van Hof, J. J., Commentary on the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: The Application by the Iran–US Claims Tribunal (The Hague: TNC Asser Instituut, 1991), 58Google Scholar

Baker, Stewart A. and Davis, Mark D., ‘Establishment of an Arbitral Tribunal under the UNCITRAL Rules: The Experience of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal’, Int’l Law, 23 (1989), 81, 116

Caron, D. D., Caplan, L. M. and Pellonpää, M., The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2006), 201CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Report of the Secretary-General on the Preliminary Draft Set of Arbitration Rules, UNCITRAL, 8th Session, UN Doc A/CN.9/97 (1974), reprinted in UNCITRAL Yearbook, Volume VI: 1975, 163, 171.

Gaillard, E. and Savage, J. (eds.), Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999), 1021;

Greenberg, S., Kee, C. and Weeramantry, J. R., International Commercial Arbitration: An Asia Pacific Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2011),Google Scholar

Blackaby, N. and Partasides, C., with Redfern, A. and Hunter, J. M., Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, 5th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zuberbühler, T., Muller, K. and Habegger, P. A. (eds.), Swiss Rules of International Arbitration: Commentary (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005)

Berlinguer, A., ‘Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators in International Practice’, American Review of International Arbitration 6 (1995), 339, 343.Google Scholar

Donahey, M. S., ‘The Independence and Neutrality of Arbitrators’, Journal of International Arbitration, 9 (1992), 31;Google Scholar

Smith, M., ‘Impartiality of the Party-Appointed Arbitrator’, Arbitration International, 6 (1990), 323;CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lew, J. D. M., Mistelis, L. A. and Kröll, S. M., Comparative International Commercial Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003), para. 11–19;Google Scholar

Sanders, Pieter in The Work of UNCITRAL on Arbitration and Conciliation (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), 5,Google Scholar

Cárdenas, E. and Rivkin, D. W., ‘A Growing Challenge for Ethics in International Arbitration’, in Aksen, G., Böckstiegel, K. -H., Mustill, M. J., Patocchi, P. M. and Whitesell, A. -M. (eds.), Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner (Paris: ICC Publishing, 2005), 199.Google Scholar

Craig, W. L., Park, W. W. and Paulsson, J., International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration, 3rd ed. (Dobbs Ferry: Oceana, 2000), 215.Google Scholar

Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. & Vivendi Universal S.A. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/03/19, Decision on a Second Proposal for the Disqualification of a Member of the Arbitral Tribunal (12 May 2008), para. 44.

Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v Continental Casualty Co. (1968) 393 US 145

AT&T Corporation and Lucent Technologies Inc v Saudi Cable Company [2000] EWCA Civ 154

Svea Court of Appeal has taken a similar approach to the English court in a judgment of 7 December 2006, The Rappler Invest v TNK Trade Case, Svea Court of Appeal, Sweden, Case No T5004–04

Poudret, J. -F. and Besson, S., Comparative Law of International Arbitration, 2nd ed. (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2007), 362.Google Scholar

Ball, M., ‘Probity Deconstructed: How Helpful, Really, Are the New International Bar Association Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration?’, Arbitration International, 21(3) (2005), 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar