Adams, Robert Merrihew. 1999. Finite and Infinite Goods: A Framework for Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alexander, David E. 2012. Goodness, God and Evil. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry. 2000. “Insufficient Concern: A Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability.” California Law Review 88 (3): 931–54.Google Scholar

Alvarez, Maria. 2010. Kinds of Reasons: An Essay in the Philosophy of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

American Law Institute. 1985. Model Penal Code: Official Draft and Explanatory Notes: Complete Text of the Model Penal Code as Adopted at the 1962 Annual Meeting of the American Law Institute at Washington, DC, May 24, 1962. Philadelphia: The Institute.Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth. 1993. Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1963. Intention. 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981a. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” In The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Volume 3: Ethics, Religion and Politics, 26–42. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981b. “Mr. Truman’s Degree.” In The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Volume 3: Ethics, Religion and Politics, 62–71. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981c. “The Justice of the Present War Examined.” In The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Volume 3: Ethics, Religion and Politics, 72–81. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981d. “The Two Kinds of Error in Action.” In The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Volume 3: Ethics, Religion and Politics, 3–9. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981e. “War and Murder.” In The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Volume 3: Ethics, Religion and Politics, 51–61. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005a. “Action, Intention and ‘Double Effect’.” In Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 207–26. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005b. “Knowledge and Reverence for Human Life.” In Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 59–66. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005c. “Murder and the Morality of Euthanasia.” In Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 261–78. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005d. “Practical Inference.” In Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 109–48. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005e. “Practical Truth.” In Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 149–58. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005f. “The Dignity of the Human Being.” In Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 67–73. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 2008. “Contraception and Chastity.” In Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Ethics by G. E. M. Anscombe, edited by Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke, 170–91. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1947. Summa Theologica. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. 5 vols. New York: Benziger Brothers.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Edited by Barnes, Jonathan. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Audi, Robert. 2016. Means, Ends, and Persons: The Meaning and Psychological Dimensions of Kant’s Humanity Formula. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Awad, Edmond, Dsouza, Sohan, Shariff, Azim, Rahwan, Iyad, and Bonnefon, Jean-François. 2020. “Universals and Variants in Moral Decisions Made in 42 Countries by 70,000 Participants.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (5): 2332–7.Google Scholar

Ayars, Alisabeth. 2016. “Can Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Explain Deontological Moral Judgments?” Cognition 150: 232–42.Google Scholar

Baron, Marcia. 2005. “Justifications and Excuses.” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2 (2): 387–406.Google Scholar

Bayertz, Kurt. 1999. “Four Uses of ‘Solidarity’.” In Solidarity, edited by Bayertz, Kurt, 3–28. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan. 1995. The Act Itself. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Berker, Selim. 2009. “The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (4): 293–329.Google Scholar

Biggar, Nigel. 2013. In Defense of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blair, R. J. 1995. “A Cognitive Developmental Approach to Morality: Investigating the Psychopath.” Cognition 57 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar

Bland, Larry, ed. 1991. George C. Marshall Interviews and Remembrances for Forrest C. Pogue. Lexington, VA: George C. Marshall Research Foundation.Google Scholar

Blum, Lawrence A. 1980. Friendship, Altruism and Morality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Bommarito, Nicolas. 2016. “Private Solidarity.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (2): 445–55.Google Scholar

Boyle, Joseph. 1980. “Toward Understanding the Principle of Double Effect.” Ethics 90 (4): 527–38.Google Scholar

Boyle, Joseph. 2004. “Medical Ethics and Double Effect: The Case of Terminal Sedation.” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1): 51–60.Google Scholar

Brewer, Talbot. 2011. The Retrieval of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Broome, John. 2013. Rationality through Reasoning. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cavanaugh, T. A. 2006. Double-Effect Reasoning: Doing Good and Avoiding Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chang, Ruth. 2015. “Value Incomparability and Incommensurability.” In The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory, edited by Hirose, Iwao and Olson, Jonas, 205–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chappell, Timothy. 2011. “The Action-Omission and Double Effect Distinctions.” In Bioethics with Liberty and Justice: Themes in the Work of Joseph M. Boyle, edited by Tollefsen, Christopher, 113–41. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Coady, C. A. J. 2008. Morality and Political Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coates, A. J. 2016. The Ethics of War. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Conway, Paul and Gawronski, Bertram. 2013. “Deontological and Utilitarian Inclinations in Moral Decision Making: A Process Dissociation Approach.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 104 (2): 216–35.Google Scholar

Cowan, Howard. 1945. “Terror Bombing Gets Allied Approval as Step to Speed Victory.” Washington Star, February 18, 1945, 1.Google Scholar

Crockett, Molly. 2013. “Models of Morality.” Trends in Cognitive Science 17 (8): 363–6.Google Scholar

Cullity, Garrett. 2004. The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cureton, Adam. 2012. “Solidarity and Social Moral Rules.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5): 691–706.Google Scholar

Cushman, Fiery. 2013. “Action, Outcome and Value: A Dual-System Framework for Morality.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 17 (3): 273–92.Google Scholar

Cushman, Fiery. 2016. “The Psychological Origins of the Doctrine of Double Effect.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (4): 763–76.Google Scholar

Cushman, Fiery and Miller, Ryan. 2013. “Aversive for Me, Wrong for You: First-person Behavioral Aversions Underlie the Moral Condemnation of Harm.” Social Personality Psychology Compass 7 (10): 707–18.Google Scholar

Cushman, Fiery, Young, Liane, and Hauser, Marc. 2006. “The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment: Testing Three Principles of Harm.” Psychological Science 17 (12): 1082–9.Google Scholar

Dancy, Jonathan. 2018. Practical Shape: A Theory of Practical Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

D’Arcy, Eric. 1963. Human Acts: An Essay in Their Moral Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. 2002. Welfare and Rational Care. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Das, Ramon. 2003. “Virtue Ethics and Right Action.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3): 324–39.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1963. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” The Journal of Philosophy 60 (23): 685–700.Google Scholar

Delaney, Neil. 2015. “The Doctrine of Double Effect: Some Remarks on Intention and Evaluation.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3): 397–406.Google Scholar

Di Nucci, Ezio. 2014. Ethics without Intention. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Doestoevsky, Fyodor. 2002. The Brothers Karamazov. Translated by Richard Peaver and Larissa Volokhonsky. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Dressler, Joshua. 2018. Understanding Criminal Law. 8th ed. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar

Duff, R. A. 1996. Criminal Attempts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Duff, R. A. 2007. Answering for Crime. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Duffy, Shane. 2007. “Obstetric Haemorrhage in Gimbie, Ethiopia.” The Obstetrician and Gynecologist 9 (2): 121–6.Google Scholar

Evans, Jonathan. 2003. “In Two Minds: Dual-Process Accounts of Reasoning.” Trends in Cognitive Science 7 (10): 454–9.Google Scholar

Fernandez, Patricio A. 2016. “Practical Reasoning: Where the Action Is.” Ethics 126 (4): 869–900.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. 1983. Fundamentals of Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. 1991. Moral Absolutes: Tradition, Revision, and Truth. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. 1995. “A Philosophical Case against Euthanasia.” In Euthanasia Examined, edited by Keown, John, 23–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. 1998. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. 2011a. “Human Acts.” In Intention and Identity: Collected Essays. Vol. 2, 133–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. 2011b. “Intention and Side Effects.” In Intention and Identity: Collected Essays. Vol. 2, 173–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. 2011c. “Intention in Direct Discrimination.” In Intention and Identity: Collected Essays. Vol. 2, 269–75. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Finnis, John. 2013. “Reflections and Responses.” In Reason, Morality, and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis, edited by Keown, John and George, Robert P., 459–584. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Finnis, John, Boyle, Joseph, and Grisez, Germain. 1987a. Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Finnis, John, Boyle, Joseph, and Grisez, Germain. 1987b. “Practical Principles, Moral Truth, and Ultimate Ends.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 32 (1): 99–151.Google Scholar

Finnis, John, Boyle, Joseph, and Grisez, Germain. 2001. “‘Direct’ and ‘Indirect’: A Reply to Critics of Our Action Theory.” The Thomist 65 (1): 1–44.Google Scholar

FitzPatrick, William J. 2003. “Acts, Intentions, and Moral Permissibility: In Defense of the Doctrine of Double Effect.” Analysis 63 (4): 317–21.Google Scholar

