Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Importance of Campaign Promises , pp. 183 - 198Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Abramowitz, A. I., and Saunders, K. L.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” The Journal of Politics 70 (2): 542–555.Google Scholar
Adams, J., Ezrow, L., and Somer-Topcu, Z.. 2011. “Is Anybody Listening? Evidence That Voters Do Not Respond to European Parties’ Policy Statements during Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 370–382.Google Scholar
Adams, J., Ezrow, L., and Somer-Topcu, Z.. 2014. “Do Voters Respond to Party Manifestos or to a Wider.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 967–978.Google Scholar
Ahler, D. J., and Sood, G.. 2018. “The Parties in Our Heads: Misperceptions about Party Composition and Their Consequences.” The Journal of Politics 80 (3): 964–981.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. H. 1995. Why Parties?: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., and Cukierman, A.. 1990. “The Politics of Ambiguity.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 105 (4): 829–850.Google Scholar
Allgeier, A., Byrne, D., Brooks, B., and Revnes, D.. 1979. “The Waffle Phenomenon: Negative Evaluations of Those Who Shift Attitudinally.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 9 (2): 170–182.Google Scholar
Alston, L. J., and Mueller, B.. 2006. “Pork for Policy: Executive and Legislative Exchange in Brazil.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 22 (1): 87–114.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. M. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. M., and Franklin, C. H.. 1994. “Uncertainty and Political Perceptions.” The Journal of Politics 56 (3): 671–688.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. E., Butler, D. M., and Harbridge-Yong, L.. 2020. Rejecting Compromise: Legislators’ Fear of Primary Voters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANES. 2012. “The ANES 2012 Times Series Study.” American National Election Studies. https://electionstudies.org/data-center/2012-time-series-study/ (accessed: November 10, 2014).Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S., and Iyengar, S.. 1994. “Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership over Issues: The Joint Effects of Advertising and News Coverage in Campaigns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 58 (3): 335–357.Google Scholar
Aragones, E., Postlewaite, A., and Palfrey, T.. 2007. “Political Reputations and Campaign Promises.” Journal of the European Economic Association 5 (4): 846–884.Google Scholar
Artes, J. 2011. “Do Spanish Politicians Keep Their Promises?” Party Politics 19 (1): 142–158.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, D., and Banks, J.. 1989. “Electoral Accountability and Incumbency.” In Models of Strategic Choice in Politics, ed. Ordeshook, P.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, chapter 7, 121–148.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words, vol. 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Azari, J. R. 2014. Delivering the People’s Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., and Rothmund, T.. 2017. “Making America Great Again: System Justification in the US Presidential Election of 2016.” Translational Issues in Psychological Science 3 (3): 231.Google Scholar
Baker, P. 2008. “Obama Team Weighs What to Take on First.” www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/us/politics/09promises.html?searchResultPosition=9 (published March 18, 2015; accessed June 27, 2020).Google Scholar
Banks, J. S. 1990. “A Model of Electoral Competition with Incomplete Informa-tion.” Journal of Economic Theory 50 (2): 309–325.Google Scholar
Baron, D. P. 1989. “Service-Induced Campaign Contributions and the Electoral Equilibrium.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 (1): 45–72.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M. 1986. “Issue Voting under Uncertainty: An Empirical Test.” American Journal of Political Science 30 (4): 709–728.Google Scholar
Baum, M. A. 2005. “Talking the Vote: Why Presidential Candidates Hit the Talk Show Circuit.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 213–234.Google Scholar
Baum, M. A., and Kernell, S.. 1999. “Has Cable Ended the Golden Age of Presidential Television?” American Political Science Review 93 (1): 99–114.Google Scholar
BBC. 2013. “Gabrielle Giffords Launches Gun Control Campaign.” www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-20949405. (accessed April 1, 2014)Google Scholar
Benoit, W. L. 2000. “A Functional Analysis of Political Advertising across Media, 1998.” Communication Studies 51 (3): 274–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, W. L. 2004. “Political Party Affiliation and Presidential Campaign Discourse.” Communication Quarterly 52 (2): 81–97.Google Scholar
Berinsky, A. J., and Lewis, J. B.. 2007. “An Estimate of Risk Aversion in the US Electorate.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2 (2): 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., and Lenz, G. S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20 (3): 351–368.Google Scholar
