Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T11:53:55.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - A Habit Ontology for Cognitive and Social Sciences

Methodological Individualism, Pragmatist Interactionism, and 4E Cognition

from Part III - Socially Embeddded and Culturally Extended Habits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2020

By
Italo Testa
Edited by
Fausto Caruana  and
Italo Testa
Fausto Caruana
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience (Parma), Italian National Research Council
Italo Testa
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi, Parma
Get access

Summary

In this chapter I argue that a Pragmatist framework can offer us a common ontological framework for both social and cognitive sciences, which represents a promising alternative to both internalist and methodological and ontological individualist approaches to sociality. Accordingly, social interaction is constitutive of cognitive phenomena both at the subpersonal and at the personal level, and at the individual and at the collective level. I reconstruct this model as a form of motor social ontology based on the notion of habit and criticize in this light intentionalist takes on social cognition. Finally, I assess recent arguments in favor of the rediscovery of the notion of “habit” within cognitive sciences, and argue that habit ontology can play a foundational role in embodied cognitive sciences insofar as it can give a unified account of 4E cognition, that is of cognition understood as an embodied, enactive, embedded, and extended phenomenon.

Keywords

social ontologycollective intentionalitysocial sciencesindividualismpragmatism
Type
Chapter
Information
Habits
Pragmatist Approaches from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory
 , pp. 395 - 416
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Fredrick, and Aizawa, Kenneth. 2008. The Bounds of Cognition. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barandiaran, Xavier E., and Di Paolo, Ezequiel A.. 2014. “A Genealogical Map of the Concept of Habit.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (522): 22–8. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2008. “Grounded Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernacer, Javier, and Murillo, Jose Angel 2014. “The Aristotelian Conception of Habit and Its Contribution to Human Neuroscience.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (883): 12–21. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, Richard J. 2010. The Pragmatic Turn. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bhargava, Rajeev. 1992. Individualism in Social Science: Forms and Limits of a Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael. 2014. Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemero, Tony. 2009. Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. “Language and Nature.” Mind 104: 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andy. 1997. Being There. Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. 1999. “An Embodied Cognitive Science?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (9): 345–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andy. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andy, and Chalmers, David. 1998. “The Extended Mind.” Analysis 58: 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Tim. 1998. “Intentionality as the Mark of the Mental.” In Contemporary Issues in the Philosophy of Mind. Edited by O'Hear, Anthony, 229–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jaegher, Hanne, Di Paolo, Ezequiel, and Gallagher, Shaun 2010. “Can Social Interaction Constitute Social Cognition?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (10): 441–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1973. Lectures in China, 1919–1920. Edited and translated by Clopton, R. W. and Ou, Tsuin-Chen. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. 1981. “Experience and Nature.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, vol. 1: 1925, Experience and Nature. Edited by Boydston, J. A.. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1982. “Reconstruction in Philosophy.” In The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1899–1924, vol. 12: 1920, Essays, Miscellany, and Reconstruction in Philosophy. Edited by Boydston, J. A., 77–202. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1983. “Human Nature and Conduct.” In The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1899–1924, vol. 14: 1922, Human Nature and Conduct. Edited by Boydston, J. A.. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1984. “The Public and Its Problems.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, vol. 2: 1925–1927, Essays, Reviews, Miscellany, and “The Public and Its Problems”. Edited by Boydston, J. A., 235–372. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1988a. “My Philosophy of Law.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925-1953, vol. 14: 1939–1941, Essays, Reviews, and Miscellany. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, 116–23. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1988b. “Experience and Education.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, vol. 13: 1938–1939, Experience and Education, Freedom and Culture, Theory of Valuation, and Essays. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, 1–62. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John, and Bentley, Arthur F.. 1991. “Knowing and the Known.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, vol. 16: 1949–1952, Essays, Typescripts, and Knowing and the Known. Edited by Boydston, J. A., 1–294. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, Ezequiel, and Thompson, Evan. 2014. “The Enactive Approach.” In The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition. Edited by Shapiro, Larry, 68–78. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Engel, Andreas K., Maye, Alexander, Kurthen, Martin, and König, Peter. 2013. “Where's the Action? The Pragmatic Turn in Cognitive Science.” Trends in Cognitive Science 17 (5): 202–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engel, Andreas K., Friston, Karl J., and Kragic, Danica, eds. 2016. The Pragmatic Turn: Toward Action-Oriented Views in Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Brian. 2016. The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1980. “Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1): 63–73.Google Scholar
Frega, Roberto. 2019. “The Social Ontology of Democracy.” Journal of Social Ontology 4 (2):157–85.Google Scholar
Frega, Roberto. 2020. “Social Ontology between Habits and Social Interactions.” In Habits. Pragmatist Approaches from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory. Edited by Caruana, Fausto and Testa, Italo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Chapter 20 in this volume.)Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun, and Miyahara, Katsunori. 2012. “Neo-Pragmatism and Enactive Intentionality.” In New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science: Adaptation and Cephalic Expression. Edited by Schulkin, Jay, 117–46. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin, and de Vignemont, Frédérique. 2009. “Is Social Cognition Embodied?” Trends in Cognive Science 13 (4): 154–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Gulick, Robert.1989. “Metaphysical Arguments for Internalism and Why They Don't Work.” In Representation. Edited by Silver, Stuart, 151–60. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1999. “Hermeneutic and Analytic Philosophy: Two Complementary Versions of the Linguistic Turn?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 44: 413–44.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2003. Truth and Justification. Edited and translated by Barbara Fultner. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Joseph. 2015. “Methodological Individualism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 ed.). Edited by Zalta, Edward N., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/methodological-individualism/.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2010. “Choice, Habit, Evolution.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 20: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hutto, Daniel D., and Myin, Erik. 2013. Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds Without Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1890. Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1993. Pragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Social Action. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 2006. “Cognitive Science.” In A Companion to Pragmatism. Edited by Shook, John R. and Margolis, Joseph, 369–77. Cambridge: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 2010. “Cognitive Science and Dewey's Theory of Mind, Thought, and Language.” In The Cambridge Companion to John Dewey. Edited by Cochran, M., 123–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark and Rohrer, Tim. 2007. “We Are Live Creatures: Embodiment, American Pragmatism, and the Cognitive Organism.” In Body, Language, and Mind, vol. 1. Edited by Zlatev, Jordan, Ziemke, Tom, Frank, Roz, and Dirven, René, 17–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jung, Matthias. 2010. “John Dewey on Action”. In The Cambridge Companion to Dewey. Edited by Cochran, Molly, 145–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, Matthias. 2011. “Verkörperte Intentionalität. Zur Anthropologie des Handelns.” In Handlung und Erfahrung. Das Erbe von Historismus und Pragmatismus und die Zukunft der Sozialtheorie. Edited by Hollstein, Bettina B., Jung, Matthias, and Knöbl, Wolfgang, 25–50. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Lakoff, John, and Johnson, Mark. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
List, Christian, and Pettit, Philip. 2011. Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steve. 1968. “Methodological Individualism Reconsidered.” The British Journal of Sociology 19 (2): 119–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mättänen, Pentti. 2010. “Habits as Vehicles of Cognition.” In Ideas in Action: Proceedings of the Applying Peirce Conference. Edited by Bergman, M., Paavola, S., Pietarinen, A.-V., and Rydenfelt, H., 201–10. Nordic Studies in Pragmatism 1. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network.Google Scholar
Madzia, Roman. 2013. “Chicago Pragmatism and the Extended Mind Theory: Mead and Dewey on the Nature of Cognition.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 5 (1): 193–211.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1967. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Menary, Richard. 2010a. “Introduction to the Special Issue on 4E Cognition.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (4): 459–63.Google Scholar
Menary, Richard, ed. 2010b. The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menary, Richard. 2016. “Pragmatism and the Pragmatic Turn in Cognitive Science.” In The Pragmatic Turn: Toward Action-Oriented Views in Cognitive Science. Edited by Engel, Andreas K., Friston, Karl J., and Kragic, Danica, 215–34. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Noë, Alva. 2009. Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1949/1968. The Structure of Social Action, 2 vols. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, and Shils, Edward, eds. 1951. Toward a General Theory of Action. New York: Harper & Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1976. New Elements of Mathematics, vol. 4. Edited by Eisele, Carolyn. The Hague: Mouton/Atlantic Highlands NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Poldrack, Russell A., Sabb, Fred W., Foerde, Karin, Tom, Sabrina M., Asarnow, Robert F., Bookheimer, Susan Y., and Knowlton, Barbara J.. 2005. “The Neural Correlates of Motor Skill Automaticity.” Journal of Neuroscience 25 (22): 5356–64.Google Scholar
Rockwell, Teed. 2005. Neither Brain nor Ghost: A Nondualist Alternative to the Mind–Brain Identity Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rockwell, Teed. 2016. “The Embodied ‘We’: Extended Mind as Cognitive Sociology.” In Pragmatism and Embodied Cognitive Science: From Bodily Intersubjectivity to Symbolic Articulation. Edited by Jung, Matthias and Madzia, Roman, 165–82. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Särkelä, Arvi. Forthcoming. “Das andere Leben: Deweys naturalistische Sozialontologie und ihre kritische Aufgabe.” In Pragmatistische Sozialwissenschaft. Edited by Brunkhorst, Hauke, Petersen, Felix, and Seeliger, Martin. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans B. 2017. “The Subject of We-Intend.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences doi: 10.1007/s11097-017-9501-7.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Larry. 2007. “The Embodied Cognition Research Programme.” Philosophy Compass 2 (2): 338–46.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Larry. 2011. Embodied Cognition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Solymosi, Tibor, and Shook, John. 2013. “Neuropragmatism: A Neurophilosophical Manifesto.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy V (1). doi: 10.4000/ejpap.671.Google Scholar
Steiner, Pierre. 2013.“Pragmatisme(s) et sciences cognitives: considérations liminaires”. Intellectica 60 (2): 7–47.Google Scholar
Steiner, Pierre. 2020. “Habit, Meaning, and Intentionality. A Deweyan Reading.” In Habits. Pragmatist Approaches from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory. Edited by Caruana, Fausto and Testa, Italo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Chapter 10 in this volume.)Google Scholar
Testa, Italo. 2017a. “Dewey's Social Ontology: A Pragmatist Alternative to Searle's Approach to Social Reality.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (1): 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Testa, Italo. 2017b. “The Authority of Life. The Critical Task of Dewey's Social Ontology.” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 31 (2): 231–44.Google Scholar
Testa, Italo. 2017c. “Dewey, Second Nature, Social Criticism, and the Hegelian Heritage.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy XI (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Testa, Italo. 2017d. “Dominant Patterns in Associated Living: Hegemony, Domination, and Ideological Recognition in Dewey’s Lectures in China.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53 (1): 29–52.Google Scholar
Testa, Italo. 2017e. “The Imaginative Rehearsal Model. Dewey, Embodied Simulation, and the Narrative Hypothesis.” Pragmatism Today 8 (1): 105–12.Google Scholar
Testa, Italo. 2020. “Embodied Cognition, Habit, and Natural Agency in Hegel's Anthropology.” In The Palgrave Hegel Handbook. Edited by Bykova, Marina and Westphal, Kenneth, 269–95. London: Palgrave Macmillan. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Deborah Perron. 2006. “From Extended Mind to Collective Mind.” Cognitive Systems Research 7: 140–50.Google Scholar
Tuomela, Raimo, 2003. “The We-Mode and the I-Mode.” In Socializing Metaphysics. The Nature of Social Reality. Edited by Schmitt, Fredrick F., 93–128. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, Evan, and Rosch, Eleanor. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, John W. N. 1957. “Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8: 104–17.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1922. Economy and Society. Edited by Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert A. 1999. “Individualism.” In The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Edited by Wilson, Robert A. and Keil, Frank C., 397–98. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Robert A. 2004. Boundaries of the Mind. The Individual in the Fragile Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert A., and Foglia, Lucia. 2017. “Embodied Cognition.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 ed.). Edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/embodied-cognition/.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×