Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aarts, H., (2003). The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 18–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abric, J.-C. (1994). Pratiques sociales et représentations. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Abric, J.-C. (1999). Psychologie de la communication. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Abric, J.-C. (2003a). L’analyse structurale des représentations sociales. In Moscovici, S. & Buschini, F. (Eds.), Les méthodes des sciences humaines (pp. 375–392). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Abric, J.-C. (2003b). La recherche du noyau central et de la zone muette d’étude des représentations sociales. In Méthodes d’étude des représentations sociales (pp. 59–80). Toulouse: érès.Google Scholar

Abric, J.-C. (2003c). Méthodes d’étude des représentations sociales. Toulouse: érès.Google Scholar

Adan, A. (2012). Cognitive performance and dehydration. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 31(2), 71–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Agogué, M., Kazakçi, A., Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., Weil, B., Poirel, N., & Cassotti, M. (2014). The impact of type of examples on originality: Explaining fixation and stimulation effects. Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Kuhl, J. & Beckmann, J. (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.Google Scholar

Akrich, M. (1998). Les utilisateurs, acteurs de l’innovation. Education Permanente, 134, 79–89.Google Scholar

Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2006). Sociologie de la traduction: textes fondateurs. «Sciences sociales». Paris: Mines Paris, les Presses.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alderson, G. J. K., Sully, D. J., & Sully, H. G. (1974). An operational analysis of a one-handed catching task using high speed photography. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6(4), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alexandrov, Y. I. (2008). How we fragment the world: The view from inside versus the view from outside. Social Science Information, 47(3), 419–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexandrov, Y. I., & Sams, M. E. (2005). Emotion and consciousness: Ends of a continuum. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(2), 387–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In Murchison, C. (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 798–844). Worcester, MA: Clarck University Press.Google Scholar

Alter, N. (1993a). Innovation et organisation: Deux légitimités en concurrence. Revue Française de Sociologie, 34(2), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, N. (1993b). La lassitude de l’acteur de l’innovation. Sociologie du Travail, (4), 447–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied Cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, N., Potocnik, K., Zhou, J., Potocnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary Development: A Morphological Analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial N° 238, 58(10), 1–166.Google Scholar

Anonymous. (2014). Prison UK: An Insider’s View: Perils and Pitfalls of Life After Prison. Retrieved April 3, 2016, from http://prisonuk.blogspot.fr/2014/08/perils-and-pitfalls-of-life-after-prison.htmlGoogle Scholar

Apostolidis, T. (2003). Représentations sociales et triangulation: enjeux théorico-méthodologiques. In Abric, J.-C. (Ed.), Méthodes d’étude des représentations sociales (pp. 13–35). Saint-Agne: Erès.Google Scholar

Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363.Google Scholar

Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 471–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. The American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In Guetzkow, H. (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men (pp. 177–190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6), 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Attride-Sterling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avery, J. A., Kerr, K. L., Ingeholm, J. E., Burrows, K., Bodurka, J., & Simmons, W. K. (2015). A common gustatory and interoceptive representation in the human mid-insula. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 2996–3006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bachimont, B. (2004). Arts et sciences du numérique: Ingénierie des connaissances et critique de la raison computationnelle. Mémoire de HDR. Compiègne, France: Université de Technologie de Compiègne.Google Scholar

Bailey, H. N., DeOliveira, C. A., Wolfe, V. V., Evans, E. M., & Hartwick, C. (2012). The impact of childhood maltreatment history on parenting: A comparison of maltreatment types and assessment methods. Child Abuse and Neglect, 36(3), 236–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baldwin, J. M. (1896). A new factor in evolution. The American Naturalist, (354, June 1896), 441–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, R., Scott, C., & Hood, C. (1998). Introduction. In Baldwin, R., Scott, C., & Hood, C. (Eds.), A Reader on Regulation (pp. 1–55). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory (Vol. 53). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barabanschikov, V. (2007). La question de l’activité dans la psychologie russe. In Rabardel, P. & Nosulenko, V. N. (Eds.), Rubinstein Aujourd’hui. Nouvelles Figures de L’activité Humaine (pp. 41–81). Paris: Octarès et Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar

Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1177–1187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(4), 617–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1281–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. A study in experimental and social psychology (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Basso, F., Guillou, L., & Oullier, O. (2010). Embodied entrepreneurship: a sensory theory of value. In Stanton, A. A., Day, M., & Welpe, I. M. (Eds.), Neuroeconomics and the Firm (pp. 217–232). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Basso, F., & Oullier, O. (2010). Le Corps et les Prix. ENS Cachan: Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Basso, F., Petit, O., Le Bellu, S., Lahlou, S., Le Goff, K., Anton, J.-L., Nazarian, B., Cancel, A., & Oullier, O. (2017). Taste at First (Person) Sight: Visual Perspective Modulates Brain Regions Contributing to Taste and Reward Representations. Working paper, LSE: London.Google Scholar

Basso, F., Robert-Demontrond, P., Hayek, M., Anton, J. L., Nazarian, B., Roth, M., & Oullier, O. (2014). Why people drink shampoo? Food imitating products are fooling brains and endangering consumers for marketing purposes. PLoS ONE, 9(9), e100368 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100368CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bataille, M. (2002). Un noyau peut-il ne pas être central? In Garnier, C. & Doise, W. (Eds.), Les Representations Sociales, Balisage du Domaine d’Étude (pp. 25–34). Montréal: Editions Nouvelles.Google Scholar

Bates, F. (1955). Position, role, and status: A reformulation of concepts. Social Forces, 34(1), 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology (Vol. 26). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc.Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A Necessary unity. Philosophy of Science. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar

Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. (1956). Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 1(2), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baudelaire, C. (1857). Les fleurs du mal. Paris: Poulet-Malassis et de Broise.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W. (1991). Resistance to change – a monitor of new technology. Systems Practice, 4(3), 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, M. W. (1995). Towards a functional analysis of resistance. In Bauer, M. W. (Ed.), Resistance to New Technology: Nuclear Power, Information Technology and Biotechnology. (pp. 393–418). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. D. (2000). Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook for social research. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaudouin, V. (2008). PowerPoint: Le lit de Procuste revisité. Social Science Information, 47(3), 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaudouin, V. (2011), Prosumer. Communications, 88(1), 131–139.Google Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1996). The economic way of looking at behavior: The Nobel lecture. Essays in Public Policy, 101(9), 385–409.Google Scholar

