Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Analytical Table of Contents
- Preface
- Dedication
- Introduction
- 1 Human Rights and Community: Unlocking the Deadlock
- 2 Are Human Rights Enough?
- 3 Good Governance as Metaphor for Development
- 4 Good Governance and the Marketisation of Human Rights
- 5 The Good Governance of Electricity: Nigeria as Case Study
- 6 Reclaiming Human Rights: A Theory of Community
- 7 Electricity for Community by Community: The Co-operative Model
- Conclusion: Imagining a Post-state Human Rights Discourse
- Bibliography
- Index
2 - Are Human Rights Enough?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Analytical Table of Contents
- Preface
- Dedication
- Introduction
- 1 Human Rights and Community: Unlocking the Deadlock
- 2 Are Human Rights Enough?
- 3 Good Governance as Metaphor for Development
- 4 Good Governance and the Marketisation of Human Rights
- 5 The Good Governance of Electricity: Nigeria as Case Study
- 6 Reclaiming Human Rights: A Theory of Community
- 7 Electricity for Community by Community: The Co-operative Model
- Conclusion: Imagining a Post-state Human Rights Discourse
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
INTRODUCTION
In this chapter, I consider another problem with human rights, one that does not feature prominently in the communitarian critiques discussed in the previous chapter. This chapter is concerned about what human rights offer as a way of understanding what it means to suffer and what human suffering entails by way of a response. This question raises two related issues. The first concerns the capacity of human rights to give insight into mass abuses of civil and political and economic and social rights or other injustices and forms of human suffering. In other words, do human rights offer sufficient conceptual resources to assist the proper articulation of suffering and vulnerability?
The second issue has to do with the nature of the human rights claim. It questions the extent to which human rights hinder our ability to recognise and respond to various forms of human suffering by preventing empathic or other more affectionate forms of interaction and relationships between people. In this context, I am referring to the adversarial or antagonistic nature of a human rights claim; that is, the extent to which it prevents the proper appreciation and articulation of human suffering and vulnerability.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human Rights from CommunityA Rights-Based Approach to Development, pp. 50 - 68Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2013