Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: What is film-philosophy?
- I WHAT IS CINEMA?
- 1 Hugo Münsterberg
- 2 Vilém Flusser
- 3 Siegfried Kracauer
- 4 Theodor Adorno
- 5 Antonin Artaud
- 6 Henri Bergson
- 7 Maurice Merleau-Ponty
- 8 Emmanuel Levinas
- 9 André Bazin
- 10 Roland Barthes
- II POLITICS OF THE CINEMATIC CENTURY
- III CINEMATIC NATURE
- Filmography
- Bibliography
- Index
10 - Roland Barthes
from I - WHAT IS CINEMA?
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: What is film-philosophy?
- I WHAT IS CINEMA?
- 1 Hugo Münsterberg
- 2 Vilém Flusser
- 3 Siegfried Kracauer
- 4 Theodor Adorno
- 5 Antonin Artaud
- 6 Henri Bergson
- 7 Maurice Merleau-Ponty
- 8 Emmanuel Levinas
- 9 André Bazin
- 10 Roland Barthes
- II POLITICS OF THE CINEMATIC CENTURY
- III CINEMATIC NATURE
- Filmography
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Roland Barthes (1915–80) studied Classsical Letters at the Sorbonne, Paris, from 1935 to 1939. Ill health kept him out of military service during the war. He taught at a number of institutes until 1977, when he began at the Collège de France in Paris (on the proposal of Michel Foucault) as the Chair of Literary Semiology from 1977. His works include Writing Degree Zero (1953; English trans. 1968), Mythologies (1957; English trans. 1972), Criticism and Truth (1966; English trans. 1987), his famous essay “The Death of the Author” (1967), Empire of Signs (1970; English trans. 1982), S/Z (1970; English trans. 1974), A Lover's Discourse (1977; English trans. 1979) and Camera Lucida (1980; English trans. 1981).
Given Roland Barthes' deep distrust of bourgeois myths and their attendant orthodoxies, as well as his committed belief that the ostensible author of a given work is merely the contingent effect of a braid of separate texts, any attempt to systematically define his writings on film as a coherent body of work is inevitably doomed to failure. For better or worse, Barthes was an intellectual flâneur who persistently “wrote” (and “rewrote”) his often “erotic” passion for literature, theatre, music, advertising, pop culture and photography into a unique phenomenonology of both textual and somatic excess whereby he reversed the syntagmatic order of Maurice Merleau-Ponty's famous dictum in Phenomenology of Perception, “The theory of perception is already the theory of the body” (1989: 181).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Film, Theory and PhilosophyThe Key Thinkers, pp. 109 - 118Publisher: Acumen PublishingPrint publication year: 2009