So far, this book has said a great deal about what human dignity is not, or, at any rate, how we shouldn’t think about it. I have denied that it is helpfully construed as an inherent possession of the person, an inward attribute revealed in conscious introspection, an existential identity or uniqueness, a quasi-juridical status, a form of authority or personal sovereignty, a generic “purposiveness,” or an inalienable quality that never changes. If human dignity is none of these things, then what would a more compelling conceptualization of it look like? Is any cogent and politically useful account of human dignity left?