I - Setting the background
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2014
Edited by
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Innovation in IndiaCombining Economic Growth with Inclusive Development, pp. 37 - 104Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
References
Agarwal, Pawan. 2007. ‘Higher Education in India: Growth, Concerns and Change Agenda.’ Higher Education Quarterly 61 (2): 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, David. 2004. Science, Technology and Medicine in Colonial India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arun Kumar, D. 2008. ‘Impact of Globalization on Core Engineering Education in India.’ Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 7 (1): 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, Andreas and Saeki, Hiroshi. 2011. ‘Employability and Skill Set of Newly Graduated Engineers in India.’ Policy Research Working Paper # 5640. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Accessed: 27 April 2012; http://www.wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2011/04/25/000158349_20110425112950/Rendered/PDF/WPS5640.pdf.Google Scholar
Carroll, Tim and Burton, Richard M.. 2000. ‘Organizations and Complexity: Searching for the Edge of Chaos.’ Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 6 (4): 319–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjea, A. and Moulik, S. A.. 2012. ‘Academic Research.’ In The Oxford Companion to Economics in India, edited by Basu, Kaushik, 1–7. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjea, A. and Moulik, S. P.. 2006. ‘Doctoral Education and Academic Research (in India).’ CHERI Working Paper #87. New York: Cornell University, ILR School. Accessed: June 2012; http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/workingpapers/65/.Google Scholar
Choudhury, Prithviraj and Khanna, Tarun. 2009. ‘State Owned Entity Reform in Absence of Privatization: Reforming Indian National Laboratories and Role of Leadership.’ Working Paper 10-006. Boston: Harvard Business School. Accessed: June 2012; http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/10-006_1051fcd3-70f6-4a5c-b388-3621d56f2375.pdf.Google Scholar
CSIR (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research). 2006. Report of the Working Group on CSIR: Eleventh Five-Year Plan (2007–2012). New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
Datta, S. and Saad, Mohammed. 2011. ‘University and Innovation Systems: The Case of India.’ Science and Public Policy 38 (1): 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Science and Technology. 1997. Research and Development Statistics, 1994–1995, p. 75. New Delhi: Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
Department of Science and Technology. 2009. Research and Development Statistics, 2007–2008. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
Desai, Ashok, ed. 1988. Technology Absorption in Indian Industry. New Delhi: Wiley Eastern.Google Scholar
Dharampal. 1971. Indian Science and Technology in the Eighteenth Century: Some Contemporary European Accounts. Delhi: Impex India. (Reprint. 1983. Hyderabad: Academy of Gandhian Studies).Google Scholar
DSIR (Department of Scientific and Industrial Research). 2006. Report of the Working Group for Eleventh Five-Year Plan (2007–2012).’ Volume II. New Delhi: DSIR, Government of India.Google Scholar
EXIM Bank. 2006. ‘Strengthening R&D Capabilities in India.’ Occasional Paper No. 115. India: Quest Publications.Google Scholar
Ganguli, Prabuddha. 2005. ‘Industry-Academic Interaction in Technology Transfer and IPR: The Indian Scene – An Overview.’ Report written for World Intellectual Property Organization. Mumbai.Google Scholar
Ghose, T. K. and Bisaria, V. S.. 2000. ‘Development of Biotechnology in India.’ Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology 69 : 87–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GOI (Government of India). 2010. India as a Global Leader in Science. New Delhi: Department of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
GOI (Government of India). 2009. Research and Development Statistics 2007–08. New Delhi: Department of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
GOI (Government of India). 2007. Nano Mission. New Delhi: Department of Science and Technology. Accessed: June 2012; http://nanomission.gov.in/.Google Scholar
GOI (Government of India). 1956. Second Five-Year Plan. New Delhi: Planning Commission. Accessed: 23 January 2012; http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/default.html.Google Scholar
GOI (Government of India). 1951. First Five-Year Plan. New Delhi: Planning Commission. Accessed: 23 January 2012; http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/default.html.Google Scholar
