Abbott, Andrew. ‘Pragmatic Sociology and the Public Sphere: The Case of Charles Richmond Henderson’. Social Science History 34, no. 3 (September 21, 2010): 337–71.Google Scholar

Abma, Ruud. Over de grenzen van disciplines: plaatsbepaling van de sociale wetenschappen. Nijmegen: Vantilt, 2011.Google Scholar

Abma, Ruud. ‘Replicaties in de psychologie – reactie op Radder’. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Wijsbegeerte 106, no. 1 (2014): 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akin, William E. Technocracy and the American Dream: The Technocrat Movement, 1900–1941. Oakland: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Alexander, Jack. ‘The Green Pencil’. The New Yorker, December 11, 1937.Google Scholar

Andriopoulos, Stefan. ‘The Sleeper Effect: Hypnotism, Mind Control, Terrorism’. Grey Room, no. 45 (Fall 2011): 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anonymous. ‘The Mistakes of the Efficiency Men’. In Scientific Management. A Collection of the More Significant Articles Describing the Taylor System of Management, edited by Thompson, C. B., 615–31. Easton: Hive Pub. Co., 1972.Google Scholar

Back, Kurt Wolfgang. Beyond Words: The Story of Sensitivity Training and the Encounter Movement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1972.Google Scholar

Baistow, K. ‘Behavioural Approaches and the Cultivation of Competence’. In Psychology in Britain. Historical Essays and Personal Reflections, edited by Bunn, G. C., Lovie, A. D. and Richards, G. D., 309–29. London: Science Museum, British Psychological Society, 2001.Google Scholar

Baker, K. M. ‘The Early History of the Term “Social Science”’. Annals of Science 20, no. 3 (1964): 211–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bannister, Robert C. Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A. ‘Free Will Is Un-Natural’. In Are We Free?: Psychology and Free Will, edited by Baer, John, Kaufman, J. C. and Baumeister, R. E., 128–54. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A. ‘Nothing in Their Heads’. The Natural Unconscious, March 5, 2012. http://web.archive.org/web/20120307100648/http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-natural-unconscious/201203/nothing-in-their-heads.Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A. ‘Our Unconscious Mind’. Scientific American 310, no. 1 (2014): 30–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bargh, J. A., and Chartrand, T. L.. ‘The Mind in the Middle: A Practical Guide to Priming and Automaticity Research’. In Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, edited by Reis, H. T. and Judd, C. M., 253–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Bargh, John A., Chen, Mark and Burrows, Lara. ‘Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype Activation on Action’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71, no. 2 (1996): 230–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barlow, John A. ‘Mass Line Leadership and Thought Reform in China’. American Psychologist 36, no. 3 (1981): 300–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barron, Margaret. ‘Case-Study of a Basic Skill Training Group’, August 15, 1947. Box 220, folder #1. The Drs. Nicholas and Dorothy Cummings Center for the History of Psychology.Google Scholar

Bauer, Raymond A. ‘Brainwashing: Psychology or Demonology?’ Journal of Social Issues 13, no. 3 (July 1957): 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Raymond A., and Schein, Edgar H.. ‘Introduction’. Journal of Social Issues 13, no. 3 (July 1, 1957): 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bavelas, Alex. ‘A Method for Investigating Individual and Group Ideology’. Sociometry 5, no. 4 (November 1, 1942): 371–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bavelas, Alex. ‘An Experiment in the Retraining of Recreation Leaders’. Iowa City: University of Iowa, 1942.Google Scholar

Bavelas, Alex. ‘Communication Patterns in Task-Oriented Groups’. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22, no. 6 (1950): 725–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bavelas, Alex. ‘Morale and the Training of Leaders’. In Civilian Morale: Second Yearbook of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, edited by Watson, Goodwin and Watson, Goodwin, 143–65. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1942.Google Scholar

Bavelas, Alex. ‘Some Mathematical Properties of Psychological Space’. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1948. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/34690.Google Scholar

Bavelas, Alex, and Lewin, Kurt. ‘Training in Democratic Leadership’. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 37, no. 1 (1942): 115–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bem, D. J. ‘Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100, no. 3 (2011): 407–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benjafield, John G. A History of Psychology. Don Mills, Ontario; New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Ludy T., and Baker, David B.. From Séance to Science: A History of the Profession of Psychology in America. Australia; Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth, 2004.Google Scholar

Bernard, L. L. ‘Some Dynamics of Present World Relations’. Phylon (1940–1956) 7, no. 2 (June 1, 1946): 105–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, L. L. ‘Standards of Living and Planes of Living’. Social Forces 7, no. 2 (December 1, 1928): 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, L. L. ‘The Place of the Social Sciences in Modern Education’. Journal of Educational Sociology 9, no. 1 (1935): 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, L. L. ‘The Teaching of Sociology in the United States’. American Journal of Sociology 15, no. 2 (October 1, 1909): 164–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biderman, A. ‘Communist Attempts to Elicit False Confessions from Air Force Prisoners of War’. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 33, no. 9 (1957): 616–25.Google ScholarPubMed

Biderman, A. ‘Social-Psychological Needs and “Involuntary” Behavior as Illustrated by Compliance in Interrogation’. Sociometry 23, no. 2 (June 1, 1960): 120–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Billig, M. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. European Monographs in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Billig, M. ‘Rhetoric of Social Psychology’. In Deconstructing Social Psychology, edited by Shotter, J. and Parker, I., 47–60. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar

Billig, M. ‘The Myth of Kurt Lewin and the Rhetoric of Collective Memory in Social Psychology Textbooks’. Theory & Psychology, 25, no. 6 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackman, Frank W. ‘Reasonable Department of Sociology for Colleges and Universities’. American Journal of Sociology 20, no. 2 (September 1, 1914): 261–63. doi:10.2307/2763114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloemen, Erik Sybrand Arnold. Scientific Management in Nederland, 1900–1930. Amsterdam: NEHA, 1988.Google Scholar

Boese, Franz. Geschichte des Vereins für Sozialpolitik: 1872–1932. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1939.Google Scholar

Bogardus, Emory Stephen. A History of Social Thought. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press, 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogardus, Emory Stephen. Introduction to Sociology. 2nd rev. ed. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press, 1917.Google Scholar

Breslau, Daniel. ‘The Scientific Appropriation of Social Research’. Theory and Society 19, no. 4 (August 1, 1990): 417–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, JoAnne. The Definition of a Profession: The Authority of Metaphor in the History of Intelligence Testing, 1890–1930. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Brown, Steve D., and Stenner, Paul. Psychology without Foundations: History, Philosophy and Psychosocial Theory. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd., 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryson, Dennis. ‘Lawrence K. Frank, Knowledge, and the Production of the “Social”’. Poetics Today 19, no. 3 (October 1, 1998): 401–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bulmer, Martin. The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, Diversity, and the Rise of Sociological Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Bulmer, Martin, and Bulmer, Joan. ‘Philanthropy and Social Science in the 1920s: Beardsley Ruml and the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial, 1922–29’. Minerva 19, no. 3 (1981): 347–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunge, Mario. ‘The Seven Pillars of Popper’s Social Philosophy’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26, no. 4 (December 1, 1996): 528–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunn, G. C. The Truth Machine: A Social History of the Lie Detector. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgess, E. W., and Park, Robert Ezra. Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1921.Google Scholar

Burnes, Bernard. ‘Kurt Lewin and the Harwood Studies: The Foundations of OD’. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 43, no. 2 (June 1, 2007): 213–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Susan. Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking. London: Penguin Books, 2013.Google Scholar

Callon, Michel, and Law, John. ‘On Qualculation, Agency, and Otherness’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23, no. 5 (October 1, 2005): 717–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callon, Michel, and Muniesa, Fabian, ‘Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices’. Organization Studies 26, no. 8 (2005): 1229–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, D. E. ‘Adventures with Repetition: The Search for Its Possibilities’. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Psychopathological Association 53 (1965): 312–22.Google ScholarPubMed

Cameron, D. E. ‘Production of Differential Amnesia as a Factor in the Treatment of Schizophrenia’. Comprehensive Psychiatry 1, no. 1 (February 1960): 26–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cameron, D. Ewen.‘Psychic Driving’. American Journal of Psychiatry 112, no. 7 (1956): 502–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cameron, D. E., Levy, Leonard, Ban, Thomas and Rubenstein, Leonard. ‘Automation of Psychotherapy’. YCOMP Comprehensive Psychiatry 5, no. 1 (1964): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cameron, D. Ewen, Lohrenz, John G. and Handcock, K. A.. ‘The Depatterning Treatment of Schizophrenia’. YCOMP Comprehensive Psychiatry 3, no. 2 (1962): 65–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cameron, D. E., and Pande, S. K.. ‘Treatment of the Chronic Paranoid Schizophrenic Patient’. Canadian Medical Association Journal 78, no. 2 (1958): 92–96.Google ScholarPubMed

Capshew, James H. Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge Studies in the History of Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnagey, Dale. Public Speaking: Instructor’s Manual. New York: Association Press, 1920.Google Scholar

Carnegie, Dale. Comment se faire des amis pour réussir dans la vie. Translated by Geneix, Denise. [Paris]: Hachette, 1946.Google Scholar

Carnegie, Dale. How to Win Friends and Influence People. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1936.Google Scholar

Carnegie, Dale. Public Speaking; a Practical Course for Business Men. New York: Association Press, 1926.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Susan L. Cold War Captives: Imprisonment, Escape, and Brainwashing. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Cartwright, Dorwin. ‘Achieving Change in People: Some Applications of Group Dynamics Theory’. Human Relations 4, no. 4 (1951): 381–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, Dorwin. ‘Social Psychology in the United States during the Second World War’. Human Relations 1, no. 3 (June 1, 1948): 333–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cartwright, Dorwin. ‘Some Things Learned: An Evaluative History of the Research Center for Group Dynamics’. Journal of Social Issues 14, no. S12 (December 1, 1958): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, Dorwin. The Research Center for Group Dynamics; a Report of Five Years’ Activities and a View of Future Needs. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1950.Google Scholar

Cawley, R. McGreggor, and Chaloupka, William. ‘American Governmentality. Michel Foucault and Public Administration’. American Behavioral Scientist 41, no. 1 (September 1, 1997): 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cesario, Joseph. ‘Priming, Replication, and the Hardest Science’. Perspectives on Psychological Science 9, no. 1 (January 1, 2014): 40–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cesario, J., Plaks, J. E. and Higgins, E. T.. ‘Automatic Social Behavior as Motivated Preparation to Interact’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90, no. 6 (2006): 893–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

CIA. ‘KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation’. CIA, July 1963. National Security Archive. http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB122/index.htm#hre.Google Scholar

Cicero. Brutus, Orator; Volume V. Translated by Hendrickson, G. L. and Hubbell, H. M.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1939.Google Scholar

Collins, A. ‘From H = Log S(n) to Conceptual Framework: A Short History of Information’. History of Psychology 10, no. 1 (2007): 44–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Anne.In the Sleep Room: The Story of the CIA Brainwashing Experiments in Canada. Toronto, Canada: Lester & Orpen Dennys, 1988.Google Scholar

Collins, H. M. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Condorcet, Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat, Marquis de. Outline of an Historical View of the Progress of the Human Mind. Dublin: John Chambers, 1796.Google Scholar

Cooke, Morris Llewellyn, Gompers, Samuel and Miller, Fred J.. Labor, Management and Production. Philadelphia: American Acad. of Political and Social Science, 1920.Google Scholar

Coon, D. J. ‘Testing the Limits of Sense and Science. American Experimental Psychologists Combat Spiritualism, 1880–1920’. American Psychologist 47, no. 2 (1992): 143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

>Court-Martial Reports. Holdings and Decisions of the Judge Advocates General Boards of Review and United States Court of Military Appeals. Vol. 19. The Judge Advocates General of the Armed Forces & The United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955.Court-Martial+Reports.+Holdings+and+Decisions+of+the+Judge+Advocates+General+Boards+of+Review+and+United+States+Court+of+Military+Appeals.+Vol.+19.+The+Judge+Advocates+General+of+the+Armed+Forces+&+The+United+States+Court+of+Military+Appeals,+1955.>Google Scholar

Cravens, Hamilton. Before Head Start: The Iowa Station & America’s Children. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1993.Google Scholar

‘D&B – wetenschappelijk inzicht & gedragsbeïnvloeding in de praktijk’. Accessed July 3, 2013. www.db-abs.com/home.Google Scholar

De Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar

De Munnik, Martin. De koopknop: het geheim van het consumentenbrein: inclusief meer dan 50 neuromarketingtips. Edited by Talsma, Annet. Den Haag: Academic Service, 2012.Google Scholar

Dent, Eric B., and Goldberg, Susan Galloway. ‘Challenging “Resistance to Change”’. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 35, no. 1 (1999): 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derksen, M. ‘Are We Not Experimenting Then? The Rhetorical Demarcation of Psychology and Common Sense’. Theory & Psychology 7, no. 4 (August 1997): 435–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derksen, M. ‘Discipline, Subjectivity and Personality: An Analysis of the Manuals of Four Psychological Tests’. History of the Human Sciences 14, no. 1 (February 2001): 25–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Derksen, M. ‘People as Scientific Instruments’. Spontaneous Generations 4, no. 1 (2010): 21–29.Google Scholar

Derksen, Maarten, and Rietzschel, Eric. ‘Surveillance Is Not the Answer, and Replication Is Not a Test: Comment on Kepes and McDaniel, “How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in I-O Psychology?”’ Industrial and Organizational Psychology 6, no. 3 (2013): 295–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derksen, M., and Beaulieu, A.. ‘Social Technology’. In The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Science, edited by Jarvie, I. and Zamora-Bonilla, J., 703–20. London: Sage, 2011.Google Scholar

Derksen, M., Vikkelsø, S. and Beaulieu, A.. ‘Social Technologies: Cross-Disciplinary Reflections on Technologies in and from the Social Sciences’. Theory & Psychology 22, no. 2 (April 1, 2012): 139–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutsch, M. ‘Field Theory in Social Psychology’. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E., 412–87. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1968.Google Scholar

Dewey, F. A. ‘An Application of Statistical Method’. American Journal of Sociology 21, no. 3 (1 November 1, 1915): 334–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dijksterhuis, Ap. ‘Welcome Back Theory!’ Perspectives on Psychological Science 9, no. 1 (January 1, 2014): 72–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dijksterhuis, Ap, and van Knippenberg, Ad. ‘The Relation between Perception and Behavior, or How to Win a Game of Trivial Pursuit’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, no. 4 (April 1998): 865–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dollard, John. ‘Men Who Are Tortured by the Awful Fear of Torture’. New York Times. July 29, 1956, sec. The New York Times Book Review.Google Scholar

Doyen, Stéphane, Klein, Olivier, Pichon, Cora-Lise and Cleeremans, Axel. ‘Behavioral Priming: It’s All in the Mind, but Whose Mind?’ PLoS ONE 7, no. 1 (January 18, 2012): e29081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Drever, J. ‘The Human Factor in Industrial Relations’. In Industrial Psychology, edited by Myers, Charles Samuel, 16–38. London: T. Butterworth Ltd, 1929.Google Scholar

Duncan, J. ‘Efficiency – Real, Unreal, and Brutal’. American Federationist 18, no. 5 (1911): 380–84.Google Scholar

Dutton, Kevin. Flipnosis: The Art of Split-Second Persuasion. London: William Heinemann, 2010.Google Scholar

Eakin, Hugh, and Danner, Mark. ‘Our New Politics of Torture’. NYRBlog, December 30, 2014. www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2014/dec/30/new-politics-torture/.Google Scholar

‘Een luisterend oor is het halve werk. Omgaan met opstandigheid’. BWthema, no. 5 (2011): 6–7.Google Scholar

Ehrenreich, Barbara. Bright-Sided: How Positive Thinking Is Undermining America. New York: Picador, 2010.Google Scholar

Eliot, Thomas D. ‘The Social Worker’s Criticisms of Undergraduate Sociology’. Journal of Social Forces 2, no. 4 (May 1, 1924): 506–12.Google Scholar

Ellwood, Charles. ‘Sociology: Its Problems and Its Relations’. The American Journal of Sociology 13, no. 3 (November 1907): 300–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elteren, M.. ‘From Emancipating to Domesticating the Workers: Lewinian Social Psychology and the Study of the Work Process till 1947’. In Recent Trends in Theoretical Psychology, edited by Stam, Henderikus J., Mos, L. P., Thorngate, W. and Kaplan, B., Vol. III. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Esenwein, J. Berg, and Carnagey, Dale. The Art of Public Speaking. Springfield: The Home Correspondence School, 1915.Google Scholar

Etzemüller, Thomas, ed. Die Ordnung der Moderne: Social Engineering im 20. Jahrhundert. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2009.Google Scholar

Etzemüller, Thomas, ed. ‘Social engineering als Verhaltenslehre des kühlen Kopfes’. In Die Ordnung der Moderne: Social Engineering im 20. Jahrhundert, edited by Etzemüller, Thomas, 11–39. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, H.A. ‘What Is to Become of the Machinist?’ American Machinist 33 (December 15, 1910): 1095.Google Scholar

Feenberg, A. ‘Looking Backward, Looking Forward. Reflections on the Twentieth Century’. In Globalization, Technology, and Philosophy, edited by Tabachnick, David and Koivukoski, Toivo, 93–105. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Ferguson, C. J., and Heene, M.. ‘A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories: Publication Bias and Psychological Science’s Aversion to the Null’. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, no. 6 (2012): 555–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiedler, Klaus, Kutzner, Florian and Krueger, Joachim I.. ‘The Long Way from α-Error Control to Validity Proper: Problems with a Short-Sighted False-Positive Debate’. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, no. 6 (November 1, 2012): 661–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzsimons, G. M., Chartrand, T. L. and Fitzsimons, G. J.. ‘Automatic Effects of Brand Exposure on Motivated Behavior: How Apple Makes You “Think Different”’. Journal of Consumer Research 35, no. 1 (June 2008): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Follett, Mary. Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. Edited by Fox, Elliot M. and Urwick, Lyndall F.. 2nd ed. New York: Hippocrene Books, 1982.Google Scholar

Follett, Mary. ‘The Giving of Orders’. In Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett, edited by Fox, Elliot M. and Urwick, Lyndall F., 2nd ed., 21–41. New York: Hippocrene Books, 1982.Google Scholar

Follett, Mary. ‘The Process of Control’. In Papers on the Science of Administration, edited by Gulick, Luther Halsey and Urwick, Lyndall F., 161–69. New York: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University, 1937.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Sheridan, Alan. New ed. London: Penguin, 1991.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. ‘Technologies of the Self’. In Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, edited by Martin, Luther H., Gutman, Huck and Hutton, Patrick H., 16–49. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. The History of Sexuality. Volume 1: An Introduction. Translated by Hurley, R.. Vol. 1. 3 vols. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979.Google Scholar

Freedman, Anne, and Freedman, P. E.. ‘Mass Line Leadership: Another View of Mao’s China’. American Psychologist American Psychologist 37, no. 1 (1982): 103–5.Google Scholar

French, John R. P. Jr. ‘Role-Playing as a Method of Training Foremen’. Sociometry 8, no. 3/4 (August 1, 1945): 172–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, J.P. ‘The Relation of Scientific Management to Labor’. American Federationist 20 (1913): 296–302.Google Scholar

Friedmann, Georges. Industrial Society; the Emergence of the Human Problems of Automation. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Frison, Guido. ‘Some German and Austrian Ideas on “Technologie” and “Technik” between the End of the Eighteenth Century and the Beginning of the Twentieth’. History of Economic Ideas 6, no. 1 (January 1, 1998): 107–33.Google Scholar

Gelman, A. ‘Primed to Lose’. Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science, February 9, 2016. http://andrewgelman.com/2016/02/09/28905/.Google Scholar

Gelman, A., and Loken, E.. ‘The Statistical Crisis in Science’. American Scientist 102, no. 6 (December 2014): 460–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Genter, Robert. ‘“Hypnotizzy” in the Cold War: The American Fascination with Hypnotism in the 1950s’. The Journal of American Culture 29, no. 2 (2006): 154–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gergen, K. J. ‘Social Psychology as History’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 26, no. 2 (May 1973): 309–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giddings, Franklin Henry. ‘Relation of Sociology to Scientific Studies’. Journal of Social Science 32 (November 1, 1894).Google Scholar

Giddings, Franklin Henry. ‘Sociology as a University Study’. Political Science Quarterly 6, no. 4 (December 1, 1891): 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giddings, Franklin Henry. The Principles of Sociology: An Analysis of the Phenomena of Association and of Social Organization. New York: Macmillan Co., 1896.Google Scholar

Gilbreth, Frank. Primer of Scientific Management … With an Introduction by Louis D. Brandeis. London: Constable & Co., 1912.Google Scholar

Gilbreth, L. M. The Psychology of Management: The Function of the Mind in Determining, Teaching and Installing Methods of Least Waste. New York: MacMillan Company, 1921.Google Scholar

Gillespie, Richard. Manufacturing Knowledge: A History of the Hawthorne Experiments. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Gompers, S. ‘Editorial’. American Federationist 18, no. 2 (1911): 116–17.Google Scholar

Gompers, S. ‘Speeding Up’. American Federationist 20 (1913): 524.Google Scholar

Gompers, S. ‘The Miracles of Efficiency’. American Federationist 18, no. 4 (1911): 273–79.Google Scholar

Gorgias, . Encomium of Helen. Translated by MacDowell, Douglas M.. Bristol [Gloucestershire]: Bristol Classical, 1982.Google Scholar

Gorny, Tom, and Tijn, van Ewijk. MasterFlirt. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff Boekerij B.V., 2011.Google Scholar

Graebner, William. ‘The Small Group and Democratic Social Engineering, 1900–1950’. Journal of Social Issues 42, no. 1 (April 1, 1986): 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, G. Edward. Seduction of a Generation – Sensitivity Training as Brainwashing, 1969. www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gc4g-HCan0.Google Scholar

Guinn, Jeff. Manson: The Life and Times of Charles Manson. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2013.Google Scholar

Hacohen, Malachi Haim. Karl Popper, the Formative Years, 1902–1945: Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Hacohen, Malachi Haim. ‘Karl Popper, the Vienna Circle, and Red Vienna’. Journal of the History of Ideas 59, no. 4 (October 1, 1998): 711–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansson, Sven Ove. ‘Falsificationism Falsified’. Foundations of Science 11, no. 3 (September 2006): 275–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, Christine R., Coburn, Noriko, Rohrer, Doug and Pashler, Harold. ‘Two Failures to Replicate High-Performance-Goal Priming Effects’. PLoS ONE 8, no. 8 (August 16, 2013): e72467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haskell, Thomas L. The Emergence of Professional Social Science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth-Century Crisis of Authority. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hayes, Edward Cary. ‘Sociology as Ethics’. American Journal of Sociology 24, no. 3 (November 1, 1918): 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine. ‘Boundary Disputes: Homeostasis, Reflexivity, and the Foundations of Cybernetics’. Configurations 2, no. 3 (1994): 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmer, Olaf, Brown, Bernice B. and Gordon, Theodore J.. Social Technology. New York: Basic Books, 1966.Google Scholar

Henderson, C. R. ‘Applied Sociology (or Social Technology)’. American Journal of Sociology 18, no. 2 (1912): 215–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, C. R. ‘Definition of a Social Policy Relating to the Dependent Group’. American Journal of Sociology 10, no. 3 (November 1, 1904): 315–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, C. R. ‘Review: [Untitled]’. Journal of Political Economy 3, no. 2 (March 1, 1895): 236–38.Google Scholar

Henderson, C. R. Social Elements. Institutions, Character, Progress. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons, 1898.Google Scholar

Henderson, C. R. ‘The Scope of Social Technology’. The American Journal of Sociology 6, no. 4 (January 1901): 465–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Highhouse, S. ‘A History of the T-Group and Its Early Applications in Management Development’. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice: The Official Journal of Division 49, Group Psychology and Group Psychotherapy of the American Psychological Association 6, no. 4 (2002): 277–90.Google Scholar

Hinkle, L. E. ‘Communist Manipulation of Behavior. The Russians use Confession to Convict and Condemn, the Chinese to Rehabilitate and Reform’. Science, 133 (1961): 1912–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hinkle, L. E., and Wolff, H. G.. ‘Brainwashing from a Psychological Viewpoint’. Washington, DC: CIA, January 3, 1956.Google Scholar

Hinkle, L. E., and Wolff, H. G.. ‘Communist Control Techniques: An Analysis of the Methods Used by Communist State Police in the Arrest, Interrogation, and Indoctrination of Persons Regarded as “Enemies of the State”’. Washington, DC: CIA, April 2, 1956.Google Scholar

Hinkle, L. E., and Wolff, H. G.. ‘Communist Interrogation and Indoctrination of “Enemies of the State”; Analysis of Methods Used by the Communist State Police (a Special Report)’. A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 76, no. 2 (1956): 115–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinkle, L. E., and Wolff, H. G.. ‘The Methods of Interrogation and Indoctrination Used by the Communist State Police’. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 33, no. 9 (September 1957): 600–15.Google ScholarPubMed

Hogan, Kevin, and Speakman, James. Covert Persuasion: Psychological Tactics and Tricks to Win the Game. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.Google Scholar

Hughes, Thomas Parke. American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm, 1870–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, Edward. Brain-Washing in Red China: The Calculated Destruction of Men’s Minds. New York: Vanguard Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Hunter, Edward. Brainwashing; the Story of Men Who Defied It. New York: Farrar, Straus and Cudahy, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, William. The Principles of Psychology. Edited by Burkhardt, Frederick, Bowers, Fredson and Skrupskelis, Ignas K.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Janis, Irving Lester. ‘Are the Cominform Countries Using Hypnotic Techniques to Elicit Confessions in Public Trials?’ U.S. Airforce Project Rand Research Memorandum. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 1949. www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM161.html.Google Scholar

John, Leslie, Loewenstein, George F. and Prelec, Drazen. ‘Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth-Telling’. Psychological Science 23, no. 5 (2012): 524–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

John, Matthias, Eckardt, George and Hiebsch, Hans. ‘Kurt Lewin’s Early Intentions (Dedicated to His 100th Birthday)’. European Journal of Social Psychology 19, no. 2 (March 1, 1989): 163–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, John M. Machine-Age Ideology: Social Engineering and American Liberalism, 1911–1939. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Judd, Charles M., and Gawronski, Bertram. ‘Editorial Comment’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100, no. 3 (2011): 406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kang, Minsoo. Sublime Dreams of Living Machines: The Automaton in the European Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Kanigel, Robert. The One Best Way: Frederick Winslow Taylor and the Enigma of Efficiency. New York: Viking, 1997.Google Scholar

Karlsen, Mads Peter, and Villadsen, Kaspar. ‘Who Should Do the Talking? The Proliferation of Dialogue as Governmental Technology’. Culture and Organization 14, no. 4 (2008): 345–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karremans, Johan C., Stroebe, Wolfgang and Claus, Jasper. ‘Beyond Vicary’s Fantasies: The Impact of Subliminal Priming and Brand Choice’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42, no. 6 (November 2006): 792–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, Bruce E. Managing the Human Factor: The Early Years of Human Resource Management in American Industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Kelly, J. G., Dalton, J. and Francisco, V. T.. Interview of Alvin Zander, 1995. https://vimeo.com/69632837.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George Alexander. The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Raymond, and Reeves Kennedy, Ruby Jo. ‘Sociology in American Colleges’. American Sociological Review 7, no. 5 (October 1, 1942): 661–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Killen, Andreas. ‘Homo Pavlovius: Cinema, Conditioning, and the Cold War Subject’. Grey Room, no. 45 (Fall 2011): 42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Killen, Andreas, and Andriopoulos, Stefan. ‘Editors’ Introduction on Brainwashing: Mind Control, Media, and Warfare’. Grey Room, no. 45 (Fall 2011): 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klatzky, R. L., and Creswell, J. D.. ‘An Intersensory Interaction Account of Priming Effects – and Their Absence’. Perspectives on Psychological Science 9, no. 1 (2014): 49–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Klein, Richard A., Ratliff, Kate A., Vianello, Michelangelo, Adams, Reginald B. Jr., Bahník, Štěpán, Bernstein, Michael J., Bocian, Konrad, et al. ‘Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project’. Social Psychology 45, no. 3 (2014): 142–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleinman, S. ‘KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation Review: Observations of an Interrogator – Lessons Learned and Avenues for Further Research’. In Educing Information – Interrogation: Science and Art, Foundations for the Future, 95–140. Washington DC: National Defence Intelligence College, 2006. www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA476636.Google Scholar

Kline, Ronald. ‘Construing ‘Technology’ as “Applied Science”: Public Rhetoric of Scientists and Engineers in the United States, 1880–1945’. Isis 86, no. 2 (June 1, 1995): 194–221.Google Scholar

Konnikova, Maria. ‘Trying to Cure Depression, but Inspiring Torture’. The New Yorker, January 14, 2015. www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/theory-psychology-justified-torture.Google Scholar

Korn, James H. Illusions of Reality: A History of Deception in Social Psychology. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Kuna, David P. ‘The Concept of Suggestion in the Early History of Advertising Psychology’. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 12, no. 4 (1976): 347–53.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kunert, Richard. ‘Internal Conceptual Replications Do Not Increase Independent Replication Success’. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23, no.5 (2016): 1631–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lamme, Victor A. F. De vrije wil bestaat niet: over wie er echt de baas is in het brein. Amsterdam: Bakker, 2010.Google Scholar

Lancaster, Jane. Making Time: Lillian Moller Gilbreth, A Life Beyond ‘Cheaper by the Dozen’. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Latour, B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. The Pasteurization of France. Translated by Sheridan, A. and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Latour, B. ‘The Prince for Machines as Well as for Machinations’. In Technology and Social Process, edited by Elliott, B., 20–43. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Latour, B. ‘Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands’. In Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, edited by Kuklick, H., 6:1–40. JAI Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Latour, B. ‘When Things Strike Back: A Possible Contribution of “Science Studies” to the Social Sciences’. British Journal of Sociology 51, no. 1 (2000): 107–23.Google Scholar

Latour, B. ‘Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts’. In Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, 225–58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Lehrer, Jonah. ‘The Truth Wears Off’. The New Yorker, December 13, 2010. www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/12/13/the-truth-wears-off.Google Scholar

Lemov, Rebecca. ‘Brainwashing’s Avatar: The Curious Career of Dr. Ewen Cameron’. Grey Room, no. 45 (Fall 2011): 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leopold, Jason. ‘Psychologist James Mitchell Admits He Waterboarded Al Qaeda Suspects’. VICE News, December 15, 2014. https://news.vice.com/article/psychologist-james-mitchell-admits-he-waterboarded-al-qaeda-suspects.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M., Groenhuijsen, M. S. and Hagenaars, J. A. P.. ‘Interim-rapportage inzake door prof. dr. D.A. Stapel gemaakte inbreuk op wetenschappelijke integriteit’. Tilburg: Universiteit van Tilburg, October 31, 2011.Google Scholar

Lewin, Kurt. Die Sozialisierung des Taylorsystems: eine grundsätzliche Untersuchung zur Arbeits- u. Berufs-Psychologie. Vol. 4. Praktischer Sozialismus. Berlin: Gesellschaft und Erziehung, 1920.Google Scholar

Lewin, Kurt. ‘Frontiers in Group Dynamics. Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science; Social Equilibria and Social Change’. Human Relations 1 (1947): 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewin, Kurt. ‘The Relative Effectiveness of a Lecture Method and a Method of Group Decision for Changing Food Habits’. Washington, DC: Committee on Food Habits, National Research Council, 1942. Box 948, folder #56. The Drs. Nicholas and Dorothy Cummings Center for the History of Psychology.Google Scholar

Lewin, Kurt. ‘The Research Center for Group Dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology’. Sociometry 8, no. 2 (1945): 126–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewin, Kurt. ‘The Solution of a Chronic Conflict in a Factory’. In Proceedings of the Second Brief Psychotherapy Council, 36–46. Chicago, 1944.Google Scholar

Lewin, Kurt. ‘The Solution of a Chronic Conflict in a Factory. Analysis of a Report by Alex Bavelas’. Iowa, undated. Box M948, folder #57. The Drs. Nicholas and Dorothy Cummings Center for the History of Psychology.Google Scholar

Lewin, Kurt. ‘The Solution of a Chronic Conflict in Industry (1944)’. In Resolving Social Conflicts and Field Theory in Social Science., 94–104. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1997.Google Scholar

Lewis, Sinclair. ‘Car-Yes-Man’. Newsweek, November 15, 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Sinclair. ‘One Man Revolution’. Newsweek, November 22, 1937.Google Scholar

Lezaun, J. ‘A Market of Opinions: The Political Epistemology of Focus Groups’. Sociological Review 55 (October 2007): 130–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lezaun, Javier, and Calvillo, Nerea. ‘In the Political Laboratory: Kurt Lewin’s Atmospheres’. Journal of Cultural Economy 7, no. 4 (2014): 434–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Lezingen en workshops’. PACELLEVANGOETHEM. Accessed September 4, 2014. http://pacellevangoethem.nl/lezing-workshop/.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Matthew D. ‘Latitudes of Acceptance. A Conversation with Matthew D. Lieberman’. Edge.org, 8 2014. http://edge.org/conversation/latitudes-of-acceptance.Google Scholar

Lifton, Robert J. ‘Chinese Communist “Thought Reform”: Confession and Re-Education of Western Civilians’. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 33, no. 9 (September 1957): 626–44.Google ScholarPubMed

Lifton, Robert J. ‘“Thought Reform” of Western Civilians in Chinese Communist Prisons’. Psychiatry 19, no. 2 (May 1, 1956): 173–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lifton, Robert Jay. Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of ‘Brainwashing’ in China. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Lind, Andrew W. ‘Some Ecological Patterns of Community Disorganization in Honolulu’. American Journal of Sociology 36, no. 2 (September 1, 1930): 206–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lippitt, Ronald. Training in Community Relations; a Research Exploration toward New Group Skills. New York: Harper, 1949.Google Scholar

Locke, E. A. ‘Theory Building, Replication, and Behavioral Priming: Where Do We Need to Go from Here?’ Perspectives on Psychological Science 10, no. 3 (May 18, 2015): 408–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lopes, Lola L. ‘The Rhetoric of Irrationality’. Theory & Psychology 1, no. 1 (February 1, 1991): 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubove, Roy. The Professional Altruist: The Emergence of Social Work as a Career, 1880–1930. A Publication of the Center for the Study of the History of Liberty in America, Harvard University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Lutz, Catherine. ‘Epistemology of the Bunker: The Brainwashed and Other New Subjects of Permanent War’. In Inventing the Psychological: Toward a Cultural History of Emotional Life in America, edited by Pfister, Joel and Schnog, Nancy, 245–67. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince. Translated by Price, Russell. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Maier, Charles S. ‘Between Taylorism and Technocracy: European Ideologies and the Vision of Industrial Productivity in the 1920s’. Journal of Contemporary History 5, no. 2 (January 1, 1970): 27–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marklund, Carl. ‘Begriffsgeschichte and Übergriffsgeschichte in the History of Social Engineering’. In Die Ordnung der Moderne: Social Engineering im 20. Jahrhundert, edited by Thomas, Etzemüller. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2009.Google Scholar

Marks, John D. The Search for the ‘Manchurian Candidate’: The CIA and Mind Control. London: A. Lane, 1979.Google Scholar

Marrow, Alfred Jay. The Practical Theorist: The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin. New York: Basic Books, 1969.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy – Vol. I-Part I: The Process of Capitalist Production. New York: Cosimo, Inc., 2007.Google Scholar

Marx, Leo. ‘Technology: The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept’. Technology and Culture 51, no. 3 (2010): 561–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayo, Charles W., and United States Delegation to the General Assembly. Statement by The Honorable Charles W. Mayo, United States Alternate Representative on the Political Committee on ‘The Question of Impartial Investigation of Charges of Use by United Nations Forces of Bacteriological Warfare’. Washington: US Delegation to the General Assembly, 1953.Google Scholar

McCauley, Clark. ‘More about Thought Reform’. American Psychologist 37, no. 1 (January 1982): 102–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McComiskey, Bruce. Gorgias and the New Sophistic Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

McCoy, Alfred. A Question of Torture. CIA Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2006.Google Scholar

McGee, Micki. Self-Help, Inc.: Makeover Culture in American Life. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGregor, Douglas Murray. ‘The Human Side of Enterprise’. Management Review 46, no. 11 (November 1, 1957).Google Scholar

Meerloo, J. A. M. Een mond vol spijkers: een psycholoog op oorlogspad. Wassenaar: Servire, 1975.Google Scholar

Meerloo, J. A. M. ‘Pavlovian Strategy as a Weapon of Menticide’. The American Journal of Psychiatry 110, no. 11 (1954): 809–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meerloo, J. A. M. ‘The Crime of Menticide’. American Journal of Psychiatry 107, no. 8 (February 1, 1951): 594–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meerloo, J. A. M. The Rape of the Mind: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing. Cleveland, OH: The World Publishing Company, 1956.Google Scholar

Melley, Timothy. ‘Brain Warfare: The Covert Sphere, Terrorism, and the Legacy of the Cold War’. Grey Room, no. 45 (Fall 2011): 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melley, Timothy. ‘Brainwashed! Conspiracy Theory and Ideology in the Postwar United States’. New German Critique 35, no. 103 (March 20, 2008): 145–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merton, Robert K. Social Theory and Social Structure. Enlarged ed. New York: Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Meyer, Donald. The Positive Thinkers. A Study of the American Quest for Health, Wealth and Personal Power from Mary Baker Eddy to Norman Vincent Peale. New York: Doubleday, 1965.Google Scholar

Miller, Carolyn. ‘Should We Name the Tools?’ In The Public Work of Rhetoric: Citizen-Scholars and Civic Engagement, edited by Ackerman, John and Coogan, David, 19–38. Studies in Rhetoric/Communication. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Miller, Irving. ‘Letter from Rabbi Irving Miller, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the American Jewish Congress, to Karl Compton, President of MIT’, November 16, 1944. Box M293, folder #11. The Drs. Nicholas and Dorothy Cummings Center for the History of Psychology.Google Scholar

Miller, James G. ‘Brainwashing: Present and Future’. Journal of Social Issues 13, no. 3 (July 1, 1957): 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Jason. ‘On the Emptiness of Failed Replications’. Accessed August 28, 2014. https://web.archive.org/web/20150604192510/http://wjh.harvard.edu/~jmitchel/writing/failed_science.htm.Google Scholar

Mönning, Paul Hassels. ‘Neuromarketing: De “koopknop” is een illusie’. Marketing Online, October 30, 2012. www.marketingonline.nl/bericht/neuromarketing-de-koopknop-is-een-illusie.Google Scholar

Morawski, Jill. ‘Epistemological Dizziness in the Psychology Laboratory: Lively Subjects, Anxious Experimenters, and Experimental Relations, 1950–1970’. Isis 106, no. 3 (September 1, 2015): 567–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moreno, Jonathan D. Mind Wars: Brain Science and the Military in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Bellevue Literary Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Münsterberg, H. On the Witness Stand: Essays in Psychology and Crime. New York: Doubleday, Page & Company, Inc., 1908.Google Scholar

Münsterberg, H. Psychology and Industrial Efficiency. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Münsterberg, H. ‘The Market and Psychology’. In American Problems., 151–73. New York: Moffat, Yard & Co., 1910.Google Scholar

Myers, C. S. Mind and Work: The Psychological Factors in Industry and Commerce. London: University of London Press, 1927.Google Scholar

Myers, Charles S. Present-Day Applications of Psychology, with Special Reference to Industry, Education and Nervous Breakdown. London: Methuen, 1918.Google Scholar

Myers, Charles S. ‘The Efficiency Engineer and the Industrial Psychologist’. Journal of the National Institute of Industrial Psychology 1, no. 5 (1923): 168–72.Google Scholar

Nadworny, Milton J. Scientific Management and the Unions, 1900–1932: A Historical Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Natorp, Paul. Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Sozialpädagogik. Stuttgart: Frommans, 1922.Google Scholar

Natorp, Paul. Sozialpädagogik: Theorie der Willenserziehung auf der Grundlage der Gemeinschaft. Stuttgart: Fr. Frommanns Verlag (E. Hauff), 1899.Google Scholar

Nelson, Daniel. Frederick W. Taylor and the Rise of Scientific Management. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Nelson, Daniel. ‘Scientific Management, Systematic Management, and Labor, 1880–1915’. The Business History Review 48, no. 4 (December 1, 1974): 479–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neurensics and dijksterhuis&vanbaaren. ‘Front Runners in Neuro-Economie Kondigen Alliantie Aan’. Press release. Amsterdam, July 6, 2012. www.db-abs.com/downloads/120706_persbericht%20alliantie.pdf.Google Scholar

Neuroskeptic. ‘The Replication Crisis: Response to Lieberman’. Neuroskeptic, August 31, 2014. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2014/08/31/replication-crisis-response-lieberman/.Google Scholar

‘NeuroStandards Project White Paper’. Advertising Research Foundation, October 2011.Google Scholar

Nicholson, Ian. ‘“Torture at Yale”: Experimental Subjects, Laboratory Torment and The “rehabilitation” of Milgram’s “Obedience to Authority”’. Theory & Psychology 21, no. 6 (2011): 737–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nosek, B. A., and Bar-Anan, Y.. ‘Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication’. Psychological Inquiry 23, no. 3 (July 2012): 217–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R. and Motyl, M.. ‘Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability’. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, no. 6 (2012): 615–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Odum, Howard W. American Sociology: The Story of Sociology in the United States through 1950. New York: Greenwood Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Ofner, Julius. Studien sozialer Jurisprudenz. Vienna: Hölder, 1894.Google Scholar

Ogburn, William Fielding. ‘Technology and Sociology’. Social Forces 17, no. 1 (October 1, 1938): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogburn, William Fielding. ‘The Folkways of a Scientific Sociology’. Publications of the American Sociological Society 24 (1930): 1–11.Google Scholar

Oldenziel, Ruth. Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women and Modern Machines in America, 1870–1945. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Open Science Collaboration. ‘An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science’. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, no. 6 (November 1, 2012): 657–60.Google Scholar

Overstreet, H. A. Influencing Human Behavior. New York: W.W. Norton, 1925.Google Scholar

Owen, Robert. A New View of Society. Or: Essays on the Formation of the Human Character Preparatory to the Development of a Plan for Gradually Ameliorating the Condition of Mankind. 2nd ed. Clifton, NJ: A.M. Kelley, 1972.Google Scholar

Oxtoby, Roby. ‘An Observational Method for Determining the Job of Individual Floor Girls’, undated. Box M1940, folder #8. The Drs. Nicholas and Dorothy Cummings Center for the History of Psychology.Google Scholar

Pashler, Harold, Coburn, Noriko and Harris, Christine R.. ‘Priming of Social Distance? Failure to Replicate Effects on Social and Food Judgments’. PLoS ONE 7, no. 8 (August 29, 2012): e42510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

‘Pastor Raps Best Seller. Asserts Dale Carnegie’s Book Is a Mockery of True Friendship’. Reading Eagle, March 18, 1938.Google Scholar

Patnoe, Shelley. A Narrative History of Experimental Social Psychology: The Lewin Tradition. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paul, Joanne. ‘The Use of Kairos in Renaissance Political Philosophy’. Renaissance Quarterly 67, no. 1 (March 1, 2014): 43–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peck, E.C. ‘Systematic versus Scientific Management. A Word of Caution against Precipitate Introduction of Radical Shop-Working Measures’. Iron Age 88 (August 17, 1911): 364–65.Google Scholar

Pels, Dick, Hetherington, Kevin and Vandenberghe, Frédéric. ‘The Status of the Object Performances, Mediations, and Techniques’. Theory, Culture & Society 19, no. 5–6 (December 1, 2002): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, Michael. The Science of Deception: Psychology and Commerce in America. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Pickel, A. ‘Between Social Science and Social Technology – Toward a Philosophical Foundation for Post-Communist Transformation Studies’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31, no. 4 (December 2001): 459–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinch, T., Ashmore, M. and Mulkay, M.. ‘Technology, Testing Text: Clinical Budgeting in the U.K. National Health Service’. In Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Bijker, W. E. and Law, J., 265–89. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Ping, Hu. The Thought Remolding Campaign of the Chinese Communist Party-State. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plato. The Collected Dialogues of Plato: Including the Letters. Edited by Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. ‘The Poverty of Historicism, I’. Economica, New Series, 11, no. 42 (May 1, 1944): 86–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, Karl. ‘The Poverty of Historicism, II. A Criticism of Historicist Methods’. Economica, New Series, 11, no. 43 (1944): 119–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, Karl. ‘The Poverty of Historicism, III’. Economica, New Series, 12, no. 46 (May 1, 1945): 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, Karl. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Volume I: The Spell of Plato. 5th ed. Vol. 1. 2 vols. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Volume II. The High Tide of Prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the Aftermath. 5th ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Post, Julius. Arbeit statt Almosen: Beitrag zur Social-Technik. Bremen: Roussell, 1881.Google Scholar

Pratkanis, A. R. ‘The Cargo-Cult Science of Subliminal Persuasion – CSI’. Skeptical Enquirer 16, no. 3 (1992). www.csicop.org/si/show/cargo-cult_science_of_subliminal_persuasion.Google Scholar

‘Preliminary Report of the First National Training Laboratory on Group Development: Sponsored by the National Education Association and Research Center for Group Dynamics, M.I.T. Bethel, Maine, June 16 to July 4, 1947’. National Education Association, 1947.Google Scholar

Price, C. ‘Interview with Mason Haire’, undated. Box M946, folder #21. The Drs. Nicholas and Dorothy Cummings Center for the History of Psychology.Google Scholar

‘Private Institutions Used in C.I.A. Effort to Control Behavior; 25-Year, $25 Million Program New Information About Funding and Operations Disclosed by Documents and Interviews Private Institutions Used in C.I.A. Plan’. The New York Times, August 2, 1977.Google Scholar

Publication of the American Sociological Society. Vol. 8, 1913.Google Scholar

‘Pulitzer Critic Rates Top Ten Culture Books’. Schenectady Gazette, March 27, 1985.Google Scholar

Quintilian, Marcus Fabius. The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian, translated by Harold Edgeworth Butler. London: Heinemann, 1920–1922.Google Scholar

Radder, H. ‘Causality, Theory Ladenness and Reproducibility in Experimental Science’ (n.d.). www.academia.edu/26560040/Causality_Theory_Ladenness_and_Reproducibility_in_Experimental_Science.Google Scholar

Radder, H. ‘De Cognitieve drie-eenheid: realiseren, interpreteren en abstraheren’. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Wijsbegeerte 106, no. 1 (2014): 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radder, H. ‘Science, Technology and the Science–Technology Relationship’. In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, edited by Meijers, Anthonie. Amsterdam; London; Boston: Elsevier/North Holland, 2009.Google Scholar

Ramage, John D. Twentieth-Century American Success Rhetoric: How to Construct a Suitable Self. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Ray, L. J. ‘Critical Theory and Positivism: Popper and the Frankfurt School’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. An International Journal Aberdeen 9, no. 2 (1979): 149–73.Google Scholar

Riley, Thomas J. ‘Sociology and Social Surveys’. American Journal of Sociology 16, no. 6 (May 1, 1911): 818–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritchie, S. J., Wiseman, R. and French, C. C.. ‘Failing the Future: Three Unsuccessful Attempts to Replicate Bem’s “Retroactive Facilitation of Recall” Effect’. PLoS ONE 7, no. 3 (March 14, 2012): e33423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ritchie, S. J., Wiseman, R. and French, C. C.. ‘Replication, Replication, Replication’. The Psychologist 25 (May 2012): 346–57.Google Scholar

Rivers, Nathaniel A., and Derksen, M.. ‘Ecologies of Deception in Psychology and Rhetoric’. Quarterly Journal of Speech 101, no. 4 (2016): 633–54.Google Scholar

Rose, N. ‘Engineering the Human Soul: Analyzing Psychological Expertise’. Science in Context 5, no. 2 (1992): 351–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, N. Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge Studies in the History of Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, Dorothy. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Rutherford, Alexandra. Beyond the Box: B.F. Skinner’s Technology of Behavior from Laboratory to Life, 1950s–1970s. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanderson, Dwight. ‘Discussion of Sociometry’. Sociometry 6, no. 3 (1943): 214–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saroyan, William. The Trouble with Tigers. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co, 1938.Google Scholar

Schachter, H. L. ‘Frederick Winslow Taylor and the Idea of Worker Participation. A Brief against Easy Administrative Dichotomies’. Administration and Society 21, no. 1 (1989): 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schatzberg, Eric. ‘Technik Comes to America: Changing Meanings of Technology before 1930’. Technology and Culture 47, no. 3 (2006): 486–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheflin, Alan W., and Opton, Edward M.. The Mind Manipulators: A Non-Fiction Account. New York: Paddington Press (distributed by Grosset & Dunlap), 1978.Google Scholar

Schein, Edgar H. ‘Knuckling Under’. Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews 2, no. 5 (1957): 140–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schein, Edgar H., Schneier, Inge and Barker, Curtis H. Coercive Persuasion: A Socio-Psychological Analysis of the ‘Brainwashing’ of American Civilian Prisoners by the Chinese Communists. New York: Norton, 1961.Google Scholar

Schein, E. H. ‘The Chinese Indoctrination Program for Prisoners of War; a Study of Attempted Brainwashing’. Psychiatry 19, no. 2 (1956): 149–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schlenker, Barry R. ‘Social Psychology and Science’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29, no. 1 (1974): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schnall, Simone. ‘Moral Intuitions, Replication, and the Scientific Study of Human Nature’, 2014. http://edge.org/conversation/simone-schnall-moral-intuitions-replication-and-the-scientific-study-of-human-nature.Google Scholar

Schnall, Simone. ‘Simone Schnall on Her Experience with a Registered Replication Project’. Character and Context, May 23, 2014. www.spspblog.org/simone-schnall-on-her-experience-with-a-registered-replication-project/.Google Scholar

Schnall, Simone. ‘Social Media and the Crowd-Sourcing of Social Psychology’. Page. Cambridge Embodied Cognition and Emotion Laboratory Blog, November 18, 2014. www.psychol.cam.ac.uk/cece/blog.Google Scholar

Schneider, Tanja, and Woolgar, Steve. ‘Technologies of Ironic Revelation: Enacting Consumers in Neuromarkets’. Consumption Markets & Culture 15, no. 2 (2012): 169–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schröder, Tobias, and Thagard, Paul. ‘The Affective Meanings of Automatic Social Behaviors: Three Mechanisms That Explain Priming’. Psychological Review 120, no. 1 (2013): 255–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwartz, B. ‘On Klatzky and Creswell (2014): Saving Social Priming Effects but Losing Science as We Know It?’ Perspectives on Psychological Science 10, no. 3 (May 18, 2015): 404–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwarzkopf, Stefan. ‘Measurement Devices and the Psychophysiology of Consumer Behaviour: A Posthuman Genealogy of Neuromarketing’. BioSocieties 10, no. 4 (December 2015): 465–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, Walter Dill. Increasing Human Efficiency in Business: A Contribution to the Psychology of Business. New York: Macmillan, 1911.Google Scholar

Scott, Walter Dill. Influencing Men in Business; the Psychology of Argument and Suggestion. New York: The Ronald Press Company, 1911.Google Scholar

Scott, Walter Dill. The Psychology of Public Speaking, Adapted for Use as a Text Book in High Schools and Colleges. New York: Noble and Noble, 1926.Google Scholar

Seed, David. Brainwashing. The Fictions of Mind Control: A Study of Novels and Films since World War II. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. ‘The Senate Intelligence Committee Report on Torture: Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program’, 2014.Google Scholar

Shanks, David R., Newell, Ben R., Lee, Eun Hee, Balakrishnan, Divya, Ekelund, Lisa, Cenac, Zarus, Kavvadia, Fragkiski and Moore, Christopher. ‘Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon’. PLoS ONE 8, no. 4 (April 24, 2013): e56515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shaw, Tamsin. ‘The Psychologists Take Power’. The New York Review of Books, February 25, 2016. www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/02/25/the-psychologists-take-power/.Google Scholar

Simkin, Colin George Frederick. Popper’s Views on Natural and Social Science. BRILL, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons, Joseph P., Nelson, Leif D. and Simonsohn, Uri. ‘False-Positive Psychology’. Psychological Science 22, no. 11 (November 1, 2011): 1359–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simonsohn, U. ‘Just Post It: The Lesson from Two Cases of Fabricated Data Detected by Statistics Alone’. Psychological Science 24, no. 10 (2013): 1875–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sipiora, Phillip, and Baumlin, James S., eds. Rhetoric and Kairos Essays in History, Theory, and Praxis. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sloane, Thomas O., ed. Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Small, Albion W. ‘Fifty Years of Sociology in the United States (1865–1915)’. American Journal of Sociology 21, no. 6 (May 1, 1916): 721–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Small, Albion W. General Sociology. An Exposition of the Main Development in Sociological Theory from Spencer to Ratzenhofer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1905.Google Scholar

Small, Albion W. ‘General Sociology’. American Journal of Sociology 18, no. 2 (1912): 200–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Small, Albion W. ‘Points of Agreement among Sociologists’. American Journal of Sociology 12, no. 5 (March 1, 1907): 633–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Small, Albion W. ‘Seminar Notes: The Methodology of the Social Problem. Division I. The Sources and Uses of Material’. The American Journal of Sociology 4, no. 1 (July 1898): 113–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Small, Albion W. ‘The Scope of Sociology. VI. Some Incidents of Association’. American Journal of Sociology 6, no. 3 (November 1, 1900): 324–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Small, Albion W. ‘The Scope of Sociology. VII. Classification of Associations’. American Journal of Sociology 6, no. 4 (January 1, 1901): 487–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Small, Albion W. ‘The Scope of Sociology. IX. Premises of Practical Sociology’. American Journal of Sociology 10, no. 1 (July 1, 1904): 26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Small, Albion W., and Vincent, George. An Introduction to the Study of Society. New York: American Book Co., 1894.Google Scholar

Smith, Mark C. Social Science in the Crucible: The American Debate over Objectivity and Purpose, 1918–1941. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

‘Soft Answers’. New York Times. February 14, 1937, sec. Book Review.Google Scholar

‘Specific Gripes’, undated. Box 220, folder #1. The Drs. Nicholas and Dorothy Cummings Center for the History of Psychology.Google Scholar

Sproule, J. Michael. ‘Inventing Public Speaking: Rhetoric and the Speech Book, 1730–1930’. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 15, no. 4 (2012): 563–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Srivastava, Sanjay. ‘An Open Review of Many Labs 3: Much to Learn’. The Hardest Science, March 12, 2015. https://hardsci.wordpress.com/2015/03/12/an-open-review-of-many-labs-3-much-to-learn/.Google Scholar

Srivastava, Sanjay. ‘Making Progress in the Hardest Science’. The Hardest Science, March 14, 2009. http://hardsci.wordpress.com/2009/03/14/making-progress-in-the-hardest-science/.Google Scholar

Steiner, Jesse F. Education for Social Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1921.Google Scholar

Steiner, Jesse F. ‘The Limitations of a Conceptual Approach to the Applications of Sociology to Social Work’. Social Forces 7, no. 4 (June 1, 1929): 500–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Story, Christopher. The New Underworld Order: Triumph of Criminalism the Global Hegemony of Masonic Intelligence. Westminster: Edward Harle, 2003.Google Scholar

Stroebe, Wolfgang. ‘The Subtle Power of Hidden Messages’. Scientific American Mind 23, no. 2 (June 5, 2012): 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroebe, Wolfgang, Postmes, Tom and Spears, Russell. ‘Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science’. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, no. 6 (November 1, 2012): 670–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stroebe, Wolfgang, and Strack, Fritz. ‘The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication’. Perspectives on Psychological Science 9, no. 1 (January 1, 2014): 59–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Susman, Warren. Culture as History: The Transformation of American Society in the Twentieth Century. New York: Pantheon Books, 1984.Google Scholar

Taylor, Carl C. ‘The Social Survey and the Science of Sociology’. American Journal of Sociology 25, no. 6 (May 1, 1920): 731–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Frederick Winslow. ‘A Piece-Rate System: Being a Step toward Partial Solution of the Labor Problem’. In Scientific Management. A Collection of the More Significant Articles Describing the Taylor System of Management, edited by Thompson, C. B., 636–83. Easton: Hive Pub. Co., 1972.Google Scholar

Taylor, Frederick Winslow. Scientific Management: Comprising Shop Management, The Principles of Scientific Management and Testimony before the Special House Committee. New York: Harper, 1947.Google Scholar

Taylor, Frederick Winslow. ‘Shop Management’. In Scientific Management: Comprising Shop Management, The Principles of Scientific Management and Testimony before the Special House Committee. New York: Harper, 1947.Google Scholar

Taylor, Frederick Winslow. ‘Testimony before the Special House Committee’. In Scientific Management: Comprising Shop Management, The Principles of Scientific Management and Testimony before the Special House Committee. New York: Harper, 1947.Google Scholar

Taylor, Frederick Winslow. ‘The Principles of Scientific Management’. In Scientific Management: Comprising Shop Management, The Principles of Scientific Management and Testimony before the Special House Committee. New York: Harper, 1947.Google Scholar

Throop, Robert, and Ward, Lloyd Gordon. ‘Organization of Academic Foci within the “Department of Social Science”’, 2006. www.brocku.ca/MeadProject/Timeline/Department_foci_Soci.html.Google Scholar

Thurber, James. ‘The Voice with the Smile. Review of Dale Carnegie, How to Win Friends and Influence People’. Saturday Review, January 30, 1937.Google Scholar

Tolman, Frank. ‘The Study of Sociology in Institutions of Learning in the United States. II’. The American Journal of Sociology 8, no. 1 (July 1902): 85–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tressler, Irving D. How to Lose Friends and Alienate People. New York: Stackpole Sons, 1937.Google Scholar

US Congress. House. Committee on Labor. Investigation of Taylor System of Shop Management. Hearings before the Committee on Labor of the House of Representatives, Sixty-Second Congress, First Session, on House Resolution 90 … Washington: Government Printing Office, 1911.Google Scholar

US Congress. House. Committee on Labor. The Taylor and Other Systems of Shop Management. Hearings before Special Committee of the House of Representatives to Investigate the Taylor and Other Systems of Shop Management under Authority of H. Res. 90 … [Oct. 4, 1911–Feb. 12, 1912]. 3 vols. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1912.Google Scholar

Van Asperen de Boer, Rosanne. ‘Herziene editie iJs verkopen aan Eskimo’s’. PACELLEVANGOETHEM, March 10, 2014. http://pacellevangoethem.nl/herziene-editie-ijs-verkopen-aan-eskimos-2/.Google Scholar

Van De Water, Thomas J. ‘Psychology’s Entrepreneurs and the Marketing of Industrial Psychology’. Journal of Applied Psychology 82, no. 4 (1997): 486–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Ginneken, Jac. Zielkunde en Taylor-systeem. Zielkundige verwikkelingen: wegwijzertjes voor eenling en gemeenschap. 1. Amsterdam: De R.K. Boekcentrale, 1918.Google Scholar

Van Goethem, Pacelle. IJs verkopen aan eskimo’s. Amsterdam: Atlas Contact, Uitgeverij, 2012.Google Scholar

Veblen, Thorstein B. ‘Some Neglected Points in the Theory of Socialism’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2 (November 1, 1891): 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Veblen, Thorstein B. The Engineers and the Price System. New York: B. W. Huebsch, Inc., 1921.Google Scholar

Vickers, Brian. In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Vincent, George E. ‘Varieties of Sociology’. American Journal of Sociology 12, no. 1 (July 1, 1906): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wagenmakers, Eric–Jan, Wetzels, Ruud, Borsboom, Denny and van der Maas, Han L. J.. ‘Why Psychologists Must Change the Way They Analyze Their Data: The Case of Psi: Comment on Bem (2011)’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100, no. 3 (March 2011): 426–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wallace, Robert W. ‘Starting a Department and Getting It Under Way: Sociology at Columbia University, 1891–1914’. Minerva 30, no. 4 (December 1, 1992): 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watts, Steven. Self-Help Messiah: Dale Carnegie and Success in Modern America. New York: Other Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Weil, Simone. ‘Prospects. Are We Heading for a Proletarian Revolution?’ In Oppression and Liberty, 1–23. London: Routledge and Paul, 1958.Google Scholar

Wilde, Rein de. Discipline en legende: de identiteit van de sociologie in Duitsland en de Verenigde Staten, 1870–1930. Amsterdam: Van Gennep, 1992.Google Scholar

Williams, R. Keywords. A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana, 1988.Google Scholar

Wilson, Andrew. ‘Psychology’s Real Replication Problem: Our Methods Sections’. Notes from Two Scientific Psychologists, May 26, 2014. http://psychsciencenotes.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/psychologys-real-replication-problem.html.Google Scholar

Yong, E. ‘A Failed Replication Draws a Scathing Personal Attack from a Psychology Professor’. Not Exactly Rocket Science, March 10, 2012. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/03/10/failed-replication-bargh-psychology-study-doyen/.Google Scholar

Yong, E. ‘Replication Studies: Bad Copy’. Nature 485 (May 17, 2012): 298–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Young, Charles S. Name, Rank, and Serial Number: Exploiting Korean War POWs at Home and Abroad, 2014. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar