Bibliography

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511618734.016

Althusser, Louis. 1972. Politics and History: Montesquieu, Hegel and Marx. Trans. Ben Brewster. London: NLB.Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth. 1991. “John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living.” Ethics 102: 4–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, Perry. 2000. “Renewals.” New Left Review, new series, no. 1 (January/February): 5–24.Google Scholar

Anderson-Gold, Sharon. 2001. Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar

Andrews, Stuart. 1967. Enlightened Despotism. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Annas, Julia. 1977. “Mill and The Subjection of Women.” Philosophy 52: 179–94.CrossRef Google Scholar

Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 2005. The Ethics of Identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1995. The Politics. Translated by Backer, Ernest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arkes, Hadley. 1981. The Philosopher in the City: The Moral Dimensions of Urban Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Arneson, Richard J. 1979. “Mill's Doubts about Freedom under Socialism.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism. Edited by Cooper, Wesley E., Nielson, Kai, and Patton, Steven C.. Guelph, Ontario: Canadian Association for Publishing in Philosophy.Google Scholar

Arneson, Richard J. 1982. “Democracy and Liberty in Mill's Theory of Government.” Journal of the History of Philosophy XX (January): 43–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Arnold, Matthew. 1996–2002. The Letters of Matthew Arnold. Edited by Lang, Cecil Y.. 6 vols., Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar

Ashcraft, Richard. 1989. “Class Conflict and Constitutionalism in J. S. Mill's Thought.” Liberalism and the Moral Life. Ed Rosenblum, Nancy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashcraft, Richard. 1998. “John Stuart Mill and the Theoretical Foundations of Democratic Socialism.” In Mill and the Moral Character of Liberalism. Edited by Eisenach, Eldon J.. University Park: The Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar

Bailey, Alison. 1998. Journal of Social Philosophy (Winter): 104–19.CrossRef

Bain, A. 1882. John Stuart Mill: A Criticism With Personal Recollections. London: Longmans, Green.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barrell, J. 1972. “Introduction” to Samuel Taylor Coleridge, On the Constitution of the Church and State. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar

Barry, Brian. 1997 [1982]. “Humanity and Justice in Global Perspective.” In Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Edited by Goodin, Robert E. and Pettit, Philip. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1990. Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bartley, Paula. 2000. Prostitution: Prevention and Reform in England, 1860–1914. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baum, Bruce. 2000. Rereading Power and Freedom in J. S. Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baum, Bruce. 2003. “Millian Radical Democracy: Education for Freedom and Dilemmas of Liberal Equality.” Political Studies 51, no. 2 (Summer): 404–428.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bauman, Zygmunt. 1988. Freedom. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Beitz, Charles. 1979. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Beitz, Charles. 1994. “Cosmopolitan Liberalism and the States System.” In Political Restructuring in Europe: Ethical Perspectives. Edited by Brown, Chris. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Benditt, Theodore M. 1979. “Compromising Interests and Principles.” In Compromise in Ethics, Law and Politics. Edited by Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W.. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Martin. 1990. Splitting the Difference: Compromise and Integrity in Ethics and Politics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Benner, Erica. 1997. “Nationality without Nationalism.” Journal of Political Ideologies 2, no. 2: 189–206.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bentham, J. 1838–43. The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Edited by Bowring, J.. 11 vols. Edinburgh: W. Tait; London: Simpkin, Marshall.Google Scholar

Bentham, J.. 1931. Principles of the Civil Code in his book, The Theory of Legislation. Edited by Ogden, C. K.. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar

Bentham, J.. 1962a. The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Edited by Bowring, John. 10 vols. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. 1962b [1793]. “Essay on the Influence of Time and Place in Matters of Legislation.” In The Works of Jeremy Bentham Published Under the Superintendence of His Executor, John Bowring. Vol. I: 169–94. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. 1962c [1793]. Emancipate your Colonies! In The Works of Jeremy Bentham Published Under the Superintendence of His Executor, John Bowring. Vol. IV. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar

Bentham, J.. 1970. The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Edited by Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A.. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Bentham, J.. 1983 [1830]. Constitutional Code, Volume I. Edited by Rosen, F. and Burns, J. H. [Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bentham, J.. 1996 [1789]). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Edited by Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A., with a new introduction by Rosen, F. [Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Berger, Fred R. 1984. Happiness, Justice, and Freedom: The Moral and Political Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, Peter. 1998. “Mill: Liberty, Virtue, and the Discipline of Individuality.” In Mill and the Moral Character of Liberalism. Edited by Eisenach, E. J.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, Peter. 1999. Virtue and the Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University press.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. 1969 [1959]. “John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life.” Four Essays on Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. 1992 [1958]. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. 1997 [1959]. “John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life.” In Mill. Edited by Ryan, Alan. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Eduard. 1993 [1899]. The Preconditions of Socialism. Edited by Tudor, Henry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Biagini, E. 1996. “John Stuart Mill and the Model of Ancient Athens.” In Citizenship and Community. Edited by Biagini, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blackburn, Robin. 1991. “Fin de Siecle: Socialism after the Crash.” In After the Fall: The Failure of Socialism and the Future of Socialism. Edited by Blackburn, R.. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Bluche, François. 1968. Le Despotisme éclaire. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Bobbio, Norberto. 1987. Which Socialism? Marxism, Socialism and Democracy. Translated by Roger Griffin. Edited by Bellamy, Richard. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Boehm, Max. 1931. “Cosmopolitanism.” In The Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Vol. IV. New York: Macmillan, 457–61.Google Scholar

