Book contents
- Language Regard
- Language Regard
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Language Regard: Varied Methods
- 2 A Variationist Approach to Studies of Language Regard
- 3 The Emic and the Etic in Perceptual Dialectology
- 4 Variation in Language Regard: Sociolinguistic Receptivity and Acceptability of Linguistic Features
- 5 Social Meanings of the North–South Divide in the Netherlands and Their Linkage to Standard Dutch and Various Dialects
- 6 Language Subordination on a National Scale: Examining the Linguistic Discrimination of Hungarians by Hungarians
- 7 Regional Identity and Listener Perception
- Part II Language Regard and Language Variation
- Part III Language Regard and Language Change
- Index
- References
5 - Social Meanings of the North–South Divide in the Netherlands and Their Linkage to Standard Dutch and Various Dialects
from Part I - Language Regard: Varied Methods
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2018
Book contents
- Language Regard
- Language Regard
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Language Regard: Varied Methods
- 2 A Variationist Approach to Studies of Language Regard
- 3 The Emic and the Etic in Perceptual Dialectology
- 4 Variation in Language Regard: Sociolinguistic Receptivity and Acceptability of Linguistic Features
- 5 Social Meanings of the North–South Divide in the Netherlands and Their Linkage to Standard Dutch and Various Dialects
- 6 Language Subordination on a National Scale: Examining the Linguistic Discrimination of Hungarians by Hungarians
- 7 Regional Identity and Listener Perception
- Part II Language Regard and Language Variation
- Part III Language Regard and Language Change
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language RegardMethods, Variation and Change, pp. 96 - 117Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bezooijen, Renée van. 1997. Normen met betrekking tot het Standaard Nederlands. Taal en Tongval.TijdschriftvoorDialectologie 10. 30–48.Google Scholar
Knotter, Ad. 2002. Aesthetic evaluation of Dutch. Comparisons across dialects, accents and languages. In Long, & Preston, (eds.), 13–31.Google Scholar
Cornips, Leonie. 2013. Recent developments in the Limburg dialect region. In Hinskens, & Taeldeman, (eds.), 378–399.Google Scholar
Cornips, Leonie & Ad Knotter. In press. Inventing Limburg (the Netherlands): territory, history, language and identity. In Helen Christen, Peter Gilles, Cristoph Purschke (eds.), Räume, Grenzen, Übergänge. ZDL Beihefte, 71–92. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Cornips, Leonie & Rooij, Vincent de. 2015. Belonging through language: Cultural practices in the periphery. The politics of Carnival in the Dutch province of Limburg. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 24(1). 83–101.Google Scholar
Cornips, Leonie, Rooij, Vincent de, & Stengs, Irene L.. 2012. Carnavalesk taalgebruik en de constructie van locale identiteiten. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1). 15–40.Google Scholar
Cornips, Leonie, Rooij, Vincent de, Stengs, Irene, & Thissen, Lotte. 2016. Local language and local media. Reproducing the multi-dialectal space of Limburg (the Netherlands). In Coupland, Nikolas, Mortensen, Janus & Thøgersen, Jacob (eds.), Style, Media and Language Ideologies, 189–216. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Doesborgh, Wim. 2014. De vijand heet Zuid-Limburg. De Limburger/Limburgs Dagblad, February 26, 2–3.Google Scholar
Driessen, Geert. 2006. Ontwikkelingen in het gebruik van streektalen en dialecten in de periode 1995–2003. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 75. 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2011. Fractals all the way down. Paper presented at the workshop on The Construction of Local Identities through Language and Culture. Netherlands Institute of Advanced Studies. Wassenaar.Google Scholar
Evans, Betsy. 2013. Seattle to Spokane: Mapping perceptions of English in Washington. Journal of English Linguistics 41. 268–291.Google Scholar
Goeman, Ton. 2002. Perception of dialect distance: Standard and dialect in relation to new data on Dutch varieties. In Long, & Preston, (eds.), 137–151.Google Scholar
Goeman, Ton & Jongenburger, Willy. 2009. Dimensions and determinants of dialect use in the Netherlands at the individual and regional levels at the end of the twentieth century. Dialect death in Europe? International Journal of Sociology of Language 196/197. 31–72.Google Scholar
Gooskens, Charlotte, Bezooijen, Rene van & Nerbonne, John. 2013. Perception of geographically conditioned linguistic variation. In Hinskens, & Taeldeman, (eds.), 567–585.Google Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan & Hout, Roeland van. 2010. Is Standard Dutch with a regional accent standard or not? Evidence from native speakers’ attitudes. Language Variation and Change 22. 221–239.Google Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan, Hout, Roeland van & Harst, Sander van der. 2015. Subjective accent strength perceptions are not only a function of objective strength. Evidence from Netherlandic Standard Dutch. Speech Communication 74. 1–11.Google Scholar
Hagen, Anton & Giesbers, Herman. 1988. Dutch sociolinguistic studies. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 73. 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heeringa, Wilbert. 2004. Measuring dialect pronunciation. Groningen: University of Groningen doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Hermans, Ben. 2013. Phonological features of Limburgian dialects. In Hinskens, & Taeldeman, (eds.), 336–356.Google Scholar
Hinskens, Frans & Taeldeman, Johan (eds.). 2013. Language and Space: Dutch. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith. T. & Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of Language, Ideologies, Polities and Identities, 35–83. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press.Google Scholar
Knotter, Ad (ed.). 2009a. Dit is Limburg! Opstellen over de Limburgse identiteit. Sociaal Historisch Centrum voor Limburg: Waanders Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
Knotter, Ad. 2009b. Limburg bestaat niet. Paradoxen van een sterke identiteit. In Knotter, (ed.), 263–277.Google Scholar
Knotter, Ad. 2011. Regional character and regional stereotypes: some thoughts about their construction in Dutch Limburg. Paper presented at the workshop on The Construction of Local Identities through Language and Culture. Netherlands Institute of Advanced Studies, Wassenaar, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Long, Daniel & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.). 2002. Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Maastricht Dictionary online (Dictionair vaan de Mesteechter Taol). http://www.mestreechtertaol.nl/ (December 2015).Google Scholar
Massey, Doreen. 1993. Power geometry and a progressive sense of place. In Bird, Jon, Curtis, Barry, Putnam, Tim, & Tickner, Lisa (eds.), Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, 60–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mathijsen, Marita. 2011. De Limburger als de ander. Roermond, Netherlands: Letterkundig Centrum Limburg.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy & Preston, Dennis. 2010. Folk Linguistics. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, Sari & Kelly-Holmes, Helen (eds.). 2013. Multilingualism and the Periphery. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2002. Language with an attitude. In Chambers, J.K., Trudgill, Peter & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 40–66. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2010. Language, people, salience, space, perceptual dialectology and language regard. Dialectologia 5. 87–131.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2011. The power of language regard – Discrimination, classification, comprehension, and production. Dialectologia Special Issue II. 9–33.Google Scholar
Smakman, Dirk. 2006. Standard Dutch in the Netherlands. A Sociolinguistic and Phonetic Description. Utrecht: LOT 135.Google Scholar
Thissen, Lotte. 2013. The ambiguities of Limburgerness. Language, place and belonging in Limburg, the Netherlands. Etnofoor 25(2). 119–143.Google Scholar
Thissen, Lotte & Cornips, Leonie. 2014. Sjtómme Limburger met een zachte G. In Andeweg, Agnes & Wesseling, Lies (eds.), Wat de verbeelding niet vermag! Essays bij het afscheid van Maaike Meijer, 295–300. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar
Wijers, Carla. 2009. ‘In één hand de rozenkrans, in de andere een glas bier’. De Limburgse identiteit onder de loep. In Knotter, Ad (ed.), Dit is Limburg! Opstellen over de Limburgse identiteit, 127–150. Sociaal Historisch Centrum voor Limburg: Waanders Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
Wikimedia Commons contributors, “Atlas of the Netherlands,” Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atlas_of_the_Netherlands&oldid=203571069 (September 20, 2016).Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by