Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Standard editions and conventions
- Introduction
- 1 ‘[T]o whom ought to be gyuen laude and presynge’: Ideas of authorship in print, at court, and in the dream vision
- 2 John Skelton, William Dunbar, and authorial self-promotion at court
- 3 ‘Obscure allegory’ and reading ‘by true experyence’ in the dream visions of Stephen Hawes
- 4 ‘Quod the compilar Gawin D’: Gavin Douglas’s implied authorship
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
4 - ‘Quod the compilar Gawin D’: Gavin Douglas’s implied authorship
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 May 2024
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Standard editions and conventions
- Introduction
- 1 ‘[T]o whom ought to be gyuen laude and presynge’: Ideas of authorship in print, at court, and in the dream vision
- 2 John Skelton, William Dunbar, and authorial self-promotion at court
- 3 ‘Obscure allegory’ and reading ‘by true experyence’ in the dream visions of Stephen Hawes
- 4 ‘Quod the compilar Gawin D’: Gavin Douglas’s implied authorship
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
In Chapter 2, I quoted the eulogy of Sir David Lyndsay, poet and herald at the court of James V, for William Dunbar, ‘quhilk language had at large’. Dunbar is one among twelve deceased vernacular poets named as paragons of their art in the prologue to Lyndsay's Testament and Complaynt of Our Soverane Lordis Papyngo (1530). First comes the English literary triumvirate, ‘Chawceir, Gower, and Lidgate laureate’ (line 12); next, a series of Scottish writers: Walter Kennedy, Dunbar, and seven further names all also mentioned either in Dunbar's Lament for the Makars or The Flyting of Dumbar and Kennedie. Lyndsay praises these poets in terms of their ‘rethorick’ (line 11) and ‘sweit sentence’ (line 14), claiming that ‘Thocht thay be ded, thar libels bene levand’ (line 20). But in the stanzas that follow, all are surpassed by the superlative skill and learning of ‘Albione’'s pre-eminent poet, Gavin Douglas:
Allace for one, quhilk lampe wes of this land!
Of eloquence the flowand balmy strand,
And, in our Inglis rethorick, the rose.
As, of rubeis, the charbunckle bene chose,
And, as Phebus dois Synthia presell,
So Gawane Dowglas, byschope of Dunkell,
Had, quhen he wes in to this land on lyve,
Abufe vulgare poetis prerogative,
Boith in pratick and speculatioun.
I saye no more. Gude redaris may discryve
His worthy workis, in nowmer mo than five,
And speciallye the trew transaltioun
Of Virgill, quhilk bene consolatioun
To cunnyng men, to knaw his gret ingyne
Als weil in naturall science as devyne.
(Lyndsay, Papyngo, lines 22–36)Lyndsay's eulogy evidences Douglas's high literary reputation in Scotland and, though to a lesser degree, England throughout much of the sixteenth century. It also suggests some of the important differences between Douglas and the other English and Scottish poets examined in this book, not least, his particular agon with the concept of authorship. The most obvious difference is Douglas's noble status, both as a member of the powerful ‘Red’ Douglas family and, from 1516, bishop of Dunkeld. Douglas's material ‘prerogative’ would have greatly exceeded that of the court servitors and minor ecclesiastics Skelton, Dunbar, and Hawes.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ideas of Authorship in the English and Scottish Dream VisionSkelton, Dunbar, Hawes, Douglas, pp. 129 - 180Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2024