Bianco, W. T. 1994. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borunda, D., and Mekelburg, M.. 2018. “Ted Cruz Wins Texas Senate Race, but Beto O’Rourke Draws All Eyes to El Pasol.” www.elpasotimes.com/story/news/politics/elections/2018/11/06/ted-cruz-wins-texas-senate-race-beto-orourke-draws-eyes-el-paso/1905477002/ (published November 6, 2018; accessed November 6, 2018).Google Scholar
Bracic, A., Israel-Trummel, M., and Shortle, A. F.. 2019. “Is Sexism for White People? Gender Stereotypes, Race, and the 2016 Presidential Election.” Political Behavior 41 (2): 281–307.Google Scholar
Bradley, J. P. 1969. “Party Platforms & Party Performance Concerning Social Security.” Polity 1 (3): 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, H. E., and Ansolabehere, S.. 1989. “The Nature of Utility Functions in Mass Publics.” American Political Science Review 83 (1): 143–163.Google Scholar
Brazeal, L. M., and Benoit, W. L.. 2001. “A Functional Analysis of Congressional Television Spots, 1986–2000.” Communication Quarterly 49 (4): 436–454.Google Scholar
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., and Ross, M.. 1994. “Exploring the ‘Planning Fallacy’: Why People Underestimate Their Task Completion Times.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (3): 366.Google Scholar
Bühlmann, M., Widmer, A. F., and Schädel, L.. 2010. “Substantive and Descriptive Representation in Swiss Cantons.” Swiss Political Science Review 16 (3): 565–595.Google Scholar
Bullock, J. G., and Ha, S. E.. 2011. “Mediation Analysis Is Harder than It Looks.” Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, eds. Druckman, J., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 508–521.Google Scholar
Bump, P. 2015. “Donald Trumps Got a Particularly Strange Voting History.” www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/11/07/donald-trumps-got-a-particularly-strange-voting-history/ (accessed November 7, 2018).Google Scholar
Bump, P. 2016. “Donald Trump Took 5 Different Positions on Abortion in 3 Days.” www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/04/03/donald-trumps-ever-shifting-positions-on-abortion/?utm_term=.ce30842939ca (accessed November 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Burden, B. 2007. The Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton: University of Princeton Press.Google Scholar
Burke, E. 1987. “Speech to the Electors of Bristol on Being Elected (Nov. 1774).” In The Political Philosophy of Edmund Burke, ed. Hampsher-Monk, I.. London: Longman, 108–111.Google Scholar
Bush, G. H. W. 1988. “The Presidential Debate; Transcript of the Second Debate between Bush and Dukakis.” www.nytimes.com/1988/10/14/us/the-presidential-debate-transcript-of-the-second-debate-between-bush-and-dukakis.html (accessed February 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Bush, G. H. W. 1992. “Presidential Debate in Richmond, Virginia on October 15.” The American Presidency Project.Google Scholar
Bush, G. H. W. 2004. “Presidential Debate in St. Louis, Missouri on October 8.” The American Presidency Project.Google Scholar
Cain, B., Ferejohn, J., and Fiorina, M.. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Callander, S. 2008 a. “A Theory of Policy Expertise.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3 (May 2007): 123–140.Google Scholar
Callander, S. 2008 b. “Political Motivations.” Review of Economic Studies 75 (3): 671–697.Google Scholar
Callander, S., and Wilkie, S.. 2007. “Lies, Damned Lies, and Political Campaigns.” Games and Economic Behavior 60 (2): 262–286.Google Scholar
Callander, S., and Wilson, C. H.. 2008. “Context Dependent Voting and Political Ambiguity.” Journal of Public Economics 92 (3): 565–581.Google Scholar
Calvert, R. L. 1985. “Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (1): 69–95.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. E. 1983. “The Electoral Consequences of Issue Ambiguity: An Examination of the Presidential Candidates’ Issue Positions from 1968 to 1980.” Political Behavior 5 (3): 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, B., Herron, M. C., and Shotts, K. W.. 2001. “Leadership and Pandering: A Theory of Executive Policymaking.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (3): 532–550.Google Scholar
Carlin, D. B. 2009. The Third Agenda in US Presidential Debates: Debate Watch and Viewer Reactions, 1996–2004. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Carlson, J. M., and Dolan, K.. 1985. “The Waffle Phenomenon and Candidates’ Image.” Psychological Reports 57 (3): 795–798.Google Scholar
Charness, G., and Dufwenberg, M.. 2006. “Promises and Partnership.” Econometrica 74 (6): 1579–1601.Google Scholar
Charness, G., and Dufwenberg, M.. 2010. “Bare Promises: An Experiment.” Economics Letters 107 (2): 281–283.Google Scholar
Chong, D., and Druckman, J. N.. 2011. “Identifying Frames in Political News.” In SourceBook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques, eds. Bucy, Erik P. and Holbert, R. Lance. New York: Routledge, 238–267.Google Scholar
Clinton, B. 1991. “Announcement Speech in Little Rock, Arkansas.” www.4president.org/speeches/1992/billclinton1992announcement.htm (accessed November 7, 2018).Google Scholar
