Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:16:10.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Commenting on the Old Testament

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2010

B. D. Chilton
Affiliation:
Professor of Religion and Chaplain, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, and Rector, The Church of St John the Evangelist, Barrytown, New York
Get access

Summary

THE PESHARIM

Of the documents or fragments of documents which have been discovered at Qumran, perhaps the most distinctive are the pesharim. Formally, they are continuous interpretations of the biblical passages to which they relate, Habakkuk (1QpHab), Micah (1QpMic), Zephaniah (1QpZeph and 4QpZeph), Psalms (1QpPs and 4QpPs [a, b]), Isaiah (4QpIsa [a−e]), Hosea (4QpHos [a, b]) and Nahum (4QpNah). Other fragmentary material might also have belonged within pesharim (cf. Horgan, 1979, p. 1; Horgan's edition of the Hebrew texts is to be found in an appendix, here cited with ‘I’ before the arabic numeral of the page number), so that the task of identification must continue. The most complete of the pesharim is that of Habakkuk, which has been subjected to diligent investigation since the publication of Elliger's magisterial treatment (1953). By reason of its relative completeness and the close attention it has attracted, 1QpHab is a suitable point of departure for understanding the pesharim generally.

1QpHab is commonly cited by column and line of text, as here, but it proceeds systematically in the order of Habakkuk, until Hab. 2:20 is cited in the thirteenth column. The pesher therefore ends on the openly eschatological climax of what is called the ‘burden’ of Habakkuk in 1:1, and does not take up the ‘prayer’ of Habakkuk, from 3:1. On both external and internal grounds, the ending of the document should be seen as the result of a deliberate decision; blank space follows the four lines of the thirteenth column, and the chief concern of the pesher appears to be unequivocally eschatological (cf. Brownlee, 1979, pp. 2i8f for an unrepresentative attempt to explain the ending as accidental).

Type
Chapter
Information
It Is Written: Scripture Citing Scripture
Essays in Honour of Barnabas Lindars, SSF
, pp. 122 - 140
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×