Becker, H. S. (1966). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Becvar-Weddle, A., & Hollan, J. D. (2010). Professional perception and expert action: Scaffolding embodied practices in professional education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17(2), 119–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bedny, G., & Meister, D. (1997). The Russian theory of activity: Current applications to design and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Beeler, J. A. (2012). Thorndike’s law 2.0: Dopamine and the regulation of thrift. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6(Aug), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality; a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Bernays, E. L. (1928). Propaganda. New York: Horace Liveright.Google Scholar

Bernstein, N. A. (1947). On the construction of movements (О построении движений). Moscow: Medgiz.Google Scholar

Berridge, K. C. (2007). The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: The case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology, 191(3), 391–431.Google Scholar

Berthoud, H.-R. (2006). Homeostatic and non-homeostatic pathways involved in the control of food intake and energy balance. Obesity, 14 Suppl 5(August), 197S–200S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berthoud, H.-R., & Morrison, C. (2008). The brain, appetite, and obesity. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 55–92.Google Scholar

Bestor, C. (2003). Installation art: Image and reality. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 37(1), 16–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bicchieri, C. (2006). The Grammar of Society. The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1988). Social representations, objectification and anchoring: A rhetorical analysis. Social Behaviour, 3, 1–16.Google Scholar

Birch, L. L. (1999). Development of food preferences. Annual Review of Nutrition, 19, 41–62.Google Scholar

Birdwhistell, R. L, (1971). Appendix 6: Sample Kinesic Transcription. In N.A. McQuown (dir.), The Natural History of an Interview, Chicago, Microfilm Collection of Manuscripts on Cultural Anthropology, Fifteenth Series. Chicago: University of Chicago, Joseph Regenstein Library, Department of Photoduplication, 1971, 1–29.Google Scholar

Bittner, E. (2005). Florence Nightingale in pursuit of Willie Hutton. In Newburn, T. (Ed.), Policing: Key Readings (pp. xiv, 834). Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar

Black, J. (2002). Critical reflections on regulation. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27(1), 1–36.Google Scholar

Black, J. (2008). Forms and paradoxes of principles-based regulation. Capital Markets Law Journal, 3(4), 425–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, J. (2010). The Rise, fall and fate of principles-based regulation. London School of Economics. Law Society Economy Working Papers, (17), 1–25.Google Scholar

Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the “value-action gap” in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment, 4(3), 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Bødker, S. (1991). Activity theory as challenge to system design. In Nissen, H.-E. & Sanström, (Eds.), Information System Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Proceedings of the IFIP TC 8/WG 8.2 Working Conference (pp. 551–564). Copenhagen: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Sjogren, D., & Sundblad, Y. (2000). Co-operative design – Perspectives on 20 years with “the Scandinavian IT Design Model.” In Proceedings of NordiCHI 2000, Stockholm, October 2000. (pp. 1–12). CID Center for User Oriented Design.Google Scholar

Bohner, G., & Schwarz, N. (2001). The construction of attitudes. In Tesser, A. & Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Intrapersonal Processes (Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology) (pp. 436–457). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth (1st ed. French 1991). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction: critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (2013). Outline of a theory of practice {1st ed.French 1972) (28th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (2014). Men and machines. In Knorr-Cetina, K. D. & Cicourel, A. V. (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bower, G. H. (1972). Mental imagery and associative learning. In Greeg, L. (Ed.), Learning and Memory (pp. 51–88). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11(2), 177–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Broady, M. (1966). Social theory in architectural design. Arena (The Architectural Association Journal), 81(898 [January]), 149–154.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1966). On cognitive growth. In Studies in cognitive growth (pp. 1–29). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1968). Towards a theory of instruction (1st ed. 1966). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1972). The nature and uses of immaturity. American Psychologist, 27(8, August), 687–708.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1974). From communication to language – A psychological perspective. Cognition, 3(3), 255–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In Sinclair, A., Jarvelle, R. J., & Levelt, W. J. (Eds.), The Child’s Concept of Language. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1984). Savoir faire et savoir dire. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54(1), 11–32.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of Meaning. The Jerusalem-Harvard Lectures. Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1.Google Scholar

Brushlinskii, A. V., Kol’Tsova, V. A., & Oleinik, I. N. (1997). A brief sketch of the life and scientific activity of A. F. Lazurskii. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 35(2), 6–31.Google Scholar

Cabanac, M. (2003). La cinquième influence, ou La dialectique du plaisir. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar

Cabanac, M., Guillaume, J., Balasko, M., & Fleury, A. (2002). Pleasure in decision-making situations. BMC Psychiatry, 2, 7.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Law, J (Ed.), Power, Action And Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 196–223). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (2001). Actor network theory. In Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, P. B. (Eds.), International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 62–66). Elsevier.Google Scholar

Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them do so. In Knorr-Cetina, K. & Cicourel, A. V. (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies (pp. 277–303). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1971). Reforms as experiments. Journal of Legal Education, 23(1), 217–239.Google Scholar

Cangiano, G. R., & Hollan, J. D. (2009). Capturing and restoring the context of everyday work: A case study at a law office. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 5619) (pp. 945–954). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Cantor, G. (1874). Ueber eine Eigenschaft des Inbegriffs aller reellen algebraischen Zahlen (“On a Property of the Collection of All Real Algebraic Numbers”). Journal Für Die Reine Und Angewandte Mathematik, 77, 258–326.Google Scholar

Carlesimo, G. A., Lombardi, M. G., Caltagirone, C., & Barban, F. (2015). Recollection and familiarity in the human thalamus. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 54, 18–28.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92(1), 111–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Castellion, G., & Markham, S. K. (2013). Perspective: New product failure rates: Influence of argumentum ad populum and self-interest. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 976–979.Google Scholar

Challamel, M.-J., Lahlou, S., Revol, M., & Jouvet, M. (1985). Sleep and smiling in neonate: A new approach. In Koella, W., Ruther, E., & Schulz, H. (Eds.), Sleep 84 (pp. 290–292). New York: Gustav Fisher Verlag.Google Scholar

Chen, J., Papies, E. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2016). A core eating network and its modulations underlie diverse eating phenomena. Brain and Cognition, 110, 20–42.Google Scholar