Clinton, H. R. 2004. “Hillary Clinton: No Regret on Iraq Vote.” www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/21/iraq.hillary/ (accessed July 20, 2014).Google Scholar
Clinton, H. R. 2016 a. “Presidential Debate in Hempstead, New York on September 26.” The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/us/politics/transcript-of-the-second-presidential-debate-in-hempstead-ny.htm (accessed January 16, 2020).Google Scholar
Clinton, H. R. 2016 b. “Presidential Debate in Las Vegas, Nevada on October 19.” The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2016/10/20/us/politics/third-debate-transcript.html (accessed January 16, 2020).Google Scholar
Clinton, H. R. 2016 c. “Presidential Debate in St. Louis, Missouri on October 9.” The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/transcript-debate.html (accessed January 16, 2020).Google Scholar
Cobb, M. D., and Kuklinski, J. H.. 1997. “Changing Minds: Political Arguments and Political Persuasion.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 88–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, S. 2016. “All the Times Obama Has Said He’s Going to Close Guantanamo Bay.” https://qz.com/623131/all-the-times-obama-has-said-hes-going-to-close-guantanamo-bay/ (published February 23, 2016; accessed June 27, 2020).Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. 2006. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics (1964).” Critical Review 18 (1–3): 1–74.Google Scholar
Cornyn, J. 2002. “Texas Senate Debate.” www.c-span.org/video/?173416-1/texas-senate-debate&start=2196 (accessed November 7, 2018).Google Scholar
Costello, R., and Thomson, R.. 2008. “Election Pledges and Their Enactment in Coalition Governments: A Comparative Analysis of Ireland.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18 (3): 239–256.Google Scholar
Craighill, P. M., and Clement, S.. 2015. “Trump’s Popularity Spikes among Repub-licans.” Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/07/15/trumps-popularity-spikes-among-republicans/ (published July 17, 2015; accessed August 2, 2015).Google Scholar
Debate. 1976. “Presidential Debate in Williamsburg on October 22.” The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/presidential-campaign-debate-0 (accessed February 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Debate. 1992. “Presidential Debate in Richmond, Virginia on October 15.” The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/presidential-debate-the-university-richmond (accessed February 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Debate. 2012. “Full Transcript of the Second Presidential Debate.” New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/us/politics/transcript-of-the-second-presidential-debate-in-hempstead-ny.html (accessed August 20, 2013).Google Scholar
DelReal, J. A. 2016. “Trump Draws Fire for Saying Abortion Laws Are Set, ‘We have to leave it that way’.” Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-says-us-abortion-laws-are-set-and-we-have-to-leave-it-that-way/2016/04/02/ (published April 2, 2016; accessed November 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Dimitrova, D. V., and Kostadinova, P.. 2013. “Identifying Antecedents of the Strategic Game Frame: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 90 (1): 75–88.Google Scholar
Ditto, P. H., and Mastronarde, A. J.. 2009. “The Paradox of the Political Maver-ick.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 (1): 295–298.Google Scholar
Dixon, T. 2016. “Souh Carolina Senate Debate.” www.c-span.org/video/?417499-1/south-carolina-senate-debate&start=1016 (accessed November 7, 2018).Google Scholar
Dovi, S. 2018. “Political Representation.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2017 ed. Zalta, E. N.. plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/ political-representation/ (accessed March 11, 2021).Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N., and Kam, C. D.. 2011. “Students as Experimental Participants.” Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science 1: 41–57.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N., and Leeper, T. J.. 2012. “Is Public Opinion Stable? Resolving the Micro/Macro Disconnect in Studies of Public Opinion.” Daedalus 141 (4): 50–68.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., and Parkin, M.. 2009. “Campaign Communications in US Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 103 (3): 343–366.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., and Parkin, M.. 2014. “US Congressional Campaign Communications in an Internet Age.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 24 (1): 20–44.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. 2016. “Where Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Stand on LGBTQ Rights.” www.teenvogue.com/story/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-lgbt-lgbtq-rights-2016-election (accessed November 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Elinder, M., Jordahl, H., and Poutvaara, P.. 2015. “Promises, Policies and Pocketbook Voting.” European Economic Review 75: 177–194.Google Scholar
Enten, H. 2016. “Americans Distaste for Both Trump and Clinton Is Record-Breaking.” https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/americans-distaste-for-both-trump-and-clinton-is-record-breaking/ (accessed November 7, 2018).Google Scholar
