Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- List of Contributors
- Foreword by The Hon Sir Anthony Mason AC KBE: Human Rights and Courts
- INTRODUCTION
- SETTING THE SCENE
- CONTEMPORARY FREEDOM OF RELIGION ISSUES
- COMPARATIVE EXPERIENCE WITH FREEDOM OF RELIGION
- TABLE OF LEGISLATION AND INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS
- INDEX
Foreword by The Hon Sir Anthony Mason AC KBE: Human Rights and Courts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- List of Contributors
- Foreword by The Hon Sir Anthony Mason AC KBE: Human Rights and Courts
- INTRODUCTION
- SETTING THE SCENE
- CONTEMPORARY FREEDOM OF RELIGION ISSUES
- COMPARATIVE EXPERIENCE WITH FREEDOM OF RELIGION
- TABLE OF LEGISLATION AND INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS
- INDEX
Summary
The Australian Constitution contains no guarantee of freedom of religion or freedom of conscience. Indeed, it contains very few provisions dealing with rights — in essence, it is a Constitution that confines itself mainly to prescribing a framework for federal government, setting out the various powers of government and limiting them as between federal and state governments and the three branches of government without attempting to define the rights of citizens except in minor respects.
Section 116 of the Constitution merits mention not only because it has been wrongly said, during the course of debate, that properly understood it guarantees freedom of religion. Properly understood, it does no such thing. It prohibits the Commonwealth from:
establishing any religion
imposing any religious observance
prohibiting the free exercise of any religion
requiring any religious test as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.
Because s 116 does not apply to state laws, it provides no protection against state laws interfering with religion. Further, the High Court of Australia has interpreted the provision narrowly. While it is distinctly possible that the High Court could revise its view that s 116 is not infringed by a Commonwealth law whose effect, as distinct from its purpose, is to establish or prohibit a religion or impose a religious observance, there is nothing at this time to support the view that the other shortcomings of the section can or will be overcome.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Freedom of Religion under Bills of Rights , pp. xi - xxivPublisher: The University of Adelaide PressPrint publication year: 2012