Boralevi, Lea Campos. 1984. Bentham and the Oppressed. European University Institute Series C. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brennan, Timothy. 2001. “Cosmopolitanism and Internationalism.” New Left Review, second series, 7 (January–February): 75–84.Google Scholar

Brink, David O. 1992. “Mill's Deliberative Utilitarianism.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 21, no. 1 (Winter): 67–103.Google Scholar

Bristow, Edward. 1978. Vice and Vigilance: Purity Movements in Britain since 1700. Dublin: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Brogran, Hugh. 1973. Tocqueville. London: Collins/Fontana.Google Scholar

Bromwich, David, and Kateb, George, editors. 2002. On Liberty. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, D. G. 1972. “Mill on Liberty and Morality.” Philosophical Review 81: 133–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Buber, Martin. 1970. I and Thou. New York and London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Bulwer, E. 1833. England and the English. 2 vols. London: R. Bentley.Google Scholar

Burgess-Jackson, Keith. 1995. “John Stuart Mill, Radical Feminist.” Social Theory and Practice 21: 369–96.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burns, J. H. 1968 [1957]. “J. S. Mill and Democracy, 1829–61.” In Mill, A Collection of Critical Essays. Edited by Schneewind, J. B.. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Butler, Brian E. 2001. “There Are Peoples and There Are Peoples: A Critique of Rawls's ‘The Law of Peoples.’” Florida Philosophical Review 1 (Winter): 6–24.Google Scholar

Caine, Barbara. 1992. Victorian Feminists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Capaldi, N. 2004. John Stuart Mill: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Carens, Joseph. 1987. “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders.” Review of Politics 49, no. 3: 251–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Carter, April. 2001. The Political Theory of Global Citizenship. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone. 1996. Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and The Politics of Discourse. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Cheah, Pheng, and Robbins, Bruce, editors. 1998. Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling beyond the Nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Claeys, Gregory. 1987. “Justice, Independence, and Industrial Democracy: The Development of John Stuart Mill's Views on Socialism.” Journal of Politics 49 (February): 122–147.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cobban, Alfred. 1969. The Nation State and National Self-Determination. London: Collins (the Fontana Library).Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. 1992. “The Future of a Disillusion.” Queen's Quarterly 99, no. 2 (Summer): 280–96.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. 2000. If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, David. 2003. “Their Liberties, Our Security.” Boston Review, December 2002–January 2003. http://www.bostonreview.net/BR27.6/cole.html#1.

Cole, G. D. H. 1964 [1920]. “Guild Socialism Restated.” In Socialist Thought: A Documentary History. Edited by Fried, Albert and Sanders, Ronald. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Coleridge, S. T. 1972 [1830]. On the Constitution of the Church and State. Edited by Barrell, J.. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar

Collini, Stefan. 1984. “Introduction” to J. S. Mill, Essays on Equality, Law, and Education: Collected Works XXI. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Collini, Stefan. 1991. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain, 1850–1930. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Colmer, J. 1976. “Editor's Introduction” to S. T. Coleridge, On the Constitution of the Church and State [The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol. X]. Princeton: Princeton University Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas Caritat, Marquis de. 1970 [1793]. Esquisse d'un tableau historique des progrès de l'ésprit humain. Belaval, Yvon, ed. Paris: Librairie Philosophique Vrin.Google Scholar

Constant, Benjamin. 1988 [1814]. The Spirit of Conquest and Usurpation and Their Relation to European Civilization. In Political Writings. Edited by Fontana, Biancamaria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Conway, Stephen. 1989. “Bentham on Peace and War.” Utilitas 1, no. 1: 82–101.CrossRef Google Scholar

Conway, Stephen. 1990. “Bentham, the Benthamites, and the Nineteenth-Century British Peace Movement.” Utilitas 2, no. 2: 221–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Coser, Lewis, and Irving Howe. 1966. “Images of Socialism.” In The Radical Papers. Edited by Howe, Irving. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Cott, Nancy F. 1987. The Grounding of Modern Feminism. Haven, New: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Crisp, Roger. 1997. Mill on Utilitarianism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Crisp, Roger, and Slote, Michael. 1997. Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crosland, C. A. R. 1964 [1956]. “The Future of Socialism.” In Socialist Thought: A Documentary History. Edited by Fried, Albert and Sanders, Ronald. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. 2001. How Democratic Is the American Constitution?New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dasgupta, Uma. 1995. “The Ilbert Bill Agitation, 1883.” In We Fought Together for Freedom: Chapters from the Indian Nationalist Movement. Edited by Dayal, Ravi. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Department of Justice. Criminal Victimization 2002. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office. Publication No. 199994.

Dewey, John. 1991 [1927]. Liberalism and Social Action. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. 1958 [1935]. “Liberty and Social Control.” In Philosophy of Education. Totawa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.Google Scholar

di Stefano, Christine. 1991. “John Stuart Mill: The Heart of Liberalism.” In Configurations of Masculinity: A Feminist Perspective on Modern Political Theory. Edited by Stefano, C. di. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Donner, Wendy. 1991. The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill's Moral and Political Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Donner, Wendy. 1993. “John Stuart Mill's Liberal Feminism.” Philosophical Studies 69: 155–66.CrossRef Google Scholar

