Texts. Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen. Afd. Letterkunde, nieuwe reeks 144. Amsterdam and New York: North-Holland, 75–98.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Papuan Languages of New Guineaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Yimas Language of New Guineaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1997. Polysynthesis and complex verb formation: the case of applicatives in Yimas. In Alsina, A., Bresnan, J., and Sells, P. (eds.), Complex Predicatesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStanford: CSLI, 355–95.Google Scholar
Foley, William A., and Robert, D. Van Valinseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1984separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalFunctional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1986. Conditionals in discourse: a text-based study from English. In ElizabethTraugott, C., Meeulen, A., Reilly, J. S., and Ferguson, C. A. (eds.), On Conditionalsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 353–72.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michaelseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1992separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMorphophonemic complexity and typological stability in a polysynthetic language familyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalInternational Journal of American Linguistic 58, 242–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, Michael 1994. Morphology, polysynthetic. In Asher, R. E. and Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. vseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Pergamon Press, 2600–2.Google Scholar
Fortune, Reo F. 1942separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalArapesh. Publications of the American Ethnological Society 19. New York: J. J. Augustin. Reprinted 1977, New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruceseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1976separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Verb–Particle Combination in Englishseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Norman M., and Greville G. Corbett. 1995. Gender, animacy and declensional class assignment: a unified account for Russian. In Geert, Booij and Jaap, Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDordrecht: Kluwer, 123–50.Google Scholar
Fraser, Norman M., and Greville, G. Corbettseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1997separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDefaults in Arapeshseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLingua 103, 25–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraurud, Kari. 2000. Proper names and gender in Swedish. In Barbara, Unterbeck, Matti, Rissanen, Terttu, Nevalainen, and Mirja, Saari (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 167–219.Google Scholar
Galloway, Brent D. 1993separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Upriver Halkomelemseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Garnham, Alan, Jane, Oakhill, Marie-France, Ehrlich, and Manuel, Carreirasseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalRepresentations and processes in the interpretation of pronouns: new evidence from Spanish and Frenchseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalJournal of Memory and Language 34, 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald. 1990. An introduction to DATR. In Roger, Evans and Gerald, Gazdar (eds.), The DATR Papers. Cognitive Science Research Paper 139. Brighton: School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex, 1–14.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan, Klein, Geoffrey, K. Pullum, and Ivan, A. Sagseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1985separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGeneralized Phrase Structure Grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carolseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Descriptive and Historical Account of the Dolakha Newari Dialectseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. 1988separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalObject and Absolutive in Halkomelem Salishseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Garland.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1970a. The resolution of gender conflicts in Bantu conjunction: when syntax and semantics clash. Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 250–61.
Givón, T. 1970b. The Si-Luyana Language: A Preliminary Linguistic Description. Institute for Social Research, Communication 6. Lusaka, University of Zambia.
Givón, T. 1971. Some historical changes in the noun-class system of Bantu, their possible causes and wider implications. In Kim, C.-W. and Stahlke, H. (eds.), Papers in African Linguistics. Current Inquiry into Language and Linguistics 1. Edmonton (Alta.) and Champaign, IL: Linguistic Research, 33–54.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1972. Studies in ChiBemba and Bantu Grammar. Studies in African Linguistics Supplement 3.
Givón, T. 1976. Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Charles, N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topicseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Academic Press, 149–88.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1980separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalUte Reference Grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalIgnacio, CO: Ute Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1984separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSyntax: A Functional-typological introduction, vol. iseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. 1991. Some substantive issues concerning verb serialization: grammatical vs cognitive packaging. In Lefèbvre, C. (ed.), Serial Verbs: Grammatical, Comparative and Cognitive Approachesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 137–84.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1994. The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: functional and typological aspects of inversion. In Givón, T. (ed.), Voice and Inversionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glinert, Lewisseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1989separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Grammar of Modern Hebrewseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ivesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1988separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPosttransformational stem derivation in Foxseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPapers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 22, 59–72.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adeleseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalConstructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structureseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalChicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Golluscio, L. A. 2000separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalRupturing implicature in the Mapudungun verbal system: the suffix fiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalJournal of Pragmatics 32, 239–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, C. H. R. C. 1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalConcordância em Munduruku.Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Goodwin, William W. 1880separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSyntax of the Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb. 7th edn. Boston: Ginn and Heath.Google Scholar
Goodwin, William W. 1965 [1889] Syntax of the Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb. Rewritten and enlarged. London and New York: Macmillan and St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Gorbet, Larry. 1974. Relativization and complementation in Diegueño: noun phrases as nouns. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, San Diego.
Gordon, A. 1977. A unit grammar model of Hebrew. MA thesis. University of California, Los Angeles.
Gotteri, Nigel. 1984. The evasive neuter in Polish. In Frank, E. Knowles and Ian, J. Press (eds.), Papers in Slavonic Linguistics II.Birmingham: Department of Modern Languages, University of Aston in Birmingham, 1–8.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1954. A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of language. In Spencer, R. F. (ed.), Method and Perspective in Anthropology: Papers in Honor of Wilson D. Wallisseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMinneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 192–220.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph, H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Languageseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge, MA: MIT Press, 73–113.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies.The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers? In Joseph, H. Greenberg, Charles, A. Ferguson, and Edith, A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, vol. iii: Word Structureseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStanford: Stanford University Press, 47–82.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1986. The realis–irrealis continuum in the classical Greek conditional. In Elizabeth, C. Traugott, Meeulen, A. ten, Reilly, J. S., and Ferguson, C. A. (eds.), On Conditionalsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 247–67.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1988separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe present status of markedness theory: a reply to Schefflerseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalJournal of Anthropological Research 43, 367–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grevisse, M. 1964separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLe Bon Usage, 8th edn. Gembloux: J. Duculot.Google Scholar
Grimes, Charles E. 1997. Compounding and semantic bleaching in languages of Eastern Indonesia. In Cecilia Odé, and Wim, Stokhof (eds.), 7th International Conference on Austronesian Linguisticsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: Rodopi, 279–301.Google Scholar
Grossman, F. 1973separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPieter Bruegel. Complete Edition of the Paintings, vol. i, 3rd edn. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey. 1965. Studies in lexical relations. MIT doctoral dissertation. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Gudava, T. E. 1959separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSravnitel'nyj analiz glagol'nyx osnov v avarskom i andijskix jazykaxseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMakhachkakla: IIJaL Dag. Fil. AN SSSR.Google Scholar
Gudava, T. E. 1967. Godoberinskij jazyk. In Bokarev, E. A. and Lomtatidze, K. V. (eds.), Jazyki narodov SSSR: IV: Iberijsko-kavkazskie jazyki.Moscow: Nauka, 307–21.Google Scholar
Gvozdanović, , Jadranka, , and Theo, A. J. M. Janssen (with Östen Dahl) (eds.). 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Function of Tense in Texts. Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen. Afd. Letterkunde, nieuwe reeks 144. Amsterdam and New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Haase, Martin. 1994. Tense and aspect in Basque. In Thieroff, Rolf and Ballweg, Joachim (eds.), Tense Systems in European Languages 1. Linguistische Arbeiten 308. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 278–94.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claudeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1982separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLa Structure des languesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalParis: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claudeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLa Langue palau, une curiosité typologiqueseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMunich: Fink.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 1990. Do the classical morphological types have clear-cut limits? In Dressler, W. U., Luschützky, H. C., Pfeiffer, O. E., and Rennison, J. R. (eds.), Contemporary Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, Johnseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1985separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNatural Syntaxseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1998. Hua (Papuan). In Andrew, Spencer and Zwicky, A. M. (eds.), The Handbook of Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Blackwell, 539–62.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers: finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Ron, Trail (ed.), Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics No. 7. Pacific Linguistics Series A53. Canberra: Australian National University, 95–106.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth L., Mary Laughren, and Jane Simpson. 1995. Warlpiri. In Joachim, Jacobs, Arnim, Stechow, Wolfgang, Sternefeld, and Theo, Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung 2. Halbband. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1430–51.Google Scholar
Hall, T. Alan, and Ursula Kleinhenz, (eds.). 1999separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudies on the Phonological Wordseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardison, Debra M. 1992. Gender assignment to nonwords in French: implications for the role of the final syllable in lexical processing and organization of the mental lexicon. In Indiana Linguistics Club Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Volume, 1separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club, 3–25.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, David. 1991. The conceptual structure of intentional action: data from Kathmandu Newari. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 379–89.