Cheng, Y., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2007). Motivation modulates the activity of the human mirror-neuron system. Cerebral Cortex, 17(8), 1979–1986.Google Scholar

Chernilo, D. (2002). The theorization of social co-ordinations in differentiated societies: The theory of generalized symbolic media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas. The British Journal of Sociology, 53(3), 431–449.Google Scholar

Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence. Science and practice (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201–234.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026.Google Scholar

Cicourel, A. V. (1964). Method and measurement in sociology. New York: Free Press, Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cicourel, A. V. (1974). Cognitive sociology: language and meaning in social interaction. New York: Free Press, Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cicourel, A. V. (1992). The interpenetration of communicative contexts: examples from medical encounters. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (Eds.), Rethinking Context (Vol. 50, pp. 291–311). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cicourel, A. V. (2002). Le raisonnement médical. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Cicourel, A. V. (2012). Origin and demise of socio-cultural presentations of self from birth to death: Caregiver “scaffolding” practices necessary for guiding and sustaining communal social structure throughout the life cycle. Sociology, 47(1), 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cieciuch, J., & Schwartz, S. H. (2012). The number of distinct basic values and their structure assessed by PVQ–40. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(3), 321–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber, and I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clémence, A. (2002). Catégorisation sociale et représentation sociale: Commentaires sur le texte de Lacassagne, Salès-Wuillemin, Castel & Jébrane (2001). Papers on Social Representations, 11, 2.1–2.4Google Scholar

Clot, Y., Faïta, D., Fernandez, G., & Scheller, L. (2001). Entretiens en auto-confrontation croisée: une méthode en clinique de l’activité. Education Permanente, 146(1), 17–25.Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, November (16), 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, (3), 1–44.Google Scholar

Cochin, Y., & Dupont, F. (1995). La relation de service et la clientèle en difficulté. HN-51 95-003. Clamart, France: EDF Direction des Etudes et Recherches.Google Scholar

Codol, J.-P. (1969). Note terminologique sur l’emploi de quelques expressions concernant les activités et processus cognitifs en psychologie sociale. Bulletin de Psychologie Sociale, 23, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1984). The zone of proximal development: when culture and cognition create each other. In Wertsch, J. (Ed.), Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M., Hood, L., & McDermott, R. (1997). Concepts of ecological validity: Their differing implications for comparative cognitive research. In M. Cole and Y. Engeström (Eds.), Mind, Culture, and Activity: Seminal Papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (pp. 48–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cordelois, A. (2010). Using digital technology for collective ethnographic observation: an experiment on “coming home.” Social Science Information, 49(3), 445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coutu, W. (1951). Role-Playing vs. Role-Taking: An Appeal for Clarification. American Sociological Review, 16, April(2), 180–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cranach, M. von, & Kalbermatten, U. (1982). The Ordinary interactive action: theory, methods and some empirical findings. In Cranach, M. von & Harre, R. (Eds.), The Analysis of Action (pp. 115–160). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crews, W., & Young, R. (2013, June 5). Twenty years of non-stop regulation. The American Spectator. Arlington, VA.Google Scholar

D’Andrade, R. G. (2008). A study of personal and cultural values. American, Japanese, and Vietnamese. New York: Palgrave, MacMillan.Google Scholar

D’Anna, C., Zechmeister, E., & Hall, J. (1991). Toward a meaningful definition of vocabulary size. Journal of Literacy Research, 23(1), 109–122.Google Scholar

Dahlgren, G., & Whitehead, M. (1991). Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. Background document to WHO – Strategy paper for Europe. Stockholm: Institutet för Framtidsstudier.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33, 25–62.Google Scholar

Danone. (2010). TNS-OBOP uses and attitudes survey. Unpublished data for Danone. Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar

Darnton, A. (2008a). GSR behaviour change knowledge review – Reference report: An overview of behaviour change models and their uses. London: Government Social Research.Google Scholar

Darnton, A. (2008b). Practical Guide: An overview of behaviour change models and their uses. London: Government Social Research.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daucé, E. (2010). Systèmes dynamiques: Propriétés générales et définitions. Retrieved November 5, 2010, from http://emmanuel.dauce.free.fr/sdsc/node3.htmlGoogle Scholar

Davis, K. (1948). Human society. New York: Rinehart and Company.Google Scholar

Davis, R., Campbell, R., Hildon, Z., Hobbs, L., & Michie, S. (2015). Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review. Health Psychology Review, 9(3), 323–344.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dawnay, E., & Shah, H. (2005). Behavioural economics: Seven principles for policy-makers. London: New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar

de Araujo, I. E., & Simon, S. A. (2009). The gustatory cortex and multisensory integration. International Journal of Obesity, 33 (Suppl 2), S34–S43.Google ScholarPubMed

Deforge, Y. (1985). Technologie et génétique de l’objet industriel. Paris: Maloine.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1996), Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. London: Penguin Book.Google Scholar

Dent, E. B., & Goldberg, S. G. (1999). Challenging “resistance to change.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dessalles, J.-L. (2007). Why we talk – The evolutionary origins of language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and nature (Vol. 1). London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of valuation. Political Research Quarterly. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse. How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Dieckmann, P., Clemmensen, M., & Lahlou, S. (2016). Medication dispensing from a “work as done” perspective. Paper presented at the Fifth Resilient Health Care Net meeting, Hindsgavl Castle, Middelfart, Denmark, August 15–17, 2016.Google Scholar

Dieckmann, P., Clemmensen, M., (2017). How the medication room dispenses the medication. An ethnographic study of facilitators and obstacles. Working paper.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, K., Kaschak, M. P., & Zwaan, R. A. (2007). Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cognition, 102(1), 139–149.Google Scholar

Doise, W., & Palmonari, A. (1986). Caractéristiques des représentations sociales. In Doise, W. & Palmonari, A. (Eds.), L’étude des représentations sociales. Textes de base en Psychologie (pp. 12–33). Neuchâtel, Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar

Dortier, J.-F. (2004). L’homme, cet étrange animal. Au origines du langage, de la culture et de la pensée. Auxerre: Sciences Humaines Editions.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. (2001). Purity and danger. An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo (1st ed. 1966). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. T. (1986). How institutions think. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

Dourish, P. (2006). Re-space-ing place: “Place” and “space” ten years on. Computing, 299–308.Google Scholar

Drewnowski, A., Rehm, C. D., & Constant, F. (2013). Water and beverage consumption among children age 4–13y in the United States: Analyses of 2005–2010 NHANES data. Nutrition Journal, 12(85).Google Scholar

Drobes, D. J., Miller, E. J., Hillman, C. H., Bradley, M. M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Food deprivation and emotional reactions to food cues: Implications for eating disorders. Biological Psychology, 57(1–3), 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dubuffet, J. (1973). L’homme du commun à l’ouvrage. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Duque, L. F., Toro, Jo. A., & Montoya, N. (2010). Tolerancia al quebrantamiento de la norma en el area metropolitana de Medellín, Colombia. Opiniao Publica, Campinas, 16 (1), 64–89.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse (1968, 5ème ed.). Paris: PUF. Collection “Bibliothèque de philosophie contemporaine.”Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of the sociological method (1st ed. 1895 French). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Duveen, G., & Lloyd, B. B. (1993). An ethnographic approach to social representations. In Breakwell, G. M. & Canter, D. V (Eds.), Empirical Approaches to Social Representations (pp. 90–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Edelman, G. M. (2004). Wider Than the Sky. The Phenomenal Gift of Consciousness. New Brunswick and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Edmonds, C. J., Crombie, R., Ballieux, H., Gardner, M. R., & Dawkins, L. (2013). Water consumption, not expectancies about water consumption, affects cognitive performance in adults. Appetite, 60(1), 148–153.Google Scholar

Edmonds, C. J., & Jeffes, B. (2009). Does having a drink help you think? 6–7-Year-old children show improvements in cognitive performance from baseline to test after having a drink of water. Appetite, 53(3), 469–472.Google ScholarPubMed

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) (2010). Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for water. EFSA Journal, 8(3), 1459.Google Scholar

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1967). Éthologie – Biologie du comportement. Paris: Éditions Scientifiques, Naturalia et Biologia,.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1949). Remarks to the essays brought together in this co-operative volume. In Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist (pp. 665–688). New York: MJF Books.Google Scholar

Elfenbein, H. A. (2014). The many faces of emotional contagion: An affective process theory of affective linkage. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(4), 326–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, J. (1983). Explaining technical change. Studies in rationality and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (2007). Explaining social behaviour. More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enfield, N. J. (2013). Relationship thinking. Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Engel, A. K. (2010). Directive minds: How dynamics shapes cognition. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne et E.A. Di Paolo (dir.), Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science (pp. 219–243). Boston: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960–74.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y., & Bannon, L. (2009). What is activity theory? Retrieved August 2, 2015, from http://www.psicopolis.com/psycosphere/whatsactiv.htmGoogle Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Estes, W. K. (1961). Dynamics of choice behaviour. Behavioral Science, 6(3), 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, S. (2015). Virtual selves in virtual worlds: Towards the development of a social psychological understanding of the self in contemporary society. PhD Thesis. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar

Everri, M., Fruggeri, L., & Molinari, L. (2014). Microtransitions and the dynamics of family functioning. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 48(1), 61–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Everri, M., & Sterponi, L. (2013). Identity development is distributed; specifically, it emerges from the texture of different interactive configurations occurring in families. In Proceedings of the REID Conference “Revisiting Identity: Embodied communication across time and space”. Örebro University, Sweden, October 22–24, 2013. Springer.Google Scholar

Ewoldsen, D. R., Rhodes, N., & Fazio, R. H. (2015). The MODE model and its implications for studying the media. Media Psychology, 18(3), 312–337.Google Scholar

Eymard-Duvernay, F., & Thévenot, L. (1983). Les investissements de forme: leurs usages pour la main d’oeuvre (Vol. N°1878/432). Malakoff, France: INSEE.Google Scholar

Fang, L. (2014). Where have all the lobbyists gone? The Nation, Feb 19, 2014.Google Scholar

Fann, K. T. (1970). Peirce’s theory of abduction. The Hague: Martinus Nijhof.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces. Aspects of meaning construction in natural language (1st ed. 1985). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Fauquet-Alekhine, P. (2016a). Risk assessment for subjective evidence-based ethnography applied in high risk environment. Advances in Research, 6(2), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fauquet-Alekhine, P. (2016b). Subjective ethnographic protocol for work activity analysis and occupational training improvement. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 12(5), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 23 (pp. 75–109). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Fischler, C. (1990). L’homnivore. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Fisher, J. D., Fisher, W. A., Bryan, A. D., & Misovich, S. J. (2002). Information-motivation-behavioral skills model-based HIV risk behavior change intervention for inner city high school youth. Health Psychology, 21(2), 177–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fisher, R. A. (1915). The evolution of sexual preference. The Eugenics Review, 7(3), 184–192.Google ScholarPubMed

Flament, C. (1962). L’analyse de similitude. Cahiers du Centre de Recherche Operationnelle (Bruxelles), 4, 63–97.Google Scholar

Flament, C. (1994). Structure, dynamique et transformation des représentations sociales. In Abric, J.-C. (Ed.), Pratiques Sociales et Représentations (pp. 37–57). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Flament, C. (2007). Conformisme et scolarité: Les représentations sociales du travail et du non travail chez les jeunes non qualifiés des quartiers défavorisés. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 1(73), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact (1st ed. 1935 German). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Flick, U. (2000). Episodic interviewing. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound (pp. 75–92). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Flick, U. (2007). Designing qualitative research (Vol. 1). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard NRF.Google Scholar

Franks, B. (2011). Culture and cognition. Evolutionary perspectives. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franks, B., Lahlou, S., Bottin, J. H., Guelinckx, I., & Boesen-Mariani, S. (2017). Increasing water intake in pre-school children: a year-long randomised controlled longitudinal field experiment assessing the impact of information, water availability, and social regulation. Appetite, 116, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freud, S. (1895). Project for a scientific psychology. In J. Strachey, A. Freud, A. Tyson, & A. Strachey (Eds.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume I (1886–1899) (pp. 283–398). London: Vintage [reprint 1999].Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. In J. Strachey, A. Freud, A. Tyson, & A. Strachey (Eds.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIX (1923–1925) (pp. 3–68). London: Vintage [reprint 1999].Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1925). Negation. In J. Strachey, A. Freud, A. Tyson, & A. Strachey (Eds.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIX (1923–1925) (pp. 233–240). London: Vintage [reprint 1999].Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1926). Psycho-analysis. In J. Strachey, A. Freud, A. Tyson, & A. Strachey (Eds.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XX (1925–1926) (pp. 259–270). London: Vintage [reprint 1999].Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1932). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. Lecture 35: The Question of a Weltanschauung. In J. Strachey, A. Freud, A. Tyson, & A. Strachey (Eds.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XXII (1932–1936) (pp. 158–184). London: Vintage [reprint 1999].Google Scholar

