Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2017
Edited by
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant on Persons and Agency , pp. 231 - 237Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Agamben, Giorgio. The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, Lucy. “What Properly Belongs to Me,” Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (4) (2014): 754–71.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. Kant’s Theory of Mind. Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason, expanded edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “Ambiguities in the Will: Reinhold and Kant, Briefe II,” in Wille, Willkür, Freiheit: Reinholds Freiheitskonzeption im Kontext der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts, ed. Stolz, Violetta, Heinz, Marion, and Bondeli, Martin, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012, pp. 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “History, Idealism, and Schelling,” Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/International Yearbook of German Idealism 10 (2012): 123–42.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “The End of the Critiques: Kant’s Moral ‘Creationism,’” in Kant’s Elliptical Path, Oxford: Clarenden Press, 2012, pp. 238–59.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “On Universality, Necessity, and Law in General in Kant,” in Kant and the Laws of Nature, ed. Massimi, Michela and Breitenbach, Angela, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 30–48.Google Scholar
Anderson-Gold, Sharon and Muchnik, Pablo (eds.). Kant’s Anatomy of Evil, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bacin, Stefano and Sensen, Oliver (eds.). The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Baum, Manfred. “Kants Replik auf Reinhold,” in Wille, Willkür, Freiheit: Reinholds Freiheitskonzeption im Kontext der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts, ed. Stolz, Violetta, Heinz, Marion, and Bondeli, Martin, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012, pp. 153–63.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. “Moral Faith and the Highest Good,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, ed. Guyer, Paul, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 588–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, John. “Why Look at Animals,” in About Looking, New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.Google Scholar
Bittner, Rüdiger and Cramer, Konrad (eds.). Materialien zu Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1975.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. Articulating Reasons. An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel. “The Fate of Kantian Freedom: One Cheer (More) for Reinhold,” in Wille, Willkür, Freiheit: Reinholds Freiheitskonzeption im Kontext der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts, ed. Stolz, Violetta, Heinz, Marion, and Bondeli, Martin, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012, pp. 91–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brokoff, Jürgen and Schipper, Bernd (eds.). Apokalyptik in Antike und Aufklärung, Paderborn: Schöningh, 2004.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. The Community of the Beloved Disciple, New York: Paulist Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara (ed.). Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Fenves, Peter. Late Kant: Towards Another Law of the Earth, New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person,” in The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 11–25.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. “Autonomy, Necessity, and Love,” in Necessity, Volition, and Love, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 129–41.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. “On the Usefulness of Final Ends,” in Necessity, Volition, and Love, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 82–94.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry,” in Readings in the Philosophy of Language, ed. Ludlow, Peter, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997, pp. 9–30.Google Scholar
Frierson, Patrick. Freedom and Anthropology in Kant’s Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine. “Social Dimensions of Kant’s Conception of Radical Evil,” in Kant’s Anatomy of Evil, ed. Anderson-Gold, Sharon and Muchnik, Pablo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “From a Practical Point of View: Kant’s Conception of a Postulate of Pure Practical Freedom,” in Kant on Freedom, Law and Happiness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 333–71.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Kant on the Theory and Practice of Autonomy,” Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2003): 70–98.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Naturalistic and Transcendental Moments in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” Inquiry 50 (2007): 444–64.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Ist und Soll: Von Hume bis Kant, und nun,” in Kant und die Zukunft der Aufklärung, ed. Klemme, Heiner, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009, pp. 210–32.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Problems with Freedom: Kant’s Argument in Groundwork III and Its Subsequent Emendations,” in Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, ed. Timmerman, Jens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 176–202.Google Scholar
Harris, H. S. Hegel’s Development: Toward the Sunlight, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Phänomenologie des Geistes, Bamburg and Würzburg: Joseph Anton Goebhardt, 1807.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, Allen W., trans. H. B. Nisbet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. The Encyclopedia Logic, trans. T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting, and H. S. Harris, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1991.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. The Science of Logic, trans. George Di Giovanni, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. “Can Morality Be Self-contained? Or: Why Might Kant Think Religion Is Needed to Complete Morality?,” in Nature and Freedom in Kant, ed. Moran, Kate and von Platz, Jeppe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (in press).Google Scholar
Holzhey, Helmut and Kohler, Georg (eds.). In Erwartung eines Endes: Apokalyptik und Geschichte, Zurich: Pano, 2001.Google Scholar
Kain, Patrick. “Duties Regarding Animals,” in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, ed. Denis, Lara, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kain, Patrick. “Practical Cognition, Intuition, and the Fact of Reason,” in Kant’s Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom and Immortality, ed. Bruxvoort Lipscomb, Benjamin J. and Krueger, James, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010, pp. 211–32.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “The End of All Things,” in On History, ed. Beck, Lewis White, trans. Robert E. Anchor, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963, pp. 69–84.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Natural Science, ed. Watkins, Eric, trans. Lewis White Beck, Jeffrey B. Edwards, Olaf Reinhardt, Martin Schönfeld, and Eric Watkins, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and Other Writings, ed. and trans. Wood, Allen and di Giovanni, George, with an introduction by Robert Merrihew Adams (revised edition), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 193–205.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Kant’s Second Thoughts on Colonialism,” in Kant and Colonialism: Historical and Critical Perspectives, ed. Flikschuh, Katrin and Ypi, Lea, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 43–67.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Contradiction and Kant’s Formula of Universal Law,” Kant-Studien 108 (1) (2017): 89–115.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Moral Autonomy As Political Analogy: Self-legislation in Kant’s Groundwork and the Feyerabend Lectures on Natural Law,” in The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory, ed. Stefano Bacin and Oliver Sensen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. and Willaschek, Marcus. “Autonomy without Paradox: Kant on Self-Legislation and the Moral Law,” unpublished manuscript (2017).Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner. “Einleitung,” in Kant, Immanuel: Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, ed. Brandt, Horst D. and Klemme, Heiner, Hamburg: Meiner, 2003, pp. ix–lxiii.Google Scholar
Kneller, Jane. “The Poetic Science of Moral Exercise in Early German Romanticism,” Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/International Yearbook of German Idealism 6 (2008): 145–61.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. “Two Distinctions in Goodness,” The Philosophical Review 92 (1983): 169–95.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. “Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-Century Moral Philosophy,” APA Centennial Supplement to The Journal of Philosophical Research 28 (2003): 99–122.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. Self-Constitution – Agency, Identity, and Integrity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. “Interacting with Animals: A Kantian Account,” in The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics, ed. Beauchamp, T., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. “Objective and Unconditioned Value,” The Philosophical Review 116 (2007): 157–85.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. New Essays on Human Understanding, trans. P. Remnant and J. Bennett, Oxford: Clarendon, 1981.Google Scholar
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H., Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. I, Me, Mine. Back to Kant, and Back Again, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue, second edition, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Moran, Kate A. “Neither Justice Nor Charity? Kant on ‘General Injustice,’” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (4) (2017): 477–98.Google Scholar
Morgan, Seriol. “The Missing Formal Proof of Humanity’s Radical Evil in Kant’s Religion,” The Philosophical Review 114 (1) (2005): 63–114.Google Scholar
Morrison, Iain P. D. Kant and the Role of Pleasure in Moral Action, New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora. “Constructivisms in Ethics,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 89 (1988): 1–17.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora. “Autonomy: The Emperor’s New Clothes,” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1) (2003): 1–21.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora. “Autonomy, Plurality and Public Reason,” in New Essays on the History of Autonomy: A Collection Honoring J. B. Schneewind, ed. Brender, Natalie and Krasnoff, Larry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 181–94.Google Scholar
Platz, Jeppe von. “Freedom As Both Fact and Postulate,” in Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Kant-Kongresses 2010, ed. Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, La Rocca, Claudio, and Ruffing, Margit, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013, vol. iii, pp. 533–46.Google Scholar
Quinn, Philip, Essays in the Philosophy of Religion, ed. Miller, Christian, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” Journal of Philosophy 77 (9) (1980): 515–72.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Lectures on Moral Philosophy, ed. Herman, Barbara, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews. Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard. Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie, Zweyter Band, Leipzig: Georg Joachim Göschen, 1792.Google Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard. “Einige Bemerkungen über die in der Einleitung zu den Metaphysischen Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre von I. Kant aufgestellten Begriffe von der Freiheit des Willens,” in Auswahl vermischter Schriften, 2. Teil (Jena, 1797), pp. 364–500; reprinted, slightly abbreviated, in Materialien zu Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, ed. Bittner, Rüdiger and Cramer, Konrad, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1975, pp. 310–24.Google Scholar