FitzPatrick, William J. 2006. “The Intend/Foresee Distinction and The Problem of ‘Closeness’.” Philosophical Studies 128 (3): 585–617.Google Scholar

FitzPatrick, William J. 2012. “Intention, Permissibility, and Double Effect.” In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics. Vol. 2, edited by Timmons, Mark, 97–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Foot, Philippa. 2002. “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect.” In Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy, 19–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Foot, Philippa. 2008a. “Morality, Action, and Outcome.” In Moral Dilemmas and Other Topics in Moral Philosophy, 88–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Foot, Philippa. 2008b. “Utilitarianism and the Virtues.” In Moral Dilemmas and Other Topics in Moral Philosophy, 59–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ford, Anton. 2016. “On What Is in Front of Your Nose.” Philosophical Topics 44 (1): 141–61.Google Scholar

Ford, Anton. 2017. “The Representation of Action.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 80: 217–33.Google Scholar

Ford, John C. 1944. “The Morality of Obliteration Bombing.” Theological Studies 5 (3): 261–309.Google Scholar

Frank, Richard B. 1999. Downfall: The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1961a. Civilization and Its Discontents. Translated and edited by Strachey, James. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1961b. The Future of an Illusion. Translated and edited by Strachey, James. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Fried, Charles. 1978. Right and Wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Garcia, Jorge L. A. 1993. “The New Critique of Anti-Consequentialist Moral Theory.” Philosophical Studies 71 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar

Garrett, Stephen. 2007. “Airpower and Non-combatant Immunity: The Road to Dresden.” In Civilian Immunity in War, edited by Primoratz, Igor, 161–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Garrett, Stephen. 2014. “The Bombing Campaign: The RAF.” In Terror from the Skies: The Bombing of German Cities in World War II, edited by Primoratz, Igor, 19–38. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

George, Robert P. 1999. In Defense of Natural Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gleichgerrcht, Ezequiel and Young, Liane. 2013. “Low Levels of Emphatic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment.” PLoS One 8 (4): e60418.Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin I. 1970. A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Gómez-Lobo, Alfonso. 2002. Morality and the Human Goods. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Gómez-Lobo, Alfonso and Keown, John. 2015. Bioethics and the Human Goods. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Gormally, Luke. 2013. “Intention and Side Effects: John Finnis and Elizabeth Anscombe.” In Reason, Morality, and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis, edited by Keown, John and George, Robert P., 93–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gormally, Luke. 2016. “On Killing Human Beings.” In The Moral Philosophy of Elizabeth Anscombe, edited by Gormally, Luke, Jones, David Albert, and Teichmann, Roger, 133–53. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Grayling, A. C. 2006. Among the Dead Cities: Is the Targeting of Civilians in War Ever Justified? London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Greene, Joshua D. 2008. “The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul.” In Moral Psychology, Volume 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Disease, and Development, edited by Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, 35–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Greene, Joshua D. 2013. Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar

Greene, Joshua D. 2014. “Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality: Why Cognitive (Neuro)Science Matters for Ethics.” Ethics 124 (4): 695–726.Google Scholar

Greene, Joshua D. 2016. “Reply to Driver and Darwall.” In Moral Brains: The Neuroscience of Morality, edited by Matthew Liao, S., 170–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Greene, Joshua D. 2017. “The Rat-a-gorical Imperative: Moral Intuition and the Limits of Affective Learning.” Cognition 167: 66–77.Google Scholar

Greene, Joshua D., Cushman, Fiery A., Stewart, Lisa E., Lowenberg, Kelly, Nystrom, Leigh E., and Cohen, Jonathan D.. 2009. “Pushing Moral Buttons: The Interaction between Personal Force and Intention in Moral Judgment.” Cognition 111 (3): 364–71.Google Scholar

Greenspan, Patricia. 2015. “Confabulating the Truth: In Defense of ‘Defensive’ Moral Reasoning.” Journal of Ethics 19 (2): 105–23.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts, edited by Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L., 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Grisez, Germain. 1993. The Way of the Lord Jesus, Volume 2: Living A Christian Life. Quincy: Franciscan Press.Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo. 1949. The Laws of War and Peace. Translated by Ropes Loomis, Louise. Roslyn, NY: Walter J. Black.Google Scholar

