Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T06:30:43.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Judging Muslims

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2013

Robin Griffith-Jones
Affiliation:
The Temple Church, London
Get access

Summary

The current discussion of Muslim law and its relevance for British jurisdictions has largely bypassed the activity of the official courts. Whatever accommodation may or may not be given to Muslim law within British legal systems, judges in British courts and tribunals will need to ensure that greater attention is paid to the religion and mores of Muslim communities. Indeed, there is already evidence that British judges have had to reckon, and increasingly so, with issues of cultural specificity and expertise when cases involving Muslims come before them. In this chapter, I outline some of the tensions between legal traditions in such cases. The focus is on issues of marriage and divorce, and the argument centres on the need for a greater flexibility in judicial decision-making when Muslim cases come before courts.

The moral deficiency of those who subscribe to non-Christian religions is a well-established – and still endemic – theme in Western culture. Those who follow ‘false religions’ are morally suspect and, since it is assumed that action follows doctrine, their actions bear out the falsity of their doctrines. Modern secularism, although it purports to transcend the bias of particular religions, has not abandoned this theme, and it survives and reproduces through other, ostensibly non-religious, secular tests. The underlying theme is clear and evident in the ways in which Western legal orders are responding to the presence of Muslims. Muslims, for their part, have not been able to formulate coherent responses to societal or legal pluralism, and generally assume that others should accept the centrality of their Islamic doctrines. It may therefore be argued that neither the West nor its Muslims are fully prepared to respond to the globalisation, migration and pluralism of contemporary times. Instead, each side manoeuvres with the aim of asserting the moral superiority of its own doctrines. This chapter takes these blockages to pluralist thinking as givens, and assumes that there is nonetheless a willingness to overcome them.

Type
Chapter
Information
Islam and English Law
Rights, Responsibilities and the Place of Shari'a
, pp. 144 - 156
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

O’Donoghue and Others v United Kingdom [2011] All ER (D) 46 (Jan). Discrimination was found particularly because the requirement did not apply to marriages solemnised in an Anglican Church. The scheme was finally abolished with effect from 9 May 2011, but its abolition has met with concerns about marriages being contracted solely for immigration purposes: Home Affairs Committee, ‘The work of the UK Border Agency’, ninth report, (November 2010–March 2011), para 25
Hill, A and McVeigh, K, ‘Gay men become victims of forced marriages’, The Guardian, 1 July 2010.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×