Agawu, V. K., Playing with Signs: A Semiotic Interpretation of Classic Music, Princeton University Press, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agawu, V. K., Review of R. S. Hatten: Musical Meaning in Beethoven, Current Musicology 60–61 (1996), pp. 147–161Google Scholar

Agawu, V. K., Music as Discourse: Semiotic Adventures in Romantic Music, Oxford University Press, 2009Google Scholar

Agmon, E., “The First Movement of Beethoven’s Cello Sonata, Op. 69: The Opening Solo as a Structural and Motivic Source,” The Journal of Musicology 16 (1998), pp. 394–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alegant, B., “A-Major Events,” in Keys to the Drama: Nine Perspectives on Sonata Form, ed. Sly, G., Farnham: Ashgate, 2009, pp. 199–224Google Scholar

Almén, B., A Theory of Musical Narrative, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008Google Scholar

Amon, R., Lexikon der Harmonielehre, Munich: Doblinger, 2005Google Scholar

Arthurs, D. J., “Irony and Illusion in the Second Movement of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata, Op. 101,” Journal of Schenkerian Studies 7 (2013), pp. 63–81Google Scholar

Barry, B., “In Beethoven’s Clockshop: Discontinuity in the Opus 18 Quartets,” The Musical Quarterly 88 (2005), pp. 320–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beach, D. W., “Motivic Repetition in Beethoven’s Piano Sonata Op. 110; Part I: The First Movement,” Intégral 1 (1987), pp. 1–29; “Motivic Repetition in Beethoven’s Piano Sonata Op. 110; Part II: The Trio of the Second Movement and the Adagio-Arioso,” Intégral 2 (1988), pp. 75–97Google Scholar

Beach, D. W., “The Analytic Process: A Practical Demonstration; The Opening Theme from Beethoven’s Op. 26,” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 3 (1989), pp. 25–46Google Scholar

Beach, D. W., “Phrase Expansion: Three Analytical Studies,” Music Analysis 14 (1995), pp. 27–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beach, D. W., “The Submediant as Third Divider: Its Representation at Different Structural Levels,” in Music Theory in Concept and Practice, ed. Baker, J. M., Beach, D. W., and Bernard, J. W., University of Rochester Press, 1997, pp. 309–335Google Scholar

Bergé, P., “Die neapolitanische Themenwendung als formal-harmonisches Muster in einigen Sonatensätzen von Beethoven und Brahms,” Musiktheorie 19 (2004), pp. 261–268Google Scholar

Bergé, P. ed., Musical Form, Forms & Formenlehre: Three Methodological Reflections, Leuven University Press, 2009Google Scholar

Bishop, D. M., “Chromatic and Diatonic Pitch-Class Motives and Their Influence on Closural Strategies: Analytical Studies of Three Middle-Period String Quartets of Ludwig van Beethoven,” Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 1999Google Scholar

Black, L. A. S., “Syntactic Irregularities in the Early and Middle Period Works of Beethoven,” Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, 1999Google Scholar

Boirio, G., “Schenker versus Schoenberg versus Schenker: The Difficulties of a Reconciliation,” Journal of the Royal Musical Association 126 (2001), pp. 250–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonds, M. E., Wordless Rhetoric: Musical Form and the Metaphor of the Oration, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boss, J., “‘Schenkerian-Schoenbergian Analysis’ and Hidden Repetition in the Opening Movement of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata Op. 10, No. 1,” Music Theory Online 5/1 (1999)Google Scholar

Boykan, M., The Power of the Moment: Essays on the Western Musical Canon, Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon Press, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britton, J. G., “Harmony, Voice Leading, and Motive in Beethoven’s Last Quartet,” Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Oregon, 2008Google Scholar

Brown, M., Dempster, D., and Headlam, D., “The ♯IV(♭V) Hypothesis: Testing the Limits of Schenker’s Theory of Tonality,” Music Theory Spectrum 19 (1997), pp. 155–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budday, W., Harmonielehre Wiener Klassik: Theorie – Satztechnik – Werkanalyse, Stuttgart: Berthold & Schwerdtner, 2002Google Scholar

Burnham, S., “Reading Between the Lines: Hugo Riemann and Beethoven’s Op. 31 Piano Sonatas,” in The Oxford Handbook of Neo-Riemannian Music Theories, ed. Gollin, E. and Rehding, A., Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 440–461Google Scholar

Burstein, L. P., “Surprising Returns: The VII♯ in Beethoven’s Op. 18, No. 3, and Its Antecedents in Haydn,” Music Analysis 17 (1998), pp. 295–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burstein, L. P., “Recomposition and Retransition in Beethoven’s String Quintet, op. 4,” The Journal of Musicology 23 (2006), pp. 62–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burstein, L. P., “Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata: A Schenkerian Approach,” in Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata: Perspectives of Analysis and Performance, ed. Bergé, P., Leuven: Peeters, 2009, pp. 61–85Google Scholar

Burstein, L. P., “Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata (First Movement): A Schenkerian Approach,” in Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata (First Movement): Five Annotated Analyses for Performers and Scholars, ed. Bergé, P., Leuven: Peeters, 2012, pp. II/1–32Google Scholar

Byros, V., “Foundations of Tonality as Situated Cognition, 1730–1830: An Enquiry into the Culture and Cognition of Eighteenth-Century Tonality, with Beethoven’s Eroica Symphony as a Case Study,” Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, 2009Google Scholar

Byros, V., “Topics and Harmonic Schemata: A Case from Beethoven,” in The Oxford Handbook of Topic Theory, ed. Mirka, D., Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 381–414Google Scholar

Caplin, W. E., “Structural Expansion in Beethoven’s Symphonic Forms,” in Beethoven’s Compositional Process, ed. Kinderman, W., Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1991, pp. 27–54Google Scholar

Caplin, W. E., Classical Form: A Theory of Formal Functions for the Instrumental Music of Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven, Oxford University Press, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caplin, W. E., “Harmonic Variants of the Expanded Cadential Progression,” in A Composition as a Problem II: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Music Theory, Tallinn, April 17–18, 1998, ed. Humal, M., Tallinn: Eesti Muusikaakadeemia, 1999, pp. 49–71Google Scholar

Caplin, W. E., “Beethoven’s Tempest Exposition: A Springboard for Form-Functional Considerations,” in Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata: Perspectives of Analysis and Performance, ed. Bergé, P., Leuven: Peeters, 2009, pp. 87–125Google Scholar

Caplin, W. E., “Beethoven’s ‘Tempest’ Exposition: A Response to Janet Schmalfeldt,” Music Theory Online 16/2 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caplin, W. E., “Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata (First Movement): Form-Functional Analysis,” in Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata (First Movement): Five Annotated Analyses for Performers and Scholars, ed. Bergé, P., Leuven: Peeters, 2012, pp. III/1–44Google Scholar

Caplin, W. E., Analyzing Classical Form: An Approach for the Classroom, Oxford University Press, 2013Google Scholar

Caplin, W. E., “Topics and Formal Functions,” in The Oxford Handbook of Topic Theory, ed. Mirka, D., Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 415–452Google Scholar

Chua, D. K. L., The “Galitzin” Quartets of Beethoven: Opp. 127, 132, 130, Princeton University Press, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chua, D. K. L., Absolute Music and the Construction of Meaning, Cambridge University Press, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churgin, B., “Harmonic and Tonal Instability in the Second Key Area of Classic Sonata Form,” in Convention in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Music: Essays in Honor of Leonard G. Ratner, ed. Allanbrook, W. J., Levy, J. M., and Mahrt, W. P., Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon, 1992, pp. 23–57Google Scholar

Churgin, B., Transcendent Mastery: Studies in the Music of Beethoven, Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon, 2008Google Scholar

Clark, S., “Terzverwandtschaft in der ‘Unvollendeten’ von Schubert und der ‘Waldstein-Sonate’ von Beethoven,” trans. Aigner, T., Schubert durch die Brille: Internationales Franz Schubert Institut—Mitteilungen 20 (1998), pp. 123–130Google Scholar

Cohn, R., “‘This music crept by me upon the waters’: Introverted Motives in Beethoven’s ‘Tempest’ Sonata,” in Engaging Music: Essays in Music Analysis, ed. Stein, D., Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 226–235Google Scholar

