Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:08:30.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

General introduction: the twentieth and twenty-first centuries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2013

Liz Disley
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Nicholas Boyle
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Liz Disley
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Karl Ameriks
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Get access

Summary

From inauspicious beginnings to the ‘return of metaphysics’ – German Idealism at the turn of the century

At first glance, the impact of Idealism at the dawn of the twentieth century seemed to be on the wane. In America, George Santayana, a student of William James, spearheaded a common-sense return to naturalism and realism, attacking not only Idealism itself but also perceived Idealist elements in pragmatism. His five-volume Life of Reason (1905–1906) was an ambitious and broad-based contribution to philosophy, focusing not only on metaphysical and epistemological topics, but also on religion and literature. An early advocate of epiphenomenalism, that is, the view that mental events are caused by physical events and have no influence on subsequent physical events, Santayana's wide-ranging project could hardly have been more hostile to classical German Idealism. He was to exercise significant influence on subsequent figures in English-speaking philosophy, including Bertrand Russell, as well as on literary figures such as Wallace Stevens. In the German-speaking world, 1908 saw the first meeting of what would ultimately become the Vienna Circle, which would foster the development of the enormously influential logical positivist movement. As well as being a philosophical methodology, logical positivism was a fundamentally empiricist movement which saw all knowledge as proceeding from experience. In this sense, it too was inimical to German Idealism, and saw many of the tenets of the earlier movement as metaphysical and therefore meaningless statements. The logical positivist movement and German Idealism did not operate in entirely separate worlds, however, and many of the central questions and concerns of both were brought together in the work of Ludwig Wittgenstein and those who worked with him.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Impact of Idealism
The Legacy of Post-Kantian German Thought
, pp. 41 - 61
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gentile, Giovanni, Theory of the Mind as Pure Act (London: Macmillan, 1922Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F., Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Kritische Ausgabe / Einleitung in die Geschichte der Philosophie: Orientalische Philosophie (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1993), 96 (B375)Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009)Google Scholar
Sheehan, Paul, ‘Postmodernism and philosophy’, in Connor, S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 20–42Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N., Hegel's Idea of a Phenomenology of Spirit (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), 208Google Scholar
Berlin, I., Two Concepts of Liberty: an inaugural lecture delivered before the University of Oxford on 31 October 1958 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959)Google Scholar
Davis, C., Levinas: an introduction (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), 8Google Scholar
Lyotard, J. F., La Condition Postmoderne (Paris: Editions de minuit, 1979)Google Scholar
Dews, P., ‘Power and subjectivity in Foucault’, New Left Review 144 (1984), 148–52, at 149Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. E., ‘The unreality of time’, Mind 17 (1908), 457–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robin, G., Collingwood: an essay on metaphysics (London: Oxford University Press, 1940)Google Scholar
Theunissen, M., ‘The repressed intersubjectivity in Hegel's Philosophy of Right’, Hegel and Legal Theory, ed. Cornell, D., Rosenfeld, M. and Carlson, D. G. (London: Routledge, 1991), 3–63Google Scholar
Russell, B., My Philosophical Development (London: Unwin Hyman, 1995)Google Scholar
Moore, G. E., A Defence of Common Sense (London: Allen & Unwin, 1925)Google Scholar
Russell, B., Theory of Knowledge: the 1913 manuscript (London: Routledge, 1992)Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone, The Second Sex, trans. Parshley, H. M. (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972)Google Scholar
Butler, J., Giving an Account of Oneself (New York: Fordham University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, J., ‘Negativity: Rejection’, Hegel and Contemporary Continental Philosophy, ed. Keenan, Dennis King (Albany: SUNY Press, 2004), 327Google Scholar
Malabou, C., The Future of Hegel: plasticity, temporality and dialectic, trans. During, Lisabeth (New York and London: Routledge, 2005)Google Scholar
Malabou, C., Plasticity at the Dusk of Writing: dialectic, destruction, deconstruction (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Said, E. W., The World, the Text, and the Critic (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Brandom, R. B., Between Saying and Doing: towards an analytic pragmatism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, P. S., ‘Life, death and (inter) subjectivity: realism and recognition in continental feminism’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 60 (2006), 41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadaki, E. L., ‘Sexual objectification: from Kant to contemporary Feminism’, Contemporary Political Theory 6 (2007), 330–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R., Irony, Contingency and Solidarity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, ‘On Hegel, women and irony’, in Mills, P. J., Feminist Interpretations of GWF Hegel (Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press, 1996), 25–44Google Scholar
Irigaray, L., An Ethics of Sexual Difference (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×