Harris, Alice C. 2000separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalWhere in the word is the Udi clitic?Language 76, 593–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Sheldonseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1976separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMokilese Reference Grammar. PALI Language Texts: Micronesia. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Harvey, Mark. 1987. The Warray language from Adelaide River. MA thesis. Australian National University. Canberra.
Harvey, Mark, and Nicholas, Reid (eds.). 1997separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNominal Classification in Aboriginal Australia. Studies in Language Companion Series 37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1992. Grammaticization theory and heads in morphology. In Aronoff, M. (ed.), Morphology Nowseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAlbany: State University of New York Press, 69–82.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martinseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1993separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Lezgian. Mouton Grammar Library 9. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1994. The tense system of Lezgian. In Rolf, Thieroff and Joachim, Ballweg (eds.), Tense Systems in European Languages 1. Linguistische Arbeiten 308. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 267–77.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martinseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1996separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalIndefinite Pronouns.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martinseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2002separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalUnderstanding Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John. 1979. Guugu Yimidhirr. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Barry, J. Blake (eds.), Handbook of Australian Languages, vol. iseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 27–180.Google Scholar
Hayward, Richard J. 1989separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe notion of ‘default gender’: a key to interpreting the evolution of certain verb paradigms in East Ometo, and its implications for Omoticseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAfrika und Übersee 72, 17–32.Google Scholar
Head, Brian F. 1978. Respect degrees in pronominal reference. In Joseph, H. Greenberg, Charles, A. Ferguson, and Edith, A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, vol. iii: Word Structureseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStanford: Stanford University Press, 151–211.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1983. Referential tracking in Nunggubuyu (Australia). In John, Haiman and Pamela, Munro (eds.), Switch-Reference and Universal Grammar: Proceedings of a Symposium on Switch-Reference and Universal Grammar, Winnipeg, May 1981. Typological Studies in Language 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 129–49.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1991. Pragmatic disguise in pronominal–affix paradigms. In Frans, Plank (ed.), Paradigms: The Economy of Inflectionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 75–89.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffreyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1998separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPragmatic skewing in 1 <-> 2 pronominal combinations in Native American languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalInternational Journal of American Linguistics 64, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlund, Cecilia. 1992. On participles. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm. Distributed by Akademitryck abessive, Edsbruk.
Heine, Berndseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1968separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDie Verbreitung und Gliederung der Togorestsprachen. Kölner Beiträge zur Afrikanistik 1. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Heine, Berndseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1982. African noun class systems. In Hansjakob, Seiler and Christian, Lehmann (eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen. I: Bereich und Ordnung der Phänomeneseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTübingen: Narr, 189–216.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars. 1977. X̄-syntax, categorial syntax and logical form. In Thorstein, Freitheim and Lars, Hellan (eds.), Papers from the Trondheim Syntax Symposium 1977separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTrondheim: University of Trondheim, Department of Linguistics, 85–135.Google Scholar
Herbert, R. K., and Nykiel-Herbert, B. 1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalExplorations in linguistic sexism: a contrastive sketchseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPapers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 21, 47–85.Google Scholar
Herweg, Michaelseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPerfective and imperfective aspect and the theory of events and statesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics 29, 969–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, B. Georgeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1979separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAbkhazseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B. Georgeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1989. Abkhaz. In George, B. Hewitt (ed.), Northwest Caucasian Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDelmar, NY: Caravan Books, 39–88.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B. George, and S. R. Crisp. 1986. Speech reporting in the Caucasus. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), Direct and Indirect Speech. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 31. Berlin, New York, and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter, 121–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Deborah. 1992. Longgu grammar. person (in chapter 3)h. D. thesis. Australian National University. Canberra.
Hinds, John. 1984. Japanese. In William, S. Chisholm (ed.), Interrogativityseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 145–88.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala. 1994. Introduction: sound-symbolic processes. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and Ohala, J. J. (eds.), Sound Symbolismseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–12.Google Scholar
Hirtle, W. H. 1967separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Simple and Progressive Forms: An Analytical Approach. Cahiers du psychomécanique du langage 8. Quebec: L'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louisseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1935separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLa Catégorie des cas: étude de grammaire générale Iseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCopenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louisseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1937separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLa Catégorie des cas: étude de grammaire générale IIseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCopenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalRefurbishing our Foundationsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoijer, Harryseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1945separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalClassificatory verb stems in the Apachean languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalInternational Journal of American Linguistics 11, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homer., 1974separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Iliad. Trans. Robert Fitzgerald. Garden City: Anchor (Doubleday).Google Scholar
Hook, Peter. 1983. The English abstrument and rocking case relations. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 183–94.
Hopper, Paul. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Givón, T. (ed.), Discourse and Syntax. Syntax and Semantics 12. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth, Closs Traugott (eds.). 1993separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGrammaticalizationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
H⊘ybye, Poulseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1944separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalL'Accord en français contemporain: essai de grammaire descriptive.Copenhagen: H⊘st and S⊘ns Forlag.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1836separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalÜber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaus und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechtesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar
Huntley, David. 1993. Old Church Slavonic. In Bernard, Comrie and Greville, G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon: Routledge, 125–87.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2000. Bantu suffix ordering and its phonological consequences. Paper presented at the University of California. Berkeley. September 2000.
Hyman, Larry, and Daniel, Magajiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1970separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalEssentials of Gwari Grammar. Occasional Publications 27. University of Ibadan: Institute of African Studies.Google Scholar
Ikoro, Suanu M. 1996separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Kana Language.Leiden: University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Im, Sung-chool. 2001. Typological patterns of motion verbs in Korean. Ms. University at Buffalo.
Inkelas, Sharonseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1993separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNimboran position class morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNatural Language and Linguistic Theory 11, 559–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, Gordonseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1966separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAn Introduction to Grebo.London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank (ed.). 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalConditionals.Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Jr, William H. 1980. Washo bipartite verb stems. In Kathryn, Klar, Margaret, Langdon, and Shirley, Silver (eds.), American Indian and Indoeuropean Studies: Papers in Honor of Madison S. Beeler. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 16. The Hague, Paris, and New York: Mouton, 85–99.Google Scholar
Jacquesson, Franç oisseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2001separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPerson-marking in Tibeto-Burman languages, North-Eastern Indiaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24, 113–44.Google Scholar
Jaisser, Annie. 1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalHmong classifiersseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics of The Tibeto-Burman Area 10, 169–75.Google Scholar
Jaisser, Annie. 1941separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalKindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetzeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalUppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971a [1936]. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. In Selected Writings, vol. iiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Hague: Mouton, 23–71.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Romanseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1971b [1958]. Morfologicheskie nabljudenija nad slavjanskom skloneniem. In Selected Writings, vol. iiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Hague: Mouton, 154–83.Google Scholar
Janssen, Theo A. J. M., and Wim, Wurff (eds.). 1996separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalReported Speech: Forms and Functions of the Verb. Pragmatics and Beyond. New Series 43. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauncey, Dorothy G. 1997separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA grammar of Tamambo. person (in chapter 4)h. D. thesisseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAustralian National Universityseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCanberra.Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloiseseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1984separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalEmpty categories, case, and configurationalityseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNatural Language and Linguistic Theory second person, 39–76.Google Scholar
Jenny, Mathias. 2001. The aspect system of Thai. In Karen, Ebert and Ferndando Zúñiga, (eds.), Aktionsart and Aspectotemporality in Non-European Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalZurich: ASAS, 97–140.Google Scholar
Jensen, Cheryl J. 1999. Tupí-Guaraní. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, A. Y. (eds.), Amazonian Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 125–63.Google Scholar
Jensen, John Thayerseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1977separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalYapese Reference Grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalHonolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Ottoseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1924aseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Philosophy of Grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Ottoseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1924b/1965separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Philosophy of Grammar.New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian. 1994. Modern Greek ts: beyond sound symbolism. In Hinton, L., Nicholas, J., and Ohala, J. J. (eds.), Sound Symbolismseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 222–36.Google Scholar
Josephs, Lewis S. (with Masa-aki Emesiochel, Masaharu Tmodrang, and Helen Wilson). 1975separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPalauan Reference Grammar. PALI Language Texts: Micronesia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Kakumasu, James Y. 1986. Urubu-Kaapor. In Derbyshire, D. C. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. iseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 326–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Källström, Rogerseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1993separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalKongruens i svenskan. Nordistica Gothoburgensia 16. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Källström, Rogerseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1996. On gender assignment in Swedish. In Kjartan, G. Ottósson, Ruth, V. Fjeld, and Arne, Torp (eds.), The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 9separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOslo: Novus, 151–67.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans, and Christian Rohrer. 1983. Tense in texts. In Bäuerle, R., C., Schwarze, and Stechow, A. (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Languageseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: de Gruyter, 250–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1984separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSemantic correlates of the ergative/absolutive distinctionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics 22, 197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenesei, Istvan, Robert, M. Vago, and Anna Fenyvesi., 1998separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalHungarian.London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, Harold H. 1965separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSome semantic functions of reduplication in various languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAnthropological Linguistics 7, 88–102.Google Scholar
Key, Harold H. 1967separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMorphology of Cayuvavaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1972separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalO formal´nom vydelenii soglasovatel´nyx klassov v arčinskom jazykeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalVoprosy jazykoznanija first person, 124–31.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1991. Organizing principles for nominal paradigms in Daghestanian languages: comparative and typological observations. In Frans, Plank (ed.), Paradigms: The Economy of Inflectionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 255–74.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1994. Archi. In Rieks, Smeets (ed.), The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, vol. iv, part 2. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books, 297–365.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1996. Agreement in conjoined noun phrases. In Aleksandr, E. Kibrik, Sergej, G. Tatevosov, and Alexander, Eulenberg (eds.), Godoberi. Lincom Studies in Caucasian Linguistics 2. Munich: Lincom Europa, 156–9.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1997separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBeyond subject and object: towards a comprehensive relational typologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistic Typology first person, 279–346.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E., Kodzasov, S. V., Olovjannikova, I. P., and Samedov, D. S.separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1977separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOpyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka: I: Leksika, fonetika. Publikacii otdelenija strukturnoj i prikladnoj lingvistiki 11. Moscow: Izdatel´stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1996. Allomorphy or morphophonology? (And Reply to Mohanan and Walker). In Rajendra, Singh (ed.), Trubetzkoy's Orphanseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 12–31, 48–54.Google Scholar
Kirkness, A. C. 1994. Word-formation: neo-classical combinations. In Asher, R. E. and Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. ixseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Pergamon Press, 5026–8.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgangseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1992separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe present perfect puzzleseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 68, 525–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein-Andreu, Flora. 1996. Anaphora, deixis, and the evolution of Latin ille. In Barbara, Fox (ed.), Studies in Anaphora. Typological Studies in Language 33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 305–31.Google Scholar
Klenin, Emilyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1989separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOn preposition repetition: a study in the history of syntactic government in Old Russianseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalRussian Linguistics 13, 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, E. 1993separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalIncorporation in Australian languages. Honours thesis. University of New Englandseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalArmidale, Australia.Google Scholar
