Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of genealogical tables
- List of tables
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction. Hanover: the missing dimension
- 2 Hanoverian nexus: Walpole and the Electorate
- 3 Pitt and Hanover
- 4 George III and Hanover
- 5 The Hanoverian dimension in early nineteenth-century British politics
- 6 The end of the dynastic union, 1815–1837
- 7 The university of Göttingen and the Personal Union, 1737–1837
- 8 The confessional dimension
- 9 Hanover and the public sphere
- 10 Dynastic perspectives
- 11 British maritime strategy and Hanover 1714–1763
- 12 Hanover in mid-eighteenth-century Franco-British geopolitics
- 13 Hanover and British republicanism
- Index
5 - The Hanoverian dimension in early nineteenth-century British politics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of genealogical tables
- List of tables
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction. Hanover: the missing dimension
- 2 Hanoverian nexus: Walpole and the Electorate
- 3 Pitt and Hanover
- 4 George III and Hanover
- 5 The Hanoverian dimension in early nineteenth-century British politics
- 6 The end of the dynastic union, 1815–1837
- 7 The university of Göttingen and the Personal Union, 1737–1837
- 8 The confessional dimension
- 9 Hanover and the public sphere
- 10 Dynastic perspectives
- 11 British maritime strategy and Hanover 1714–1763
- 12 Hanover in mid-eighteenth-century Franco-British geopolitics
- 13 Hanover and British republicanism
- Index
Summary
It might be very well to say, that Hanover and England were two separate kingdoms – that one had nothing to do with the other. This might be the case theoretically; but it never had been, it could not be so, practically … The policy pursued by the King of Hanover must, without strong proofs to the contrary, be considered as the policy of the King of England.
Henry Lytton Bulwer MP, 2 August 1832.The Hanoverian dimension in British foreign policy and domestic politics during the final decades of the Personal Union has received little historical attention. The only historian to have specifically focused on the relationship between Britain and Hanover after 1815 confined his analysis largely to the realm of foreign policy and admitted the need for more research. The absence of Hanover from general surveys of British domestic politics is perhaps understandable: the significance of the Personal Union in purely domestic British affairs was spasmodic and haphazard. Nevertheless there was a Hanoverian dimension to British domestic politics after 1815 which manifested itself in public attitudes towards the monarchy, catholic emancipation and the cause of liberty at home and abroad. Hanoverian issues were not constant themes in newspapers, periodicals and political caricature, but nor were they entirely invisible. The omission of the Hanoverian dimension by historians is particularly striking in areas where there seems to be a good prima facie case for taking the Personal Union into consideration.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Hanoverian Dimension in British History, 1714–1837 , pp. 86 - 110Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007