Donner, Wendy. 1998. “Mill's Utilitarianism.” The Cambridge Companion to Mill Edited by Skorupski, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Donner, Wendy. 1999. “A Millian Perspective on the Relations between Persons and Their Bodies.” In Persons and Their Bodies: Rights, Responsibilities, Relationships. Edited by Cherry, Mark J. and Bole, Thomas J. III. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Donner, Wendy. 2005. “Mill's Theory of Value.” The Blackwell Guide to Mill's “Utilitarianism.” Edited by West, Henry. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Duncan, Graeme. 1973. Marx and Mill: Two Views of Social Conflict and Social Harmony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dutton, Geoffrey. 1967. The Hero as Murderer: The Life of Edward John Eyre, Australian Explorer and Governor of Jamaica, 1815–1901. Melbourne: Cheshire.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Gerald. 1997a. Mill's “On Liberty”: Critical Essays. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Gerald. 1997b [1972]. “Paternalism.” In Mill's “On Liberty”: Critical Essays. Edited by Dworkin, Gerald. London, New York, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. “Liberalism.” In Public and Private Morality. Edited by Hampshire, Stuart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. 1996a. “Do Liberty and Equality Conflict?” In Living as Equals. Edited by Barker, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. 1996b. “Foundations of Liberal Equality.” In Equal Freedom: Selected Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Edited by Darwall, Stephen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. 2002. “The Threat to Patriotism.” New York Review of Books, February 28: 44–49.Google Scholar

Eisenach, Eldon J., editor. 1998. Mill and the Moral Character of Liberalism. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Zillah. 1981. The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Ellis, Anthony. 1992. “Utilitarianism and International Ethics.” Traditions of International Ethics. Edited by Nardin, Terry and Mapel, David R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, and Karl Ove Moene. 1989. “Introduction.” In Alternatives to Capitalism. Edited by Elster, Jon and Moene, Karl Ove. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fabre, Cécile, and Miller, David. 2003. “Justice and Culture: Rawls, Sen, Nussbaum and O'Neill.” Political Studies Review 1: 4–17.CrossRef Google Scholar

Feinberg, Joel. 1980. Rights, Justice and the Bounds of Liberty: Essays in Social Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Finley, M. I. 1985 [1973]. Democracy Ancient and Modern. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Richard B. 1966. “A New Exploration of Mill's Essay On Liberty.” Political Studies 14 (October): 281–304.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibbons, John. 1990. “J. S. Mill, Liberalism, and Progress.” In Victorian Liberalism: Nineteenth Century Political Thought and Practice. Edited by Bellamy, Richard. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gray, John. 1983. Mill on Liberty: A Defense. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gray, John. 1989. “Indirect Liberty and Fundamental Rights.” In Liberalisms: Essays in Political Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gray, John. 1989. Liberalisms: Essays in Political Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gray, John. 1995. “Harnessing the Market.” New Left Review, no. 210 (March/April): 147–52.Google Scholar

Grosrichard, Alain. 1979. Structure du sérial: La fiction du despotisme asiatique dans l'Occident classique. Paris: Ėditions du Seuil.Google Scholar

Grote, George. 1906 [1846–56]. A History of Greece. 12 vols. London: J. M. Dent; New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar

Grote, George. 2000 [1846–56]. A History of Greece. 12 vols. Bristol: Thoemmes. (Reprint of 4th ed., 1872, in 10 vols.)Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy. 1987. Democratic Education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy. Liberal Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis, Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Haakonsen, Knud. 1996. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1996 [1992]. Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, and Michnik, Adam. 1994. “More Humility, Fewer Illusions.” New York Review of Books 41 (March 24): 24–29.Google Scholar

Habibi, Don A. 1999. “The Moral Dimensions of J. S. Mill's Colonialism.” Journal of Social Philosophy 30(1): 125–146.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hall, Catherine. 2002. Civilizing Subjects: Metropole and Colony in the English Imagination, 1830–1867. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar

Hamburger, Joseph. 1965. Intellectuals in Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hansen, H. 2005. “‘The Great Business of Life’: Mill and Argumentation.” Unpublished paper presented at the International Society for Utilitarian Studies Conference, Dartmouth College, USA, August.

Hansen, M. H. 1996. “The Ancient Athenian and the Modern Liberal View of Liberty as a Democratic Ideal.” In Demokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern. Edited by Ober, J. and Hedrick, C.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hansen, M. H. 1999. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes [1991]. Translated by J. A. Crook. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Harris, Abram L. 1956. “John Stuart Mill's Theory of Progress.” Ethics 66: 157–75.CrossRef Google Scholar

Harris, Abram L. 1964. “John Stuart Mill: Servant of the East India Company.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 30: 185–202.CrossRef Google Scholar

Harris, Ian. 2004. “Edmund Burke.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Spring Edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2004/entries/burke/.Google Scholar

Haslanger, Sally. 1995. “Ontology and Social Construction.” Philosophical Topics 23:2 (Fall): 95–125.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haslanger, Sally. 2002a. “On Being Objective and Being Objectified.” In A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Edited by Antony, L. M. and Witt, C. E.. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Haslanger, Sally. 2002b. “Social Construction: The Debunking Project.” In Socializing Metaphysics. Edited by Schmitt, F.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Haslanger, Sally. 2002c. “Ontology and Social Construction.” Philosophical Topics 23(2): 95–125.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hayes, Carlton J. H. 1931. The Historical Evolution of Modern Nationalism. New York: R. R. Smith.Google Scholar

Heater, Derek. 1996. World Citizenship and Government: Cosmopolitan Ideas in the History of Western Political Thought. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heater, Derek. 2002. World Citizenship: Cosmopolitan Thinking and Its Opponents. London and New York: Cotinuum.Google Scholar

Heckman, Susan. 1992. “John Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women: The Foundations of Liberal Feminism.” History of European Ideas 15: 681–6.CrossRef Google Scholar

Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Held, David. 2002. “Globalization, Corporate Practice and Cosmopolitan Social Standards.” Contemporary Political Theory 1: 59–78.CrossRef Google Scholar

Himmelfarb, Gertrude. 1963. “Introduction.” Essays on Politics and Culture. J. S. Mill. Edited by Himmelfarb, Gertrude. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Himmelfarb, Gertrude. 1974. On Liberty and Liberalism: The Case of John Stuart Mill. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar

Hirschmann, Edwin. 1980. ‘White Mutiny:’ The Ilbert Bill Crisis and the Genesis of the Indian National Congress. New Delhi: Heritage.Google Scholar

Hoag, Robert W. 1986. “Happiness and Freedom: Recent Work on John Stuart Mill.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 15(2): 188–99.Google Scholar

Hobhouse, Leonard T. 1980 [1911]. Liberalism. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Holcolme, Lee. 1983. Wives and Property: Reform of the Married Women's Property Law in Nineteenth-Century England. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Hollander, Samuel. 1985. The Economics of John Stuart Mill. Vol. 2. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen, and Sunstein, Cass R.. 1999. The Cost of Rights: Why Liberty Depends on Taxes. New York and London: Norton.Google Scholar

Holt, Thomas. 1992. The Problem of Freedom: Race, Labor, and Politics in Jamaica and Britain, 1832–1938. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Howe, Irving. 1966. “Introduction: The Radical Perspectiver.” The Radical Papers, ed. Howe, Irving. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Howes, John. 1986. “Mill on Women and Human Development.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (supplement): 66–74.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hutchings, Kimberly and Dannreuther, Roland, eds. 1999. Cosmopolitan Citizenship. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press; NewYork: St. Martin's Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar

Jardin, André. 1988. Tocqueville: A Biography. Translated by Lydia Davis with Robert Hemenway. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar

Johnston, David. 1994. The Idea of a Liberal Theory: A Critique and Reconstruction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Charles. 1999. Global Justice: Defending Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Deiniol. 2003. “The origins of the global city: ethics and morality in contemporary cosmopolitanism.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5(1): 50–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jones, H. S. 2000. Victorian Political Thought. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kalsem, Kristin Brandser. 2004. “Looking for law in all the ‘wrong’ places: Outlaw texts and early women's advocacy.” Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies 13: 273–325.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1991. The Metaphysics of Morals. Edited by Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kateb, G. 2003. “A Reading of On Liberty.” In On Liberty: John Stuart Mill. Edited by Bromwich, D. and Kateb, G.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Katznelson, Ira. 2003. Desolation and Enlightenment: Political Knowledge After Total War, Totalitarianism, and the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, D. G., Edmunds, C. N., and Seymour, A. K. 1992. Rape in America: A Report to the Nation. Arlington, VA: National Victim Center and Medical University of North Carolina.Google Scholar

Kinzer, Bruce L. 1978. “J. S. Mill and the Secret Ballot.” Historical Reflections 5 (Summer): 19–39. Reprinted in G. W. Smith, ed. J. S. Mill's Social and Political Thought: Critical Assessments. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Kinzer, Bruce L. 1984. “Mill and the Cattle Plague.” TheMill News Letter 19: 2–12.Google Scholar

Kinzer, Bruce L.. 1997. “J. S. Mill and the Problem of Party.” In John Stuart Mill's Social and Political Thought: Critical Assessments. Edited by Smith, G. W.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kinzer, Bruce L., Robson, Ann P., and Robson, John M.. 1992. A Moralist in and out of Parliament: John Stuart Mill at Westminster, 1865–1868. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Koebner, R. 1951. “Despot and Despotism: Vicissitudes of a Political Term.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 14: 292–302.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kojève, Alexandre. 2000 [1950]. “Tyranny and Wisdom.” In Leo Strauss, On Tyranny: Including the Strauss-Kojève Correspondence. Edited by Gourevitch, Victor and Roth, Michael S.. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Krieger, Leonard. 1975. An Essay on the Theory of Enlightened Despotism. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Krouse, Richard W. 1982. “Patriarchal Liberalism and Beyond: From John Stuart Mill to Harriet Taylor.” In The Family in Political Thought. Edited by Elshtain, J. B.. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., and Lozano, R., editors. 2004. World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Kuflik, Arthur. 1979. “Morality and Compromise.” In Compromise in Ethics, Law and Politics. Edited by Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W.. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Kurtfirst, Robert. 1996. “J. S. Mill on Oriental Despotism, Including Its British variant.” Utilitas 8(1): 73–87.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kuttner, Robert. 1992. “Liberalism, Socialism, and Democracy.” The American Prospect 9 (Spring): 7–12.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will. 2002. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will. 2003. “Being Canadian.” Government and Opposition 38(3): 357–85.CrossRef Google Scholar

Laine, Michael, ed. 1991. A Cultivated Mind: Essays on J. S. Mill Presented to John Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Laski, Harold. 1924. “Introduction.” In John Stuart Mill, Autobiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leavis, F. R. 1980 [1950]. ‘Introduction’ to Mill on Bentham and Coleridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leliepvre-Botton, Sylvie. 1996. Droit du sol, droit du sang: Patriotisme et sentiment national chez Rousseau. Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar

Levin, Michael. 2003. “John Stuart Mill: A Liberal Looks at Utopian Socialism in the Years of Revolution.” Utopian Studies 14(2): 68–82.Google Scholar

Lichtenberg, Judith. 1999. “How Liberal can Nationalism Be?” In Theorizing Nationalism. Edited by Biener, Ronald. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Lichtheim, George. 1975. A Short History of Socialism. London: Fontana.Google Scholar

Lindsay, Peter. 2000. “Overcoming False Dichotomies: Mill, Marx, and the Welfare State.” History of Political Thought 21(4): 657–81.Google Scholar

Lock, F. P. 1998. Edmund Burke. Vol. I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Locke, John. 1988 [c. 1681]. Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Locke, John. 1993 [c. 1681]. The Second Treatise of Government: An Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent, and the End of Civil Government. In Political Writings of John Locke. Edited by Wootton, David. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar

Locke, John. 1997 [1669]. “The Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina.” In Locke: Political Essays. Edited by Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lu, Catherine. 2000. “The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism.” Journal of Political Philosophy 8(2): 244–67.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lyons, David. 1979. “Mill on Liberty and Harm to Others.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (supplementary volume): 1–19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lyons, David. 1994. Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Lyons, David, editor. 1997. Mill's Utilitarianism: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. 1875. “Government of India. A Speech delivered in the House of Commons on the 10th of July, 1833. In Speeches of Lord Macaulay corrected by Himself. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar

MacIntosh, Peggy. 1991. “White Privilege and Male Privilege: A Personal Account of Coming to See Their Correspondence through Work in Women Studies.” In Race, Class, and Gender: An Anthology. Edited by Andersen, M. L. and Collins, P. H.. New York: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Macpherson, C. B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Macpherson, C. B. 1977. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Majeed, Javed. 1992. Ungoverned Imaginings: James Mill's The History of British India and Orientalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Manent, Pierre. 1994. An Intellectual History of Liberalism. Translated by Rebecca Balinski. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mantena, Karuna. Alibis of Empire: Henry Maine and the Transformation of Imperial Ideology. Princeton: Princeton University Press (forthcoming).CrossRef

Marcuse, Herbert. 1991 [1964]. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Markovits, Daniel. 2005. “Quarantines and Distributive Justice.” Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33: 323–38.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Marx, Karl. 1983 [1871]. “The Civil War in France.” In The Portable Karl Marx. Edited by Kamenka, Eugene. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. 1983 [1875]. “Marginal Notes to the Programme of the German Workers' Party [Critique of the Gotha Programme].” In The Portable Karl Marx. Edited by Kamenka, Eugene. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 1983 [1848]. “Manifesto of the Communist Party.” In The Portable Karl Marx. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Mazlish, Bruce. 1975. James and John Stuart Mill: Father and Son in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

McCallum, Gerald C. 1973. “Negative and Positive Freedom.” In Concepts in Social and Political Philosophy. Edited by Flathman, Richard. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

McElroy, Wendy. 2000. “The Contagious Disease Acts.” Freedom Daily, March 2000. http://www.zetetics.com/-mac/articles/contagious.html.

McHugh, Paul. 1980. Prostitution and Victorian Social Reform. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

McKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McKinnon, Catharine. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Medearis, John. 2005. “Labor, Democracy, Utility, and Mill's Critique of Private Property.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (January): 135–49.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mehta, Pratap Bhanu. 1996. “Liberalism, Nation and Empire: The Case of J. S. Mill,” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.

Mehta, Uday. 1999. Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mill, James. 1967 [1829]. An Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind. 2 vols. London: Longmans, Green & Dyer (reprint New York: Augustus M. Kelly).Google Scholar

Mill, James. 1858 [1817]. The History of British India. 5th ed. with Notes and Continuation by H. H. Wilson. 10 vol. London: James Madden, Piper, Stephenson, and Spence.Google Scholar

Mill, James. 1990 [1817]. The History of British India. New Delhi: Atlantic.Google Scholar

Mill, James. 1978. “Essay on Government.” In Utilitarian Logic and Politics. Edited by Lively, Jack and Rees, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. 1870a. “Letter to Williams Malleson,” 18 January, 1870. In The Letters of John Stuart Mill. Edited by Elliot, Hugh S. R.. Vol. III. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. 1870b, “Letter to Professor J. Nichol, of Glasgow.” 29 December, 1870. In The Letters of John Stuart Mill. Edited by Elliot, Hugh S. R.. Vol. III. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. 1963–91. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Edited by Robson, John M.. 33 vols. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Millar, F. 1998. The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, Dale. 2000. “John Stuart Mill's Civil Liberalism.” History of Political Thought XXI, no. 1 (Spring): 88–113.Google Scholar

Miller, Dale. 2003. “Mill's ‘Socialism.’” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2, no. 2: 213–38.CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, David. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Miller, David. 2000. Citizenship and National Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Moody, Kim. 1997. Workers in a Lean World: Unions in the International Economy. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Morales, Maria H. 1996. Perfect Equality: John Stuart Mill on Well-Constituted Communities. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Morrow, J. 1990. Coleridge's Political Thought, Property, Morality, and the Limits of Traditional Discourse. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Morton, James. 1987. “AIDS and the Contagious Diseases Acts.” New Law Journal 137: 764–6.Google Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. “Towards a Liberal Socialism.” In The Return of the Political. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Murray, Janet Horowitz. 1982. Strong-Minded Women and Other Lost Voices from Nineteenth-Century England. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. 2003. “Rawls and Liberalism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Edited by Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Neidleman, Jason Andrew. 2001. The General Will Is Citizenship: Inquiries into French Political Thought. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

New Left Review. 1960. “Introducing NLR.” New Left Review, no. 1 (January/February): 1–3.

Nove, Alex. 1987. “Socialism.” In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 4. Edited by Eatwell, John et al. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. 1999. Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. 2005. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. 1994. “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism.” The Boston Review 19:5 (October/November): 3–34.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, Michael. 1991 [1962]. Rationalism in Politics and other Essays, expanded edition. Edited by Fuller, Timothy. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar

Ober, J. 1989. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ober, J. 1996. The Athenian Revolution. Princeton: PrincetonUniversity Press.Google Scholar

Ober, J. 1998. Political Dissent in Democratic Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Okin, Susan Moller. 1973. “John Stuart Mill's Feminism: The Subjection of Women and The Improvement of Mankind.” New Zealand Journal of History 7: 105–27.Google Scholar

Okin, Susan Moller. 1979. “John Stuart Mill, Liberal Feminist.” In Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

O'Rourke, K. 2001. John Stuart Mill and Freedom of Expression, The Genesis of a Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Parekh, Bhikhu. 1994. “The Narrowness of Liberalism from Mill to Rawls.” Times Literary Supplement (25 February): 11–13.Google Scholar

Parekh, Bhikhu. 1995. “Liberalism and Colonialism: A Critique of Locke and Mill.” In The Decolonization of Imagination: Culture, Knowledge, and Power. Edited by Pieterse, Jan Nederveen and Parekh, Bhikhu. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Parekh, Bhikhu. 2000. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and Political Theory. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Parry, G. 1967. “Enlightened Government and Its Critics in Germany.” In Enlightened Despotism. Edited by Andrews, Stuart. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Pearson, Michael. 1972. The Age of Consent: Victorian Prostitution and Its Enemies. Newton Abbot: David and Charles.Google Scholar

Peers, Douglas M. 1999. “Imperial Epitaph: John Stuart Mill's Defense of the East India Company.” In J. S. Mill's Encounter with India, edited Moir, Martin I., Peers, Douglas M., and Zastoupil, Lynn. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Petrie, Glen. 1971. A Singular Iniquity: The Campaigns of Josephine Butler. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. 2001. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Philips, C. H., Singh, H. L., and Pandey, B. N., editors. 1962. The Evolution of India and Pakistan, 1858 to 1947: Select Documents. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pogge, Thomas W. 2002. “Moral Universalism and Global Economic Justice.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1(1): 29–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pyle, Andrew, ed. 1994. The Subjection of Women: Contemporary Responses to John Stuart Mill. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar

Radcliff, Peter. 1966. Limits of Liberty: Studies of Mill's On Liberty. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 1985. “Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14: 223–52.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 1988. “The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 17: 251–76.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Edited by Kelly, Erin. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. 1988. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rees, J. C. 1960. “A Re-reading of Mill on Liberty” Political Studies 8: 113–29.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rees, J. C.. 1985. John Stuart Mill's “On Liberty.” Edited by Williams, G. L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

“Report of the Jamaica Royal Commission.” British Parliamentary Papers, 1866, vol. XXX: 518–28.

Richter, Melvin. 1977. The Political Theory of Montesquieu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Riley, J. 1988. Liberal Utilitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Riley, J. 1990. “Utilitarian Ethics and Democratic Government.” Ethics 100: 335–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Riley, J. 1994. “Introduction.” In John Stuart Mill, Principles of Political Economy and Chapters on Socialism. Edited by Riley, Jonathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Riley, J. 1996a. “J. S. Mill's Liberal Utilitarian Assessment of Capitalism Versus Socialism.” Utilitas 8: 39–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

Riley, J. 1996b. “On Liberty and the Periclean Ideal.” Qwerty 6: 241–9.Google Scholar

Riley, J. 1998a. Mill on Liberty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Riley, J. 1998b. “Mill's Political Economy: Ricardian Science and Liberal Utilitarian Art.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Edited by Skorupski, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Riley, J. 2005a. “Mill's Doctrine of Freedom of Expression.” Utilitas 17: 147–79.CrossRef Google Scholar

Riley, J. 2005b. “Rousseau: The Social Contract.” In Central Works of Philosophy. 5 vols. Edited by Shand, J. II. Chesham: Acumen.Google Scholar

Riley, J. 2006a. Mill's Radical Liberalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Riley, J. 2006b. “Justice as a Higher Pleasure.” Keynote lecture delivered at the Mill Bicentennial Conference, University College London, 5–7 April 2006.

Ring, Jennifer. 1985. “Mill's The Subjection of Women: The Methodological Limits of Liberal Feminism.” Review of Politics 47: 27–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Robbins, Lionel. 1952. The Theory of Economic Policy in Classical Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Roberts, J. T. 1982. Accountability in Athenian Government. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, J. T. 1994. Athens on Trial. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Robson, Ann P., and Robson, John M., editors. 1994. Sexual Equality: Writings by John Stuart Mill, Harriet Taylor Mill, and Helen Taylor. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Robson, John M. 1968. The Improvement of Mankind: The Social and Political Thought of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Robson, John M. 1998. “Civilization and Culture as Moral Concepts.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Edited by Skorupski, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosen, F. 1983. Jeremy Bentham and Representative Democracy, A Study of the Constitutional Code. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Rosen, F. 2003. Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rosen, F.. 2007. “From Jeremy Bentham's Radical Philosophy to J. S. Mill's Philosophic Radicalism.” In Cambridge History of Nineteenth Century Political Thought. Edited by Jones, G. Stedman and Claeys, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosenblum, Nancy. 1987. Another Liberalism: Romanticism and the Reconstruction of Liberal Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosselli, Carlo. 1994 [1929]. Liberal Socialism. Translated by William McCuaig. Edited by Urbanati, Nadia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Russett, Cynthia. 1989. Sexual Science: The Victorian Construction of Womanhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ryan, Alan. 1972. “Utilitarianism and Bureaucracy: The Views of J. S. Mill.” In Studies in the Growth of Nineteenth-Century Government. Edited by Sutherland, Gillian. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Ryan, Alan. 1974. J. S. Mill. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Ryan, Alan. 1983. “Property, Liberty, and On Liberty.” In Of Liberty. Edited by Griffiths, A. Phillips. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ryan, Alan. 1990 [1970]. The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. 2d ed. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar

Sarvasy, Wendy. 1984. “J. S. Mill's Theory of Democracy for a Period of Transition Between Capitalism and Socialism.” Polity 16 (Summer): 567–87.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sarvasy, Wendy. 1985. “A Reconsideration of the Development and Structure of John Stuart Mill's Socialism.” Western Political Quarterly 38 (June): 312–333.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sassoon, Donald. 1996. One Hundred Years of Socialism: The West European Left in the Twentieth Century. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Scalia, Antonin. 1997. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Schackleton, Robert. 1961. Montesquieu: A Critical Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scheffler, Samuel. 1996. “Family and Friends First?” (review article on Martha C. Nussbaum, For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism, edited by Cohen, Joshua, Boston: Beacon, 1996), Times Literary Supplement (27 December 1996): 8–9.Google Scholar

Scheffler, Samuel. 1999. “Conceptions of Cosmopolitanism.” Utilitas 11, no. 3: 255–76.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. 1988 [1923]. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Translated by Ellen Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Schultz, Bart, and Varouxakis, Georgios, editors. 2005. Utilitarianism and Empire. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Pedro. 1968. “John Stuart Mill and Socialism.” The Mill News Letter 4 (Fall): 3–7.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Pedro. 1972. The New Political Economy of J. S. Mill. English translation. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Semmel, Bernard. 1976. Jamaican Blood and Victorian Conscience: The Governor Eyre Controversy. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar

Semmel, Bernard. 1984. John Stuart Mill and the Pursuit of Virtue. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Senior, Nassau W. 1842. “France, America, and Britain.” Edingurgh Review 75: 1–48.Google Scholar

Shanley, Mary Lyndon. 1981. “Marital Slavery and Friendship: John Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women.” Political Theory 9: 229–47.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shanley, Mary Lyndon. 1989. Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850–1895. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Shanley, Mary Lyndon. 1998. “The Subjection of Women.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Edited by Skorupski, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shanley, Mary Lyndon and Pateman, Carole, editors. 1991. Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Shields, Johanna Nicol. 1985. The Line of Duty: Maverick Congressmen and the Development of American Political Culture, 1836–1860. Westport CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar

Sinha, Mrinalini. 1995. Colonial Masculinity: The ‘Manly’ Englishman and the ‘Effeminate’ Bengali. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. 1988. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” In Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics. Edited by Tully, James. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Skorupski, John. 1989. John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Skorupski, John, editor. 1998. The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, F. B. 1971. “Ethics and Disease in the Later Nineteenth Century: The Contagious Diseases Acts.” Historical Studies 15: 118–39.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Smith, G. W. 1984. “J. S. Mill on Freedom.” In Conceptions of Liberty in Political Philosophy. Edited by Pelczynski, Zbigniew and Gray, John. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Smout, T. C. 1993. Review of The Magdalenes: Prostitution in the Nineteenth Century by Linda Mahood. English Historical Review 108: 1048–9.Google Scholar

Snyder, A. D. 1929. Coleridge on Logic and Learning with Selections from the Unpublished Manuscripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Spitz, Jean-Fabian. 1995. La liberté politique: Essai de généalogie conceptuelle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Stafford, William. 1998a. “How Can a Pragmatic Liberal Call Himself a Socialist? The Case of John Stuart Mill.” Journal of Political Ideologies 3 (October): 325–45.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stafford, William. 1998b. John Stuart Mill. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stapleton, Julia. 1998. “James Fitzjames Stephen: Liberalism, Patriotism, and English Liberty.” Victorian Studies 41: 243–63.Google Scholar

Stapleton, Julia. 2001. Political Intellectuals and Public Identities in Britain since 1850. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Starr, Paul. 1991. “Liberalism after Socialism.” The American Prospect 7 (Fall): 70–80.Google Scholar

Stephen, James Fitzjames. 1866a. “Mr. Arnold and the Middle Classes.” Saturday Review 21 (10 February): 161–3.Google Scholar

Stephen, James Fitzjames. 1866b. “Lord Macaulay's Works.” Saturday Review 22 (18 August): 207–9.Google Scholar

Stephen, James Fitzjames. 1883a. “Criminal Procedure in India.” The Times. March 1.

Stephen, James Fitzjames. 1883b. “Foundations of the Government of India.” The Nineteenth Century LXXX (October): 541–568.Google Scholar

Stephen, James Fitzjames. 1991 [1873]. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Stephen, James Fitzjames. 1993 [1873]. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. Edited by Warner, Stuart D.. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar

Stephen, Leslie. 1900. The English Utilitarians. Vol. III. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Stetson, Dorothy. 1982. A Woman's Issue: The Politics of Family Reform in England. London: Greenwood.Google Scholar

Stokes, Eric. 1959. The English Utilitarians and India. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

St. John-Packe, Michael. 1954. The Life of John Stuart Mill. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar

Strachey, Lytton. 1988 [1918]. “Florence Nightingale.” In Eminent Victorians: The Illustrated Edition. New York: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Eileen P. 1983. “Liberalism and Imperialism: J. S. Mill's Defense of the British Empire.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44: 599–617.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sumner, L. W. 1979. “The Good and the Right.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism. Edited by Wesley E. Cooper, Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 5 (supplementary volume): 99–114.