Cone, E. T., “Analysis Today,” The Musical Quarterly 46 (1960), pp. 172–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cone, E. T., “Beethoven’s Experiments in Composition: The Late Bagatelles,” in Music: A View From Delft. Selected Essays, ed. Morgan, R. P., University of Chicago Press, 1989, pp. 179–200Google Scholar

Cook, N., “Heinrich Schenker, Polemicist: A Reading of the Ninth Symphony Monograph,” Music Analysis 14 (1995), pp. 89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahlhaus, C., Ludwig von Beethoven und seine Zeit, Laaber: Laaber Verlag, 1987; as Ludwig van Beethoven: Approaches to His Music, trans. M. Whittall, Oxford University Press, 1991Google Scholar

Damschroder, D., “Schubert, Chromaticism, and the Ascending 5–6 Sequence,” Journal of Music Theory 50 (2006), pp. 253–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damschroder, D., Thinking About Harmony: Historical Perspectives on Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damschroder, D., Harmony in Schubert, Cambridge University Press, 2010Google Scholar

Damschroder, D., Review of Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata: Perspectives of Analysis and Performance (ed. Bergé, P.), Music Theory Online 16/2 (June 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damschroder, D., “Schenker, Schubert, and the Subtonic Chord,” in A Music-Theoretical Matrix: Essays in Honor of Allen Forte (Part II), ed. Berry, D. C., Gamut: Online Journal of the Music Theory Society of the Mid-Atlantic 3 (2010), pp. 127–166Google Scholar

Damschroder, D., Harmony in Haydn and Mozart, Cambridge University Press, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damschroder, D., Harmony in Chopin, Cambridge University Press, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damschroder, D., Tonal Analysis: A Schenkerian Perspective, New York: W. W. Norton, forthcomingGoogle Scholar

Diergarten, F., “‘Ancilla Secundae’: Akkord und Stimmführung in der Generalbass-Kompositionslehre,” in Musik und ihre Theorien, ed. Diergarten, F., Holtmeier, L., Leigh, J., and Metzner, E., Dresden: Sandstein Verlag, 2010, pp. 132–148Google Scholar

Diergarten, F., and Holtmeier, L., “Nicht zu disputieren: Beethoven, der Generalbass und die Sonate op. 109,” Musiktheorie 26 (2011), pp. 123–146Google Scholar

Dodson, A., “Performance, Grouping and Schenkerian Alternative Readings in Some Passages from Beethoven’s ‘Lebewohl’ Sonata,” Music Analysis 27 (2008), pp. 107–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drabkin, W., “The Agnus Dei of Beethoven’s Missa Solemnis: The Growth of Its Form,” in Beethoven’s Compositional Process, ed. Kinderman, W., Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1991, pp. 131–159Google Scholar

Drabkin, W., “Schenker, the Consonant Passing Note, and the First-Movement Theme of Beethoven’s Sonata Op. 26,” Music Analysis 15 (1996), pp. 149–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drabkin, W., “The Introduction to Beethoven’s ‘Kreutzer’ Sonata: A Historical Perspective,” in The Beethoven Violin Sonatas: History, Criticism, Performance, ed. Lockwood, L. and Kroll, M., Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2004, pp. 83–109Google Scholar

Dudeque, N., Music Theory and Analysis in the Writings of Arnold Schoenberg (1874–1951), Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005Google Scholar

Earp, L., “Tovey’s ‘Cloud’ in the First Movement of the Eroica: An Analysis Based on Sketches for the Development and Coda,” Beethoven Forum 2 (1993), pp. 55–84Google Scholar

Ellis, M., A Chord in Time: The Evolution of the Augmented Sixth from Monteverdi to Mahler, Farnham: Ashgate, 2010Google Scholar

Ellison, P., “The Largo/Allegro from Beethoven’s ‘Tempest’ Sonata, opus 31, no. 2: Affective Tonality as a Key to Meaning,” The Beethoven Journal 27/1 (2012), pp. 13–25Google Scholar

Ellison, P., The Key to Beethoven: Connecting Tonality and Meaning in His Music, Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon Press, 2014Google Scholar

Epstein, D., Beyond Orpheus: Studies in Musical Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1979Google Scholar

Eybl, M., “Zweckbestimmung und historische Voraussetzungen der Analytik Heinrich Schenkers,” in Zur Geschichte der Musikalischen Analyse: Bericht über die Tagung München 1993, ed. Gruber, G., Laaber: Laaber Verlag, 1996, pp. 145–156Google Scholar

Federhofer, H., “Zur Analyse des zweiten Satzes von L. van Beethovens Klaviersonate Op. 10, No. 3,” in Festskrift Jens Peter Larsen, ed. Schiørring, N., Glahn, H., and Hatting, C. E., Copenhagen: Hansen, 1972, pp. 339–350Google Scholar

Forte, A., The Compositional Matrix, Baldwin, NY: Music Teachers National Association, 1961Google Scholar

Forte, A., and Gilbert, S. E., Introduction to Schenkerian Analysis, New York: W. W. Norton, 1982Google Scholar

Gauldin, R., “Beethoven’s Interrupted Tetrachord and the Seventh Symphony,” Intégral 5 (1991), pp. 77–100Google Scholar

Goldenberg, Y., Prolongation of Seventh Chords in Tonal Music, 2 vols., Lewiston, NY: Mellen, 2008Google Scholar

Greene, D. B., Temporal Processes in Beethoven’s Music, New York: Gordon and Breach, 1982Google Scholar

Halm, A., Beethoven, Berlin: Max Hesses Verlag, 1926Google Scholar

Hanninen, D. A., A Theory of Music Analysis: On Segmentation and Associative Organization, University of Rochester Press, 2012Google Scholar

Hatch, C., “Normality and Disruption in Beethoven’s Bagatelle Op. 119, No. 8,” in Music Theory and the Exploration of the Past, ed. Hatch, C. and Bernstein, D. W., University of Chicago Press, 1993, pp. 341–355Google Scholar

Hatten, R. S., “An Approach to Ambiguity in the Opening of Beethoven’s String Quartet, Op. 59, No. 3,” Indiana Theory Review 3/3 (1980), pp. 28–35Google Scholar

Hatten, R. S., Musical Meaning in Beethoven: Markedness, Correlation, and Interpretation, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994Google Scholar

Hatten, R. S., Interpreting Musical Gestures, Topics, and Tropes: Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004Google Scholar

Hatten, R. S., “Plenitude as Fulfillment: The Third Movement of Beethoven’s String Quartet in B♭, Op. 130,” in The String Quartets of Beethoven, ed. Kinderman, W., Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2006, pp. 214–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hepokoski, J., “Approaching the First Movement of Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata through Sonata Theory,” in Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata: Perspectives of Analysis and Performance, ed. Bergé, P., Leuven: Peeters, 2009, pp. 181–212Google Scholar

Hepokoski, J., “Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata (First Movement): Sonata Theory Analysis,” in Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata (First Movement): Five Annotated Analyses for Performers and Scholars, ed. Bergé, P., Leuven: Peeters, 2012, pp. IV/1–38Google Scholar

Hepokoski, J., and Darcy, W., Elements of Sonata Theory: Norms, Types, and Deformations in the Late-Eighteenth-Century Sonata, Oxford University Press, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyer, B., “Second Immediacies in the Eroica,” in Music Theory in the Age of Romanticism, ed. Bent, I., Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 77–104Google Scholar

Jones, T., Beethoven: The “Moonlight” and Other Sonatas, Op. 27 and Op. 31, Cambridge University Press, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kamien, R., “Chromatic Details in Beethoven’s Piano Sonata in E-flat Major, Op. 7,” The Music Review 35 (1974), pp. 149–156Google Scholar

Kamien, R., “Aspects of the Recapitulation in Beethoven Piano Sonatas,” The Music Forum 4 (1976), pp. 195–235Google Scholar

Kamien, R., “Subtle Enharmonic Connections, Modal Mixture, and Tonal Plan in the First Movement of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata in C Major, Opus 53 (‘Waldstein’),” in Beethoven Forum 1 (1992), pp. 93–110Google Scholar

Kamien, R., “Non-tonic Settings of the Primary Tone in Beethoven Piano Sonatas,” The Journal of Musicology 16 (1998), pp. 379–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, H., and Wintle, C., Beethoven’s String Quartets in F minor, Op. 95, and C♯ minor, Op. 131: Two Studies, University of Nottingham Department of Music, 1995Google Scholar

Kerman, J., The Beethoven Quartets, New York: Knopf, 1967Google Scholar

Kinderman, W., “Beethoven’s Compositional Models for the Choral Finale of the Ninth Symphony,” in Beethoven’s Compositional Process, ed. Kinderman, W., Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1991, pp. 160–188Google Scholar

Klein, M. L., Intertextuality in Western Art Music, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005Google Scholar

Kopp, D., Chromatic Transformations in Nineteenth-Century Music, Cambridge University Press, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsyn, K., “Integration in Works of Beethoven’s Final Period,” Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, 1983Google Scholar

Kramer, E., “Lebewohl, Abwesenheit, and Wiedersehn: Cyclic Integration in Beethoven’s ‘Grand Characteristic Sonata’ in E flat, Op. 81a,” Ad Parnassum: A Journal of Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Instrumental Music 10/19 (2012), pp. 129–163Google Scholar

Kreft, E., Harmonische Prozesse im Wandel der Epochen, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, vol. 1, 1995Google Scholar

Laufer, E., Review of H. Schenker: Free Composition, Music Theory Spectrum 3 (1981), pp. 158–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laufer, E., “On the Fantasy,” Intégral 2 (1988), pp. 99–133Google Scholar

Laufer, E., “Voice-Leading Procedures in Development Sections,” Studies in Music from The University of Western Ontario 13 (1991), pp. 69–120Google Scholar

Lerdahl, F., Tonal Pitch Space, Oxford University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Lockwood, L., “‘Eroica’ Perspectives: Strategy and Design in the First Movement,” in Beethoven Studies 3, ed. Tyson, A., Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 85–105Google Scholar

Marston, N., “Schenker and Forte Reconsidered: Beethoven’s Sketches for the Piano Sonata in E, Op. 109,” 19th-Century Music 10 (1986–1987), pp. 24–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marston, N., “Trifles or a Multi-Trifle? Beethoven’s Bagatelles, Op. 119, Nos. 7–11,” Music Analysis 5 (1986), pp. 193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marston, N., “Analysing Variations: The Finale of Beethoven’s String Quartet Op. 74,” Music Analysis 8 (1989), pp. 303–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marston, N., Beethoven’s Piano Sonata in E, Op. 109, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marston, N., “Notes to a Heroic Analysis: A Translation of Schenker’s Unpublished Study of Beethoven’s Piano Variations, Op. 35,” in Nineteenth-Century Piano Music: Essays in Performance and Analysis, ed. Witten, D., New York: Garland, 1997, pp. 15–52Google Scholar

Marston, N., “Voicing Beethoven’s Distant Beloved,” in Beethoven and His World, ed. Burnham, S. and Steinberg, M. P., Princeton University Press (2000), pp. 124–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marston, N., Heinrich Schenker and Beethoven’s ‘Hammerklavier’ Sonata, Farnham: Ashgate, 2013Google Scholar

Marx, A. B., Ludwig van Beethoven: Leben und Schaffen, 2 vols., Leipzig: Adolph Schumann, 1902Google Scholar

McClary, S., Conventional Wisdom: The Content of Musical Form, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000Google Scholar

McCreless, P., “The Pitch-Class Motive in Tonal Analysis: Some Historical and Critical Observations,” Res musica 3 (2011), pp. 52–67Google Scholar

McKee, E., “Alternative Meanings in the First Movement of Beethoven’s String Quartet in E♭ Major Op. 127: Emergence and Growth from Stagnation and Decline,” in Beethoven: Studien und Interpretationen, ed. Tomaszewski, M. and Chrenkoff, M., Cracow: Akademia Muzyczna, vol. 1 (2000), pp. 133–161Google Scholar

McKee, E., “E Major and Spirituality in Beethoven’s Instrumental Music,” in Beethoven: Studien und Interpretationen, ed. Tomaszewski, M. and Chrenkoff, M., Cracow: Akademia Muzyczna, vol. 2 (2003), pp. 125–143Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J., “Beethoven’s La Malinconia from the String Quartet, Opus 18, No. 6: Techniques and Structure,” The Music Forum 3 (1973), pp. 269–280Google Scholar

Morgan, R. P., “Coda as Culmination: The First Movement of the ‘Eroica’ Symphony,” in Music Theory and the Exploration of the Past, ed. Hatch, C. and Bernstein, D. W., University of Chicago Press, 1993, pp. 357–376Google Scholar

Morgan, R. P., “The Concept of Unity and Musical Analysis,” Music Analysis 22 (2003), pp. 7–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moßburger, H., Ästhetische Harmonielehre: Quellen – Analysen – Aufgaben, 2 vols., Wilhelmshaven: Florian Noetzel Verlag, 2012Google Scholar

Moßburger, H., and Weißgerber, L., “Anmerkungen zur Harmonik in der 20. Diabelli-Variation,” Musiktheorie 14 (1999), pp. 269–274Google Scholar

Oster, E., “The Dramatic Character of the Egmont Overture,” in Aspects of Schenkerian Theory, ed. Beach, D., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1983, pp. 209–222Google Scholar

Ratner, L. G., Classic Music: Expression, Form, and Style, New York: Schirmer, 1980Google Scholar

Redmann, B., “Zum (Schein-)Antipodentum von Hugo Riemann und Heinrich Schenker,” in Zur Geschichte der musikalischen Analyse: Bericht über die Tagung München 1993, ed. Gruber, G., Laaber: Laaber Verlag, 1996, pp. 131–144Google Scholar

Rehding, A., “Tonality Between Rule and Repertory; Or, Riemann’s Functions – Beethoven’s Function,” Music Theory Spectrum 33 (2011), pp. 109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Réti, R., Thematic Patterns in Sonatas of Beethoven, ed. Cooke, D., London: Faber, 1967Google Scholar

Reynolds, C. A., Motives for Allusion: Context and Content in Nineteenth-Century Music, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003Google Scholar

Riemann, H., L. van Beethovens sämtliche Klavier-Solosonaten: Ästhetische und formal-technische Analyse mit historischen Notizen, 3 vols., Berlin: Max Hesses Verlag, 1917–1919Google Scholar

Ronge, J., Beethovens Lehrzeit: Kompositionsstudien bei Joseph Haydn, Johann Georg Albrechtsberger und Antonio Salieri, Bonn: Verlag Beethoven-Haus, 2011Google Scholar

Rosen, C., The Classical Style: Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, New York: W. W. Norton, 1971Google Scholar

Rosen, C., Sonata Forms, New York: W. W. Norton, 1980Google Scholar

Rosen, C., Beethoven’s Piano Sonatas: A Short Companion, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002Google Scholar

Rothgeb, J., “Salient Features,” in Music Theory in Concept and Practice, ed. Baker, J. M., Beach, D. W., and Bernard, J. W., University of Rochester Press, 1997, pp. 181–196Google Scholar

Rothstein, W., Phrase Rhythm in Tonal Music, New York: Schirmer, 1989; reprint edn., Ann Arbor, MI: Musicalia, 2007Google Scholar

Rothstein, W., “Beethoven with and without Kunstgepräng’: Metrical Ambiguity Reconsidered,” Beethoven Forum 4 (1995), pp. 165–193Google Scholar

Rothstein, W., “Riding the Storm Clouds: Tempo, Rhythm, and Meter in Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata,” in Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata: Perspectives of Analysis and Performance, ed. Bergé, P., Leuven: Peeters, 2009, pp. 235–271Google Scholar

Rothstein, W., “Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata (First Movement): Metrical Analysis,” in Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata (First Movement): Five Annotated Analyses for Performers and Scholars, ed. Bergé, P., Leuven: Peeters, 2012, pp. V/1–44Google Scholar

Rumph, S., “Op. 132 and the Search for a Deep Structure,” Beethoven Forum 14/1 (2007), pp. 73–89Google Scholar

Rumph, S., “What Beethoven Learned from K. 464,” Eighteenth-Century Music 11 (2014), pp. 55–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salzer, F., Structural Hearing: Tonal Coherence in Music, 2 vols., New York: Boni, 1952; reprint edn., New York: Dover, 1962Google Scholar

Samarotto, F., “A Theory of Temporal Plasticity in Tonal Music: An Extension of the Schenkerian Approach to Rhythm with Special Reference to Beethoven’s Late Music,” Ph.D. dissertation, The City University of New York, 1999Google Scholar

Samarotto, F., “Multiple Voices and Metrical Dramas in Beethoven’s Goethe-Songs, Op. 83,” Beethoven Forum 12 (2005), pp. 151–175Google Scholar

Samarotto, F., “The Divided Tonic in the First Movement of Beethoven’s Op. 132,” in Keys to the Drama: Nine Perspectives on Sonata Form, ed. Sly, G., Farnham: Ashgate, 2009, pp. 1–26Google Scholar

Schachter, C., “Rhythmic and Linear Analysis, Durational Reduction,” The Music Forum 5 (1980), pp. 197–232; reprinted in Unfoldings: Essays in Schenkerian Theory and Analysis, ed. J. N. Straus, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 54–78Google Scholar

Schachter, C., “Beethoven’s Sketches for the First Movement of Op. 14, No. 1: A Study in Design,” Journal of Music Theory 26 (1982), pp. 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachter, C., “Analysis by Key: Another Look at Modulation,” Music Analysis 6 (1987), pp. 289–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachter, C., “Rhythm and Linear Analysis: Aspects of Meter,” The Music Forum 6/1 (1987), pp. 1–59; reprinted in Unfoldings: Essays in Schenkerian Theory and Analysis, ed. J. N. Straus, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 79–117Google Scholar

Schachter, C., “Mozart’s Last and Beethoven’s First: Echoes of K. 551 in the First Movement of Opus 21,” in Mozart Studies, ed. Eisen, C., Oxford University Press, 1991, pp. 227–251Google Scholar

Schachter, C., “The Triad as Place and Action,” Music Theory Spectrum 17 (1995), pp. 149–169; reprinted in Unfoldings: Essays in Schenkerian Theory and Analysis, ed. J. N. Straus, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 161–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachter, C., “Che Inganno! The Analysis of Deceptive Cadences,” in Essays from the Third International Schenker Symposium, ed. Cadwallader, A., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2006, pp. 279–298Google Scholar

Schenker, H., Harmonielehre: Neue musikalische Theorien und Phantasien I, Stuttgart: Cotta, 1906; as Harmony (abridged), ed. O. Jonas, trans. E. M. Borgese, University of Chicago Press, 1954Google Scholar

Schenker, H., Beethovens neunte Sinfonie: Eine Darstellung des musikalischen Inhaltes, unter fortlaufender Berücksichtigung auch des Vortrages und der Literatur, Vienna: Universal, 1912; as Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony: A Portrayal of Its Musical Content, with Running Commentary on Performance and Literature As Well, trans. J. Rothgeb, New Haven. CT: Yale University Press, 1992Google Scholar

Schenker, H., Die letzten fünf Sonaten Beethovens: Krtitische Ausgabe mit Einführung und Erläuterung, 4 vols., Vienna: Universal, 1913, 1914, 1915, 1920Google Scholar

Schenker, H., Der Tonwille: Flugblätter zum Zeugnis unwandelbarer Gesetze der Tonkunst, einer neuen Jugend dargebracht, 2 vols., Vienna: A. J. Gutmann, Leipzig: F. Hofmeister, 1921–1924; as Der Tonwille: Pamphlets in Witness of the Immutable Laws of Music, Offered to a New Generation of Youth, ed. W. Drabkin, trans. I. Bent et al., Oxford University Press, 2004–2005Google Scholar

Schenker, H., Das Meisterwerk in der Musik: Ein Jahrbuch, 3 vols., Munich: Drei Masken, 1925, 1926, 1930; as The Masterwork in Music, ed. W. Drabkin, trans. I. Bent et al., 3 vols., Cambridge University Press, 1994–1997Google Scholar

Schenker, H., Der freie Satz: Neue musikalische Theorien und Phantasien III, Vienna: Universal, 1935; rev. edn., ed. O. Jonas, Vienna: Universal, 1956; as Free Composition, trans. and ed. E. Oster, New York: Longman, 1979; reprint of trans. edn., Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press, 2001Google Scholar

Schmalfeldt, J. “On the Relation of Analysis to Performance: Beethoven’s Bagatelles Op. 126, Nos. 2 and 5,” Journal of Music Theory 29 (1985), pp. 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmalfeldt, J., “Cadential Processes: The Evaded Cadence and the ‘One More Time’ Technique,” Journal of Musicological Research 12 (1992), pp. 1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmalfeldt, J., “Form as the Process of Becoming: The Beethoven-Hegelian Tradition and the Tempest Sonata,” in Beethoven Forum 4 (1995), pp. 37–71; rev. edn. in Schmalfeldt, J., In the Process of Becoming: Analytic and Philosophical Perspectives on Form in Early Nineteenth-Century Music, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 23–57Google Scholar

Schmalfeldt, J., “Beethoven’s ‘Bridgetower’ Sonata, Op. 47,” in New Paths: Aspects of Music Theory and Aesthetics in the Age of Romanticism, Leuven University Press, 2009, pp. 37–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmalfeldt, J., In the Process of Becoming: Analytic and Philosophical Perspectives on Form in Early Nineteenth-Century Music, Oxford University Press, 2011Google Scholar

Schoenberg, A., Structural Functions of Harmony, rev. edn., ed. Stein, L., New York: W. W. Norton, 1954Google Scholar

Schwab-Felisch, O., “Functions of the Unclear: Chromaticism in Beethoven’s String Quartet in E-flat Major, Op. 74,” Dutch Journal of Music Theory 6 (2001), pp. 188–194Google Scholar

Seidel, W., “Riemann und Beethoven,” in Hugo Riemann (1849–1919): Musikwissenschaftler mit Universalanspruch, ed. Böhme-Mehner, T. and Mehner, K., Cologne: Böhlau Verlag, 2001, pp. 139–151Google Scholar

Smith, C. J., “The Functional Extravagance of Chromatic Chords,” Music Theory Spectrum 8 (1986), pp. 94–139; response by D. Beach and reply by C. J. Smith in Music Theory Spectrum 9 (1987), pp. 173–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, P. H., “Structural Tonic or Apparent Tonic? Parametric Conflict, Temporal Perspective, and a Continuum of Articulative Possibilities,” Journal of Music Theory 39 (1995), pp. 245–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, P. H., “Tonal Pairing and Monotonality in Instrumental Forms of Beethoven, Schubert, Schumann, and Brahms,” Music Theory Spectrum 35 (2013), pp. 77–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smyth, D. H., “Beethoven’s Last Bagatelle,” Intégral 13 (1999), pp. 117–142Google Scholar

Song, M. K., “The Evolution of Sonata-Form Design in Ludwig van Beethoven’s Early Piano Sonatas, WoO 47 to Opus 22,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 2009Google Scholar

Spitzer, M., “The Significance of Recapitulation in the Waldstein Sonata,” Beethoven Forum 5 (1996), pp. 103–118Google Scholar

Spitzer, M., Metaphor and Musical Thought, University of Chicago Press, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spitzer, M., Music as Philosophy: Adorno and Beethoven’s Late Style, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006Google Scholar

Stanley, G., “Voices and Their Rhythms in the First Movement of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata Op. 109: Some Thoughts on the Performance and Analysis of a Late-Style Work,” in Beethoven and His World, ed. Burnham, S. and Steinberg, M. P., Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 88–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suurpää, L., “Non-Tonic Openings in Three Beethoven Introductions,” in Essays from the Third International Schenker Symposium, ed. Cadwallader, A., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2006, pp. 51–66Google Scholar

Suurpää, L., “The Undivided Ursatz and the Omission of the Tonic Stufe at the Beginning of the Recapitulation,” Journal of Schenkerian Studies 1 (2006), pp. 66–91Google Scholar

Taylor, B., “The Problem of the ‘Introduction’ in Beethoven’s Late Quartets,” Ad Parnassum: A Journal of Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Instrumental Music 3/6 (2005), pp. 45–64Google Scholar

Tovey, D. F., A Companion to Beethoven’s Pianoforte Sonatas: Bar-to-Bar Analysis, London: Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music, 1931, 1947; ed. B. Cooper, 1998Google Scholar

Tusa, M. C., “Beethoven and Opera: The Grave-Digging Duet in Leonore (1805),” Beethoven Forum 5 (1996), pp. 1–63Google Scholar

Wen, E., “Beethovens’s Meditation on Death: The Funeral March of the ‘Eroica’ Symphony,” Dutch Journal of Music Theory 10 (2005), pp. 9–25Google Scholar

Wintle, C., “Kontra-Schenker: Largo e mesto from Beethoven’s Op. 10 No. 3,” Music Analysis 4 (1985), pp. 145–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar