Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:45:35.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Modern work and safety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2009

Nik Chmiel
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Belfast, UK
Katharina Naswall
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Johnny Hellgren
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Magnus Sverke
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Get access

Summary

This chapter is concerned with safety within contemporary work contexts from a work and organizational psychology perspective. The aim of the chapter is to provide a critical appreciation of the contribution of recent questionnaire studies to modern work and safety issues in light of previous work on human error.

Background

The scientific study of safety at work has been characterized by Hale and Hovden (1998) as having three ages. The first age was concerned with “technical measures to guard machinery, stop explosions and prevent structures collapsing” (p. 129) and lasted from the nineteenth century until after 1945. The second age, initiated between the two world wars, witnessed research into prevention measures based on personnel selection, training, and motivation, often referred to as theories of accident proneness. Hale and Hovden indicate that the technical and individual-based approaches merged in the 1960s and 70s with developments in ergonomics and probabilistic risk analysis, and the study of human error as a field of inquiry. They go on to identify the 1980s as characterized by “an increasing dissatisfaction with the idea that health and safety could be captured simply by matching the individual to technology” (p. 130) and that the 1990s were well into the third age of safety.

The third age Hale and Hovden (1998: 130) characterize as focused on management systems, and the literature, to the 1980s at least, as “accumulated common sense and as general management principles applied to the specific field of safety” rather than science.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., and Iverson, R. D. (2003). High-quality work, job satisfaction, and occupational injuries. Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 276–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barling, J., Loughlin, C., and Kelloway, E. K. (2002). Development and test of a model linking safety specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology 87: 488–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Standards Institute (2000). Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems: Guidelines for the Implementation of OHSAS 18001 (Publication No. BSI-02-2000). London: British Standards Institute.
Broadbent, D. E., Broadbent, M. H. P., and Jones, J. L. (1986). Performance correlates of self-reported cognitive failure and of obsessionality. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 25: 285–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. J., Fitzgerald, P. F., and Parkes, K. R. (1982). The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 21: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, I. (1990). Accident reporting and analysis. In Wilson, J. R. and Corlett, E. N. (eds.), Evaluation of Human Work (pp. 969–92). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Brown, R. L. and Holmes, H. (1986). The use of a factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model. Accident Analysis and Prevention 18: 445–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, M. J., Sarpy, S. A., Tesluk, P. E., and Smith-Crowe, K. (2002). General safety performance: a test of a grounded theoretical model. Personnel Psychology 55: 429–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. (1973). The concept of exposure. Accident Analysis and Prevention 5: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheyne, A., Cox, S., Oliver, A., and Tomas, J. M. (1998). Modelling safety climate in the prediction of safety activity. Work and Stress 12: 255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chmiel, N. (1998). Jobs, technology and people. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chmiel, N.(2005). Promoting healthy work: self-reported minor injuries, work characteristics, and safety behaviour. In Korunka, C. and Hoffman, P. (eds.), Change and quality in human service work (pp. 277–88). Munich and Mering: Rainer Hampp Verlag.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. (1998). Organizational factors affecting the incident reporting of train drivers. Work and Stress 12: 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, S.(2006). The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 11: 315–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, M. D. and Phillips, R. A. (2004). Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. Journal of Safety Research 35: 497–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beeck, R. and Heuverswyn, K. (2002). European Agency for Safety and Health at Work: new trends in accident prevention due to the changing world of work. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Dedobbeleer, N. and Beland, F. (1991). A safety climate measure for construction sites. Journal of Safety Research 22: 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeJoy, D. M. (1985). Attributional processes and hazard control management in industry. Journal of Safety Research 16: 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeJoy, D. M., Searcy, C. A., Murphy, L. R., and Gershon, R. R. M. (2000). Behavioral-diagnostic analysis of compliance with universal precautions among nurses. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 5: 127–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flin, R., Mearns, K., O'Connor, P., and Bryden, R. (2000). Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Safety Science 34: 177–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frone, M. R. (1998). Predictors of work injuries among employed adolescents. Journal of Applied Psychology 83: 565–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, M. A. and Neal, N. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 5: 347–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hale, A. R. and Hovden, J. (1998). Management and culture: the third age of safety. A review of approaches to organizational aspects of safety, health, and environment. In Feyer, A.-M. and Williamson, A. (eds.), Occupational injury: risk, prevention and intervention (pp. 129–66). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Hodge, G. A. and Richardson, A. J. (1985). The role of accident exposure in transport system safety evaluations I: intersection and link site exposure. Journal of Advanced Transportation 19: 179–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, D. A., Jacobs, R., and Landy, F. (1995). High reliability process industries: individual micro, and macro organizational influences on safety performance. Journal of Safety Research 26: 131–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., and Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader–member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 170–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, D. A. and Stetzer, A. (1996). A cross-level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents. Personnel Psychology 49: 307–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoonakker, P., Loushine, T., Carayon, P., Kallman, J., Kapp, A., and Smith, M. J. (2005). The effect of safety initiatives on safety performance: a longitudinal study. Applied Ergonomics 36: 461–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iverson, R. D. and Erwin, P. J. (1997). Predicting occupational injury: the role of affectivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 70: 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacinto, C. and Aspinwall, E. (2004). A survey on occupational accidents’ reporting and registration systems in the European Union. Safety Science 42: 933–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, M. (2001). Unintended consequences: organizational practices and their impact on workplace safety and productivity. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 6: 127–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelloway, E. K., Mullen, J., and Francis, L. (2006). Divergent effects of transformational and passive leadership on employee safety. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 11: 76–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, G. E., Alderton, D. L., Neideffer, M., and Underhill, E. (1997). Further evidence on the dimensionality and correlates of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. British Journal of Psychology 88: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLoughlin, I. and Clark, J. (1994). Technological change at work (2nd edn). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Michael, J. H., Evans, D. D., Jansen, K. J., and Haight, J. M. (2005). Management commitment to safety as organizational support: relationships with non-safety outcomes in wood manufacturing employees. Journal of Safety Research 36: 171–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, L., DaSilva, N., Townsend, J., and Tetrick, L. (1999). An empirical evaluation of competing safety climate measurement models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.
Neal, A. and Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology 91: 946–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., and Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science 34: 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, A., Cheyne, A., Tomas, J. M., and Cox, S. (2002). The effects of organizational and individual factors on occupational accidents. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 75: 473–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, S., Axtell, C., and Turner, N. (2001). Designing a safer workplace: importance of job autonomy, communication quality, and supportive supervisors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 6: 211–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrow, C. (1994). Accidents in high risk systems. Technology Studies Offprint 1: 1–20.Google Scholar
Probst, T. M., Brubaker, T. L., and Barsotti, A. (2006). Organizational injury rate under-reporting: the moderating effect of organizational safety climate. Paper presented to the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, Texas.
Reason, J. T. (1990). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reason, J. T.(1993). Self-report questionnaires in cognitive psychology: have they delivered the goods? In Baddeley, A. and Weiskrantz, L. (eds.), Attention: selection, awareness, and control – a tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 406–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reason, J. T.(1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Reason, J. T., Parker, D., and Lawton, R. (1998). Organizational controls and safety: the varieties of rule-related behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 71: 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salminen, S., Saari, J., Saarela, K. L., and Räsänen, T. (1993). Organizational factors influencing occupational accidents. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health 19: 352–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salminen, S. and Tallberg, T. (1996). Human errors in fatal and serious occupational accidents in Finland. Ergonomics 39: 980–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, H. S., Mayr, J., and Haines, T. (1997). Overview of the relationship between organizational and workplace factors and injury rates. Safety Science 26: 201–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehy, N. and Chapman, A. (1987). Industrial accidents. In Cooper, C. L. and Robertson, I. T. (eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thompson, R., Hilton, T., and Witt, L. (1998). Where the safety rubber meets the shop floor: a confirmatory model of management influence on workplace safety. Journal of Safety Research 29: 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, N., Chmiel, N., and Walls, M. (2005). Railing for safety: job demands, job control, and safety citizenship role definitions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 10: 504–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaaf, T. and Kanse, L. (2004). Biases in incident reporting databases: an empirical study in the chemical process industry. Safety Science 42: 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vredenburgh, A. G. (2002). Organizational safety: which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates?Journal of Safety Research 33: 259–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagenaar, W. A. and Groeneweg, J. (1987). Accidents at sea: multiple causes and impossible consequences. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 27: 587–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagenaar, W. A., Groeneweg, J., Hudson, P. T. W., and Reason, J. T. (1994). Promoting safety in the oil industry. Ergonomics 37: 1999–2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagenaar, W. A., Hudson, P. T. W., and Reason, J. T. (1990). Cognitive failures and accidents. Applied Cognitive Psychology 4: 273–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, J. C. and Chen, G. (2005). Development and validation of a work-specific measure of cognitive failure: implications for occupational safety. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 78: 615–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, J. C., Popp, E., and Mondore, S. (2006). Safety climate as a mediator between foundation climates and occupational accidents: a group-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology 91: 681–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, J. C. and Vodanovich, S. J. (2003). Workplace safety performance: conscientiousness, cognitive failure, and their interaction. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 8: 316–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weddle, M. G. (1996). Reporting occupational injuries: the first step. Journal of Safety Research 27: 217–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westaby, J. D. and Lee, B. C. (2003). Antecedents of injury among youth in agricultural settings: a longitudinal examination of safety consciousness, dangerous risk taking, and safety knowledge. Journal of Safety Research 34: 227–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiegmann, D. A., Zhang, H., and von Thaden, T. (2001). Defining and assessing safety culture in high reliability systems: an annotated bibliography. Technical report ARL-01-12/FAA-01-4, Aviation Research Lab, Institute of Aviation, University of Illinois.
Zacharatos, A., Barling, J., and Iverson, R. D. (2005). High-performance work systems and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology 90: 77–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology 65: 96–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zohar, D.(2000). A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology 85: 587–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zohar, D.(2002). Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety: a leadership-based intervention model. Journal of Applied Psychology 87: 156–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zohar, D. and Luria, G. (2003). The use of supervisory practices as leverage to improve safety behavior: a cross-level intervention model. Journal of Safety Research 34: 567–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zohar, D. and Luria, G.(2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organizational and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology 90: 616–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×