Book contents
- Language Regard
- Language Regard
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Language Regard: Varied Methods
- Part II Language Regard and Language Variation
- 8 Language Regard and Migration: Cuban Immigrants in the United States
- 9 Perceptions of Black American Sign Language
- 10 Ethnolinguistic Assertions Regarding People Who Allegedly “Talk White,” or “Talk Black”
- 11 Language Regard in Liminal Hmong American Speech Communities
- 12 Language Regard and Sociolinguistic Competence of Non-native Speakers
- Part III Language Regard and Language Change
- Index
- References
11 - Language Regard in Liminal Hmong American Speech Communities
from Part II - Language Regard and Language Variation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2018
Book contents
- Language Regard
- Language Regard
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Language Regard: Varied Methods
- Part II Language Regard and Language Variation
- 8 Language Regard and Migration: Cuban Immigrants in the United States
- 9 Perceptions of Black American Sign Language
- 10 Ethnolinguistic Assertions Regarding People Who Allegedly “Talk White,” or “Talk Black”
- 11 Language Regard in Liminal Hmong American Speech Communities
- 12 Language Regard and Sociolinguistic Competence of Non-native Speakers
- Part III Language Regard and Language Change
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language RegardMethods, Variation and Change, pp. 197 - 217Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bucholtz, Mary. 2004. Styles and stereotypes: The linguistic negotiation of identity among Laotian American youth. Pragmatics 14(2–3). 127–147.Google Scholar
Burt, Susan Meredith. 2009. Contact pragmatics: Requests in Wisconsin Hmong. Journal of the Southeast Asia Linguistics Society 1. 63–76.Google Scholar
Burt, Susan Meredith. 2010. The Hmong Language in Wisconsin. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah 2005. Language, gender, and sexuality: Current issues and new directions. Applied Linguistics 26(4). 482–502.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. & Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Dialectology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, Elaine. 2004. Ideologies of legitimate mockery: Margaret Cho’s revoicings of mock Asian. Pragmatics 14(2/3). 263–289.Google Scholar
Culas, Christian & Michaud, Jean. 2004. A contribution to the study of Hmong (Miao) migrations and history. In Tapp, Nicholas, Michaud, Jean, Culas, Christian, & Lee, Gary Yia (eds.), Hmong/Miao in Asia, 61–96. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2003. Language and gender in adolescence. In Holmes, Janet & Meyerhoff, Miriam (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender, 381–400. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fought, Carmen. 2006. Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fought, Carmen. 2008. On the borderlands of communities: Taking linguistic research to la frontera. Plenary talk for New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV-37), Houston, November 6–9.Google Scholar
Gooskens, Charlotte & Heeringa, Wilbert. 2004. Perceptive evaluation of Levenshtein dialect distance measurements using Norwegian dialect data. Language Variation and Change 16. 189–207.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira. 2005. Intertextual sexuality: Parodies of class, identity and desire in liminal Delhi. Journal Linguistic Anthropology 15(1). 125–144.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2009. Ethnicity and phonetic variation in a San Francisco neighborhood. Stanford: Stanford University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Hess, Natalie. 1996. Code switching and style shifting as markers of liminality in literature. Language and Literature 5(1). 5–18.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne. 2009. Trading tongues: Loss of heritage language in the United States. In Reyes, & Lo, (eds.), 331–346.Google Scholar
Irwin, Anthea. 2010. Social constructionism. In Wodak, Ruth, Johnstone, Barbara & Kerswill, Paul (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 100–112. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ito, Rika. 2010. Accommodation to the local majority norm by Hmong Americans in the Twin Cities, Minnesota. American Speech 85(2). 141–62.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2004. Place, globalization, and linguistic variation. In Fought, Carmen (ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections, 65–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Eden. 2011. Sociophonetics of Hmong American English in Minnesota. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Keown-Bomar, Julie. 2004. Kinship Networks among Hmong American Refugees. New York: LKB Scholarly Publishing.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1978. Toward a theory of social dialect variation. Language in Society 7(1). 17–36.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon & Boberg, Charles. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. A Multimedia Reference Tool. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malch & Steiner, Richard. 1972. A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress, Vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: US Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Lee, Pao. 1999. Language maintenance and language shift among second generation Hmong teenagers. San Francisco, CA: University of San Francisco EdD dissertation.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina. 1997. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Livia, Anna. 1997. Disloyal to masculinity: Linguistic gender and liminality in French. In Livia, Anna & Hall, Kira (eds.), Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 349–368. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi. 2015. A sociolinguistic view of null subjects and VOT in Toronto heritage languages. Lingua 164B. 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Naomi & Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2008. The social lives of language. In Meyerhoff, Miriam & Nagy, Naomi (eds.), Social Lives in Language – Sociolinguistics and Multilingual Speech Communities: Celebrating the Work of Gillian Sankoff, 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nibbs, Faith. 2006. The Texas two-step, Hmong style: A delicate dance between culture and ethnicity. Hmong Studies Journal 7. 1–34.Google Scholar
Nibbs, Faith. 2013. Kinship at the intersection of lineage and linguistics: A study of Hmong relatedness in Western contexts. Language and Intercultural Communication 13(4). 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nibbs, Faith. 2014. The Social Dynamics of Fitting in as Experienced by Hmong Refugees in Germany and Texas. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nibbs, Faith. 2016. Hmong women on the web. In Vang, Chia, Nibbs, Faith, & Vang, Ma (eds.), Claiming Place: On the Agency of Hmong Women, 161–194. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy & Preston, Dennis R.. 2000. Folk Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeifer, Mark E., Sullivan, John, Yang, Kou & Yang, Wayne. 2012. Hmong population and demographic trends in the 2010 Census and 2010 American Community Survey. Hmong Studies Journal 13(2). 1–13.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1993. The uses of folk linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 3(2). 181–259.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2004. Language attitudes and speech. In Finegan, Edward & Rickford, John (eds.), Language in the USA: Themes for the Twenty-First Century, 480–492. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2010. Variation in language regard. In Gilles, Peter, Scharloth, Joachim, & Ziegler, Evelyn (eds.), Variatio delectat: Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, für Klaus J. Mattheier zum 65. Geburtstag, 7–27. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2015. The silliness of the standard. Representaciones 11(2). 59–80.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 1995. Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 1999. Sociolinguistics and cultural studies: New ethnicities, liminality and interaction. Social Semiotics 9. 355–373.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 1992. Meaningful Tone: A Study of Tonal Morphology in White Hmong. Dekalb, IL: Center for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Reyes, Angela. 2007. Language, Identity, and Stereotype among Southeast Asian Americans. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Reyes, Angela & Lo, Adrienne (eds.). 2009. Beyond Yellow English: Toward a Linguistic Anthropology of Asian Pacific America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shankar, Shalini. 2008. Desi Land: Teen Culture, Class, and Success in Silicon Valley. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Stanford, James N. 2010a. Gender, generations, and nations: An experiment in Hmong American discourse and sociophonetics. Language and Communication 30(4). 285–296.Google Scholar
Stanford, James N. 2010b. The role of marriage in linguistic contact and variation: Two Hmong dialects in Texas. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(1). 89–115.Google Scholar
Stanford, James N. & Pan, Yanhong. 2013. The sociolinguistics of exogamy: Dialect acquisition in a Zhuang village. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(5). 573–607.Google Scholar
Talmy, Steven. 2009. Forever FOB? Resisting and reproducing the Other in high school ESL. In Reyes & Lo (eds.), 347–365.Google Scholar
Thao, Yer J. 2006. The Mong Oral Tradition: Cultural Memory in the Absence of Written Language. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
Thoj, Xaiv Phaj & Xyooj, Xeev Nruag. 1984. Pho/Phau Kawm Koom Moob Leeg/Hmoob Dawb [Hmong Daw/Mong Leng Primer]. Windfield, IL: Mong Volunteer Literacy.Google Scholar
Thoj, Xeeb Xaivkaub. 2000. Tsevlu Aakiv-Hmoob [English–Hmong Dictionary]. San Diego, CA: Windsor.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1974. Liminal to liminoid in play, flow, and ritual: An essay in comparative symbology. Rice University Studies 60. 53–92.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1982. From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1987. Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites of passage. In Mahdi, Louise, Foster, Steven, & Little, Meredith (eds.), Betwixt & between: Patterns of Masculine and Feminine Initiation, 3–19. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Vang, Chia Youyee. 2008. Hmong in Minnesota. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press.Google Scholar
Vang, Chia, Nibbs, Faith, & Vang, Ma (eds.). 2016. Claiming Place: Hmong Women, Power, and Knowledge Production. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Schilling, Natalie. 2016. American English: Dialects and Variation, 3rd edn. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Xiong, Jay. 2005. Lus Hmoob Txhais [Hmong–English Dictionary]. http://www.HmongDictionary.comGoogle Scholar
Zentella, Ana Celia. 1997. Growing up Bilingual: Puerto Rican Children in New York. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by