Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:03:18.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Unsolved dilemmas: the concept of matter in the history of philosophy and in contemporary physics

from Part I - History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

By
Philip Clayton
Edited by
Paul Davies  and
Niels Henrik Gregersen
Paul Davies
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Niels Henrik Gregersen
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

By the end of the modern period, a particular world view had become firmly entrenched in the public understanding. Unlike most philosophical positions, which are sharply distinguished from scientific theories, this world view was widely seen as a direct implication of science, and even as the sine qua non for all scientific activity. For shorthand, let's call this view “materialism.”

Materialism consisted of five central theses:

  1. (1) Matter is the fundamental constituent of the natural world.

  2. (2) Forces act on matter.

  3. (3) The fundamental material particles or “atoms” – together with the fundamental physical forces, whatever they turn out to be – determine the motion of all objects in nature. Thus materialism entails determinism.

  4. (4) All more complex objects that we encounter in the natural world are aggregates of these fundamental particles, and their motions and behaviors can ultimately be understood in terms of the fundamental physical forces acting on them. Nothing exists that is not the product of these same particles and forces. In particular, there are no uniquely biological forces (vitalism or “entelechies”), no conscious forces (dualism), and no divine forces (what came to be known as supernaturalism). Thus materialism implied the exclusion of dualism, downward causation (Bøgh Andersen et al., 2000), and divine activity.

  5. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Information and the Nature of Reality
From Physics to Metaphysics
 , pp. 38 - 62
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ananthamurthy, S. et al., eds. (2005). Landscape of Matter: Conference Proceedings on the Concept of Matter. Bangalore, India: Bangalore University Prasaranga Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1933). Metaphysics, trans. Tredennick, H., vol. XVII–XVIII, Loeb Classical Library Series. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, (1934). Physics, trans. Wicksteed, P. H. and Cornford, F. M., vol. IV–V, Loeb Classical Library Series. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedau, M. (1997). Weak emergence. Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 11: Mind, Causation, and World. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. (1972). Platonismus und Idealismus. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. (1985). Denken des Einen: Studien zur neuplatonischen Philosophie und ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W., Balthasar, H. Urs, and Haas, A. M. (1974). Grundfragen der Mystik. Einsiedeln: Johannes Verlag.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. W. (1996). Real Process: How Logic and Chemistry Combine in Hegel's Philosophy of Nature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Bøgh Andersen, P. et al., eds. (2000). Downward Causation: Minds, Bodies and Matter. Aarhus and Oakville, CT: Aarhus University Press.
Capra, F. (1984). The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism. New York: Bantam Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, J., Mason, G., and Vijver, G., eds. (2000). Closure: Emergent Organizations and Their Dynamics, Annals of the New York Academy of Science Series, vol. 901. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Clayton, P. (2000). The Problem of God in Modern Thought. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Clayton, P. (2004). Mind and Emergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crick, F. (1994). The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1968–1969). The Philosophical Works of Descartes, trans. Haldane, E. S. and Ross, G. R. T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
d'Espagnat, B. (1983). In Search of Reality. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Espagnat, B. (1995). Veiled Reality: An Analysis of Present-Day Quantum Mechanical Concepts. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
D'Espagnat, B. (2006). On Physics and Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1995a). On the Name, ed. Dutoit, T.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1995b). The Gift of Death, trans. Wills, D.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1998/1967). Of Grammatology, trans. Spivak, G. C.. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, G. B. (1995). Aristotle's Theory of Material Substance: Heat and Pneuma, Form and Soul, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Friedmann, G. (1962). Leibniz et Spinoza, 2nd ed. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, C. I. (1849–1863). Die mathematischen Schriften von G. W. Leibniz. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, C. I. (1875–1890). Die philosophischen Schriften von G. W. Leibniz, 7 vols. Berlin: Weidmann. Excerpts available in English in Leibniz, G. W., Philosophical Essays, trans. R. Ariew and D. Garber (1989). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. (1989). Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grib, A. A., and Rodrigues, Jr. W. A., (1999). Nonlocality in Quantum Physics. New York: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D. R. (2001). Reenchantment Without Supernaturalism: A Process Philosophy of Religion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. F. W. (1974). Hegel's Lectures on The History of Philosophy, trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, F. H.. New York: The Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (2007/1958). Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, J. L. (1982). Atoms, Snowflakes and God: The Convergence of Science and Religion. San Francisco: Alchemy Books.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S., ed. (1998). Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Jolley, N. (1993). Leibniz: Truth, knowledge and metaphysics. In The Renaissance and Seventeenth-century Rationalism, ed. Parkinson, G. H. R.. Routledge History of Philosophy vol. 4, London: Routledge, 353–388.Google Scholar
Joos, E. (2006). The emergence of classicality from quantum theory. In The Re-emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion, eds. Clayton, P. and Davies, P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 53–78.Google Scholar
Josslyn, C. (2000). Levels of control and closure in complex semiotic systems. In Closure: Emergent Organizations and Their Dynamics, Annals of the New York Academy of Science Series, vol. 901, eds. Chandler, J., Mason, G., and Vijver, G.. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 67–74.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1989). Philosophical Essays, trans. Ariew, R. and Garber, D.. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Leibniz, G. W. (1992). Discourse on Metaphysics and the Monadology, trans. Montgomery, G. R.. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. (2000). Opening up closure: Semiotics across scales. In Closure: Emergent Organizations and Their Dynamics, Annals of the New York Academy of Science Series, vol. 901, eds. Chandler, J., Mason, G., and Vijver, G.. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 101–111.Google Scholar
Maudlin, T. (2002). Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palsson, B.Ø. (2006). Systems Biology: Properties of Reconstructed Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, (1965). Timaeus, trans. Lee, H. D. P.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Plato, (2000). Republic, ed. Ferrari, G. R. F., trans. Griffith, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, L. J. (1981). The correspondence between Leibniz and De Volder. In Leibniz: Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science, ed. Woolhouse, R. S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, R. J., et al., eds. (2000). Quantum Mechanics: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Vatican: Vatican Observatory Press.
Russell, R. J., et al., eds. (2008). Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Twenty Years of Challenge and Progress. Vatican: Vatican Observatory Press.
Schroeder, G. (1998). The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Stapp, H. P. (2004). Mind, Matter, and Quantum Mechanics. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojanow, J. (2001). On the Absolute Rational Will: II On the Absolute Material Entelechy, accessed June 23, 2008 (www.jgora.dialog.net.pl/OnTheAbsoluteRationalWill/OnTheAbsoluteEntelechy.htm#14).
Weizsäcker, C. F. (1976). Zum Weltbild der Physik, 12th ed. Stuttgart: S. Hirzel; trans. in Weizsäcker, The World View of Physics, trans. by Grene, Marjorie (1952). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weizsäcker, C. F. (1980). The Unity of Nature, trans. Zucker, F. J.. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.Google Scholar
Weinberg, J. R. (1977). Ockham, Descartes, and Hume: Self-Knowledge, Substance, and Causality. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1994). Dreams of a Final Theory: The Scientists Search for the Ultimate Laws of Nature. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and Reality, corrected ed, eds. Griffin, D. R. and Sherburne, D.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zeilinger, A. (2004). Why the quantum? ‘It’ from ‘bit’? A participatory universe? Three far-reaching challenges from John Archibald Wheeler and their relation to experiment. In Science and Ultimate Reality: Quantum Theory, Cosmology and Complexity, eds. Barrow, J., Davies, P. and Harper, C., Jr., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201–220.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×