Sumner, L. W. 1992. “Welfare, Happiness, and Pleasure.” Utilitas 4(2): 199–206.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sumner, L. W. 1997. The Moral Foundation of Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ten, C. L. 1980. Mill on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ten, C. L.. 1998. “Democracy, Socialism, and the Working Classes.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Edited by Skorupski, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thomas, Keith. 1959. “The Double Standard.” Journal of the History of Ideas 20: 199–216.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thomas, W. 1979. The Philosophic Radicals: Nine Studies in Theory and Practice, 1817–41. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Thompson, Dennis. 1976. John Stuart Mill and Representative Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, Dennis. 1987. Political Ethics and Public Office. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Thucydides. 1991. The Peloponnesian War. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Tideman, N. 1995. “The Single Transferable Vote.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 27–38.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tjaden, P., and Thoennes, N.. 2000. Full Report on the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence against Women: Findings from the National Violence against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Report NCJ 183781.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tulloch, Gail. 1989. Mill and Sexual Equality. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Turk, C. 1988. Coleridge and Mill: A Study of Influence. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia. 1991. “John Stuart Mill on Androgyny and Ideal Marriage.” Political Theory 19: 626–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia. 1994. “Introduction: Another Socialism.” In Liberal Socialism by Carlo Roselli. Translated by William McCuaig. Edited by Urbanati, Nadia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia. 2002. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Urbinati, Nadia. 2004. “The Importance of Norberto Bobbio.” Dissent 51 (Spring): 78–80.Google Scholar

Varouxakis, Georgios. 1997. “John Stuart Mill on Intervention and Non-Intervention.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 26(1): 57–76.CrossRef Google Scholar

Varouxakis, Georgios. 2001. “Patriotism,” in Encyclopaedia of Nationalism. Edited by Leoussi, Athena S.. Brunwick and London: Transaction.Google Scholar

Varouxakis, Georgios. 2002a. Mill on Nationality. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Varouxakis, Georgios. 2002b. Victorian Political Thought on France and the French. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave.CrossRef Google Scholar

Varouxakis, Georgios. 2005. “Empire, Race, Euro-centrism: John Stuart Mill and His Critics.” In Utilitarianism and Empire. Edited by Schultz, Bart and Varouxakis, Georgios. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Varouxakis, Georgios. 2006. “‘Patriotism,’ ‘Cosmopolitanism’ and ‘Humanity’ in Victorian Political Thought.” European Journal of Political Theory 5(1): 100–18.CrossRef Google Scholar

Venturi, Franco. 1960. “Dispotismo orientale.” Rivista storica italiana (March): 119–43.Google Scholar

Vertovec, Steven, and Cohen, Robin, editors. 2002. Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Villa, Dana. 2001. Socratic Citizenship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Vincent, Andrew. 1997. “Liberal Nationalism: An Irresponsible Compound?” Political Studies 45(2): 275–95.CrossRef Google Scholar

Vincent, Andrew. (2002): Nationalism and Particularity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vincent, John. 1966. The Formation of the Liberal Party, 1857–1868. London: Constable.Google Scholar

Viroli, Maurizio. 1995. For Love of Country: An Essay on Patriotism and Nationalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. 1987. “Mill and the Value of Moral Distress.” Political Studies 35: 410–23. Reprinted in Waldron 1993.CrossRef Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. 1991. “Homelessness and the Issue of Freedom.” UCLA Law Review, 39: 295–324. Reprinted in Waldron 1993.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. 1993. Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. 1995 [1992]. “Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternative.” In The Rights of Minority Cultures. Edited by Kymlicka, Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. 2000. “What Is Cosmopolitan?” Journal of Political Philosophy 8(2): 227–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. 2002a. God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations of in Locke's Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. 2002b. “Mill as a Critic of Culture and Society.” In J. S. Mill, On Liberty. Edited by Bromwich, and Kateb, . New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. 2003. “Security and Liberty: The Image of Balance.” Journal of Political Philosophy 11: 191–210.CrossRef Google Scholar

Walkowitz, Judith R. 1980. Prostitution and Victorian Society: Women, Class and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1958. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Edited by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Welchman, Jennifer. 1995. “Locke on Slavery and Inalienable Rights.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25: 67–81.CrossRef Google Scholar

West, Henry. 2004. An Introduction to Mill's Utilitarian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, Geraint. 1989. “J. S. Mill and Political Violence.” Utilitas 1: 102–11.CrossRef Google Scholar

Williams, R. 1958. Culture and Society 1780–1950. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Wittfogel, Karl A. 1957. Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Wollheim, Richard. 1973. “John Stuart Mill and the Limits of State Action.” Social Research 40: 1–30.Google Scholar

Zastoupil, Lynn. 1994. John Stuart Mill and India. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Zastoupil, Lynn. 1999. “India, J. S. Mill, and ‘Western’ Culture.” In J. S. Mill's Encounter with India. Edited by Moir, Martin I., Peers, Douglas M., and Zastoupil, Lynn. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRef Google Scholar