Erikson, R. S., and Wlezien, C.. 2012. The Timeline of Presidential Elections: How Campaigns Do (and Do Not) Matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, J. D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” Democracy, Accountability, and Representation 55: 61.Google Scholar
Fernandez, M. 2018. “Ted Cruz Defeats Beto O’Rourke for Senate in Texas.” www.nytimes.com/2018/11/06/us/ted-cruz-wins-texas-senate-race.html (published November 6, 2018; accessed November 6, 2018).Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P., and Abrams, S. J.. 2008. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 563–588.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P., and Levendusky, M. S.. 2006. “Disconnected: The Political Class versus the People.” Red and Blue Nation 1: 49–71.Google Scholar
Fishel, J. 1985. Presidents and Promises: From Campaign Pledge to Presidential Performance. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Ford, G. 1976 a. “Presidential Debate in Philadelphia on September 23.” www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=6517; (accessed February 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Ford, G. 1976 b. “Presidential Debate in Williamsburg on October 22.” www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=6517; (accessed February 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Fox, J., and Rothenberg, L.. 2011. “Influence without Bribes: A Noncontract-ing Model of Campaign Giving and Policymaking.” Political Analysis mpr016.Google Scholar
Funk, C. L. 1996. “The Impact of Scandal on Candidate Evaluations: An Experimental Test of the Role of Candidate Traits.” Political Behavior 18 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Funk, C. L. 1999. “Bringing the Candidate into Models of Candidate Evaluation.” The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 700–720.Google Scholar
Gallup. 2014. “Guns.” www.gallup.com/poll/1645/guns.aspx (accessed November 10, 2014).Google Scholar
Geer, J. G. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Glazer, A. 1990. “The Strategy of Candidate Ambiguity.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 237–241.Google Scholar
Gneezy, A., and Epley, N.. 2014. “Worth Keeping but Not Exceeding: Asymmetric Consequences of Breaking versus Exceeding Promises.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 5 (7): 796–804.Google Scholar
GOP. 2016. “A Better Way: Our Vision for a Confident America.” www.novoco.com/sites/default/files/atoms/files/ryan_a_better_way_policy_paper_062416.pdf (published June 24, 2016; accessed June 27, 2020).Google Scholar
Gore, A. 2000. “Presidential Debate in St. Louis, Missouri on October 17.” Comission on Presidential Debates.Google Scholar
Goren, P. 1997. “Political Expertise and Issue Voting in Presidential Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 50 (2): 387–412.Google Scholar
Goren, P. 2007. “Character Weakness, Partisan Bias, and Presidential Evaluation: Modifications and Extensions.” Political Behavior 29 (3): 305–325.Google Scholar
Gottfried, J., Barthel, M., Shearer, E., and Mitchell, A.. 2016. “The 2016 Presidential Campaign – A News Event That’s Hard to Miss.” www.journalism.org/2016/02/04/the-2016-presidential-campaign-a-news-event-thats-hard-to-miss/ (published February 4, 2016; accessed June 27, 2020).Google Scholar
Green, J. 2007. “When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition.” Political Studies 55 (3): 629–655.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1991. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grimmer, J. 2013. Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grimmer, J., and Stewart, B. M.. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21 (3): 267–297.Google Scholar
Grimmer, J., Westwood, S. J., and Messing, S.. 2014. The Impression of Influence: Legislator Communication, Representation, and Democratic Accountability. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grofman, B. 1985. “The Neglected Role of the Status Quo in Models of Issue Voting.” The Journal of Politics 47 (1): 229–237.Google Scholar
Grofman, B. 2004. “Downs and Two-Party Convergence.” Annual Review Political Science 7: 25–46.Google Scholar
Grose, C. R., and Husser, J.. 2014. “Is Candidate Rhetorical Tone Associated with Presidential Vote Choice?” In Communication and Language Analysis in the Public Sphere, ed. Shart, R. P.. Hershey, PA: Information Science Review, 153–170.Google Scholar
Groseclose, T. 2001. “A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 862–886.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., and Helpman, E.. 2005. “Party Discipline and Pork Barrel Politics.” (No. w11396). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J., and Hopkins, D. J.. 2012. The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants. American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 529–548.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., and Yamamoto, T.. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis 22 (1): 1–30.Google Scholar
Håkansson, N., and Naurin, E. 2016. “Promising Ever More.” Party Politics 22 (3): 393–404.Google Scholar