Fried, I., Mukamel, R., & Kreiman, G. (2011). Internally generated preactivation of single neurons in human medial frontal cortex predicts volition. Neuron, 69(3), 548–562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, (119), 593–609.Google ScholarPubMed

Gapenne, O., Lenay, C., & Boullier, D. (2002). Defining categories of the human/technology coupling: theoretical and methodological issues. Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th ERCIM Workshop on User Interface for All, 197–198.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1964). Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social Problems, 3(11), 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., & Lane, D. J. (2003). A social reaction model of adolescent health risk. In Suls, J. & Wallston, K. A. (Eds.), Social Psychological Foundations of Health and Illness (pp. 107–136). Malden, MA:Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. London: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1963). The useful dimensions of sensitivity. American Psychologist, (18), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception (2015 ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1982). Notes on affordances (unpublished manuscript, 1967). In Reed, E. & Jones, R. (Eds.), Reasons for Realism. Selected Essays of James J. Gibson (pp. 401–418). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 20–29.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 107–143.Google Scholar

Girard, R. (1985). Deceit, desisre, & the novel. Self and other in literary structure (1st ed. 1965 French). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Glǎveanu, V. P. (2012). Habitual creativity: Revising habit, reconceptualizing creativity. Review of General Psychology, 16(1), 78–92.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P., & Lahlou, S. (2012). Through the creator’s eyes: Using the subjective camera to study craft creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 152–162.Google Scholar

Gobbo, A. (2015). The making of consumer decisions: Revisiting the notions of evaluation and choice by reconstructing consumer habits through subject evidence-based ethnography. PhD Thesis. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar

Goethe, J. W. von. (2005). Elective affinities (1st ed. German 1809). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1961a). Asylums: Essays on the Social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1961b). Encounters. Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic interaction. Philadephia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Goldstein, K. (1995). The Organism: A Holistic Approach to Biology Derived from Pathological Data in Man (1st ed. 1934). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, N. J & Cialdini R. B. (2009). Normative influences on consumption and conservation behaviors. In M. Wänke (dir.), Social Psychology of Consumer Behavior (pp. 273–296). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Gondran, M. (2014). Mécanique quantique. Et si Einstein et de Broglie avaient aussi raison? Paris: Editions Matériologiques.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (1995). The negotiation of coherence within conversation. In Gernsbacher, M. A. & Givon, T. (Eds.), Coherence in Spontaneous Text (Vol. 31, pp. 117–137). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goody, J. (2000). The power of the written traditions. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Grassé, P.-P. (1959). La théorie de la stigmergie: Essai d’interprétation du comportement des termites constructeurs. Insectes Sociaux, 6(1), 41–80.Google Scholar

Grice, P. H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Guala, F. (2012). Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(1), 1–15.Google Scholar

Guelinckx, I., Iglesia, I., Bottin, J. H., De Miguel-Etayo, P., González-Gil, E. M., Salas-Salvadó, J., Kavouras, S. A., Gandy, J., Martinez, H., Bardosono, S., Abdollahi, M., Nasseri, E., Jarosz, A., Ma, G., Carmuega, E., Thiébaut, I., & Moreno, L. A. (2015). Intake of water and beverages of children and adolescents in 13 countries. European Journal of Nutrition, 54, 69–79.Google Scholar

Guimelli, C. (1994a). Structures et transformations des représentations sociales. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar

Guimelli, C. (1994b). Transformation des représentations sociales, pratiques nouvelles et schèmes cognitifs de base. In Guimelli, C. (Ed.), Structures et transformations des représentations sociales (pp. 171–198). Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar

Guimelli, C. (1998). Differentiation between the central core elements of social representations: Normative and functional elements. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57(4), 209–224.Google Scholar

Halbwachs, M. (1994). Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire (1ère ed 1925). Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar

Halmos, P. R. (1974). Naive set theory (1st ed. 1960). New York: Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC.Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. H. (1932). Institution. In Seligman, E. R. A. & Johnson, A. (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 8 (pp. 84–89). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Handel, A. E., & Ramagopalan, S. V. (2010). Is Lamarckian evolution relevant to medicine? BMC Medical Genetics, 11, 73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hardin, G. J. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, New Series, 162(3859–Dec. 13), 1243–1248.Google Scholar

Harré, R. (1984). Some reflections on the concept of “social representation.” Social Research, 51(4, Winter), 927–938.Google Scholar

Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work – CSCW ‘96 7, 67–76.Google Scholar

Hartkopf, V., Loftness, V., & Aziz, A. (2009). Towards a global concept of collaborative space. In Lahlou, S. (Ed.), Designing User Friendly Augmented Work Environments. From Meeting Rooms to Digital Collaborative Spaces (pp. 63–85). London: Springer.Google Scholar

Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2011). Teaching innovative design reasoning: How concept–knowledge theory can help overcome fixation effects. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 25(1), 77–92.Google Scholar

Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2009). C-K design theory: An advanced formulation. Research in Engineering Design, 19(4), 181–192.Google Scholar

Haugtvedt, C. P., Herr, P., & Kardes, F. R. (2008). Handbook of consumer psychology. Marketing and consumer psychology series. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Havelange, V., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2003). Les représentations: mémoire externe et objets techniques. Intellectica 35, 115–131. Intellectica, 35, 115–131.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. von. (1952). The sensory order. An inquiry into the foundations of theoretical psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hazlehurst, B., McMullen, C. K., & Gorman, P. N. (2007). Distributed cognition in the heart room: How situation awareness arises from coordinated communications during cardiac surgery. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 40(5), 539–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Headland, T. N. (1990). Introduction: A dialogue between Kenneth Pike and Marvin Harris on emics and etics. In Headland, T. N., Pike, K. L., & Harris, M. (Eds.), Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate (pp. 13–27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Headland, T. N., Pike, K. L., & Harris, M. (1990). Emics and etics: The insiders/outsiders debate. Frontiers in Anthropology, Volume 7. (p. 226). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. (2002). The organization of behavior a neurpsychological theory (1st ed. 1949). Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83–135.Google Scholar

