Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:26:57.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Peter K. Enns
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

In ones and twos, men got out of the cars. Shadows became substance as lights revealed solid shapes moving toward the jail door. Atticus remained where he was. The men hid him from view. “He in there, Mr. Finch?” a man said … “You know what we want,” another man said. “Get aside from the door, Mr. Finch.”

Of course, Atticus did not budge. Atticus Finch — Tom Robinson's lawyer in To Kill a Mockingbird — reflects an important ideal of the US legal system. Standing between his jailed client and an angry mob, Atticus Finch represents a legal system that offers protection from the public's punitive whims.

Scholars and legal practitioners have long embraced the idea that the US criminal justice system is insulated from public opinion. Based on his travels throughout America in 1831, Alexis de Tocqueville (p. 268) observed:

In the United States it is easy to discover how well adapted the legal spirit is, both by its qualities and, I would say, even by its defects, to neutralize the vices inherent in popular government. When the American people let themselves get intoxicated by their passions or carried away by their ideas, the lawyers apply an almost invisible brake which slows them down and halts them.

The previous chapters call this ideal into question. If an “invisible brake” was applied during the past half-century, it appears to have been no match for the accelerating force of public opinion. We have seen that the public became increasingly punitive during much of the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s and these punitive attitudes exerted a major influence on criminal justice policy and the incarceration rate. If the public had not become so punitive, there is no reason to expect that the United States would have become the world's most aggressive imprisoner.

We saw in Chapter 3, for example, that the politicians most associated with tough-on-crime stances, such as Barry Goldwater and Richard Nixon, appeared to follow — not lead — the public. Indeed, internal memos from Nixon's 1968 presidential campaign suggest that his focus on crime was a direct response to public concern expressed in opinion polls. The analyses in Chapter 4, which showed that presidential rhetoric and congressional hearings followed the public's punitiveness, further illustrate political reactions to the mass public.

Type
Chapter
Information
Incarceration Nation
How the United States Became the Most Punitive Democracy in the World
, pp. 156 - 164
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Peter K. Enns, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Incarceration Nation
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316471029.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Peter K. Enns, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Incarceration Nation
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316471029.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Peter K. Enns, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Incarceration Nation
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316471029.007
Available formats
×