Harrington, J. E. 1993. “Economic Policy, Economic Performance, and Elections.” The American Economic Review 83 (1): 27–42.Google Scholar
Hetherington, M. J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95 (3): 619–631.Google Scholar
Hetherington, M. J., and Rudolph, T. J.. 2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
House, T. W. 2013. “Now Is the Time: Gun Violence Reduction Executive Actions.” whitehouse.gov.Google Scholar
Huang, H. 2010. “Electoral Competition When Some Candidates Lie and Others Pander.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 22 (3): 333–358.Google Scholar
Imai, K., and Yamamoto, T.. 2013. “Identification and Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Causal Mechanisms: Revisiting Evidence from Framing Experiments.” Political Analysis 21 (2): 141–171.Google Scholar
Imai, K., Keele, L., and Yamamoto, T.. 2010. “Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects.” Statistical Science 25 (1): 51–71.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., Hahn, K. S., Krosnick, J. A., and Walker, J.. 2008. “Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership.” The Journal of Politics 70 (1): 186–200.Google Scholar
Jacobs, L. R., and Shapiro, R. Y.. 1994. “Issues, Candidate Image, and Priming: The Use of Private Polls in Kennedy’s 1960 Presidential Campaign.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 527–540.Google Scholar
Jacobs, L. R., and Shapiro, R. Y.. 2000. Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, G. 2015. “Obama Regrets Not Closing Guantanamo on First Day in Office.” www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/03/18/obama-regrets-not-closing-guantanamo-on-first-day-in-office/ (published March 18, 2015; accessed June 27, 2020).Google Scholar
Jamieson, K. H., and Birdsell, D. S.. 1988. Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. E. 2004. “Partisan Patterns in Presidential Campaign Speeches, 1948–2000.” Communication Quarterly 52 (4): 403–419.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. 2016. “Here are 76 of Donald Trump’s Many Campaign Promises.” Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/01/22/here-are-76-of-donald-trumps-many-campaign-promises/?utm_term=.a043496e22ea (published January 1, 2016; accessed November 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Just, M. R. 1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Just, M. R., Crigler, A., and Wallach, L.. 1990. “Thirty Seconds or Thirty Minutes: What Viewers Learn from Spot Advertisements and Candidate Debates.” Journal of Communication 40 (3): 120–133.Google Scholar
Kaid, L. L., and Chanslor, M.. 1995. “Changing Candidate Images: The Effects of Political Advertising.” In Hacker, K. (Ed.). Candidate Images in Presidential Elections Westport, Connecticut. 83–97.Google Scholar
Karol, D. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kartik, N., and McAfee, R. P.. 2007. “Signaling Character in Electoral Competi-tion.” The American Economic Review 97 (3): 852–870.Google Scholar
Kasich, J. 2015. “Transcript of the Republican Presidential Debate in Detroit.” www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/us/politics/transcript-of-the-republican-presidential-debate-in-detroit.html (accessed November 7, 2018).Google Scholar
Keen, D. 2012. “Sandy Hook School Shooting, Delivered on Dec. 21, 2012 (Tran-script).” www.washingtonpost.com/politics/remarks-from-the-nra-press-conference-on-sandy-hook-school-shooting-delivered-on-dec-21-2012-transcript/2012/12/21/story.html (accessed on November 10, 2014).Google Scholar
Keneally, M. 2016. “Donald Trump’s Evolving Stance on Abortion.” http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trumps-evolving-stance-abortion/story?id=38057176 (accessed November 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Kern, M. 1989. Thirty-Second Politics: Political Advertising in the Eighties. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Kerry, J. 2004. “Presidential Debate in St. Louis, Missouri on October 8.” The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/presidential-debate-st-louis-missouri (accessed February 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R. 1986. “Presidential Character Revisited.” Political Cognition 19: 233–255.Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., Abelson, R. P., and Fiske, S. T.. 1980. “Presidential Prototypes.” Political Behavior 2 (4): 315–337.Google Scholar
Koger, G. 2003. “Position-Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 280 (2): 225–246.Google Scholar
Kostadinova, P. 2013. “Democratic Performance in Post-communist Bulgaria: Election Pledges and Levels of Fulfillment, 1997–2005.” East European Politics 29 (2): 190–207.Google Scholar
Kostadinova, P. 2015. “Party Pledges in the News: Which Election Promises Do the Media Report?” Party Politics (January).Google Scholar