Gupta, S. 2003. ‘Introduction: Scientific Research in Indian Universities: Status, Challenges and Prospects.’ In Scientific Research in Indian Universities, edited by Gupta, Sanjay, selections from University News-12, vii–xiv. New Delhi: Association of Indian Universities.Google Scholar
Jhunjhunwala, Ashok. 2000. ‘Unleashing Telecom and Internet in India.’ Presented at India Telecom Conference at the Asia/Pacific Research Center, Stanford University, November. TeNet Group, IIT Madras. Accessed: 17 February 2012; http://www.tenet.res.in/Papers/unleash.html.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart A. 1993. The Origins of Order: Self Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lall, Sanjay. 1987. Learning to Industrialize: The Acquisition of Technological Capability by India. Basingstoke, UK: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundvall, B. Å. 2007. ‘National Innovation Systems—Analytical Concept and Development Tool.’ Industry and Innovation 14 (1): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundvall, B. Å. ed. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
MHRD (Ministry of Human Resource Development). 2012. Report to the People on Education 2010-2011. New Delhi: MHRD, Government of India. Accessed: June 2012; http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/RPE-2010-11.pdf.Google Scholar
Mohan, S. and Gupta, B. M.. 2003. ‘Relevance and Quality of Indian Science.’ In Scientific Research in Indian Universities, edited by Gupta, Sanjay, selections from University News-12, 13–20. New Delhi: Association of Indian Universities.Google Scholar
Mowery, David C. and Sampat, Bhaven N.. 2005. ‘The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University-Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments?’ Journal of Technology Transfer 30 (1/2): 115–27.Google Scholar
Mowery, David C., Nelson, Richard R., Sampat, Bhaven N., and Ziedonis, Arvids A.. 2001. ‘The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by U.S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980.’ Research Policy 30 (1): 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NASSCOM-McKinsey Report. 2005. Extending India’s Leadership of the Global IT and BPO Industries. New Delhi: NASSCOM.Google Scholar
Nelson, R., ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezu, Risaburo. 2005. ‘Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property and Effective University-Industry Partnerships: The Experience of China, India, Japan, Philippines, The Republic of Korea, Singapore and Thailand.’ World Intellectual Property Organization. Accessed: June 2012; http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/freepublications/en/intproperty/928/wipo_pub_928.pdf.Google Scholar
Owen-Smith, Jason, Riccaboni, Masimo, Pammolli, Fabio, and Powell, Walter W.. 2002. ‘A Comparison of U.S. and European University-Industry Relations in the Life Sciences.’ Management Science 48 (1): 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, Ila. 1996. ‘India, International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft.’ Revue Internationale de l‘Education 42 (1/3): 75–96.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. 2004. Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
Rahman, A., ed. 1982. Science and Technology in Medieval India: A Bibliography of Source Materials in Sanskrit, Arabic and Persian. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy.Google Scholar
Ramani, S.V. and Maria, A.. 2005. ‘TRIPS and its Possible Impact on the Biotech Based Segment of the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry.’ Economic and Political Weekly of India 40 (7): 675–83.Google Scholar
Ramani, S.V. and Visalakshi, . 2001. ‘The Role of Resources and Incentives in the Integration of Biotechnology in Developing Countries: An Indian Case Study.’ International Journal of Biotechnology 2 (4): 297–312.Google Scholar
Reid, S. and Ramani, S. V.. 2012. ‘The Harnessing of Biotechnology in India: Which Roads to Travel?’ Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (4): 648–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangwan, S. 1991. Science, Technology and Colonisation: An Indian Experience 1757–1857. Delhi: Anamika Prakashan.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Benoy Kumar. 1937. India in Exact Science Old and New: Presidential Address at the Positive Sciences Section of the Second Indian Cultural Conference, Calcutta (Held under the Auspices of the Indian Research Institute, Calcutta). Calcutta: Indian Research Institute.Google Scholar
Saxena, R. P. 1990. ‘Governance of Indian Universities: From Decay to Dynamism?’ Higher Education 20 (1): 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayeda, B., Rajendran, C., and Lokachari, P. S.. 2010. ‘An Empirical Study of Total Quality Management in Engineering Educational Institutions of India.’ Benchmarking 17 (5): 728–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, R. K. 2005. India Science Report. New Delhi: National Council of Applied Economic Research.Google Scholar
Surie, G. 2008. Knowledge, Organizational Evolution and Market Creation: The Globalization of Indian Firms from Steel to Software. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surie, Gita. 1996. ‘The Creation of Organizational Capabilities through International Transfers of Technology.’ PhD dissertation. Pennsylvania: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
UNCTAD. 2011. World Investment Report: Non-Equity Modes of International Production and Development. Accessed: 14 February 2012; http://www.unctad-docs.org/files/UNCTAD-WIR2011-Full-en.pdf.Google Scholar
Visalakshi, S. and Sandhya, G. D.. 2000. ‘R&D in Pharma Industry in Context of Biotech Commercialization.’ Economic and Political Weekly 35 (4): 4223–233.Google Scholar
Woolgar, Lee. 2007. ‘New Institutional Policies for University-Industry Links in Japan.’ Research Policy 36 (8): 1261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Albuquerque, E. 2007. ‘Inadequacy of Technology and Innovation Systems at the Periphery.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 31 (5): 669–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arocena, R. and Sutz, J.. 2000. ‘Looking at National Systems of Innovation from the South.’ Industry and Innovation 7 (1): 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, S. and Romijn, H.. 2009. ‘Innovation for the Base of the Pyramid: Critical Perspectives from Development Studies on Heterogeneity and Participation.’ UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 2009–036. Maastricht: United Nations University.Google Scholar
Carlson, W. B. and Gorman, M. E.. 1990. ‘Understanding Invention as a Cognitive Process: The Case of Thomas Edison and Early Motion Pictures, 1888–91.’ Social Studies of Science 20 (3): 387–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, C. P. 2009. ‘Product Composition, Jobless Growth and the Role of Demand-side Influences.’ Paper written for the ILO Sub-regional office, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Chintan Environmental Research and Action Group. 2003. Space for Waste, Planning for the Informal Recycling Sector. New Delhi: Chintan Environmental Research and Action Group. Accessed: 3 September 2013; http://www.chintan-india.org/documents/research_and_reports/chintan_study_space_for_waste.pdf.Google Scholar
Courvisanos, J. 2009. ‘Political Aspects of Innovation.’ Research Policy 38 (7): 1117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edquist, C. and Hommen, L.. 1999. ‘Systems of Innovation: Theory and Policy for the Demand Side.’ Technology in Society 21 (1): 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edquist, C. and Lundvall, B. A.. 1993. ‘Comparing the Danish and Swedish Systems of Innovation.’ In National Innovation Systems, a Comparative Analysis, edited by Nelson, R. R., 265–98. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2005. ‘Innovation and Public Procurement. Review of Issues at Stake, Study for the European Commission (No ENTR/03/24),’ final report. Germany: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research. Accessed: June 2012; http://cordis.europa.eu/innovation-policy/studies/full_study.pdf.Google Scholar
Fontana, R. and Guerzoni, M.. 2008. ‘Incentives and Uncertainty: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Demand on Innovation.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 32 (6): 927–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, C., Oldham, C. H. G., Cooper, C. M., Sinclair, T. C., and Achilladelis, B. G.. 1971. ‘The Goals of R&D in the 1970s.’ Science Studies 1 (3/4): 357–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, C. and Perez, C.. 1988. ‘Structural Crises of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour.’ In Technical Change and Economic Theory, edited by Freeman, Dosi G., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L., 38–66. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Fujita, K. 2003. ‘Neo-industrial Tokyo: Urban Development and Globalization in Japan's State-centered Developmental Capitalism.’ Urban Studies 40 (2): 249–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of India. 2009. The Challenge of Employment in India: An Informal Economy Perspective. Volume 1, Main Report. New Delhi: National Commission for Enterprises in the Un-organised Sector. Accessed: September, 2013; http://dcmsme.gov.in/The_Challenge_of_Employment_in_India.pdf.Google Scholar
