Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and acknowledgments
- 1 The money debate and American political development
- 2 Party politics and the financial debate, 1865–1896
- 3 Greenbacks versus gold: The contest over finance in the 1870s
- 4 The “people's money”: Greenbackism in North Carolina, Illinois, and Massachusetts
- 5 The battle of the standards: The financial debate of the 1890s
- 6 Populism and the politics of finance in North Carolina, Illinois, and Massachusetts in the 1890s
- 7 Money, history, and American political development
- Appendix A Financial terms used between the Civil War and 1896
- Appendix B Major banking and currency legislation, 1860 to 1900
- Appendix C An antimonopolist reading of L. Frank Baum's The Wonderful Wizard of Oz
- Index
6 - Populism and the politics of finance in North Carolina, Illinois, and Massachusetts in the 1890s
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 March 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and acknowledgments
- 1 The money debate and American political development
- 2 Party politics and the financial debate, 1865–1896
- 3 Greenbacks versus gold: The contest over finance in the 1870s
- 4 The “people's money”: Greenbackism in North Carolina, Illinois, and Massachusetts
- 5 The battle of the standards: The financial debate of the 1890s
- 6 Populism and the politics of finance in North Carolina, Illinois, and Massachusetts in the 1890s
- 7 Money, history, and American political development
- Appendix A Financial terms used between the Civil War and 1896
- Appendix B Major banking and currency legislation, 1860 to 1900
- Appendix C An antimonopolist reading of L. Frank Baum's The Wonderful Wizard of Oz
- Index
Summary
“Can't you give me brains?” asked the Scarecrow. “You don't need them. You are learning something every day. A baby has brains, but it doesn't know much. Experience is the only thing that brings knowledge, and the longer you are on the earth, the more experience you are sure to get.”
The Wonderful Wizard of OzThe Populists and their allies spoke of themselves as participants in a revolution. It was a revolution against party dominance and against the power of money. Like their ancestors in the American Revolution, the rebels of the 1890s were not radical firebrands but conservatives seeking to restore the democratic promise of American life. Their greatest enemy was not Wall Street's financial elites, but the prejudices that divided them one from another – divisions of North against South, white against black, farmer against laborer, Democrat against Republican, Protestant against Catholic. That history has recorded Populism as a Southern, white, Protestant movement is testimony to the effectiveness of those divisions. But the effort was larger than this. It was an effort to unite producers of all persuasions in pursuit of an antimonopolist alternative. The failure of that effort contributed to the rise of a corporate capitalist economy and a narrowed democracy.
The subject of this chapter is the political geography and historical contingency of the regime shift of the 1890s. The three state cases first explored in Chapter 4 are returned to here.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Goldbugs and GreenbacksThe Antimonopoly Tradition and the Politics of Finance in America, 1865–1896, pp. 208 - 257Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1997