Kochergina, V. (ed.). 1978separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSanskritsko-russkij slovar' (Sanskrit–Russian dictionary). Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Mariaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1993separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNominalizationsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2005. Action nominal constructions. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M., Gil, D., and Comrie, B. (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structuresseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Oxford University Press, 254–7.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1911separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalIncorporation as a linguistic processseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmerican Anthropologist 13, 577–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühner, R., and Stegmann, C. 1955separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAusführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Satzlehre: Erster Teil, 3rd edn. Leverkusen: Gottschalksche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Kunene, Euphrasia. 1974. Nominalization in Zulu. In Thompson, S. A. and Lord, C. (eds.), Approaches to the Lexiconseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original UCLA Papers in Syntax 6. Los Angeles: UCLA Department of Linguistics, 107–29.Google Scholar
Laanest, A. 1975separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSissejuhatus läänemere-soome keeltesse (Introduction to Balto-Finnic languages). Tallinn: Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronaldseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalFoundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. iseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995. Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese. In Downing, P. and Noonan, M. (eds.), Word Order in Discourseseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 297–329.Google Scholar
Lastra de Suárez, Yolanda. 1981. Chichimeco Jonaz. In Victoria, Reifler Bricker (ed.), Supplement to the Handbook of Middle American Indians: Linguisticsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAustin: University of Texas Press, 20–42.Google Scholar
Lee, Jennifer R. 1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTiwi Today: A Study of Language Change in a Contact Situation.Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. 1964. Compounding as a phonological process. In Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Linguists, Cambridge 1962separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Hague: Mouton, 331–6.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christianseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThoughts on Grammaticalizationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMunich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian, Joachim, Mugdan, and Booij, G. E. (eds.). 2000separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMorphologie: ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildungseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienneseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPrefixes in English word-formationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalFolia Linguistica 29, 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1997. The creation of morphemes. Paper presented at Linguistics Seminar. Australian National University. Canberra: September 1997.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1988. Putting linguistics on a proper footing: explorations in Goffman's concept of participation. In Paul, Drew and Anthony, Wootton (eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Orderseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Polity, 161–227.Google Scholar
Lewis, G[eoffrey] Lseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1967separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTurkish Grammar.Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra, A. Thompsonseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1978separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalRelativization strategies in Wapposeparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerkeley Linguistics Society fourth (obviative) person, 106–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra, A. Thompsonseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1981separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar.Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Fengxiang. 1993. A diachronic study of V–V compounds in Chinese. Unpublished dissertation. University of New York at Buffalo.
Lightner, Theodore M. 1975separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe role of derivational morphology in generative grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 51, 617–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipkind, Williamseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1945separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalWinnebago Grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: King's Crown Press.Google Scholar
Löbel, Elizabeth. 2000. Classifier systems vs. noun class systems: a case study in Vietnamese. In Barbara, Unterbeck, Matti, Rissanen, Terttu, Nevalainen, and Mirja, Saari (eds.) Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 259–319.Google Scholar
Lord, Carolseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1977separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalHow Igbo got from SOV serializing to SVO compoundingseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudies in African Linguistics. Supplement 7, 145–55.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, Floydseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1953separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOneida Verb Morphology. Yale University Publications in Anthropology 48. New Haven, CT: Published for the Dept of Anthropology, Yale University, by Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1992separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGrammatical Categories and Cognitionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Johnseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1978separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Lenakel. Pacific Linguistics Series B55. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Lyons, Johnseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1977separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSemantics, Vol. iiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Magometov, A. A. 1963separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalKubachinskij jazykseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTbilisi: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk Gruzinskoj SSR.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrejseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2004separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNominalization/verbalization: Towards a Typology of Transcategorial Operationsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMunich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Grahamseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1984separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalProblems, pseudo-problems and hard evidence – another look at the Rumanian neuterseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalFolia Linguistica 18, 439–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, Hseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1969separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMunich: C. H. Beck Verlag.Google Scholar
Marchese, Lynellseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTense/aspect and the Development of Auxiliaries in Kru Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original SIL Publications in Linguistics 78. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Marnita, Rita 1996. Classifiers in Minangkabau. MA thesis. Australian National University.
Martins, Silvana A. 1994. Análise da morfosintaxe da língua Dâw (Makú-Kamã) e sua classificação tipológica. MA thesis. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Martins, Silvana A., and Valteir Martins. 1999. The Maku language family. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, A. Y. (eds.), Amazonian Languages.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 251–67.Google Scholar
Masson, Michel. 1974. Remarques sur les diminutifs en hébreu israélien. In Caquot, A. and David, Cohen (eds.), Actes du Premier Congrès International de linguistique sémitique et Chamito-sémitique. Paris 16–19 juillet 1969separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Hague, Paris: Mouton, 256–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1973separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Grammar of Lahu. University of California Publications in Linguistics 75. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1991. Areal and universal dimensions of grammatization in Lahu. In Traugott, E. C. and Heine, B. (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. iiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 383–453.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMorphology: An Introduction to the Theory of Word-structure, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, F. O. 1947separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe James Family. Including Selections from the Writings of Henry James, Senior, William, Henry, and Alice James.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Mattoso Câmara, J. 1972separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Portuguese Languageseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalChicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Maurice, W. 1935separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDiscrimination between past and perfectseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNeuphilologische Monatsschrift 6, 312–30.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, W. 1981separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMorfologische Natürlichkeitseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalWiesbaden: Atenäum.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J., and Alan S. Prince. 1995. Prosodic morphology. In John, A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theoryseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge, MA: Blackwell, 318–66.Google Scholar
McCawley, James. 1968. Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 71–80.
McCawley, Jamesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1971. Prelexical syntax. In Brien, R. J. O' (ed.), Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, 22nd Annual Georgetown Roundtable on Linguisticsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGeorgetown: Georgetown University Press, 19–33.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James, and Kenneth, Haleseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1984separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOn the syntax of person–number inflection in Modern Irishseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNatural Language and Linguistic Theory first person, 487–533.Google Scholar
McCoard, Robert W. 1978separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe English Perfect: Tense and Choice and Pragmatic Inferences. North Holland Linguistics Series 38. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.Google Scholar
McDonald, Lornaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1990separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Tauyaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGilvray, James A. 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTense, Reference, and Worldmaking.Montreal, Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, Williamseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1990separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Functional Grammar of Gooniyandiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, Graham R. 1975. Rembarrnga. a language of Central Arnhem Land. person (in chapter 5)h.D. Thesis. Australian National University, Canberra.
Melʹčuk, Igor A. 1958. Statistika i zavisimostʹroda francuzskix suščestvitelʹnyx ot ix okončanija. Bjulleten'ob´´edinenija po problemam mašinnogo perevoda 7, 13–40. (English version 1974: Statistics and the relationship between the gender of French nouns and their endings.) In J., V. Rozencvejg (ed.), Essays on Lexical Semantics: Iseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStockholm: Skriptor, 11–42.Google Scholar
Melʹčuk, Igor A. 1986. Toward a definition of case. In Richard, D. Brecht and James, S. Levine (eds.), Case in Slavicseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalColumbus: Slavica, 35–85.Google Scholar
Merlan, Francescaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1976separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNoun incorporation and discourse reference in Modern Nahuatlseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalInternational Journal of American Linguistics 42, 177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. 1998separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAspectual Grammar and Past-Time Reference.London, andNew York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1985. Tibeto-Burman dental suffixes: evidence from Limbu. In Graham, Thurgood, James, A. Matisoff, and David, Bradley (eds.), Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan Area: The State of the Art. Pacific Linguistics Series B87. Canberra: Australian National University, 363–75.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boydseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1997separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCatégories verbales et intransitivité duale en Limbuseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 26, 307–25.Google Scholar
Michelson, Karin (ed.), and Georgina, Nicholas storyteller, trans). 1981separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThree Stories in Oneida. National Museum of Man. Mercury Series. Canadian Ethnology Service 73. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada.Google Scholar
Mills, Anne E. 1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Acquisition of Gender: A Study of English and German.Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianneseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1984separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe evolution of noun incorporationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 60, 847–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1985. Disagreement: the case of pronominal affixes and nouns. Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 1985, 50–66.
Mithun, Marianneseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1986. The convergence of noun classification systems. In Colette, Craig (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization: Proceedings of a Symposium on Categorization and Noun Classification, Eugene, Oregon, October 1983. Typological Studies in Language 7. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 379–97.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianneseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAchive/agentive case marking and its motivationsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 67, 510–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianneseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1994. Word-formation: incorporation. In Asher, R. E. and Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. ixseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Pergamon Press, 5024–6.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianneseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1999separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Languages of Native North America.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mittwoch, Annaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1988separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAspects of English aspect: on the interaction of perfect, progressive, and durational phrasesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics and Philosophy 11, 203–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, Taraseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalWordhood and lexicality: noun incorporation in Hindiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNatural Language and Linguistic Theory 13, 75–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In Joseph, Grenberg (ed.), Univarsals of Human Language, Vol. iiiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStanford: Stanford University Press, 297–334.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGroup plural: associative or cohort pluralseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguist List 6, 681.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 1995. Summing up Suffixaufnahme. In Plank, F. (ed.), Double Caseseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Oxford University Press, 451–84.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A., and Jessica R. Wirth. 1986. Markedness – an overview. In Fred, R. Eckman, Edith, A. Moravcsik, and Jessica, R. Wirth (eds.), Markednessseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Plenum, 1–11.Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike, and Ruth Spriggs. 2000. Gender in Teop (Bougainville, Papua New Guinea). In Barbara, Unterbeck, Matti, Rissanen, Terttu, Nevalainen, and Mirja, Saari (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 321–49.Google Scholar
Motsch, Wolfgang. 1994. Word-formation: compounding. In Asher, R. E. and Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. ix. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 5021–4.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. 1980. Bantu class prefixes: inflectional or derivational? Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 246–58.
Mugdan, J. 1994. Morphological units. In Asher, R. E. and Simpson, J. M. Y., The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. v. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 2453–553.Google Scholar
Mugler, Alfredseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1988separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTempus und Aspekt als Zeitbeziehungen. Studien zur Theoretischen Linguistik 9. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Müller, Natascha. 1990. Developing two gender assignment systems simultaneously. In Jürgen, M. Meisel (ed.), Two First Languages: Early Grammatical Development in Bilingual Childrenseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDordrecht: Foris, 193–234.Google Scholar
Müller, Natascha. 1994. Gender and number agreement within DP. In Jürgen, M. Meisel (ed.), Bilingual First Language Acquisition: French and German Grammatical Development. Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 7. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 53–88.Google Scholar
Müller, Natascha. 2000. Gender and number in acquisition. In Barbara, Unterbeck, Matti, Rissanen, Terttu, Nevalainen, and Mirja, Saari (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 351–99.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamelaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1976separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMojave Syntaxseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Garland.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 1998. The Garifuna gender system. In Jane, H. Hill, Mistry, P. J., and Lyle, Campbell (eds.), The Life of Language: Papers in Linguistics in Honor of William Bright. (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 108.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 443–61.Google Scholar
Mürk, Harri W. 1990. The structure and development of Estonian morphology. person (in chapter 6)h. D. thesis. Indiana University.
Muysken, Peterseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalApproaches to affix orderseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics 24, 629–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakayama, Toshihide. 1997. Discourse-pragmatic dynamism in Nuu-chah-nulth (Nootka) morphosyntax. person (in chapter 7)h.D. dissertation. University of California, Santa Barbara.
Nash, Davidseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTopics in Warlpiri Grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Garland.Google Scholar
Newman, Paulseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2000separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna 1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalHead-marking and dependent-marking grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 62, 56–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna 1989. The origin of nominal classification. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 409–20.
Nichols, Johanna 1992separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage Diversity in Space and Timeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalChicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, Kimseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1979separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalConcerning number and gender in a non-congruent constructionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudia Linguistica 33, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michaelseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1992separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Langoseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ó Baoill, Dónall P. 1994. Tense and aspect in Modern Irish. In Rolf, Thieroff and Joachim, Ballweg (eds.), Tense Systems in European Languages 1. Linguistische Arbeiten 308. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 201–16.Google Scholar
Onishi, Masayuki. 1994. A grammar of Motuna. Bougainville, Papua New Guinea. person (in chapter 8)h.D. thesis. Australian National University.