Heptonstall, B. (2015). Cognitive de-biasing strategies in medicine: A Subject evidence-based ethnography approach. MSc Thesis. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar

Herzlich, C. (1969). Santé et maladie, analyse d’une représentation sociale. Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hetzel-Riggin, M. D., & Meads, C. L. (2011). Childhood violence and adult partner maltreatment: The roles of coping style and psychological distress. Journal of Family Violence, 26(8), 585–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Himmelweit, H. T., & Gaskell, G. D. (1990). Societal psychology: Implications and scope. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Hippel, E. von. (1994). “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.Google Scholar

Hippel, E. von. (2002). Horizontal innovation networks. MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper, (4366–2), 1–27.Google Scholar

Hippel, E. von. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. of M. (1651). Leviathan or the matter, forme, & power of a common-wealth ecclesiasticall and civill. London: Andrew Crooke.Google Scholar

Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues (Association for Evolutionary Economics), 40(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

Hollan, J. D., Hutchins, E. L., & Kirsh, D. (2002). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. In Carroll, J. M. (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium (pp. 75–94). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Horner, V., & Whiten, A. (2005). Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8(3), 164–181.Google Scholar

Hotgraves, T. (2010). Social psychology and language words, utterances, and conversations. In S. T. Fiske, T, Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 1386–1423). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Hovland, C. I., Irving, L. J., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven. CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Howarth, C. S., Campbell, C., Cornish, F., Franks, B., Garcia-Lorenzo, L., Garcia-Lorenzo, Lucia Gillespie, A., Gleibs, I., Goncalves-Portelinha, I., Jovchelovitch, S., Lahlou, S., Mannell, J., Reader, T., Tennant, C. (2013). Insights from societal psychology: The contextual politics of change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 364–384.Google Scholar

Hunt, E., & Agnoli, F. (1991). The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review, 98(3), 377–389.Google Scholar

Husbands, P. (1994). Distributed coevolutionary genetic algorithms for multi-criteria and multi-constraint optimisation. Evolutionary Computing, 865, 150–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchins, E. L. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. L. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speed. Cognitive Science, 19, 265–288.Google Scholar

Huxley, A. (2011). The doors of perception (1st ed. 1954). In The Doors of Perception; including Heaven and Hell, London, Thinking Ink, pp. 1‑41Google Scholar

Itani, J. (1957). On the acquisition and propagation of a new food habit in the natural group of the Japanese monkeys at Takasi-Yama. Primates, 12, 84–98.Google Scholar

Iverson, J. B. (1991). Life history and demography of the yellow mud turtle, Kinosternon flavescens. Herpetologica, 47(4, Dec.), 373–395.Google Scholar

Jahoda, G. (1977). In pursuit of the emic-etic distinction: Can we ever capture it? In Poortinga, Y. H. (Ed.), Basic Problems in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 55–63). Amsterdam and Lisse: Swetz and Zeitlinger B.V.Google Scholar

James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Jégou, F. (2009). Co-design approaches for early phases of augmented environments. In Lahlou, S. (Ed.), Designing User Friendly Augmented Work Environments. From Meeting Rooms to Digital Collaborative Spaces. (pp. 159–190). London: Springer.Google Scholar

Jevons, W. S. (1871). The theory of political economy. London: Macmillan & Company.Google Scholar

Jinha, A. E. (2010). Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence. Learned Publishing, 23(3), 258–263.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (1989). Les représentations sociales: un domaine en expansion. In Jodelet, D. (Ed.), Les Représentations Sociales (pp. 31–61). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (1991). Madness and social representations: Living with the mad in one French community (1st ed. French 1989). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (2013). Encounters between forms of knowledge. Papers on Social Representations, 22(9), 1–2.Google Scholar

Joffe, H. (1995, August). Social representations of AIDS: Towards encompassing issues of power. Papers on Social Representations.Google Scholar

Johanson, B., Fox, A., & Winograd, T. A. (2010). The Stanford Interactive Workspaces Project in. In Lahlou, S. (Ed.), Designing User Friendly Augmented Work Environments. (pp. 31–61). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jonassen, Z. (2016). Good practices of replay interviewers: An explorative study of their understanding of the interview setting, attitude, and behaviour. MSc Thesis. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar

Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joulé, R.-V., & Beauvois, J.-L. (2002). Petit traité de manipulation à l’usage des honnêtes gens. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar

Jullien, F. (1995). The propensity of things: Toward a history of efficacy in China (1st ed. French 1992). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. A. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. A., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. A., & Tversky, A. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157), 1124–1131.Google Scholar

Kalampalikis, N. (2006). Des noms et des représentations. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 53, 20–31.Google Scholar

Kalampalikis, N., & Apostolidis, T. (2016). La perspective socio-génétique des représentations sociales. In Monaco, G. Lo, Delouvée, S., & Rateau, P. (Eds.), Les Représentations Sociales.(pp. 69–84). Bruxelles: De Boeck.Google Scholar

Kalampalikis, N., Bauer, M. W., & Apostolidis, T. (2013). Science, technology and society: The social representations approach. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 26(3), 5–9.Google Scholar

Kaptelinin, V. (2013). Activity theory. In Soegaard, M. & Dam, R. F. (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed. Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design Foundation. Retrieved August 2, 2015, from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-encyclopedia-of-human-computer-interaction-2nd-ed/activity-theory.Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity. A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (1994). Precis of beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 693–745.Google Scholar

Katok, A., & Hasselblatt, B. (1996). Introduction to the modern theory of dynamical systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the not invented here syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7–19.Google Scholar

Kawai, M. (1965). Newly acquired pre-cultural behavior of the natural troop of Japanese monkeys on Koshima Islet. Primates, 61, 1–30.Google Scholar

Killgore, W. D. S., Young, A. D., Femia, L. A., Bogorodzki, P., Rogowska, J., & Yurgelun-Todd, D. A. (2003). Cortical and limbic activation during viewing of high- versus low-calorie foods. NeuroImage, 19(4), 1381–1394.Google Scholar

Kindberg, T., & Fox, A. (2002). System Software for ubiquitous computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 1, 70–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkpatrick, R. (1912). The nummulosphere. An account of the organic origin of the so-called igneous rocks and of abyssal red clays. London: Lamley & Co.Google Scholar

Klein, G. A., & Calderwood, R. (1991). Decision models: some lessons from the field. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21(5), 1018–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kobayashi, M., Takeda, M., Hattori, N., Fukunaga, M., Sasabe, T., Inoue, N., Nagai, Y., Sawada, T., Sadato, N., Watanabe, Y. (2004). Functional imaging of gustatory perception and imagery: “Top-down” processing of gustatory signals. NeuroImage, 23(4), 1271–1282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people behave environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.Google Scholar

Koppensteiner, M. (2013). Motion cues that make an impression. Predicting perceived personality by minimal motion information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1137–1143.Google Scholar

Koppensteiner, M., & Grammer, K. (2010). Motion patterns in political speech and their influence on personality ratings. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(3), 374–379.Google Scholar

Korzybski, A. (1933). A non-Aristotelian system and its necessity for rigour in mathematics and physics sanity, Science and Sanity, suppl. III, 747–761.Google Scholar

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2009). Marketing management, 13th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Kotter, J. P. (2007). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 85(1), 96–103.Google Scholar

Kringelbach, M. L., O’Doherty, J., Rolls, E. T., & Andrews, C. (2003). Activation of the human orbitofrontal cortex to a liquid food stimulus is correlated with its subjective pleasantness. Cerebral Cortex, 13(10), 1064–1071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kringelbach, M. L., & Radcliffe, J. (2005). The human orbitofrontal cortex: Linking reward to hedonic experience. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 6(September), 691–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kroese, F. M., Evers, C., & De Ridder, D. T. D. (2009). How chocolate keeps you slim. The effect of food temptations on weight watching goal importance, intentions, and eating behavior. Appetite, 53(3), 430–433.Google Scholar

Krug, K. S., & Weaver, C. a. (2005). Eyewitness memory and metamemory in product identification: Evidence for familiarity biases. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(4), 429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1977a). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice (c 1973). In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change (pp. 320–329). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1977b). Second thoughts on paradigms (c 1974). In The Essential Tension. Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change (pp. 293–319). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (c 1962). University of Chicago Press (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuutti, K. (1991). Activity theory and its applications to information systems research and development. In Nissen, H.-E. (Ed.), Information Systems Research. (pp. 529–549). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar

La Boétie, E. de. (1993). Discours de la servitude volontaire ou le Contr’un (1ere ed 1575). Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Laan, L. N., van der, de Ridder, D. T. D., Viergever, M. A., & Smeets, P. A. M. (2011). The first taste is always with the eyes: A meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues. NeuroImage, 55(1), 296–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LaBar, K. S., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., Kim, Y. H., Nobre, A. C., & Mesulam, M. M. (2001). Hunger selectively modulates corticolimbic activation to food stimuli in humans. Behavioral Neuroscience, 115(2), 493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lahlou, S. (1990). Eléments de formalisation pour une théorie de l’évolution des systèmes: la système-compatibilité. Cahiers de recherche. Paris: Crédoc.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (1992). Si je vous dis «bien manger», à quoi pensez-vous? Consommation et Modes de Vie, (69, Juin–Juillet), 2–4.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (1995). Penser manger. Les représentations sociales de l’alimentation. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (1998). Penser manger: alimentation et représentations sociales. Paris: PUF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lahlou, S. (1999). Observing cognitive work in offices. In Streitz, N., Siegel, J., Hartkopf, V., & Konomi, S. (Eds.), Cooperative Buildings. Integrating Information, Organizations and Architecture (LCNS Vol. 1670, pp. 150–163). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2000). Attracteurs cognitifs et travail de bureau. Intellectica, 30, 75–113.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2003). L’exploration des représentations sociales à partir des dictionnaires. In Abric, J.-C. (Ed.), Méthodes d’Étude des Représentations Sociales (pp. 37–58). Toulouse: érès.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2005). Cognitive attractors and activity-based design: Augmented meeting rooms. In Human Computer Interaction International. 2005(Vol. 1). Las Vegas.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2006). L’activité du point de vue de l’acteur et la question de l’inter-subjectivité: huit années d’expériences avec des caméras miniaturisées fixées au front des acteurs (subcam). Communications, (80), 209–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2007a). Human activity modeling for systems design: A trans-disciplinary and empirical approach. In Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (Vol. 4562 LNAI, pp. 512–521). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2007b). The activity of teleconferencing | L’activité de réunion à distance. Réseaux, 144(5), 59–101.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2008a). L’Installation du monde. De la représentation à l’activité en situation. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2008b). Supporting collaboration with augmented environments: design and dissemination issues. In Dillenbourg, P., Huang, J., & Cherubini, M. (Eds.), Interactive Furniture Supporting Collaborative Work/ Learning (pp. 75–93). Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2009). Experimental reality: Principles for the design of augmented environments. In Lahlou, S. (Ed.), Designing User Friendly Augmented Work Environments. From Meeting Rooms to Digital Collaborative Spaces (pp. 113–158). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2010a). Contexte et intention dans la détermination de l’activité: une nouvelle topique des motivations. Intellectica, 53–54(1–2), 233–280.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2010b). Digitization and transmission of human experience. Social Science Information, 49(3), 291–327.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2011a). How can we capture the subject’s perspective? An evidence-based approach for the social scientist. Social Science Information, 50(3–4), 607–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2011b). Socio-cognitive issues in human-centred design for the real world. In Boy, G. (Ed.), The Handbook of Human-Machine Interaction (pp. 165–188). Burlington, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2012). Innovation, social representations, and technology. In Permanadeli, R., Jodelet, D., & Sugiman, T. (Eds.), Alternative Production of Knowledge and Social Representations (pp. 73–86). Jakarta, Indonesia: University of Jakarta Press.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2014). Difusão de representações e inteligência coletiva distribuída. In Teoria das Representações Sociais: 50 anos (pp. 72–132). Rio de Janeiro: TechnoPolitik Editora.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2015). Social representations and social construction: The evolutionary perspective of installation theory. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 193–209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lahlou, S. (2017). How agency is distributed. In Enfield, N. J. & Kockelman, P. (Eds.), Distributed Agency (pp. 221–232). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lahlou, S., & Abric, J.-C. (2011). What are the “elements” of a representation? Papers on Social Representations, 20, 20.1–20.10.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S., Lahlou, S. & Beaudouin, V. (2016). Creativity and culture in organizations. In The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research (pp. 475–498). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lahlou, S., Boesen-Mariani, S., Franks, B., & Guelinckx, I. (2015a). Increasing water intake of children and parents in the family setting: A randomized, controlled intervention using installation theory. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 66(3), 26–30.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S., Dieckmann, P., Zhang, M., & Heptonstall, B. (2017). Decision making in the ICU: a video ethnographic study Working paper. London: LSE.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S., & Fischler, C. (1999). Le traitement de l’information par le bureau. Technologies, Idéologies, Pratiques, 65, 109–127.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S., Le Bellu, S., & Boesen-Mariani, S. (2015b). Subjective evidence-based ethnography: Method and applications. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(2), 216–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lahlou, S., Marsal, F., Peyre, L., Wattrelot, S., & Yvon, F. (1995). Le petit déjeuner. Représentations et comportements. Cahiers de Recherche CREDOC, 75.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S., Nosulenko, V. N., & Samoylenko, E. S. (2002). Un cadre méthodologique pour le design des environnements augmentés. Social Science Information, 41(4), 471–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lahlou, S., Nosulenko, V. N., (2012a). Numériser le travail. Théories, méthodes et expérimentations. Paris: Lavoisier, coll. EDF R&D.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S., Urdapilleta, I., Pruzina, I., & Catheline, J.-M. (2012b). Changing behaviour:Representation, practice and context. The case of obesity. In European Congress on Obesity (ECO 2012). Lyon, France, May 9–12.Google Scholar

Lally, P., Van Jaarsveld, C. H. M., Potts, H. W. W., & Wardle, J. (2010). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 998–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamarck, J.-B. de. (1963). Zoological philosophy, an exposition with regard to the natural history of animals (c 1809 French). New York: Hafner Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Laplanche, J., & Pontalis, J.-B. (1973). The language of psycho-analysis.Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith (Vol. 94). London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.Google Scholar

Lashley, K. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In Jeffress, L. A. (Ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior: the Hixon Symposium (pp. 112–146). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1986). Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. In Kuklick, J. (Ed.), Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present (Vol. 6, pp. 1–40). Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1993). Le “pédofil” de Boa Vista – montage photo-philosophique. In Petites leçons de sociologie des sciences (pp. 171–225). Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory. A few clarifications plus more than a few complications. Soziale Welt, 47, 369–381.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence. An anthropology of the moderns (Vol. 53). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. & Woolgar, S.(1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. C. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LaVerne-Masayesva, J. (1978). Aspects of Hopi grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, P. T. (1964). How to deal with resistance to change. Harvard, (May-June), 49–57.Google Scholar

Lazurskii, A. F. (1997). The natural experiment (1916). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 35(2), 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Le Bellu, S. (2011). Capitalisation des savoir-faire et des gestes professionnels dans le milieu industriel: Mise en place d’une aide numérique au compagnonnage métier dans le secteur de l’énergie. PhD Thesis. Bordeaux: Ecole Nationale de Cognitique.Google Scholar

Le Bellu, S., Lahlou, S., & Le Blanc, B. (2009). Comment capter le savoir incorporé dans un geste métier du point de vue de l’opérateur? Information Sciences for Decision Making, (36).Google Scholar

Le Bellu, S., Lahlou, S., & Nosulenko, V. N. (2010). Capter et transférer le savoir incorporé dans un geste professionnel. Social Science Information, 49(3), 371–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Le Bellu, S., Lahlou, S., Nosulenko, V. N., & Samoylenko, E. S. (2016). Studying activity in manual work: A framework for analysis and training. Le Travail Humain, 79(1), 7–28.Google Scholar

Le Fort, L., Pasteur, J., & Depaul, J.-A.-H. (1878). Suite de la discussion sur la désarticulation de la hanche et le pansement des plaies. Bulletin de l’Académie de Médecine, 2e série,(19 mars 1878), 264–285.Google Scholar

Lebart, L., Salem, A., & Berry, L. (1998). Exploring textual data. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy (1987). The social history of the natural history of an interview: A multidisciplinary investigation of social communication. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 20(1–4): 1–51.Google Scholar

Lem, S. (1976). Ijon Tichy’s eleventh voyage. In The Star Diaries (1st ed. Polish 1971) (pp. 41–70). New York: Continuum Books, Seabury Press.Google Scholar

Lenay, C. (2012). Separability and technical constitution. Foundations of Science, 17(4), 379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leontiev, A. N. (1961). The intellectual development of the child. In Soviet Psychology. A Symposium (pp. 55–78). New York: The Philosophical Libray.Google Scholar

Leontiev, A. N. (1976). Le développement du psychisme. Problèmes. Paris: Editions sociales.Google Scholar

Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Leroi-Gourhan, E. (1965). Le geste et la parole. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. Z. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. Z. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. Z. (1943). Forces behind food habits and methods of change. Bulletin of the National Research Council, 108(October), 35–65.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. Z. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. Z. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. Z. (1959). Group decision and social change (1st ed. 1947). In Newcomb, T. M. & Hartley, E. L. (Eds.), Readings in Social Psychology (pp. 197–211). New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. Z. (1999). Intention, will and need (1 st ed. 1926). In Gold, M. (Ed.), A Kurt Lewin Reader. The Complete Social Scientist (pp. 83–115). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. Z., & Grabbe, P. (1945). Conduct, knowledge, and acceptance of new values. Journal of Social Issues, 1(3), 53–54.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. (2002). Convention. A Philosophical Study (1st ed. 1969). Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. (2000). The triple helix: gene, organism, and environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lheureux, F., Rateau, P., & Guimelli, C. (2008). Hiérarchie structurale, conditionnalité et normativité des représentations sociales. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 77, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Libby, L. K., & Eibach, R. P. (2011). Visual perspective in mental imagery: A representational tool that functions in judgment, emotion, and Self-insight. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1st ed., Vol. 44). Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness potential). Brain, 106(3), 623–642.Google Scholar

Linton, R. (1945). The cultural background of personality. Oxford: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar

Littré, E. (1885). Installation. In Dictionnaire de la Langue Française, Tome 3 (p. 117). Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar