Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T09:54:59.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2021

Denis Feeney
Introduction by
Stephen Hinds
Denis Feeney
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Stephen Hinds
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Explorations in Latin Literature , pp. 374 - 401
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S.A. 2012. Callimachus in Context: From Plato to the Augustan Poets. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, J. 1973. The Common Liar: An Essay on Antony and Cleopatra. New Haven, CT and LondonGoogle Scholar
Ahl, F.M. 1976. Lucan: An Introduction. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Ahl, F.M. . 1985. Metaformations: Soundplay and Wordplay in Ovid and Other Classical Poets. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, M. von 1964. Silius Italicus: Freiheit und Gebundenheit römischer Epik. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, M. von . 1967. ‘Vergils Geschichtsauffassung in der <<Heldenschau>>’, WS NF 1: 156–82Google Scholar
Alfonsi, L. 1955. ‘Precedenti dell’incontro di Enea ed Anchise’, Aevum 29: 375–6Google Scholar
Allen, D.C. 1970. Mysteriously Meant: The Rediscovery of Pagan Symbolism and Allegorical Interpretation in the Renaissance. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Ampolo, C. 1988. ‘La nascità della città’, in Momigliano, A. and Schiavone, A. (eds.), Storia di Roma. Turin. 1.153–80Google Scholar
Anderson, A.R. 1928. ‘Heracles and his successors: a study of a heroic ideal and the recurrence of a heroic type’, HSPh 39: 7–58Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W.S. 1957. ‘Vergil’s second Iliad’, TAPhA 88: 17–30Google Scholar
Ando, C. 1999. ‘Was Rome a polis?’, ClAnt 18: 5–34Google Scholar
Ando, C. . 2000. Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Ando, C. . 2002. ‘Vergil’s Italy: Ethnography and Politics in First-Century Rome’, in Levene, D.S. and Nelis, D.P. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Leiden. 123–42Google Scholar
Ando, C. . 2015. Roman Social Imaginaries: Language and Thought in Contexts of Empire. TorontoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, C. . 2016. ‘Making Romans: citizens, subjects, and subjectivity in Republican Empire’, in Lavan, Payne and Weisweiler (2016), 169–86Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1981. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. . 1982. ‘Plato’s myths of judgement’, Phronesis 27: 119–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appiah, K.A. 2018. The Lies that Bind: Rethinking Identity, Creed, Country, Color, Class, Culture. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Aresi, L. forthcoming. ‘Fama storica e fama poetica: Livio e Ovidio alle prese con il mito di Roma’, Rivista di cultura classica e medioevaleGoogle Scholar
Arnim, H. von. 1898. Leben und Werke des Dio von Prusa. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Ashby, T. 1927. The Roman Campagna in Classical Times. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Atkins, J.W. 2013. Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Laws. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, J.W. . 2018. Roman Political Thought. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Austin, R.G. 1955. P. Vergilii Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Austin, R.G. . 1971. P. Vergilii Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Austin, R.G. . 1977. P. Vergilii Maronis Aeneidos Liber Sextus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C. 1935. Religion in Virgil. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C. . 1947. T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Baker, R.J. 1982. ‘Sallustian silence’, Latomus 41: 801–2Google Scholar
Balsdon, J.P.V.D. 1962. Roman Women: Their History and Habits. LondonGoogle Scholar
Bannet, E.T. 1993. Postcultural Theory: Critical Theory after the Marxist Paradigm. Basingstoke and LondonGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1984. La traccia del modello: effetti omerici nella narrazione virgiliana. Pisa = 2015. Homeric Effects in Vergil’s Narrative, tr. I. Marchesi and M. Fox. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1989. ‘Voci e istanze narrative nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio’, MD 23: 55–97Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1991. ‘Discordant Muses’, PCPhS 37: 1–21Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1994. Il poeta e il principe: Ovidio e il discorso augusteo. RomeGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1996. ‘La guerra di Troia non avrà luogo: il proemio dell’Achilleide di Stazio’, AION(filol) 18: 45–62Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1997a. The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley, CA. Translation of Barchiesi (1994)Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1997b. ‘Endgames: Ovid’s Metamorphoses 15 and Fasti 6’, in Roberts, D.H., Dunn, F.M. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ. 181–208Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1999. ‘Venus’ masterplot: Ovid and the Homeric Hymns’, in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds (1999). 112–26Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2000. ‘Rituals in ink: Horace on the Greek lyric tradition’, in Depew and Obbink (2000). 167–82Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2001a. ‘The crossing’, in Harrison, S.J. (ed.), Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature. Oxford. 142–63Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2001b. Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets, tr. M. Fox and S. Marchesi. LondonGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2002. ‘The uniqueness of the Carmen Saeculare and its tradition’, in Woodman, A.J. and Feeney, D. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. Cambridge. 107–23Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2005a. ‘Masculinity in the 90’s: the education of Achilles in Statius and Quintilian’, in Paschalis, M. (ed.), Roman and Greek Imperial Epic. Rethymnon. 47–75Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2005b. Ovidio: Metamorfosi Volume I (Libri I–II). RomeGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2008. ‘Bellum Italicum: l’unificazione dell’Italia nell’Eneide’, in Urso, G. (ed.), Patria diversis gentibus una? Unità politica e identità etniche nell’Italia antica. Atti del convegno internazionale, Cividale del Friuli, 20–22 settembre 2007. Pisa. 243–60Google Scholar
Bardon, H. and Verdière, R. (eds.). 1971. Vergiliana: Recherches sur Virgile. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, L. 1986. The Gods Made Flesh: Metamorphosis and the Pursuit of Paganism. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Barker, A. 1949. ‘Structural pattern in Paradise Lost’, PhQ 28: 17–30Google Scholar
Barker, E. 1946. The Politics of Aristotle. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. 2007. ‘The odd couple’ (review of Tombs and Tombs (2007)), The New York Review of Books, 29 March. 4–9Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 1997. ‘Romanization: a critical comment’, in Mattingly, D.J. (ed.), Dialogues in Roman Imperialism: Power, Discourse, and Discrepant Experiences in the Roman Empire. Portsmouth, RI. 51–64Google Scholar
Barrett, W.S. 1964. Euripides: Hippolytus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. 1957. Mythologies. ParisGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. . 1972. Mythologies, tr. A. Lavers. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1998. ‘Ars and the man: the politics of art in Virgil’s Aeneid’, CPh 93: 322–42Google Scholar
Basanoff, V. 1947. Evocatio. Étude d’un rituel militaire romain. ParisGoogle Scholar
Bassett, E. 1966. ‘Hercules and the hero of the Punica’, in Wallach, L. (ed.), The Classical Tradition: Literary and Historical Studies in Honor of Harry Caplan. Ithaca, NY. 258–73Google Scholar
Bayet, J. 1926. Les Origines de l’Hercule romain. ParisGoogle Scholar
Beard, M. 1991. Review of Scheid (1990), TLS (25 October 1991), 7Google Scholar
Beard, M., North, J. and Price, S. 1998. Religions of Rome, 2 vols. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Beaujeu, J. 1954. ‘Le mariage d’Énée et de Didon’, RdN 36: 115–19Google Scholar
Beck, D. 2014. ‘The first simile of the Aeneid’, Vergilius 60: 67–83Google Scholar
Bell, C. 1992. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Bell, C. . 1997. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendlin, A. 2006. ‘Nicht der Eine, nicht die Vielen. Zur Pragmatik religiösen Verhaltens in einer polytheistischen Gesellschaft am Beispiel Roms’, in Kratz, R.G. and Spieckermann, H. (eds.), Götterbilder, Gottesbilder, Weltbilder: Polytheismus and Monotheismus in der Welt der Antike. Tübingen. 2.279–311Google Scholar
Beni, P. 1607. Comparatione di Homero, Virgilio e Torquato. PaduaGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, W. 1968. Illuminations, tr. H. Zohn. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. 1711. Q. Horatius Flaccus. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, E. 1973. Indo-European Language and Society, tr. E. Palmer. LondonGoogle Scholar
Bernadete, S. 1963. ‘Achilles and the Iliad’, Hermes 91: 1–16Google Scholar
Bethe, E. 1899. ‘Choirilos von Samos’, RE 6: 2359–61Google Scholar
Beye, C.R. 1982. Epic and Romance in the Argonautica of Apollonius. Carbondale, ILGoogle Scholar
Bispham, E. 2007. From Asculum to Actium: The Municipalization of Italy from the Social War to Augustus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Blessington, F.C. 1979. ‘Paradise Lost’ and the Classical Epic. LondonGoogle Scholar
Bloch, M. 1989. Ritual, History and Power: Selected Papers in Anthropology. LondonGoogle Scholar
Bloch, R. 1972. ‘Héra, Uni, Junon en Italie centrale’, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres: 384–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, E. 1981. The Effects of Divine Manifestation on the Reader’s Perspective in Vergil’s Aeneid. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, M.W. 1975. ‘The problem of the hero in the later medieval period’, in Burns and Reagan (1975). 27–48Google Scholar
Bömer, F. 1957–8. P. Ovidius Naso: Die Fasten, 2 vols. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Bömer, F. . 1969–86. P. Ovidius Naso: Metamorphosen, 7 vols. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Bond, G.W. 1981. Euripides: Heracles. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Bonjour, M. 1975a. Terre natale: études sur une composante affective du patriotisme romain. ParisGoogle Scholar
Bonjour, M. . 1975b. ‘Les personnages féminins et la terre natale dans l’épisode de Coriolan (Liv., 2, 40)’, REL 53: 157–81Google Scholar
Bowra, C.M. 1945. From Virgil to Milton. LondonGoogle Scholar
Boyancé, P. 1936. Études sur le songe de Scipion. ParisGoogle Scholar
Boyancé, P. . 1963. La Religion de Virgile. ParisGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A.J. 1972. ‘The meaning of the Aeneid: a critical inquiry. Part 1: Empire and the individual: an examination of the Aeneid’s major theme’, Ramus 1: 63–90Google Scholar
Bradley, G. 2006. ‘Colonization and identity in Republic Italy’, in Bradley, G. and Wilson, J.-P. (eds.), Greek and Roman Colonization: Origins, Ideologies and Interactions. Swansea. 161–87Google Scholar
Bramble, J.C. 1982. ‘Lucan’, in CHCL 2: 533–57Google Scholar
Brand, C.P. 1965. Torquato Tasso: A Study of the Poet and of his Contribution to English Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.). 2003. Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T.P. Wiseman. ExeterGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, J.N. 2006. ‘Atheism in antiquity’, in Martin, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge. 11–26Google Scholar