Hård, M. and Misa, T. J., eds. 2008. Urban Machinery – Inside Modern European Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. 2008. ‘An Institutional and Evolutionary Perspective on Health Economics.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 32 (2): 235–56.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. P. 1993a. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. P. 1993b. ‘The City as Creator and Creation.’ In Berlin/New York: like and unlike: Essays on Architecture and Art From 1870 to the Present, edited by Kleihues, Josef Paul and Rathgeber, Christina, 13–32. New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Kalecki, M. 1968. Trend and business cycle reconsidered. Economic Journal 78 (2): 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kannan, K. P. 1990. ‘Secularism and People's Science Movement in India.’ Economic and Political Weekly 25 (6): 311–13.Google Scholar
Lember, V., Kalvet, T., and Kattel, R.. 2011. ‘Urban Competitiveness and Public Procurement for Innovation.’ Urban Studies 48 (7):1373–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotz, P. 1993. ‘Demand as a Driving Force in Medical Innovation.’ International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 9 (2): 174–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, M. 2000. ‘Understanding the Welfare State: The Case of Health Care.’ British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2 (2): 135–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N.. 1979. ‘The Influence of Market Demand upon Innovation: A Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies.’ Research Policy 8 (2): 102–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S. and Marquis, D. G.. 1969. Successful Industrial Innovation. Washington: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. 1977. The Moon and the Ghetto: An Essay on Policy Analysis. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. 2005. ‘On the Complexities and Limits of Market Organisation.’ Review of International Political Economy 10 (4): 697–10.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Rosenberg, N. 1993. ‘Technical Innovation and National Systems.’ In National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, edited by Nelson, Richard, 1–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaioannou, Theo. 2011. ‘Technological Innovation, Global Justice and Politics of Development.’ Progress in Development Studies 11 (4): 321–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, A. K. N. 2004. ‘Science and Technology for Rural India.’ Current Science 87 (7): 889–98.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1969. ‘The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanisms and Focusing Devices.’ Economic Development and Cultural Change 18 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothbarth, E. 1942. ‘Review of Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, by Joseph A. Schumpeter.’ The Economic Journal 52 (206/207): 223–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruttan, V. W. 1997. ‘Induced Innovation, Evolutionary Theory and Path Dependence: Sources of Technical Change.’ The Economic Journal 107 (September): 1520–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahu, S. K. 1998. Technology Transfer, Dependence, and Self-Reliant Development in the Third World: The Pharmaceutical and Machine Tool Industries in India. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. 1934. The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Srinivas, S. 2012. Market Menagerie: Health and Development in Late Industrial States. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press Economics and Finance Imprint.Google Scholar
Srinivas, S. 2006. ‘Industrial Development and Innovation: Some Lessons from Vaccine Procurement.’ World Development 34 (10): 1742–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivas, S. and Sutz, J.. 2008. ‘Developing Countries and Innovation: Searching for a New Analytical Approach.’ Technology in Society 30 (2): 129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivas, S. and Wallin, S.. 2012. ‘Labour Unions to Living Labs: The Locus of Innovation in 21st Century Welfare States.’ n.p.: Mimeo.Google Scholar
Sutz, J. and Arocena, R.. 2006. ‘Integrating Innovation Policies with Social Policies: A Strategy to embed Science and Technology into Development Processes.’ Strategic Commissioned Paper for IDRC Innovation, Policy, and Science Program Area. Ottawa: IDRC.Google Scholar
White, G. 1999. ‘Rethinking Kalecki on the Trend and Cycle.’ Review of Political Economy 11 (3): 341–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar