Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Table of legislation
- 1 States, firms and legitimacy of regulation: insoluble issues?
- 2 Internet co-regulation and constitutionalism
- 3 Self-organization and social networks
- 4 An empire entire of itself? Standards, domain names and government
- 5 Content regulation and the Internet
- 6 Private ISP censorship
- 7 Analyzing case studies
- 8 Internet co-regulation as part of the broader regulatory debate
- Bibliography
- Index
4 - An empire entire of itself? Standards, domain names and government
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Table of legislation
- 1 States, firms and legitimacy of regulation: insoluble issues?
- 2 Internet co-regulation and constitutionalism
- 3 Self-organization and social networks
- 4 An empire entire of itself? Standards, domain names and government
- 5 Content regulation and the Internet
- 6 Private ISP censorship
- 7 Analyzing case studies
- 8 Internet co-regulation as part of the broader regulatory debate
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Introducing Internet standard setting
In this chapter, I consider issues and institutions uniquely designed for the Internet, to provide co- or self-regulatory tools to solve unique problems, and the effect of both technological and government regulation thereon. Though predominantly technical in character, as seen in the previous chapter with UGC, standards define content interoperability. I therefore consider: first, core standards made in the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF); second, the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and its standard setting, including the attempt to introduce labelling standards to enable end-users to filter Internet content; and finally, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which allocates ‘addresses’ for Internet sites and claims an entirely technical character unrelated to, and entirely agnostic to, content, and the country registrar for the UK, Nominet. The ability of content providers to offer end-users a service ultimately rests on conformance with IETF standards. Understanding the importance of IETF as the basic technical rule-maker of the Internet, and its coordination mechanisms through ISOC to ICANN, and through participation to W3C and content, services and applications, is necessary before considering other SROs.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Internet Co-RegulationEuropean Law, Regulatory Governance and Legitimacy in Cyberspace, pp. 101 - 129Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011