Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- 1 Introduction: Making a Difference
- 2 Refugees and Restrictionism: Armenian Women Immigrants to the USA in the Post-World War I Era
- 3 New Refugees?: Manly War Resisters Prevent An Asylum Crisis in the Netherlands, 1968-1973
- 4 A Gender-Blind Approach in Canadian Refugee Processes: Mexican Female Claimants in the New Refugee Narrative
- 5 Queer Asylum: us Policies and Responses to Sexual Orientation and Transgendered Persecution
- 6 Belonging and Membership: Postcolonial Legacies of Colonial Family Law in Dutch Immigration Policies
- 7 Blood Matters: Sarkozy’s Immigration Policies and Their Gendered Impact
- 8 Gender, Inequality and Integration: Swedish Policies on Migrant Incorporation and the Position of Migrant Women
- 9 Take off that Veil and Give Me Access To Your Body: an Analysis Of Danish Debates About Muslim Women’s Head and Body Covering
- 10 Multiculturalism, Dependent Residence Status and Honour Killings: Explaining Current Dutch Intolerance Towards Ethnic Minorities from a Gender Perspective (1960-2000)
- 11 Conclusion: Gender, Migration and Cross-Categorical Research
- About the Authors
- Other IMISCOE Research Titles
7 - Blood Matters: Sarkozy’s Immigration Policies and Their Gendered Impact
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2021
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- 1 Introduction: Making a Difference
- 2 Refugees and Restrictionism: Armenian Women Immigrants to the USA in the Post-World War I Era
- 3 New Refugees?: Manly War Resisters Prevent An Asylum Crisis in the Netherlands, 1968-1973
- 4 A Gender-Blind Approach in Canadian Refugee Processes: Mexican Female Claimants in the New Refugee Narrative
- 5 Queer Asylum: us Policies and Responses to Sexual Orientation and Transgendered Persecution
- 6 Belonging and Membership: Postcolonial Legacies of Colonial Family Law in Dutch Immigration Policies
- 7 Blood Matters: Sarkozy’s Immigration Policies and Their Gendered Impact
- 8 Gender, Inequality and Integration: Swedish Policies on Migrant Incorporation and the Position of Migrant Women
- 9 Take off that Veil and Give Me Access To Your Body: an Analysis Of Danish Debates About Muslim Women’s Head and Body Covering
- 10 Multiculturalism, Dependent Residence Status and Honour Killings: Explaining Current Dutch Intolerance Towards Ethnic Minorities from a Gender Perspective (1960-2000)
- 11 Conclusion: Gender, Migration and Cross-Categorical Research
- About the Authors
- Other IMISCOE Research Titles
Summary
In some countries, like Senegal, Ivory Coast, the two Congos, Togo, Madagascar and the Comoro Islands, 30% to 80% of family documents are fraudulent. Dans certains pays, comme le Sénégal, la Côte d’Ivoire, les deux Congo, le Togo, Madagascar ou les Comores, de 30 % à 80% des actes d’états civils sont frauduleux.
– Adrien GouteyronIntroduction
The quote that opens this chapter is from a Senate report published in June 2007. Part of a larger study on the administration of visa applications in French consulates, the report urges consulate agents to focus on the review of visa applications, outsourcing non-essential tasks to the private sector (en externalisant au secteur privé les tâches annexes). It also recommends that a common work culture be promoted across the various agencies in charge of controlling immigration in France. The average processing cost for a visa application is €35, concludes Gouteyron, while the average cost for the deportation of an illegal immigrant can reach €1,800. By suggesting that a streamlined and more efficient processing of visa applications would result in a higher rejection rate and savings in the long term, the report clearly places the management of visa applications within the broad politics of immigration control urged by the Sarkozy administration. Nicolas Sarkozy campaigned on a political platform that called for the tightening of immigration policies and promotion of ‘chosen’ migration (immigration choisie), which favours economic migration over family reunification. The 2007 immigration law made good on both promises.
The passage above was drawn from a section of the report titled ‘Document Fraud: An Endemic Problem’ (La fraude documentaire, un phénomène endémique) and has been widely quoted to justify and legitimise the use of genetic testing in the context of immigration. By documenting that some countries are prone to produce fraudulent and unreliable civil documents – in this case, African countries that were part of France's former colonial empire – Gouteyron provided the argument that would enable French legislators to target certain immigrants and ‘offer’ them differential treatment in the visa application process.
This chapter analyses the 2007 immigration law and its introduction of DNA testing as a move toward the re-inscription of ‘blood’ and ‘bloodlines’ into discussions of national belonging in France. This move is neither new nor exceptional within the French republican tradition.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Gender, Migration and CategorisationMaking Distinctions between Migrants in Western Countries, 1945-2010, pp. 175 - 192Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2013