Guglielmo, Steve and Malle, Bertram F.. 2010. “Can Unintended Side Effects Be Intentional? Resolving a Controversy Over Intentionality and Morality.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (12): 1635–47.Google Scholar

Gury, Joannes. 1874. Compendium Theologiae Moralis. Regensburg: Georgii Josephi Manz.Google Scholar

Haidt, Jonathan. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail.” Psychology Review 108 (4): 814–34.Google Scholar

Hannikainen, Ivar R., Machery, Edouard, and Cushman, Fiery A.. 2018. “Is Utilitarian Sacrifice Becoming More Morally Permissible?” Cognition 170: 95–101.Google Scholar

Hanser, Matthew. 2005. “Permissibility and Practical Inference.” Ethics 115 (3): 443–70.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. 2008. “Intention and Punishment.” In Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law, 113–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hartle, Anthony. 2004. Moral Issues in Military Decision Making. 2nd ed. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Hauser, Marc, Cushman, Fiery, Young, Liane, Kang-Xing Jin, R., and Mikhail, John. 2007. “A Dissociation between Moral Judgments and Justifications.” Mind & Language 22 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar

Herring, Jonathan. 2018. Criminal Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heuer, Ulrike. 2015. “Intentions, Permissibility, and the Reasons for Which We Act.” In Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Agency, edited by Pavlakos, George, 11–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Holmes, Robert L. 1989. On War and Morality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hornsby, Jennifer. 1980. Actions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Hume, David. 2006. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. In Moral Philosophy, edited by Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey, 185–310. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Hurka, Thomas. 2005. “Proportionality in the Morality of War.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (1): 34–66.Google Scholar

Husak, Douglas. 2009. “The Cost to Criminal Theory of Supposing that Intentions Are Irrelevant to Permissibility.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1): 51–70.Google Scholar

Hyman, John. 2015. Action, Knowledge, and Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

International Committee of the Red Cross. 2010. Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar

International Criminal Court. 2011. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The Hague. www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs-eng.pdf (accessed January 25, 2020).Google Scholar

Jensen, Steven J. 2014. “Causal Constraints on Intention: A Critique of Tollefsen on the Phoenix Case.” National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 14 (2): 273–93.Google Scholar

Johnson, James Turner. 1999. Morality and Contemporary Warfare. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Joyce, Richard. 2006. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kagan, Shelly. 1991. The Limits of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kagan, Shelly. 1998. Normative Ethics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Kagan, Shelly. 2001. “Thinking about Cases.” Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2): 44–63.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar

Kamm, Frances M. 1991. “The Doctrine of Double Effect: Reflections on Theoretical and Practical Issues.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5): 571–85.Google Scholar

Kamm, Frances M. 2000. “The Doctrine of Triple Effect and Why a Rational Agent Need Not Intend the Means to His End.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary 74 (1): 21–39.Google Scholar

Kamm, Frances M. 2004. “Failures of Just War Theory: Terror, Harm, and Justice.” Ethics 114 (4): 650–92.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1996a. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by Gregor, Mary J., 37–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1996b. The Metaphysics of Morals. In Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by Gregor, Mary J., 353–603. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Whitley. 2009. Justified Killing: The Paradox of Self-Defense. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Whitley. 2016. “The Doctrine of Double Effect and the Trolley Problem.” Journal of Value Inquiry 50 (1): 21–31.Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. 1995. “Philippa Foot on Double Effect.” In Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory, edited by Hursthouse, Rosalind, Lawrence, Gavin, and Quinn, Warren, 77–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kindhäuser, Urs, Neumann, Ulfrid, and Paeffgen, Hans-Ulrich. 2010. Nomon Kommentar Strafgesetzbuch, Volume 2. 3rd ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Knobe, Joshua. 2003. “Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language.” Analysis 63 (3): 190–4.Google Scholar

Kolodny, Niko. 2011. “Scanlon’s Investigation: The Relevance of Intent to Permissibility.” Analytic Philosophy 52 (2): 100–23.Google Scholar

Königs, Peter. 2018. “Two Types of Debunking Arguments.” Philosophical Psychology 31 (3): 383–402.Google Scholar

Konstan, David. 1997. Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lackey, Douglas. 2014. “The Bombing Campaign: The USAAF.” In Terror from the Skies: The Bombing of German Cities in World War II, edited by Primoratz, Igor, 39–59. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Lavin, Douglas. 2016. “Action as a Form of Temporal Unity: On Anscombe’s Intention.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (4–5): 609–29.Google Scholar

Lee, Patrick. 2017. “Distinguishing between What Is Intended and Foreseen Side Effects.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 62 (2): 231–51.Google Scholar

Lee, Patrick. 2019. “The New Natural Law Theory.” In The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Ethics, edited by Angier, Tom, 73–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Patrick and George, Robert. 2008. “The Nature and Basis of Human Dignity.” Ratio Juris 21 (2): 173–93.Google Scholar

Levine, Sydney, Leslie, Alan M., and Mikhail, John. 2018. “The Mental Representation of Human Action.” Cognitive Science 42 (4): 1229–64.Google Scholar

Liao, S. Matthew. 2012. “Intentions and Moral Permissibility: The Case of Acting Permissibly with Bad Intentions.” Law and Philosophy 31 (6): 703–24.Google Scholar

Liao, S. Matthew. 2016. “The Closeness Problem and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A Way Forward.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (4): 849–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liao, S. Matthew. 2017. “Neuroscience and Ethics: Assessing Greene’s Debunking Argument against Deontology.” Experimental Pyschology 64 (2): 82–92.Google Scholar

Liao, S. Matthew, Wiegmann, Alex, Alexander, Joshua, and Vong, Gerard. 2012. “Putting the Trolley in Order: Experimental Philosophy and the Loop Case.” Philosophical Psychology 25 (5): 661–71.Google Scholar

Lillehammer, Hallvard. 2010. “Scanlon on Intention and Permissibility.” Analysis 70 (3): 578–85.Google Scholar

Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. 2014. “Just War Theory, Intentions, and the Deliberative Perspective Objection.” In How We Fight: Ethics in War, edited by Frowe, Helen and Lang, Gerald, 138–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lott, Micah. 2016. “Moral Implications from Cognitive (Neuro)Science? No Clear Route.” Ethics 127 (1): 241–56.Google Scholar

Lyons, Edward C. 2013. “Slaughter of the Innocent: Justification, Excuse, and the Principle of Double Effect.” Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law 18 (2): 231–316.Google Scholar

Mangan, Joseph. 1949. “An Historical Analysis of the Principle of Double Effect.” Theological Studies 10 (1): 41–61.Google Scholar

Marcus, Eric. 2019. “Reconciling Practical Knowledge with Self-Deception.” Mind 128 (512): 1205–25.Google Scholar

Masek, Lawrence. 2018. Intention, Character, and Double Effect. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Mason, Andrew. 2000. Community, Solidarity and Belonging. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCarthy, David. 2002. “Intending Harm, Foreseeing Harm, and Failures of the Will.” Noûs 36 (4): 622–42.Google Scholar

McDowell, John. 2010. “What Is the Content of an Intention in Action?” Ratio 23 (4): 415–32.Google Scholar

McIntyre, Alison. 2001. “Doing Away with Double Effect.” Ethics 111 (2): 219–55.Google Scholar

McMahan, Jeff. 2004. “The Ethics of Killing in War.” Ethics 114 (4): 693–733.Google Scholar

McMahan, Jeff. 2009. “Intention, Permissibility, Terrorism, and War.” Philosophical Perspectives 23: 345–72.Google Scholar

Mikhail, John. 2011. Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Miscamble, Wilson D. 2011. The Most Controversial Decision: Truman, the Atomic Bomb, and the Defeat of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mourelatos, Alexander P. D. 1978. “Events, Processes, and States.” Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (3): 415–34.Google Scholar

Murphy, Mark C. 2001. Natural Law and Practical Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, Mark C. 2004. “Intention, Foresight, and Success.” In Human Values: New Essays on Ethics and Natural Law, edited by Oderberg, David S. and Chappell, Timothy, 252–68. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nathanson, Stephen. 2010. Terrorism and the Ethics of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nelkin, Dana Kay and Rickless, Samuel C.. 2015. “So Close Yet So Far: Why Solutions to the Closeness Problem to the Doctrine of Double Effect Fall Short.” Noûs 49 (2): 376–409.Google Scholar

Newman, Robert P. 1995. Truman and the Hiroshima Cult. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar

Norcross, Alastair. 1999. “Intending and Foreseeing Death: Potholes on the Road to Hell.” Southwest Philosophy Review 15 (1): 115–23.Google Scholar

Nye, Howard. 2013. “Objective Double Effect and the Avoidance of Narcissism.” In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics. Vol. 3, edited by Timmons, Mark, 260–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Orend, Brian. 2013. The Morality of War, 2nd ed. Petersborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Otsuka, Michael. 2008. “Double Effect, Triple Effect and the Trolley Problem: Squaring the Circle in Looping Cases.” Utilitas 20 (1): 92–110.Google Scholar

Øverland, Gerhard. 2014. “Moral Obstacles: An Alternative to the Principle of Double Effect.” Ethics 124 (3): 481–506.Google Scholar

Øverland, Gerhard. 2016. “Why Kamm’s Principle of Secondary Permissibility Cannot Save the Doctrine of Double Effect.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (3): 286–96.Google Scholar

Perkins, David N., Faraday, Michael, and Bushey, Barbara. 1991. “Everyday Reasoning and the Roots of Intelligence.” In Informal Reasoning and Education, edited by Voss, James F., Perkins, David N., and Segal, Judith W., 83–105. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Perkins, Rollin M. 1934. “A Re-Examination of Malice Aforethought.” Yale Law Review 43 (4): 537–70.Google Scholar

Plato, . 1999. Gorgias. Translated by W. D. Woodhead. In The Collected Dialogues of Plato, edited by Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington, 229–307. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Primoratz, Igor. 2007. “Civilian Immunity in War: Its Grounds, Scope, and Weight.” In Civilian Immunity in War, edited by Primoratz, Igor, 21–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Primoratz, Igor. 2013. Terrorism: A Philosophical Investigation. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Pruss, Alexander. 2013. “The Accomplishment of Plans: A New Version of the Principle of Double Effect.” Philosophical Studies 165 (1): 49–69.Google Scholar

Quinn, Warren. 1993a. “Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect.” In Morality and Action, 175–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Quinn, Warren. 1993b. “Reply to Boyle’s ‘Who Is Entitled to Double Effect?’” In Morality and Action, 194–7, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rachels, James. 1986. The End of Life: Euthanasia and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Paul. 1968. The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 1999. The Laws of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rich, Ben A. 2001. Strange Bedfellows: How Medical Jurisprudence Has Influenced Medical Ethics and Medical Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Riisfeldt, Thomas David. 2019. “Weakening the Distinction between Euthanasia, Palliative Opiod Use and Palliative Sedation.” Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (2): 125–30.Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard. 1989. “Solidarity.” In Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, 189–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosen, Michael. 2012. Dignity: Its History and Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. M. 2008. Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schafer, Karl. 2017. “Evolutionary Debunking Arguments, Explanatory Structure, and Anti-Realism.” In Ethical Sentimentalism: New Perspectives, edited by Debes, Remy and Steuber, Karsten R., 66–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schwarzenbach, Sibyl A. 2015. “Fraternity, Solidarity, and Civic Friendship.” Amity: The Journal of Friendship Studies 3 (1): 3–18.Google Scholar

Schwenkler, John. 2019. Anscombe’s Intention: A Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schwitzgebel, Eric, and Cushman, Fiery A.. 2012. “Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Nonphilosophers.” Mind and Language 27 (2): 135–53.Google Scholar

Setiya, Kieran. 2012. Knowing Right from Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shaw, Joseph. 2006a. “Intention in Ethics.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (2): 187–223.Google Scholar

Shaw, Joseph. 2006b. “Intentions and Trolleys.” The Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222): 63–83.Google Scholar

Sidgwick, Henry. 1907. The Methods of Ethics. 7th ed. London: Macmillian.Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. 1972. “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3): 229–43.Google Scholar

Singer, Tania and Klimecki, Olga M.. 2014. “Empathy and Compassion.” Current Biology 24 (18): R875–8.Google Scholar

Slote, Michael. 2001. Morals from Motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smart, J. J. C. 1973. “An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics.” In Utilitarianism: For and Against, 3–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Solomon, W. David. 2019. “Elizabeth Anscombe and the Late Twentieth-Century Revival of Virtue Ethics.” In Beyond the Self: Virtue Ethics and the Problem of Culture, edited by Hain, Raymond, 223–44. Waco: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar

Stanovich, Keith E., and West, Richard F.. 2000. “Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5): 645–65.Google Scholar

Steinhoff, Uwe. 2018a. “Bennett, Intention and the DDE – The Sophisticated Bomber as Pseudo-Problem.” Analysis 78 (1): 73–80.Google Scholar

Steinhoff, Uwe. 2018b. “The Secret to the Success of the Doctrine of Double Effect (and Related Principles): Biased Framing, Inadequate Methodology, and Clever Distractions.” Journal of Ethics 22 (3–4): 235–63.Google Scholar

Steinhoff, Uwe. 2019. “Wild Goose Chase: Still No Rationales for the Doctrine of Double Effect and Related Principles.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 13 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar

Stimson, Henry L. 1947. “The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb.” Harper’s Magazine 194: 97–107.Google Scholar

Stjernø, Steinar. 2004. Solidarity in Europe: The History of an Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. 1974. “Freedom and Resentment.” In Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays, 1–25. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Street, Sharon 2006. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.” Philosophical Studies 127 (1): 109–66.Google Scholar

Stuchlik, Joshua. 2012. “A Critique of Scanlon on Double Effect.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (2): 178–99.Google Scholar

Stuchlik, Joshua. 2017. “The Closeness Problem for Double Effect: A Reply to Nelkin and Rickless.” Journal of Value Inquiry 51 (1): 69–83.Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco. 1944. A Work on the Three Theological Virtues, Disputation XIII: On Charity. In Three Works by Francisco Suárez, S.J, edited by Gwladys, L. Williams, Ammi Brown, , and Waldron, John, 799–865. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Thomas D. and Atkinson, Gary. 1985. “Benevolence and Absolute Prohibitions.” International Philosophical Quarterly 25 (3): 247–59.Google Scholar

Sverdlik, Steven. 2011. Motive and Rightness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tadros, Victor. 2011. The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tadros, Victor. 2015. “Wrongful Intentions without Closeness.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (1): 52–74.Google Scholar

Thompson, Michael. 2008. Life and Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1976. “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem.” The Monist 59 (2): 204–17.Google Scholar

Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1985. “The Trolley Problem.” Yale Law Review 94 (6): 1395–415.Google Scholar

Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1991. “Self-Defense.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (4): 283–310.Google Scholar

Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1999. “Physician-Assisted Suicide: Two Moral Arguments.” Ethics 109 (3): 497–518.Google Scholar

Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 2008. Normativity. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar

Tollefsen, Christopher. 2006. “Is a Purely First Person Account of Human Action Defensible?” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (4): 441–60.Google Scholar

Vitoria, Francisco de. 2001. On the Law of War. In Francisco de Vitoria: Political Writings, edited by Padgen, Anthony and Lawrence, Jeremy, 293–327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vogler, Candace. 2002. Reasonably Vicious. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael. 2015. Just and Unjust Wars. 5th ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Wedgwood, Ralph. 2009. “Intrinsic Values and Reasons for Action.” Philosophical Issues 19: 321–42.Google Scholar

Wedgwood, Ralph. 2011a. “Defending Double Effect.” Ratio 24 (4): 384–401.Google Scholar

Wedgwood, Ralph. 2011b. “Scanlon on Double Effect.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2): 464–72.Google Scholar

Weir, Peter, director. 2005. Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World. Beverly Hills: 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment.Google Scholar

Wiggins, David. 1998. “The Right and the Good and W.D. Ross’s Criticism of Consequentialism.” Utilitas 10 (3): 261–80.Google Scholar

Wiggins, David. 2009. Ethics: Twelve Lectures on the Philosophy of Morality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wiseman, Rachael. 2016. The Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Anscombe’s Intention. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Zamir, Eyal and Medina, Barak. 2010. Law, Economics, and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zhao, Michael. 2019. “Solidarity, Fate-Sharing, and Community.” Philosophers’ Imprint 19 (46): 1–13.Google Scholar