Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Preface
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Albania: Are Albanian Legal Rules on Divorce Adequate for High-Conflict Divorces?
- Australia: Reform and Complexity: A Difficult Balance
- Brazil: The Social Food Bank and the State's Duty to the Child in the Face of the Non-Fulfillment of Child Support Executions
- Canada: Habitual Residence of Abducted Children and Divorce Act Reform
- China: On Protection of the Child's Right to Care under the Minor Guardianship System in China
- England and Wales: Familial Relationships: Entrances and Exits
- The Faroe Islands: A New Family Law is Born
- France: A Chronicle of French Family Law
- Hong Kong: Slow Progress Towards Family Law Reform?
- Ireland: ‘Best Interests’ as a Limited Constitutional Imperative
- Italy: The Divorce Allowance in Italian Law: The Role of Jurisprudence in the Formation of the Legal Rule in the Family Sphere
- Korea: AID and Surrogacy in Korean Law
- Namibia: Towards a New Juvenile Justice System in Namibia
- New Caledonia: Legal Pluralism and Diversity of Interpretation of Fundamental Rights (Common Law, Customary Law, Reservation Related to Indigenous Rights): The Example of New Caledonia
- New Zealand: Reform is in the Air
- Papua New Guinea: State and Customary Laws and the Underlying Law of Papua New Guinea: A Family Law Conundrum
- Portugal: What's Mine is Mine and Won't be Yours: The Newly Introduced Possibility of Opting Out of the Mandatory Succession Effects of Marriage in Portugal
- Serbia: Transgender Issues before the Constitutional Court of Serbia
- The Seychelles: The Seychellois Family Tribunal and its Implementation of the Family Violence (Protection of Victims) Act 2000
- UN Committee on the Rights of the Child: Reflections on Family Law Issues in the Jurisprudence of the CRC Committee: The Convention on the Rights of the Child @ 30
- United States of America: Same-Sex and Different-Sex Relationships: Is it Time for Convergence?
- Index
Albania: Are Albanian Legal Rules on Divorce Adequate for High-Conflict Divorces?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2019
- Frontmatter
- Preface
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Albania: Are Albanian Legal Rules on Divorce Adequate for High-Conflict Divorces?
- Australia: Reform and Complexity: A Difficult Balance
- Brazil: The Social Food Bank and the State's Duty to the Child in the Face of the Non-Fulfillment of Child Support Executions
- Canada: Habitual Residence of Abducted Children and Divorce Act Reform
- China: On Protection of the Child's Right to Care under the Minor Guardianship System in China
- England and Wales: Familial Relationships: Entrances and Exits
- The Faroe Islands: A New Family Law is Born
- France: A Chronicle of French Family Law
- Hong Kong: Slow Progress Towards Family Law Reform?
- Ireland: ‘Best Interests’ as a Limited Constitutional Imperative
- Italy: The Divorce Allowance in Italian Law: The Role of Jurisprudence in the Formation of the Legal Rule in the Family Sphere
- Korea: AID and Surrogacy in Korean Law
- Namibia: Towards a New Juvenile Justice System in Namibia
- New Caledonia: Legal Pluralism and Diversity of Interpretation of Fundamental Rights (Common Law, Customary Law, Reservation Related to Indigenous Rights): The Example of New Caledonia
- New Zealand: Reform is in the Air
- Papua New Guinea: State and Customary Laws and the Underlying Law of Papua New Guinea: A Family Law Conundrum
- Portugal: What's Mine is Mine and Won't be Yours: The Newly Introduced Possibility of Opting Out of the Mandatory Succession Effects of Marriage in Portugal
- Serbia: Transgender Issues before the Constitutional Court of Serbia
- The Seychelles: The Seychellois Family Tribunal and its Implementation of the Family Violence (Protection of Victims) Act 2000
- UN Committee on the Rights of the Child: Reflections on Family Law Issues in the Jurisprudence of the CRC Committee: The Convention on the Rights of the Child @ 30
- United States of America: Same-Sex and Different-Sex Relationships: Is it Time for Convergence?
- Index
Summary
INTRODUCTION
Respect for private and family life is a fundamental human right recognised from and guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights, of which Albania became a member in 1996. In its narrow meaning the notion of family law, as basically protected by the Convention, means the parents and the children. But in the meaning of the Convention this is not limited only to the parents and children. The jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights has accepted that family life covers all persons who have blood ties or a juridical relationship like marriage.
The right to marry and found a family is provided by Article 12 of the Convention and is closely related to the right for respect to private and family life as provided by Article 8. According to Article 12 of the Convention, ‘Men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to found a family, according to the national laws governing the exercise of this right’. The concept of family life, according to the jurisprudence of the ECtHR, involves the idea of providing protection to spouses from each other. In its jurisprudence the court has accepted and defined the respect and dignity between spouses during marriage as the fundamental objective according to Article 8 of the Convention where the court acknowledged the positive obligations of the state for insuring the effective respect to family life between spouses, especially in the circumstances of a couple in crisis.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to which Albania is a party, followed on from the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights, and has stipulated the obligation of free and complete consent of the spouses to get married, during marriage and dissolution of the marriage. This principle is partially guaranteed by Article 14 of the Convention and Article 5 of the Protocol 7, which provides that:
Spouses shall enjoy equality of rights and responsibilities of a private law character between them, and in relations with their children, as to marriage, during marriage and in the event of its dissolution. This article shall not prevent States from taking such measures as are necessary in the interest of the children.
The wording ‘in the event of marriage dissolution’, does not imply the obligation of the state to provide the dissolution of marriage or any of the other forms of dissolving the marriage.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- International Survey of Family Law 2019 , pp. 1 - 12Publisher: IntersentiaPrint publication year: 2019