Orwig, Carol. 1991. Relative time reference in Nugunu. In Anderson, S. C. and Comrie, B. (eds.), Tense and Aspect in Eight Languages of Cameroon. Publications in Linguistics 99. Dallas and Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 147–62.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. R. 1974separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Tiwi Languageseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCanberra: Australian Institute for Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Overdulve, C. M. 1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalKwiga ikinyarwanda: manuel d'apprentissage de la langue Rwanda. [Gitarama, Rwanda]: Kabgayi.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. 1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMood and Modality.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Panagl, Oswald. 1987. Productivity and diachronic change in morphology. In Dressler, W. U., Luschützky, H. C., Pseiffer, O. E., and Rennison, J. R. (eds.), Contenporary Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 127–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Parker, E. M., and Hayward, R. J. 1985separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAn Afar–English–French Dictionary (with Grammatical Notes in English)separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Parker, Gary J. 1969separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAyacucho Quechua Grammar and Dictionaryseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Pasch, Helmaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1985separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPossession and possessive classifiers in 'Dongo-koseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAfrika und Übersee 68, 69–85.Google Scholar
Pasch, Helmaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDie Mba-Sprachen: Die Nominalklassensysteme und die genetische Gliederung einer Gruppe von Ubangi-Sprachen. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 6. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L. 1990separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Pragmatics of Word Order: Typological Dimensions of Verb-Initial Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Doris L. 1998separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMaasai gender in typological perspectiveseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStudies in African Linguistics 27, 159–75.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L., and Thomas E. Payne. 1990. Yagua. In Derbyshire, D. C. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. iiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 249–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John R. 1980. Iranian languages. In Bernard, Comrie (ed.), The Languages of the Soviet Unionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 158–79.Google Scholar
Payne, John R. 1985. Negation. In Timothy, Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. i: Clause Structureseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197–242.Google Scholar
Petr, Jan (ed.). 1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMluvnice češtiny, vol. ii: Tvaroslovíseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPrague: Academia.Google Scholar
Pilhofer, Georgseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1933separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGrammatik der Kâte-Sprache in Neuguineaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1991. Of abundance and scantiness in inflection: a typological prelude. In Frans, Plank (ed.), Paradigms: The Economy of Inflectionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton, 1–39.Google Scholar
Plank, Fransseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDouble Case: Agreement by Suffixaufnahmeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plank, Fransseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1999separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSplit morphology: how agglutination and flexion mixseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistic Typology third person, 279–340.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria, and Ezra, Everbroeckseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2003separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDevelopment of gender classifications: modeling the historical change from Latin to Frenchseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 79, 356–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria, and Dan Jackson. 1999. Noun classes: language change and learning. In Barbara, A. Fox, Dan, Jurafsky, and Laura, A. Michaelis (eds.), Cognition and Function in Languageseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStanford: CSLI, 29–50.Google Scholar
Popjes, Jack, and Jo Popjes. 1986. Canela-Krahô. In Desmond, C. Derbyshire and Geoffrey, K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 128–99.Google Scholar
Poppe, Nicholasseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1964separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGrammar of Written Mongolian. Porta Linguarum Orientalum. New Series 1. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald. 1993. Narratology. In Michael, Groden and Martin, Kreiswirth (eds.), The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticismseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBaltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 524–8.Google Scholar
Pyles, Thomasseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1971separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOrigins and Development of the English Language, 2nd edn. Harcourt: New York.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hansseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1947separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalElements of Symbolic Logicseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Reid, Nicholas. 1990. Ngan'gityemerri: a language of the Daly river region, Northern Territory of Australia. person (in chapter 9)h. D. thesis. Australian National University. Canberra.
Reid, Nicholas. 1997. Class and classifier in Ngan'gityemerri. In Mark, Harvey and Nicholas, Reid (eds.), Nominal Classification in Aboriginal Australia. Studies in Language Companion Series 37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 165–228.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard. 1987. Paradigms large and small. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 223–34.
Rhodes, Richard. 1990. Obviation, inversion, and topic rank in Ojibwa. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session, 52–66.
Rice, Kerenseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2000separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMorpheme Order and Semantic Scope: Word Formation in the Athapaskan Verbseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmele.London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. 1959separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNominal and verbal derivation in Sundaneseseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLingua, 8, 337–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon D. 1999. Macro-Jê. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Alexandra, Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 164–206.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas, and Siegel, Muffy E. A.separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1978separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA lexical transformation for verbal compoundsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistic Inquiry 9, 199–260.Google Scholar
Rubino, Carl R. G. 1997. A reference grammar of Ilocano. person (in chapter 10)h.D. dissertation. University of California: Santa Barbara.
Russell, Kevin. 1999. The ‘word’ in two polysynthetic languages. In Alan, T. Hall and Ursula, Kleinhenz (eds.), Studies on the Phonological Word.Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 203–21.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1980separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNoun incorporation in Greenlandic: a case of syntactic word-formationseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 56, 300–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1984. West Greenlandic. In William, S. Chisholm (ed.), Interrogativityseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–214.Google Scholar
Sandmann, Antonio Joséseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1988separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalFormaçãode palavras no PortuguêsBrasileiro contemporâneoseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCuritiba: Editora UFPR.Google Scholar
Sandmann, Antonio Joséseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCompetência lexical: produtividade, restrições e bloqueioseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCuritiba: Editora UFPR.Google Scholar
Sands, Kristinaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNominal classification in Australiaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAnthropological Linguistics 37, 247–346.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edwardseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1911separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe problem of noun incorporation in American languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmerical Anthropologist 13, 250–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edwardseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1921separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguageseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edwardseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1922. The Takelma language of Southwestern Oregon. In Boas, F. (ed.), Handbook of American Indian Languages 2. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 40.2. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1–296.Google Scholar
Sapir, J. Davidseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1965separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Diola-Fognyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio. 1990. Constraints on the Italian suffix -mente. In Dressler, W. U., Luschützky, H. C., Pfeiffer, O. E., and Rennison, J. R. (eds.) Contemporary Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul, and Fe, T. Otanesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1972separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTagalog Reference Grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schaefer, Ronald. 1988. Typological mixture in the lexicalization of manner and cause in Emai. In Paul, Newman and Robert, Botne (eds.), Current Approaches to African Linguistics, vol. vseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Foris Publications, 127–40.Google Scholar
Schaefer, Ronald. 1997. Talmy's schematic core and verb serialization in Emai: an initial sketch. In Herbert, R. K. and Kunene, E. L. (eds.), Proceedings of the First World Congress on African Linguisticsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalJohannesburg: University of Witwatersrand, 311–40.Google Scholar
Schane, Sandford A. 1970. Phonological and morphological markedness. In Bierwisch, M. and Heidolph, K. E. (eds.), Progress in Linguisticsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Hague: Mouton, second person86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Linda J. 1980. Syntactic markedness and frequency of occurrence. In Thomas, A. Perry (ed.), Evidence and Argumentation in Linguisticsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: de Gruyter, 315–33.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank. 2005. The structure and use of shape-based noun classes in Miraña (North West Amazon), Ph.D. thesis. Radbaud University, Nijmegen.
Senft, Gunter (ed.). 2000separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSystems of Nominal Classification. Language, Culture and Cognition 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Serebrennikov, B. A., and Kert, G. M.separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1958separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGrammatika finskogo jazyka.Moscow, Leningrad: Akademija Nauk.Google Scholar
Serzisko, Fritz. 1993. The Kuliak languages: a structural comparison. In Lionel, M. Bender (ed.), Topics in Nilo-Saharan Linguisticsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalHamburg: Buske, 385–404.Google Scholar
Shvedova, N. J. 1970separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGrammatika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka (A grammar of modern Russian). Nauka: Moscow.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michaelseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1974separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDialectal Developments in Chinookan Tense–Aspect Systems: An Areal-Historical Analysis. International Journal of American Linguistics, Memoir 29. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michaelseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages. [Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies]; New Jersey: Humanities Press, 112–71.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. 1998. Warumungu (Australian – Pama-Nyungan). In Andrew, Spencer and Zwicky, A. M. (eds.), The Handbook of Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Blackwell, 707–36.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jane, and Meg Withgott. 1986. Pronominal clitic clusters and templates. In Hagit, Borer (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Cliticsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOrlando: Academic Press, 149–74.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. (1997). Mind, code, and text. In , J. Bybee, Haiman, J., and Thompson, S. A. (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givónseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 437–67.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. In press. The universal, the typological, and the particular in acquisition. In Dan, Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. v: Expanding the Contextsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan, and N. Hoiting. 1994. Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: typological considerations. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 487–505.
Smirnova, I. A., and Ejubi, K. R.separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1970. Morfologicheskaja struktura slova v kurdskom jazyke (glagol i suschestviteljnoe. In Morfologicheskaya struktura slova v indoevropejskih jazykahseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMoscow: Nauka, 347–87.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlotaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1978separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe syntax and interpretation of temporal expressions in Englishseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics and Philosophy second person, 43–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlotaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1983separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA theory of aspectual choiceseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 59, 479–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlotaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Parameter of Aspect, 1st edn. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 43. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlotaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1997separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Parameter of Aspect, second personnd edn. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 43. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyman, J. W. 1970separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAn Introduction to the!Xù (!Kung) Languageseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCape Town: A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min. 1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalKoreanseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrewseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMorphological Theoryseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew, and Zwicky, A. M. (eds.). 1998separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Handbook of Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steele, Susan M. 1976. On the count of one. In Alphonse, Juilland (ed.), Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg on the Occasion of his 60th birthdayseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSaratoga: Anma Libri, 591–613.Google Scholar
Steele, Susan M. 1990separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAgreement and anti-agreement: a syntax of Luiseño.Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steever, Sanford B. 1988. Tamil and the Dravidian languages. In Comrie, B. (ed.), The World's Major Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon: Croom Helm, 725–46.Google Scholar
Strom, Clayton L. 1992separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalRetuarã Syntax. Studies in the Languages of Colombia 3. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 1996. Template morphology and inflectional morphology. In Booij, G. Geerh, and Marle, J. (eds.). Yearbook of Morphology 1996separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDordrecht: Kluwer, 217–41.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2001separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalInflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structureseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supalla, Ted. 1982. Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. Unpublished person (in chapter 11)h.D. dissertation. University of California. San Diego.
Talmy, Leonard. 1972. Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi. Dissertation. University of California. Berkeley.
Talmy, Leonard. 1975. Semantics and Syntax of motion. In Kimball, J. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 4separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Academic Press, 181–238.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy, Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description vol. iii: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 1st edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–149.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonardseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2000aseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalToward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. i: Concept Structuring Systemsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonardseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2000bseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalToward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. ii: Typology and Process in Concept Structuringseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonardseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2002. The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language. In Emmorey, K. (ed)., Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2003. The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language: a neural model. Journal of Language and Linguistics: Special Issue on Semantics and Cognition.Winter Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Tauli, Valter. 1973separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStandard Estonian Grammar. Part 1. Phonology, Morphology, Word-formation. Studia Uralica et Altaica Upsaliensia 8. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Taylor, Douglasseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1977separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguages of the West Indies.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, Philip J., and Annie, Zaenen (eds.). 1981separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTense and Aspect. Syntax and Semantics 14: New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Terrill, Angelaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2003separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Lavukaleveseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelin, Nils B. (ed.). 1990separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalVerbal Aspect in Discourse. Contributions to the Semantics of Time and Temporal Perspective in Slavic and Non-Slavic Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam, and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf (ed.). 1995separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTense Systems in European Languages 2. Linguistische Arbeiten 338. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf, and Joachim, Ballweg (eds.). 1994separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTense Systems in European Languages 1. Linguistische Arbeiten 308. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence C. 1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Vietnamese Reference Grammarseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalHonolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1974. On the issue of productivity in the Lexicon. In Thompson, S. A. and Lord, C. (eds.), Approaches to the Lexiconseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original UCLA Papers in Syntax 6. Los Angeles: UCLA Department of Linguistics. Also is Kritilkon Litterarum, 4 (1975), 332–49.Google Scholar
Thurston, William R. 1982separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Comparative Study of Anêm and Lusi. Pacific Linguistics B83. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Toman, Jindrich. 1992. Compounding. In Bright, W. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, vol. iseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNew York: Oxford University Press, 286–88.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C., Meeulen, A., Reilly, J. S., and Ferguson, C. A. (eds.). 1986separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOn Conditionals.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troike, Rudolph C. 1981separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSubject–object concord in Coahuiltecoseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLanguage 57, 658–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, A. N., and Bryan, M. A.separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1966separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistic Analyses: The Non-Bantu Languages of North-Eastern Africa(With a Supplement on the Ethiopic Languages by Wolf Leslau)separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLondon: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. R., Lambert, W. E., and Rigault, A. A.separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1977separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe French Speaker's Skill with Grammatical Gender: An Example of Rule-governed Behaviorseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. N., and Tompo, J. ole Mpaayeiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1955separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Maasai Grammar: With Vocabulary.London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Tunbridge, Dorothy. 1988. Affixes of motion and direction in Adnyamathanha. In Peter, Austin (ed.), Complex Sentence Constructions in Australian Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 267–83.Google Scholar
Unterbeck, Barbara, Malti, Rissanen, Terttu, Nevalainen, and Mirja, Saari (eds.), 2000separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGender in Grammar and Cognition, vol. i: Approaches to Gender; vol. ii: Manifestations of Gender. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van. Berkum, Jos J. A. 1996. The psycholinguistics of grammatical gender: studies in language comprehension and production. Doctoral dissertation. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Driem, George separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1987separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Limbuseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driem, George separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1993separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Dumiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marle, Jaap. 1985separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOn the Paradigmatic Dimensions of Morphological Creativityseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1985. Case marking and the structure of the Lakhota clause. In Johanna, Nichols and Anthony, C. Woodbury (eds.), Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 363–413.Google Scholar
Van, Valin Robert D. Jr, and Randy, J. LaPollaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1997separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSyntax: Structure, Meaning, and Functionseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasmer, Maxseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1953–8separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalRussisches etymologisches Worterbuch, Vols. i–iiiseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalHeidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zenoseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1957separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalVerbs and timesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalPhilosophical Review 66, 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, Henkseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1993separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincennes, L., and Dallet, J. M.separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1960separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalInitiation à la langue berbère (Kabylie), vol. iseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalFort-National, Algeria: Fichier de documentation berbère.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Charles F. 1935aseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTübatulabal Grammar. University of California Publications in American Archeology and Ethnology 34.2. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Charles F. 1935bseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTübatulabal Texts. University of California Publications in American Archeology and Ethnology 34.3. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Voigtlander, Katherine, and Artemisa, Echegoyenseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1985separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLuces contemporáneas del Otomí: gramática del otomí de la sierraseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMexico: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Walsh, Michael. 1996. Noun classes, nominal classification and generics in Murrinhpatha. In Mark, Harvey and Nicholas, Reid (eds.), Nominal Classification in Aboriginal Australiaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 255–92.Google Scholar
Watkins, Laurel J., and Parker, McKenzieseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1984separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Kiowaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Weber, David. 1978. Relativization in Huallaga (Huanuco) Quechua. MA thesis. University of California, Los Angeles.
Weber, Davidseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1989separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of Huallaga (Huanuco) Quechuaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBerkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen, and Larisa, Zlatićseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original2003separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Many Faces of Agreementseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalStanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Weigel, William F. 1993. Morphosyntactic toggles. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 467–48.
Weinrich, H. 1964separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalTempus. Besprochene und erzählte Welt.Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Weir, E. M. H. 1990. Incorporation in Nadëb. In Doris, L. Payne (ed.), Amazonian Linguistics. Studies in Lowland South American Indian Languagesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAustin: University of Texas Press, 321–66.Google Scholar
Weiss, Daniel. 1993. How many sexes are there? (Reflections on natural and grammatical gender in Polish and Russian). In Gerd, Hentschel and Roman, Laskowski (eds.), Studies in Polish Morphology and Syntax. Specimina philologiae slavicae 99. Munich: Otto Sagner, 71–105.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjaminseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1956. The punctual and segmentative aspects of verbs in Hopi. In Language, Thought, and Realityseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wiesemann, Ursula. 1972separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDie phonologische und grammatische Struktur der Kaingáng-Spracheseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe Hague, Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wildgren, W. 1982separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalZur Dynamik lokaler Kompositionsprozesse: am Beispiel nominaler ad hoc-Komposita im Deutschenseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalFolia Linguistica 16, 297–344.Google Scholar
Wilkendorf, Patricia. 1991. Le Système temporel et aspectuel de la langue nɔmaandε. In Anderson, S. R. and Comrie, B. (eds.), Tense and Aspect in Eight Languages of Cameroonseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalDallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington, 105–46.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David P. 1991separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalThe semantics, pragmatics and diachronic development of ‘associated motion’ in Mparntwe Arrernteseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalBuffalo Papers in Linguistics 91, 1, 207–57.Google Scholar
Williams, Henry W. 1971separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Dictionary of the Maori Language, 7th edn. Wellington, New Zealand: A. R. Shearer.Google Scholar
Wise, Hilaryseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1975separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Transformational Grammar of Spoken Egyptian Arabicseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfart, H. Christoph. 1978. How many obviatives: sense and reference in a Cree verb paradigm. In Eung-Do, Cook and Jonathan, Kaye (eds.), Linguistic Studies of Native Canada.Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1982separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalCHP. The Conversational Historical Present in American English Narrative. Topics in Sociolinguistics 1. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolkonsky, Catherine, and Poltoratzky, Marianneseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1961separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalHandbook of Russian Rootsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalColumbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wonderly, William, Gibson, Lorna, and Kirk, Paulseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1954separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalNumber in Kiowa: nouns, demonstratives, and adjectivesseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalInternational Journal of American Linguistics 20, first person–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Williamseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1898separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Grammar of the Arabic Language. 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wurm, Stephen A. 1981. The possessive class systems in Äiwo, Reef Islands, Solomon Islands. Papers in New Guinea Linguistics 21. Pacific Linguistics Series A61. Canberra: Australian National University, 185–208.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich. 1987a. Paradigmenstrukturbedingungen: Aufbau und Veränderung von Flexionsparadigmen. In Ramat, A. G., Carruba, O., and Bernini, G. (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguisticsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 629–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich. 1987b. System-dependent morphological naturalness in inflection. In Wolfang, Dressler (ed.), Leitmotifs in Natural Morphologyseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 59–96.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, A. A. 1964separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalK voprosu o grammatičeskix kategorijax roda i oduševlennosti v sovremennom russkom jazykeseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalVoprosy jazykoznanija fourth (obviative) person, 25–40.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, A. A. 1978separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalGrammaticheskij ocherk sanskrita (Grammatical outline of Sanskrit). In Kochergina, V. (ed.), Sanskritsko-russkij slovar' (Sanskrit–Russian dictionary). Moscow: Russkij jazyk, 785–895.Google Scholar
Zaręba, A. 1984–5separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalOsobliwa zmiana rodzaju naturalnego w dialektach polskichseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalZbornik Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku17–18, 243–7.Google Scholar
Zepeda, Ofeliaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the original1983separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalA Papago Grammar.Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Zhirkov, L. I. 1955separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLakskij jazyk: fonetika i morfologijaseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMoscow: Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Zhirkov, L. I. 1962. Grammatičeskie tablicy lakskogo jazyka. In Xaidakov, S. M. (ed.), Lakku mazral va oerus mazral slovarʹ / Laksko-russkij slovar'separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalMoscow: Gos. izd-vo inostrannykgh i natsional'nykh slovare, 399–422.Google Scholar
Zhivov, Victor. 1978separates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalSome typological observations concerning noun compoundsseparates elements of interlinear that correspond to a single morpheme in the originalLinguistics 208, 5–12.Google Scholar
Zubin, David, and Klaus-Michel Köpcke. 1986. Gender and folk taxonomy: the indexal relation between grammatical and lexical categorization. In Colette, Craig (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization: Proceedings of a Symposium on Categorization and Noun Classification, Eugene, Oregon, October 1983. Typological Studies in Language 7. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 139–80.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 1986. The general case: basic form versus default form. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 305–14.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Timothy Shopen
  • Book: Language Typology and Syntactic Description
  • Online publication: 29 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Timothy Shopen
  • Book: Language Typology and Syntactic Description
  • Online publication: 29 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Timothy Shopen
  • Book: Language Typology and Syntactic Description
  • Online publication: 29 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.007
Available formats
×