Ricken, Friedo. “The Postulates of Pure Practical Reason (CprR: 122–148),” in Kant’s Moral and Legal Philosophy: The German Philosophical Tradition, ed. Ameriks, Karl and Höffe, Otfried, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 213–28.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Political and Legal Philosophy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosefeldt, Tobias. “Kants Kompatibilismus,” in Sind wir Bürger zweier Welten? Freiheit und moralische Verantwortung im transzendentalen Idealismus, ed. Brandhorst, Mario, Hahmann, Andree, and Ludwig, Bernd, Hamburg: Meiner, 2012, pp. 77–109.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract, in “The Social Contract” and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 [1762].Google Scholar
Shell, Susan Meld. “Kant as ‘Vitalist’: The ‘Principium of Life’ in Anthropologie Friedländer,” in Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, ed. Cohen, Alix, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 151–71.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter. Kants Begriff praktischer und transzendentaler Freiheit, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2005.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (ed.). Kant on Moral Autonomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. “The Kantian Conception of Free Will,” Mind XIII (1888): 405–12, reprinted in The Methods of Ethics, seventh edition, London: Macmillan, 1907, pp. 511–16; republished in The Methods of Ethics, seventh edition, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1981, pp. 511–16.Google Scholar
Sturma, Dieter. “Self-Consciousness, Personal Identity, and the Challenge of Neuroscience,” in Biology and Subjectivity. Philosophical Contributions to Non-reductive Neuroscience, ed. García-Valdecasas, Miguel, Murillo, José Ignacio, and Barrett, Nathaniel F., Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer, 2016, pp. 13–24.Google Scholar
Sussman, David. “Perversity of the Heart,” The Philosophical Review 114 (2) (2005): 153–77.Google Scholar
Sussman, David. “Unforgivable Sins?: Revolution and Reconciliation in Kant,” in Kant’s Anatomy of Evil, ed. Anderson-Gold, Sharon and Muchnik, Pablo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 215–35.Google Scholar
Sussman, David. “Grace and Enthusiasm,” unpublished manuscript presented at the Pacific APA in Vancouver (2015).Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens. “When the Tail Wags the Dog: Animal Welfare and Indirect Duty in Kantian Ethics,” Kantian Review 10 (2005): 128–49.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Johann August Heinrich. Eleutheriologie, oder über Freyheit und Notwendigkeit, Jena: Cröker, 1788.Google Scholar
Varden, Helga. “Kant’s Non-Absolutist Conception of Political Legitimacy – How Public Right ‘Concludes’ Private Right in the “Doctrine of Right,”” Kant-Studien 102 (2010): 331–51.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. “Kant on the Unity and Diversity of Laws,” in Kant and the Laws of Nature, ed. Massimi, Michela and Breitenbach, Angela, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 11–29.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. “Kant on Real Conditions,” in Akten des 12. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, ‘Natur und Freiheit’ in Wien vom 21–25. September 2015, ed. Waibel, Violetta and Ruffing, Margit, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018 (in press).Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. “Autonomy and the Legislation of Laws in the Prolegomena,” in The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory, ed. Stefano Bacin and Oliver Sensen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. and Willaschek, Marcus. “Kant on Cognition and Knowledge,” Synthese (in press).Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus. “Kant and the Necessity of Metaphysics,” in Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant Kongresses, ed. Rodhen, Valerio, Terra, Ricardo R., de Almeida, Guido A, and Ruffing, Margit, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008, vol. i, pp. 285–307.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus. “The Primacy of Pure Practical Reason and the Very Idea of a Postulate,” in Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. A Critical Guide, ed. Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 168–96.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus. “Kant and Peirce on Belief,” in Pragmatism, Kant, and Transcendental Philosophy, ed. Gava, Gabriele and Stern, Robert, New York: Routledge, 2016, pp. 133–51.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. “General Introduction,” in Kant, Immanuel, Religion and Rational Theology, ed. Wood, Allen W. and di Giovanni, George, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. xi–xxiv.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. “Kant on Duties Regarding Non-rational Nature,” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1998): 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (ed. and trans.). Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. “Kant and the Intelligibility of Evil,” in Kant’s Anatomy of Evil, ed. Anderson-Gold, Sharon and Muchnik, Pablo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Zöller, Günter. “Von Reinhold zu Kant: Zur Grundlegung der Moralphilosophie zwischen Vernunft und Willkür,” in K. L. Reinhold: Am Vorhof des Idealismus, ed. Valenza, Pierluigi, Pisa and Rome: Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali, 2006, pp. 73–91.Google Scholar