Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:17:07.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - From Vietnam to Iraq – The Rebirth of American Military Power and the Origins of an RMA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Keith L. Shimko
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

The First Iraq War

Even those inclined to view the 1991 Iraq War as a turning point in the history of warfare concede that this is a matter of legitimate debate, a proposition about which reasonable analysts can disagree. That the war was a turning point for the American military, however, seems almost incontestable. As American and coalition forces gathered in the Arabian Desert in the winter of 1991 to do battle with Iraq, memories of Vietnam and the self-doubt the war engendered were never far from the surface. The outcome in Vietnam had shaken the U.S. military to its core, and the recovery over the subsequent decade and a half had been difficult and sometimes painful. Some may have seen the 1991 Iraq War as a test of abstract theories of changing warfare, but for the American military the stakes were less esoteric. The war provided an opportunity for institutional redemption, a chance to finally exorcise the ghosts and demons of Vietnam. It was certainly a surprising opportunity, and not merely because of the near universal failure to anticipate the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Throughout much the 1980s, the United States viewed Iraq as something of an ally, a bulwark against the spread of Iranian fundamentalism and influence. The unexpected nature of the 1991 Iraq War reminds us that nations and their militaries do not always enjoy the luxury of fighting the opponents for whom they prepared and trained.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ricks, Thomas, Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq (New York: Penguin, 2005), p. 130Google Scholar
Kagan, Frederick, Finding the Target (New York: Encounter Books, 2007), p. 5Google Scholar
Werrell, Kenneth P., “Did USAF Technology Fail in Vietnam: Three Case Studies,” Airpower Journal (Spring 1998), p. 93Google Scholar
Hallion, Richard P., Storm Over Iraq (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution, 1997), pp. 303–5Google Scholar
Gilster, Herman, The Air War in Southeast Asia: Case Studies of Selected Campaigns (Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air University Press, 1993), p. 98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clodfelter, Mark, The Limits of Air Power: The American Bombing of North Vietnam (New York: Free Press, 1989), pp. 166–76 and 194–202Google Scholar
Thompson, Wayne, To Hanoi and Back: The U.S. Air Force and North Vietnam, 1966–1973 (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 2000), pp. 219–54Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, The Revolution in Strategic Affairs (London: Oxford University Press, 1998), p. 22Google Scholar
Keegan, John, The First World War (New York: Knopf, 1998), p. 370Google Scholar
Baritz, Loren, Backfire: A History of How American Culture Led Us into Vietnam and Made US Fight the Way We Did (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985), p. 50Google Scholar
Ravenal, Earl, Never Again: Learning from America's Foreign Policy Failures (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Rostker, Bernard, I Want You! The Evolution of the All Volunteer Force (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2006)Google Scholar
Feaver, Peter and Gelpi, Christopher, Choosing Your Battles: American Civil–Military Relations and the Use of Force (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Pipes, Richard, “Why the Soviet Union Thinks It Could Fight and Win a Nuclear War.” Commentary Vol. 64, No. 1 (July 1977), pp. 21–34Google Scholar
Hakett, John's bestselling book The Third World War, August 1985 (New York: Macmillan, 1982)Google Scholar
Posen, 's “Measuring the European Conventional Balance: Coping with Complexity in Threat Assessment,” International Security Vol. 9, No. 3 (Winter 1984/85), pp. 47–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervasi, Tom, The Myth of Soviet Military Supremacy (New York: Harper and Row, 1986)Google Scholar
Record, Jeffrey, “Why the Strong Lose,” Parameters (Winter 2005), p. 26Google Scholar
Nagl, John A., Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002), p. 206Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Bruce, The New Face of War: How War Will Be Fought in the 21st Century (New York: Free Press, 2003), p. 35Google Scholar
Carter, Ashton B. and Perry, William J., Preventive Defense: A New National Security Strategy for the United States (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1999), p. 180Google Scholar
Chapman, Anne W., The Origins and Development of the National Training Center, 1976–1984 (Fort Monroe, VA: United States Army Training and Doctrine Command, 1992), p. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimbala, Stephen J., “Transformation in Concept and Policy,” Joint Force Quarterly (July 2005), p. 28Google Scholar
Sloan, Elinor, The Revolution in Military Affairs (Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 2002), p. 6Google Scholar
O'Hanlon, Michael, Technological Change and the Future of Warfare (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2000), pp. 32–67Google Scholar
Brown, Michael, Flying Blind: The Politics of the U.S. Strategic Bomber Program (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992), p. 273Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R., The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain and Germany Between the World Wars (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984), p. 13Google Scholar
Chin, Warren, “Technology, Industry and War, 1945–1991,” in Jensen, Geoffrey and Wiest, Andrew, eds., War in the Age of Technology (New York: NYU Press, 2001), pp. 55–6Google Scholar
Knox, MacGregor and Murray, Williamson, “The Future Behind Us,” in Knox, MacGregor and Murray, Williamson, eds., The Dynamics of Military Revolution, 1300–2050 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), p. 189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, Charles, “Developing Joint Counterinsurgency Doctrine,” Joint Force Quarterly (2nd Quarter, 2008), p. 91Google Scholar
Coram, Robert, Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War (New York: Back Bay Books, 2002), p. 335Google Scholar
Fadok, David S., John Boyd and John Warden: Air Power's Quest for Strategic Paralysis. (Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air University Press, February 1995), p. 37Google Scholar
Warden, John A., The Air Campaign (New York: toExel Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Sherwood, John Darrell, “Review of John Warden and the Renaissance of American Airpower by John Andreas Olsen,” Joint Force Quarterly (April 2008), p. 146Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×