Introduction

In the previous chapters, we identified that social and political change provides an essential foundation for how social work has developed, and how social workers are able (or perhaps unable) to act, in different places. This was indicated by the views and experiences of the key informant social workers and social work educators whom I have quoted in Chapters 1 and 2. Taking an anthropological perspective towards social work itself surely requires exploring contexts and chronology, especially in terms of changing professional and policy discourses.

Following up on these themes as expressed in published research and other documentary sources in this chapter (see, for example, University of Warwick, 2012; Burnham, 2011; Burnham, 2012), Harris (2008: 663, emphasis added), for example, sets out to counter:

For an anthropologist, the suggestion that social work inevitably has a contingent nature is an interesting and, I believe, useful starting point when examining policy and legislative issues and changes. My own gradual introduction to ‘social work’ in different places and times after 1990 also leads me to think that whether following up on social work education, ‘socialisation’, actions and ‘interventions’, or even social work ‘values’, I have not always and everywhere been walking along exactly ‘the same’ paths. Furthermore, while sometimes exciting, these experiences could also lead me personally into misunderstandings, wrong-footedness and insecurities. I think that social workers themselves (and those who come into contact with them) must also experience similar uncertainties, unless these changes can perhaps be anticipated and accommodated, ‘being aware of the constraints and contradictions’ can thus be seen as a strength rather than a weakness, as Dickens (2011) suggested earlier.