Kronrod, A., Grinstein, A., and Wathieu, L.. 2011. “Enjoy! Hedonic Consumption and Compliance with Assertive Messages.” Journal of Consumer Research 39 (1): 51–61.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A. 1988. “The Role of Attitude Importance in Social Evaluation: A Study of Policy Preferences, Presidential Candidate Evaluations, and Voting Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 (2): 196.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A. 1990. “Americans’ Perceptions of Presidential Candidates: A Test of the Projection Hypothesis.” Journal of Social Issues 46 (2): 159–182.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., Visser, P. S., and Harder, J.. 2010. “The Psychological Underpinnings of Political Behavior.” Handbook of Social Psychology 2: 1288–1342.Google Scholar
Krukones, M. G. 1984. Promises and Performance: Presidential Campaigns as Policy Predictors. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Krupnikov, Y., and Ryan, J. B. 2017. “Choice vs. Action: Candidate Ambiguity and Voter Decision Making.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 12 (4): 479–505.Google Scholar
Lemert, J. B. 1993. “Do Televised Presidential Debates Help Inform Voters?”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 37(1): 83–94.Google Scholar
Lenz, G. S. 2013. Follow the Leader?: How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levay, K. E., Freese, J., and Druckman, J. N.. 2016. “The Demographic and Political Composition of Mechanical Turk Samples.” Sage Open 6 (1): 2158244016636433.Google Scholar
Levendusky, M. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lindgren, E., and Naurin, E.. 2017. “Election Pledge Rhetoric: Selling Policy with Words.” International Journal of Communication 11: 22.Google Scholar
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., and Bracken, C. C.. 2002. “Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability.” Human Communication Research 28 (4): 587–604.Google Scholar
Manin, B. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (04): 515–528.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. 2009. “A Selection Model of Political Representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4): 369–398.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. 2011. “Clarifying the Concept of Representation.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 621–630.Google Scholar
Mansergh, L., and Thomson, R.. 2007. “Election Pledges , Party Competition, and Policymaking.” Comparative Policits 39 (3): 311–329.Google Scholar
Mason, L. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Matalin, M., Carville, J., and Knobler, P.. 1994. All’s Fair: Love, War, and Running for President, 1 trade ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Mayhew, D. R. 2004[1974]. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCain, J. 2008. “Presidential Debate in Hempstead, New York on October 15.” www.presidency.ucsb.edu.Google Scholar
McDermott, R. 2011. “Internal and External Validity.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, eds. Druckman, J., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27–40.Google Scholar
McGillivray, F. 1997. “Party Discipline as a Determinant of the Endogenous Formation of Tariffs.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 584–607.Google Scholar
McGraw, K. 2011. “Candidate Impressions and Evaluations.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, eds. Druckman, J., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187–200.Google Scholar
McGraw, K. M., Lodge, M., and Jones, J. M.. 2002. “The Pandering Politicians of Suspicious Minds.” The Journal of Politics 64 (2): 362–383.Google Scholar
Meirowitz, A. 2005. “Informational Party Primaries and Strategic Ambiguity.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 17 (1): 107–136.Google Scholar
Milita, K., Ryan, J. B., and Simas, E. N.. 2014. “Nothing to Hide, Nowhere to Run, or Nothing to Lose: Candidate Position-Taking in Congressional Elections.” Political Behavior 36 (2): 427–449.Google Scholar
Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45–56.Google Scholar
Miller, W. E., Kinder, D. R., and Rosenstone, S. J.. 1999. American National Election Studies, 1992 Time Series Study [dataset]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies.Google Scholar
Minow, N. N., and LaMay, C. L.. 2008. Inside the Presidential Debates: Their Improbable Past and Promising Future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., and Freese, J.. 2015. “The Generaliz-ability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2 (2): 109–138.Google Scholar
Mullis, S. 2012. “Leaked Video Shows Romney Discussing ‘Dependent’ Voters.”. It’s All Politics: Political News from NPR. www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2012/09/17/161313644/leaked-video-purports-to-show-romney-discuss-dependent-voters (published September 17, 2012; accessed September 17, 2012).Google Scholar
Naurin, E. 2011. Election Promises, Party Behaviour and Voter Perceptions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Naurin, E. 2014. “Is a Promise a Promise? Election Pledge Fulfilment in Comparative Perspective Using Sweden as an Example.” West European Politics 37 (5): 1046–1064.Google Scholar
Nielsen. 2016. “Third Presidential Debate of 2016 Draws 71.6 Million Viewers.” www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/article/2016/third-presidential-debate-of-2016-draws-71-6-million-viewers/ (published October 20, 2016; accessed January 20, 2020).Google Scholar
Obama, B. 2012. “Full Transcript of the Second Presidential Debate.” New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/us/politics/transcript-of-the-second-presidential-debate-in-hempstead-ny.html (accessed August 20, 2013).Google Scholar
Page, B. I. 1976. “The Theory of Political Ambiguity.” American Political Science Review 70 (3): 742–752.Google Scholar
Page, B. I. 1978. Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections: Rational Man and Electoral Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Paolacci, G., and Chandler, J.. 2014. “Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 23 (3): 184–188.Google Scholar
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., and Ipeirotis, P. G.. 2010. “Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk.” Judgment and Decision Making 5 (5): 411–419.Google Scholar
Parkin, M. 2014. Talk Show Campaigns: Presidential Candidates on Daytime and Late Night Television, vol. 4. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Petrocik, J. R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–850.Google Scholar
Petrocik, J. R., Benoit, W. L., and Hansen, G. J.. 2003. “Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952–2000.” Political Science Quarterly 118 (4): 599–626.Google Scholar
Pétry, F., and Collette, B.. 2009. Measuring How Political Parties Keep Their Promises: A Positive Perspective from Political Science. Do They Walk Like They Talk? Springer 65–80.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H. F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Quinnipiac University Poll. 2017. “March 23, 2017 – U.S. Voters Oppose GOP Health Plan 3-1, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Big Opposition to Cuts to Medicaid, Planned Parenthood.” https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2443 (published March 23, 2017; accessed November 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, G., and Macdonald, S. E.. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 93–121.Google Scholar
Rallings, C. 1987. “The Influence of Election Programmes: Britain and Canada 1945–1979.” In Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analysis of Post-War Election Programmes in Nineteen Democracies, eds. Budge, I., Robertsonm, D. and Hear, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–14.Google Scholar
Ryan, P. 2017. On ABC. This Week [video file]. https://twitter.com/ThisWeekABC/status/861211794886361089 (broadcast May 7, 2017; accessed November 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Rehfeld, A. 2009. “Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 103 (2): 214–230.Google Scholar
Riker, W. H. 1996. The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ringquist, E. J., and Dasse, C.. 2004. “Lies, Damned Lies, and Campaign Promises? Environmental Legislation in the 105th Congress.” Social Science Quarterly 85 (2): 400–419.Google Scholar
Rivers, D. 2008. “Understanding People: Sample Matching.” Palo Alto: YouGov \ Polimetrix www.websm.org/db/12/16528/Web%20Survey%20Bibliography/Understanding_people_Sample_matching/ (accessed May 18, 2013).Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L., and Rousseau, D. M.. 1994. “Violating the Psychological Contract: Not the Exception but the Norm.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 15 (3): 245–259.Google Scholar
Romney, M. 2012. “Full Transcript of the Second Presidential Debate.” www.presidency.ucsb.edu (accessed August 20, 2013).Google Scholar
Rosema, M. 2006. “Partisanship, Candidate Evaluations, and Prospective Vot-ing.” Electoral Studies 25 (3): 467–488.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. 1995. Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Royed, T. J. 1996. “Testing the Mandate Model in Britain and the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher Eras.” British Journal of Political Science 26 (1): 45–80.Google Scholar
Royed, T. J., and Borrelli, S. A.. 1997. “Political Parties and Public Policy: Social Welfare Policy from Carter to Bush.” Polity 29 (4): 539–563.Google Scholar
Royed, T. J., and Borrelli, S. A.. 1999. “Parties and Economic Policy in the USA Pledges and Performance, 1976–1992.” Party Politics 5 (1): 115–127.Google Scholar
Rubio, M. 2015. “Transcript of the Republican Presidential Debate in Detroit.” www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/us/politics/transcript-of-the-republican-presidential-debate-in-detroit.html (accessed November 7, 2018).Google Scholar
Saward, M. 2014. “Shape-Shifting Representation.” American Political Science Review 108 (4): 723–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, W. J. 1995. “Senators as Political Enrepreneurs: Using Bill Sponsorship to Shape Legislative Agendas.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 186–203.Google Scholar
Sellers, P. J. 1998. “Strategy and Background in Congressional Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 92 (1): 159–171.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. M. 1998. “President Clinton’s First Term: Matching Campaign Promises with Presidential Performance.” Congress and the Presidency: A Journal of Capital Studies, 25 (1): 43–65.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. A. 1972. “The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition.” American Political Science Review 66 (2): 555–568.Google Scholar
Sides, J. 2006. “The Origins of Campaign Agendas.” British Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 407.Google Scholar
Sides, J., Tesler, M., and Vavreck, L.. 2019. Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Slothuus, R., and de Vreese, C. H.. 2010. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects.” The Journal of Politics 72 (3): 630–645.Google Scholar
Smart Gun Laws. 2014. “Tracking State Gun Laws: 2014 Developments.” smartgunlaws.org/tracking-state-gun-laws-2014-developments/ (accessed June 28, 2014).Google Scholar
Sniderman, P. M., and Stiglitz, E. H.. 2012. The Reputational Premium: A Theory of Party Identification and Policy Reasoning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, R. M., and Bickers, K. N.. 1994. “Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel.” The Journal of Politics 56 (2): 377–399.Google Scholar
Stokes, D. E. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57 (2): 368–377.Google Scholar
Stokes, D. E. 1966. “Some Dynamic Elements of Contests for the Presidency.” American Political Science Review 60 (1): 19–28.Google Scholar
Strolovitch, D. Z., Wong, J. S., and Proctor, A.. 2017. “A Possessive Investment in White Heteropatriarchy? The 2016 Election and the Politics of Race, Gender, and Sexuality.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5 (2): 353–363.Google Scholar
Sulkin, T. 2009. “Campaign Appeals and Legislative Action.” The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 1093–1108.Google Scholar
Sulkin, T. 2011. The Legislative Legacy of Congressional Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. 2001. “The Programme to Policy Linkage: The Fulfilment of Election Pledges on Socio–economic Policy in The Netherlands, 1986–1998.” European Journal of Political Research 40 (2): 171–197.Google Scholar
Thomson, R., Royed, T., Naurin, E., et al. 2017. “The Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (3): 527–542.Google Scholar
Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T., Hirose, K., Keele, L., and Imai, K.. 2013. “Mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis.” R Package Version 4 (3).Google Scholar
Tomz, M., and Houweling, R. P. V.. 2008. “Candidate Positioning and Voter Choice.” American Political Science Review 102 (3): 303–318.Google Scholar
Tomz, M., and Houweling, R. P. V.. 2009. “The Electoral Implications of Candidate Ambiguity.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 83–98.Google Scholar
Tomz, M., and van Houweling, R.. 2012 a. “Candidate Repositioning.” https://tomz.people.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj4711/f/tomzvanhouweling-repositioning-2012-10-24.pdf (draft Fall 2012; accessed March 23, 2016).Google Scholar
Tomz, M., and van Houweling, R.. 2012 b. “Political Pledges as Credible Commitments.” https://tomz.people.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj4711/f/tomzvanhouweling-pledges-2012-03-27.pdf (draft March 2012; accessed March 23, 2016).Google Scholar
Trump, D. J. 2016 a. “Presidential Debate in Hempstead, New York on September 26.” The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/transcript-debate.html (accessed January 10, 2020).Google Scholar
Trump, D. J. 2016 b. “Presidential Debate in St. Louis, Missouri on October 9.” The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/us/politics/transcript-of-the-second-presidential-debate-in-hempstead-ny.htm (accessed January 16, 2020).Google Scholar
Vanberg, C. 2008. “Why Do People Keep Their Promises? An Experimental Test of Two Explanations.” Econometrica 76 (6): 1467–1480.Google Scholar
VanSickle-Ward, R. 2014. The Devil Is in the Details: Understanding the Causes of Policy Specificity and Ambiguity. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Vavreck, L. 2001. “Voter Uncertainty and Candidate Contact: New Influences on Voting Behavior.” In Communication in U.S. Elections: New Agendas, eds. Roderick P. Hart and Daron R. Shaw. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 91–104.Google Scholar
Vavreck, L. 2009. The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vladimirov, N. 2017. “Cook Political Report Moves 20 Districts toward Dems after ObamaCare Repeal Vote.” The Hill. https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/332062-cook-report-weakens-forecast-for-20-gop-districts-after (published May 5, 2017; accessed November 18, 2017).Google Scholar
Walters, B. 1976. “Presidential Debate in Williamsburg on October 22.” www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=6517;.Google Scholar
Westfall, J., van Boven, L., Chambers, J. R., and Judd, C. M.. 2015. “Perceiving Political Polarization in the United States: Party Identity Strength and Attitude Extremity Exacerbate the Perceived Partisan Divide.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 10 (2): 145–158.Google Scholar
Wittman, D. 1983. “Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories.” American Political Science Review 77 (1): 142–157.Google Scholar
Zaller, J. R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zinshteyn, M. 2016. “College Freshmen Are More Politically Engaged than They Have Been in Decades.” fivethirtyeight.com 11: 2016.Google Scholar