Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T18:02:03.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - ♀ Mixed Epithelial and Mesenchymal Tumors of the Uterus

from Section 4 - Kidney Tumors and Neoplasms with Similar Features in the Gynecologic Tract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2019

Maria Rosaria Raspollini
Affiliation:
University Hospital Careggi, Florence
Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Affiliation:
Cordoba University Medical School
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Gynecologic and Urologic Pathology
Similarities, Differences and Challenges
, pp. 194 - 199
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wells, M., Oliva, E., Palacios, J., Prat, J.. Mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumours of the uterus. In: Kurman, R.J., Carcangiu, M.L., Herrington, S., Young, R.H., editors, WHO Classification of Tumours of the Female Reproductive Organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2014.Google Scholar
Gilks, C.B., Young, R.H., Clement, P.B., Hart, W.R., Scully, R.E.. Adenomyomas of the uterine cervix of endocervical type: a report of ten cases of a benign cervical tumor that may be confused with adenoma malignum [corrected]. Mod Pathol 1996; 9(3): 220224.Google Scholar
Gilks, C.B., Clement, P.B., Hart, W.R., Young, R.H.. Uterine adenomyomas excluding atypical polypoid adenomyomas and adenomyomas of endocervical type: a clinicopathologic study of 30 cases of an underemphasized lesion that may cause diagnostic problems with brief consideration of adenomyomas of other female genital tract sites. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2000; 19(3): 195205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tahlan, A., Nanda, A., Mohan, H.. Uterine adenomyoma: a clinicopathologic review of 26 cases and a review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2006; 25(4): 361365.Google Scholar
Longacre, T.A., Chung, M.H., Rouse, R.V., Hendrickson, M.R.. Atypical polypoid adenomyofibromas (atypical polypoid adenomyomas) of the uterus. A clinicopathologic study of 55 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20(1): 120.Google Scholar
Young, R.H., Treger, T., Scully, R.E.. Atypical polypoid adenomyoma of the uterus: a report of 27 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1986; 86(2): 139145.Google Scholar
Soslow, R.A., Chung, M.H., Rouse, R.V., Hendrickson, M.R., Longacre, T.A.. Atypical polypoid adenomyofibroma (APA) versus well-differentiated endometrial carcinoma with prominent stromal matrix: an immunohistochemical study. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1996; 15(3): 209216.Google Scholar
Mazur, M.T.. Atypical polypoid adenomyomas of the endometrium. Am J Surg Pathol 1981; 5(5): 473482.Google Scholar
Zaloudek, C.J., Norris, H.J.. Adenofibroma and adenosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Cancer 1981;48(2): 354366.Google Scholar
Zaloudek, C., Hendrickson, M.R., Soslow, R.A.. Mesenchymal tumors of the uterus. In: Kurman, R.J., Wellenson, L.H., Ronnett, B.M., editors, Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 6th edn. New York: Springer; 2011, p. 453578.Google Scholar
Gallardo, A., Prat, J.. Mullerian adenosarcoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 55 cases challenging the existence of adenofibroma. Am J Surg Pathol 2009; 33(2): 278288.Google Scholar
Soslow, R.A., Ali, A., Oliva, E.. Mullerian adenosarcomas: an immunophenotypic analysis of 35 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32(7): 10131021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clement, P.B., Oliva, E., Young, R.H.. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterine corpus associated with tamoxifen therapy: a report of six cases and a review of tamoxifen-associated endometrial lesions. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1996; 15(3): 222229.Google Scholar
Clement, P.B., Scully, R.E.. Uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex-cord tumors: a clinicopathologic analysis of fourteen cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1976; 66(3): 512525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clement, P.B., Scully, R.E.. Mullerian adenosarcomas of the uterus with sex cord-like elements: a clinicopathologic analysis of eight cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1989; 91(6): 664672.Google Scholar
Zelmanowicz, A., Hildesheim, A., Sherman, M.E., et al. Evidence for a common etiology for endometrial carcinomas and malignant mixed mullerian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 69(3): 253257.Google Scholar
Thompson, L., Chang, B., Barsky, S.H.. Monoclonal origins of malignant mixed tumors (carcinosarcomas): evidence for a divergent histogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20(3): 277285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wada, H., Enomoto, T., Fujita, M., et al. Molecular evidence that most but not all carcinosarcomas of the uterus are combination tumors. Cancer Res 1997; 57(23): 53795385.Google Scholar
Fujii, H., Yoshida, M., Gong, Z.X., et al. Frequent genetic heterogeneity in the clonal evolution of gynecological carcinosarcoma and its influence on phenotypic diversity. Cancer Res 2000; 60(1): 114120.Google Scholar
Blom, R., Guerrieri, C., Stal, O., et al. Malignant mixed Mullerian tumors of the uterus: a clinicopathologic, DNA flow cytometric, p53, and mdm-2 analysis of 44 cases. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 68(1): 1824.Google Scholar
Meis, J.M., Lawrence, W.D.. The immunohistochemical profile of malignant mixed mullerian tumor. Overlap with endometrial adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1990; 94(1): 17.Google Scholar
Vaidya, A.P., Horowitz, N.S., Oliva, E., Halpern, E.F., Duska, L.R.. Uterine malignant mixed mullerian tumors should not be included in studies of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 103(2): 684687.Google Scholar
Yamada, S.D., Burger, R.A., Brewster, W.R., et al. Pathologic variables and adjuvant therapy as predictors of recurrence and survival for patients with surgically evaluated carcinosarcoma of the uterus. Cancer 2000; 88(12): 27822786.Google Scholar
Silverberg, S.G., Major, F.J., Blessing, J.A., et al. Carcinosarcoma (malignant mixed mesodermal tumor) of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group pathologic study of 203 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1990; 9(1): 119.Google Scholar
Inthasorn, P., Carter, J., Valmadre, S., et al. Analysis of clinicopathologic factors in malignant mixed Mullerian tumors of the uterine corpus. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002; 12(4): 348353.Google Scholar
Mikami, Y., Hata, S., Kiyokawa, T., Manabe, T.. Expression of CD10 in malignant mullerian mixed tumors and adenosarcomas: an immunohistochemical study. Mod Pathol 2002; 15(9): 923930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clement, P.B., Scully, R.E.. Uterine tumors with mixed epithelial and mesenchymal elements. Semin Diagn Pathol 1988; 5(2): 199222.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×