Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:16:14.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The triumph of immunology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

Alfred I. Tauber
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access

Summary

A BIOLOGY BASED ON THE WHOLE

The conflict between Metchnikoff and the humoralists must be regarded as a particular case of a more general struggle surrounding the ascendency of reductionism, defining both the research strategies and the metaphysical foundations of biology and medicine in general. Reductionism was declared as the program of German physiology in the 1840s to combat vitalism and establish the exclusive domain of physics and chemistry as the sciences to describe the living realm (Galaty 1974' Gregory 1977' Lenoir 1982' Kremer 1990). The application of physicochemical theory and methods to biology has a clear history dating from the end of the eighteenth century in the maturation of combution theory (Lavoisier), the application of atomic proportions (Jeremias Richter and Dalton), and the extension of inorganic chemistry to organic matter. More broadly the reductionist program in physiology arose from the growing appreciation that energy was interconvertible from one form to another and was conserved. As fundamental laws governing physical forces were defined for electrical, chemical, and mechanical energies, biologists would seek to place organic functions within the same scientific construct. Thus, the initial efforts to formalize the research agenda of physiology to chemistry focused on the problem of accounting for animal heat. In the process teleology and holism (the latter we would describe as organismic biology) were assaulted as allied, if not intimately linked, with the vitalistic doctrine. In the twenty-five-year period of 1883-1908 (the years of Metchnikoff's active immunology career), the emergence of new standards and expectations can be discerned in almost all biological disciplines, molded by what might well be regarded as a modern-age scientific ethos.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Immune Self
Theory or Metaphor?
, pp. 44 - 80
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×