Briggs, W.W., Jr. 1980. Narrative and Simile from the Georgics in the Aeneid. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Bright, D.F. 1981. ‘Aeneas’ other Nekuia’, Vergilius 27: 40–7Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. 1971. ‘The first decade’, in Dorey, T.A. (ed.), Livy. London and Toronto. 1–20Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. . 1973. A Commentary on Livy, Books XXXI–XXXIII. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. 1984. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Brown, P.M. 1984. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura I. BristolGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. 1987. ‘The palace of the sun in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Whitby, Hardie and Whitby (1987). 211–20Google Scholar
Brown, R. . 1995. ‘Livy’s Sabine women and the ideal of Concordia’, TAPhA 125: 291–319Google Scholar
Brunner, T. 1966. ‘The function of the simile in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, CJ 61: 354–63Google Scholar
Bruster, D. 2003. Shakespeare and the Question of Culture: Early Modern Literature and the Cultural Turn. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1963. Vergil über die Sendung Roms. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. . 1974. ‘Junos Wandel zum Guten’, Gymnasium 81: 498–503Google Scholar
Büchner, K. 1958. ‘P. Vergilius Maro’, RE 2R 16: 1266–486Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. and Phillips, T. (eds.). 2018. Textual Events: Performance and the Lyric in Early Greece. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Buffière, F. 1956. Les Mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque. ParisGoogle Scholar
Buffière, F. . 1962. Allégories d’Homère: Héraclite. ParisGoogle Scholar
Burbank, J. and Cooper, F. 2010. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Burck, E. 1964. ‘Aktuelle Probleme der Livius-Interpretation’, Gymnasium Beiheft 4: 21–46Google Scholar
Burck, E. . 1992. Das Geschichtswerk des Titus Livius. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Burden, M. (ed.) 1998. A Woman Scorn’d: Responses to the Dido Myth. LondonGoogle Scholar
Burke, P.F. 1979. ‘Roman rites for the dead and Aeneid 6’, CJ 74: 220–8Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1983. Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth, tr. P. Bing. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Burkert, W. . 1985. Greek Religion: Archaic and Classical, tr. J. Raffan. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Burns, N.T. and Reagan, C.J. (eds.). 1975. Concepts of the Hero in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
Busetto, A. 2017. ‘The idea of cosmopolitanism from its origins to the 21st century’, in Cecchet and Busetto (2017). 302–17Google Scholar
Buxton, R.G.A. 1981. ‘Introduction’, in Gordon, R.L. (ed.), Myth, Religion and Society: Structuralist Essays by M. Detienne, L. Gernet, J.-P. Vernant & P. Vidal-Naquet. Cambridge. ix–xviiGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. 1989. Virgil’s Augustan Epic. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calame, C. 2003. Myth and History in Ancient Greece: The Symbolic Creation of a Colony, tr. D.W. Berman. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A. 1970. Claudian: Poetry and Propaganda at the Court of Honorius. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A. . 1995. Callimachus and his Critics. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Camps, W.A. 1969. An Introduction to Virgil’s Aeneid. LondonGoogle Scholar
Canetti, E. 1962. Crowds and Power, tr. C. Stewart. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, L. 2014. Law and Power in the Making of the Roman Commonwealth, tr. L. Kopp. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Carey, J. and Fowler, A. 1968. The Poems of John Milton. LondonGoogle Scholar
Carlà-Uhink, F. 2017a. The ‘Birth’ of Italy: The Institutionalization of Italy as a Region, 3rd–1st Century BCE. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Carlà-Uhink, F. . 2017b. ‘Caput mundi: Rome as center in Roman representation and construction of space’, AncSoc 47: 119–57Google Scholar
Carlà-Uhink, F. . 2017c. ‘Alteram loci patriam, alteram iuris: “double fatherlands” and the role of Italy in Cicero’s political discourse’, in Cecchet and Busetto (2017). 259–82Google Scholar
Carspecken, J.F. 1952. ‘Apollonius Rhodius and the Homeric epic’, YClS 13: 33–143Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. and Greenwood, E. 2002. ‘Herodotus as a critic: truth, fiction, polarity’, in Bakker, E.J., de Jong, I.J.F. and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus. Leiden. 351–71Google Scholar
Castelvetro, L. 1570. Aristoteles: Poetica. Vulgarizzata e sposta per Lodovico Castelvetro. VeniceGoogle Scholar
Castoriadis, C. 1975. L’Institution imaginaire de la société. ParisGoogle Scholar
Ceausescu, P. 1976. ‘Altera Roma: histoire d’une folie politique’, Historia 25: 79–108Google Scholar
Cecchet, L. and Busetto, A. (eds.) 2017. Citizens in the Graeco-Roman World: Aspects of Citizenship from the Archaic Period to AD 212. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Chaplin, J. and Kraus, C.S. (eds.). 2009. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Livy. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.A. 2004. History, Theory, Text: Historians and the Linguistic Turn. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Clark, R.J. 1979. Catabasis: Vergil and the Wisdom-Tradition. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. 1949. ‘Rhetorical influences in the Aeneid’, G&R 18: 14–27Google Scholar
Clausen, W.V. 1964. ‘An interpretation of the Aeneid’, HSPh 68: 139–47Google Scholar
Clay, J.S. 1983. The Wrath of Athena: Gods and Men in the Odyssey. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Coby, P. 1999. Machiavelli’s Romans: Liberty and Greatness in the Discourses on Livy. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Coleman, R.R. 1982. ‘The gods in the Aeneid’, G&R 29: 143–68Google Scholar
Combet-Farnoux, B. 1980. Mercure romain: le culte public de Mercure et la fonction mercantile à Rome de la République archaïque à l’époque augustéenne. RomeGoogle Scholar
Commager, S. 1962. The Odes of Horace: A Critical Study. New Haven, CT and LondonGoogle Scholar
Conington, J. 1881–4. The Works of Virgil, with a Commentary4, rev. H. Nettleship, 3 vols. LondonGoogle Scholar
Connolly, J. 2007. The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Connolly, J. . 2014. The Life of Roman Republicanism. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Conte, G.B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, trans. varii, ed. Segal, C.. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Conte, G.B. . 1994a. Latin Literature: A History, tr. J.B. Solodow, rev. D. Fowler and G. Most. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Conte, G.B. . 1994b. Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia, tr. G.W. Most. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Conway, R.S. 1935. P. Vergilii Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Cornell, T.J. 1978. Review of Wardman (1976), CR 28: 110–12Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. . 1991. ‘Rome: history of an anachronism’, in Molho, A., Raaflaub, K. and Emlen, J. (eds.), City-States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy. Ann Arbor, MI. 53–69Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. . 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 BC). LondonGoogle Scholar
Cornell, T.J. . 1997. ‘Ethnicity as a factor in early Roman history’, in Cornell, T. J. and Lomas, K. (eds.), Gender and Ethnicity in Ancient Italy. London. 9–21Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. . 2000. ‘The city-state in Latium’, in Hansen, M.H. (ed.), A Comparative Study of Thirty City-State Cultures. Copenhagen. 209–28Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. . 2003. ‘Coriolanus: myth, history and performance’, in Braund and Gill (2003). 73–97Google Scholar
Coudry, M. 2001. ‘Camille: construction et fluctuations de la figure d’un grand homme’, in Coudry and Späth (2001). 47–81Google Scholar
Coudry, M. and Späth, T. (eds.). 2001. L’Invention des grands hommes de la Rome antique/Die Konstruktion der großen Männer Altroms. ParisGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R.W. 2002. ‘In my Beginning is my End’: Origins, Cities, and Foundations in Flavian Epic. Diss. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Croisille, J.M. 1985. ‘Remarques sur l’épisode troyen dans les Métamorphoses d’Ovide (Met., XII–XIII, 1–622)’, in Frécaut, J.M. and Porte, D. (eds.), Journées Ovidiennes de Parménie, Coll. Latomus vol. 189. Brussels. 57–81Google Scholar
Crusius, O. 1899. ‘Choirilos’, RE 6: 2361–3Google Scholar
Csapo, E. 2000. ‘From Aristophanes to Menander? Genre transformation in Greek comedy’, in Depew and Obbink (2000). 115–33Google Scholar
Currie, B. 2016. Homer’s Allusive Art. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Cyrino, M.S. 1998. ‘Heroes in d(u)ress: transvestism and power in the myths of Herakles and Achilles’, Arethusa 31: 207–41Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. 1935. ‘M. Terentius Varro’, RE Suppl. 6: 1173–277Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. . 1954. Der Bienenstaat in Vergils Georgica. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, W. 2002. White Mughals: Love and Betrayal in Eighteenth-Century India. LondonGoogle Scholar
Davies, J.P. 2004. Rome’s Religious History: Livy, Tacitus and Ammianus on their Gods. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. 1981. ‘The judgement of Paris and Iliad Book XXIV’, JHS 101: 56–62Google Scholar
Davies, M. and Kathirithamby, J. 1986. Greek Insects. OxfordGoogle Scholar
de Beauvoir, S. 1960. The Mandarins, tr. L.M. Friedman. LondonGoogle Scholar
De Sanctis, G. 1907/1960. Storia dei Romani I–II: la conquista del primato in Italia. Turin1; Florence (1960)2Google Scholar
De Witt, N.W. 1907. The Dido Episode in the Aeneid of Virgil. Diss. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
De Witt, N.W. . 1920. ‘An interpretation of Horace Odes III.3’, CR 34: 65–6Google Scholar
Dench, E. 2005. Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.). 2000. Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Derow, P.S. and Forrest, W.G. 1982. ‘An inscription from Chios’, ABSA 77: 79–92Google Scholar
Desideri, F. 1967. ‘Studi di storiografia eracleota’, SCO 16: 366–416Google Scholar
Diamond, J. 1997. Guns, Germs and Steel: A Short History of Everybody for the Last 13,000 Years. LondonGoogle Scholar
Dilke, O.A.W. 1954. Statius: Achilleid. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Dillery, J. 2005. ‘Greek sacred history’, AJPh 126: 505–26Google Scholar
Döring, K. 1978. ‘Antike Theorien über die staatspolitische Notwendigkeit der Götterfurcht’, A&A 24: 43–56Google Scholar
Douglas, A.E. 1961–2. ‘The realism of Vergil’, PVS 1: 15–24Google Scholar
Due, O.S. 1962. ‘An essay on Lucan’, C&M 23: 68–132Google Scholar
Due, O.S. . 1974. Changing Forms: Studies in the Metamorphoses of Ovid. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Dumézil, G. 1974. La Religion romaine archaïque. ParisGoogle Scholar
Dyson, J.T. 1996. ‘Caesi iuuenci and pietas impia in Virgil’, CJ 91: 277–86Google Scholar
Earl, D.C. 1966. The Political Thought of Sallust. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Earl, D.C. . 1967. The Moral and Political Tradition of Rome. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Earl, D.C. . 1972. ‘Prologue-form in ancient historiography’, ANRW 1.2: 842–56Google Scholar
Eckstein, A.M. 2009. Mediterranean Anarchy, Interstate War, and the Rise of Rome. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I.G. 1972–88. Posidonius, 3 vols. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, R.J.E. 2001. ‘Ascanius’ mother’, Hermes 129: 246–50Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1996. Writing Rome: Textual Approaches to the City. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Elftmann, G. 1979. ‘Aeneas in his prime: distinctions in age and the loneliness of adulthood in Vergil’s Aeneid’, Arethusa 12: 175–202Google Scholar
Elioseff, L.E. 1963. The Cultural Milieu of Addison’s Literary Criticism. Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
Eliot, George. 1967. Daniel Deronda. HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J. 2013. Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Ellsworth, J.D. 1988. ‘The episode of the Sibyl in Ovid’s Metamorphoses (14.103–56)’, in Hadlich, R.L. and Ellsworth, J.D. (eds.), East Meets West: Homage to Edgar C. Knowlton, Jr. Honolulu: 47–55Google Scholar
Elmer, D.F. 2013. The Poetics of Consent: Collective Decision Making and the Iliad. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Elsner, J. 1991. ‘Cult and sculpture: sacrifice in the Ara Pacis Augustae’, JRS 81: 50–61Google Scholar
Elter, A. 1907. Donarem Pateras … Horat. Carm. 4,8. BonnGoogle Scholar
Erskine, A. 2001. Troy Between Greece and Rome: Local Tradition and Imperial Power. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fanning, M.W. 1933. Maphei Vegii Laudensis De Educatione Liberorum et Eorum Claris Moribus. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 1979. ‘Statius’ Achilleid and his Trojan model’, CQ 29: 457–62Google Scholar
Fantham, E. . 1992. ‘Ceres, Liber and Flora: Georgic and anti-georgic elements in Ovid’s Fasti’, PCPhS 38: 39–56Google Scholar
Fantham, E. . 1998. Ovid: Fasti Book IV. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Farney, G.D. 2007. Ethnic Identity and Aristocratic Competition in Republican Rome. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Farney, G.D. . 2014. ‘Romans and Italians’, in McInerney (2014). 437–54Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 1991. Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. . 2001. Latin Language and Latin Culture from Ancient to Modern Times. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Farron, S.G. 1979–80. ‘The Roman invention of evil’, Studies in Antiquity 1: 12–46Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 2003. Review of Depew and Obbink (2000), JRS 93: 337–9Google Scholar
Feeney, D. . 2007. Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Times and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 2016. Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 2017. Review of Wiseman (2015), Gnomon 89: 412–18Google Scholar
Feger, R. 1956. ‘T. Pomponius Atticus’, RE Suppl. 8: 503–26Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1997. ‘Metamorphosis and sacrifice in Ovid’s Theban narrative’, MD 38: 25–55Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. . 1998. Spectacle and Society in Livy’s History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. . 2002. ‘Stepping out of the ring: repetition and sacrifice in the boxing match in Aeneid 5’, in Levene, D.S. and Nelis, D.P. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Leiden. 61–79Google Scholar
Fenik, B.C. 1960. The influence of Euripides on Vergil’s Aeneid. Diss. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Finsler, G. 1912. Homer in der Neuzeit von Dante bis Goethe. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Flemming, R. 2000. Medicine and the Making of Roman Women: Gender, Nature, and Authority from Celsus to Galen. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, F. 1941. Virgil: Aeneid VI. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, K.F.B. 2014. Finding Italy: Travel, Nation and Colonization in Vergil’s Aeneid. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Flexner, A. 2017. The Usefulness of Useless Knowledge, with a Companion Essay by Robbert Dijkgraaf. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Flower, M.A. 1994. Theopompus of Chios: History and Rhetoric in the Fourth Century BC. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Flower, M.A. and Marincola, J. 2002. Herodotus: Histories Book IX. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Foley, H.P. 1978. ‘“Reverse similes” and sex roles in the Odyssey’, Arethusa 11: 7–26Google Scholar
Foote, S. 1958–74. The Civil War, a Narrative, 3 vols. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. 1992. Homer: The Poetry of the Past. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Fornara, C.W. 1983. The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, G. 1999. Livy and Early Rome: A Study in Historical Method and Judgment. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A. 1982. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. 1987. ‘Vergil on killing virgins’, in Whitby, Hardie and Whitby (1987). 185–98Google Scholar
Fowler, D. . 2000. Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. . 2002. Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura Book Two, Lines 1–332. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R.L. 2004. ‘The Homeric question’, in Fowler, R.L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge. 220–32Google Scholar
Fowler, R.L. . 2012. ‘Written work,’ TLS (16 March 2012), 28Google Scholar
Fowler, W.W. 1916. Virgil’s ‘Gathering of the Clans,’ Being Observations on Aeneid VII.601–817. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1949. Review of E.K. Rand et al. (eds.), Servianorum in Vergilii Carmina Commentariorum Editionis Harvardianae II, JRS 39: 145–54Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. . 1957. Horace. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1968. Noten zu den Argonautica des Apollonios. MunichGoogle Scholar
Frazer, J.G. 1921. Apollodorus: The Library, Volume I: Books 1–3.9. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Friedlaender, L. 1919. Darstellungen aus der Sittengeschichte Roms: in der Zeit von August bis zum Ausgang der Antonine9. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Friedländer, P. 1941. ‘Pattern of sound and atomistic theory in Lucretius’, AJPh 62: 16–34Google Scholar
Friedrich, Wolf-H. 1941. ‘Zur altlateinischen Dichtung’, Hermes 76: 113–35Google Scholar
Frye, N. 1957. Anatomy of Criticism; Four Essays. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, H. 1938. Der geistige Widerstand gegen Rom in der antiken Welt. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Fürstenau, G. 1916. De Silii Italici imitatione quae fertur Enniana. Diss. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Gabba, E. 1991. Dionysius and the History of Archaic Rome. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Gaertner, J.F. 2008. ‘Livy’s Camillus and the political discourse of the late Republic’, JRS 98: 27–52Google Scholar
Gale, M. 1994. Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. . 2000. Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. . 2007. ‘Lucretius and previous poetic traditions’, in Hardie, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge. 59–75Google Scholar
Galinsky, G.K. 1972. The Herakles Theme: Adaptations of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, G.K. . 1996. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, C. and Greenblatt, S. 2000. Practicing New Historicism. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Garner, R. 1990. From Homer to Tragedy: The Art of Allusion in Greek Poetry. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Gasser, F. 1999. Germana Patria: Die Geburtsheimat in den Werken römischer Autoren der späten Republik und der frühen Kaiserzeit. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Geiger, J. 1985. Cornelius Nepos and Ancient Political Biography. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
George, E.V. 1974. Aeneid VIII and the Aitia of Callimachus. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Georgii, H. 1905–6. Ti. Claudii Donati Interpretationes Vergilianae, 2 vols. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Gerber, D.E. 1982. Pindar’s ‘Olympian One’: A Commentary. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Getty, R. 1940. Lucan: Pharsalia Book I. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Giardina, A. 1997. ‘L’identità incompiuta dell’Italia romana,’ in L’Italia romana. Storie di un’identità incompiuta. Rome and Bari. 3–116Google Scholar
Gildon, C. 1721. The Laws of Poetry. LondonGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. and Wiseman, T.P. (eds.). 2003. Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. ExeterGoogle Scholar
Gillis, D. 1983. Eros and Death in the Aeneid. RomeGoogle Scholar
Giraldi Cinzio, G.B. 1554. Discorso interno al comporre dei romanzi. VeniceGoogle Scholar
Gleason, M.W. 1995. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Glinski, M.L. von. 2012. Simile and Identity in Ovid’s ‘Metamorphoses’. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gödde, S. 2007. ‘οὔ μοι ὅσιόν ἐστι λέγειν: Zur Poetik der Leerstelle in Herodots Ägypten-Logos’, in Bierl, A., Lämmle, R., and Wesselmann, K. (eds.), Literatur und Religion: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen, vol. 2. Berlin and New York. 41–90Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1986. Reading Greek Tragedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. . 2002. The Invention of Prose. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Goodyear, F.R.D. 1972. The Annals of Tacitus: Volume I (Annals I. 1–54). CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Goodyear, F.R.D. . 1982. ‘Sallust’, in CHCL 2: 268–80Google Scholar
Gordon, R.L. 1990. ‘The veil of power: emperors, sacrificers and benefactors’, in Beard, M. and North, J. (eds.), Pagan Priests: Religion and Power in the Ancient World. Ithaca, NY. 199–231Google Scholar
Gossage, A.J. 1955. ‘Two implications of the Trojan legend’, G&R 2: 72–81Google Scholar
Gould, J. 1989. Herodotus. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Grafton, A.T. and Swerdlow, N.M. 1985. ‘Technical chronology and astrological history in Varro, Censorinus and others’, CQ 35: 454–65Google Scholar
Grafton, A.T. and Swerdlow, N.M. . 1986. ‘Greek chronology in Roman epic: the calendrical date of the fall of Troy in the Aeneid’, CQ 36: 212–18Google Scholar
Gransden, K.W. 1976. Virgil: Aeneid Book 8. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gratwick, A.S. 1982. ‘Ennius’ Annales’, in CHCL 2: 60–76Google Scholar
Greene, T. 1963. The Descent from Heaven: A Study in Epic Continuity. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. 1980. Homer on Life and Death. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. . 1985. Latin Poets and Roman Life. Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
Grimm, R.E. 1967. ‘Aeneas and Andromache in Aeneid 3’, AJPh 88: 151–62Google Scholar
Grimm, R.E. . 1969. ‘Point of view in Virgil’s Fourth Aeneid’, CW 63: 81–5Google Scholar
Gruen, E.S. 1990. Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Gruen, E.S. . 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Gruen, E.S. . 2013. ‘Did ancient identity depend on ethnicity? A preliminary probe’, Phoenix 67: 1–22Google Scholar
Gudeman, A. 1912. ‘Hellanikos von Lesbos’, RE 2R 15: 104–55Google Scholar
Guillemin, A. 1951. ‘L’Inspiration virgilienne dans la Pharsale’, REL 29: 214–27Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 1990. ‘Sacrifice, society, and Vergil’s ox-born bees’, in Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D.J. (eds.), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Atlanta, GA. 209–23Google Scholar
Habinek, T. . 2005. The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Hägin, P. 1964. The Epic Hero and the Decline of Heroic Poetry. BernGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. 1989. Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Definition Through Tragedy. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hallett, J.P. 1984. Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society: Women and the Elite Family. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Halter, T. 1963. Form und Gehalt in Vergils Aeneis. MunichGoogle Scholar
Hammer, D. 2008. Roman Political Thought and the Modern Theoretical Imagination. Norman, OKGoogle Scholar
Hammer, D. . 2014. Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Harari, Y.N. 2014. Sapiens: A Brief History of Mankind. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Hardie, A. 1983. Statius and the ‘Silvae’: Poets, Patrons and Epideixis in the Graeco-Roman World. LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. 1986. Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1990. ‘Ovid’s Theban history: the first “anti-Aeneid”?’, CQ 40: 224–35Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1991. ‘The Janus episode in Ovid’s Fasti’, MD 26: 47–64Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1994. Virgil: Aeneid Book IX. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1997. ‘Questions of authority: the invention of tradition in Ovid Metamorphoses 15’, in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution. Princeton, NJ: 182–98Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2009. Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2010. ‘Crowds and leaders in Imperial historiography and in epic’, in Miller, J. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.), Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions. Leiden. 9–27Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2012. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A. and Hinds, S. (eds.). 1999. Ovidian Transformations: Essays on Ovid’s Metamorphoses and its Reception. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Harrison, E.L. 1979. ‘The Noric plague in Vergil’s Third Georgic’, PLLS 2: 1–65Google Scholar
Harrison, E.L. . 1984. ‘Virgil’s Mercury’, Vergilius Suppl. Vol. 2: 1–47Google Scholar
Harrison, G.B. 1966. Ben Jonson: Discoveries 1641. Conversations with William Drummond of Hawthornden 1619. EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S.J. 1985. ‘Vergilian similes: some connections’, PLLS 5: 99–107Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. . 1988. ‘Vergil on kingship: the first simile of the Aeneid’, PCPhS 34: 55–9Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. . 1991. Vergil, Aeneid 10. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S.J. . 1996. ‘Aeneid 1.286: Julius Caesar or Augustus?’, PLLS 9: 127–33Google Scholar
Harrison, T. 2000. Divinity and History: The Religion of Herodotus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Häussler, R. 1978. Das historische Epos von Lucan bis Silius und seine Theorie: Studien zum historischen Epos der Antike. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Heinze, R. 1915. Virgils epische Technik3. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Heinze, R. . 1928. Vom Geist des Römertums. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Hellwig, A. 1973. Untersuchungen zur Theorie der Rhetorik bei Platon und Aristoteles. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. 1999. Writing Down Rome: Satire, Comedy, and Other Offences in Latin Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. . 2000. ‘The Camillus factory: per astra ad Ardeam’, Ramus 29: 1–26Google Scholar
Henry, J. 1873–92. Aeneidea, 4 vols. Dublin and LondonGoogle Scholar
Herrick, M.T. 1946. The Fusion of Horatian and Aristotelian Literary Criticism, 1531–1555. Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
Hershkowitz, D. 1991. ‘The Aeneid in Aeneid 3’, Vergilius 37: 69–76Google Scholar
Hershkowitz, D. . 1998. Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica: Abbreviated Voyages in Silver Latin Epic. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S. and Hainsworth, J.B. (eds.). 1988. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey. Volume I. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Heuzé, P. 1985. L’Image du corps dans l’oeuvre de Virgile. RomeGoogle Scholar
Highet, G. 1972. The Speeches in Vergil’s Aeneid. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Hill, G.B. 1905. Lives of the English Poets, by Samuel Johnson. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hillen, H.J. 2003. Von Aeneas zu Romulus: Die Legenden von der Gründung Roms. DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. 1985. ‘Booking the return trip: Ovid and Tristia 1’, PCPhS 31: 13–32Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1987. The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1999. ‘After exile: time and teleology from Metamorphoses to Ibis’, in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds (1999). 48–67Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 2000. ‘Essential epic: genre and gender from Macer to Statius’, in Depew and Obbink (2000). 221–44Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 2010. ‘Between formalism and historicism’, in Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies. Oxford. 369–85Google Scholar
Hine, H. 1987. ‘Aeneas and the arts (Vergil, Aeneid 6. 847–50)’, in Whitby, Hardie and Whitby (1987). 173–83Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T. (eds.). 1983. The Invention of Tradition. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Höistad, R. 1948. Cynic Hero and Cynic King: Studies in the Cynic Conception of Man. UppsalaGoogle Scholar
Holliday, V.L. 1969. Pompey in Cicero’s Correspondence and Lucan’s Civil War. The HagueGoogle Scholar
Holzberg, N. 1998. Ovid: Dichter und Werk. MunichGoogle Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2001. ‘Epic and epiphanies: Simonides and the “New Simonides”’, in Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.), The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford. 135–47Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. . 2018. Lykophron’s Alexandra, Rome, and the Hellenistic World. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hornblower, S. . 2019. ‘Livy, Busa the female benefactor, and the evidence of Delian epigraphy’, ZPE 210: 71–5Google Scholar
Hornsby, R.A. 1970. Patterns of Action in the Aeneid: An Interpretation of Vergil’s Epic Similes. Iowa City, IAGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. 1971. ‘Numanus Remulus: ethnography and propaganda in Aen. 9.598ff.’, Latomus 39: 1108–16Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1973–4. ‘Dido in the light of history’, PVS 12: 1–13Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1976. ‘Virgil, history and the Roman tradition’, Prudentia 8: 73–89Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1980. ‘Virgil, Varro’s Imagines and the Forum of Augustus’, AncSoc 10: 20–3Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1981. ‘Virgil and the conquest of chaos’, Antichthon 15: 141–50Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1982. ‘The structure and purpose of Virgil’s parade of heroes’, AncSoc 12: 12–18Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1989. Cornelius Nepos: A Selection, Including the Lives of Cato and Atticus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 2000. Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Houston, G.W. 2014. Inside Roman Libraries: Book Collections and their Management in Antiquity. Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
Hubaux, J. 1958. Rome et Véies: recherches sur la chronologie légendaire du moyen âge romain. ParisGoogle Scholar
Huber, L. 1965. ‘Herodots Homerverständnis’, in Flashar, H and Gaiser, K. (eds.), Synusia: Festgabe für Wolfgang Schadewaldt. Pfullingen. 29–52Google Scholar
Hügi, M. 1952. Vergils Aeneis und die hellenistische Dichtung. BernGoogle Scholar
Humbert, M. 1978. Municipium et civitas sine suffragio: l’organisation de la conquête jusqu’à la guerre sociale. RomeGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. 1993. The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. . 2006. The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. and Uhlig, A. (eds.). 2017. Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hutcheon, L. 1980. Narcissistic Narrative: The Metafictional Narrative. Waterloo, Ont.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. 2008. Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Huxley, G.L. 1969. Greek Epic Poetry from Eumelos to Panyassis. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Isayev, E. 2017. Migration, Mobility and Place in Ancient Italy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Jackson Knight, W.F. 1966. Roman Vergil2. LondonGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, F. 1902. Apollodors Chronik: Eine Sammlung der Fragmente. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, M. 1997. Livy’s Written Rome. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Jal, P. 1963. La Guerre civile à Rome. ParisGoogle Scholar
Jansen, L. (ed.). 2014. The Roman Paratext: Frame, Texts, Readers. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H.D. 1965. ‘Ancient scholarship and Virgil’s use of Republican Latin poetry. II (continued)’, CQ 15: 126–44Google Scholar
Johnson, W.A. and Parker, H.N. (eds.). 2009. Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.R. 1976. Darkness Visible. A Study of Vergil’s Aeneid. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. 1962. On Aristotle and Greek Tragedy. LondonGoogle Scholar
Jörgensen, O. 1904. ‘Das Auftreten der Götter in den Büchern ι—μ der Odyssee’, Hermes 39: 357–82Google Scholar
Kapust, D.J. 2011. Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kates, J.A. 1974. ‘The revaluation of the Classical heroic in Tasso and Milton’, CL 26: 299–317Google Scholar
Keith, A.M. 2000. Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. and Spelman, H. eds. forthcoming. Texts and Intertexts in Archaic and Classical Greece. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. 1993. The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G.A. 1963. The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G.A. . 1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E.J. 1958. ‘Nequitiae poeta’, in Herescu, N.I. (ed.), Ovidiana: Recherches sur Ovide. Paris. 201–9Google Scholar
Kenney, E.J. . 1971. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura. Book III. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E.J. . 1982. ‘Ovid’, in CHCL 2: 420–57Google Scholar
Ker, W.P. (ed.). 1900. Essays of John Dryden, 2 vols. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Kermode, F. 1983. Essays on Fiction: 1971–82. LondonGoogle Scholar
Kiessling, A. and Heinze, R. 1908–21. Horaz5, 3 vols. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G.S. 1985. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume I: Books 1–4. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G.S., Raven, J.E. and Schofield, M. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers2. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Klingner, F. 1967. Virgil. Bucolica, Georgica, Aeneis (Interpretation der Werke Virgils). ZürichGoogle Scholar
Knauer, G.N. 1964. Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils, mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Köhnken, A. 1974. ‘Pindar as innovator: Poseidon Hippios and the relevance of the Pelops story in Olympian 1’, CQ 24: 199–206Google Scholar
König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds.). 2013. Ancient Libraries. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. 2009. ‘Cosmopolitan traditions’, in Balot, R.K. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Oxford and Malden, MA. 471–84Google Scholar
Koortbojian, M. 2002. ‘A painted exemplum at Rome’s Temple of Liberty’, JRS 92: 33–48Google Scholar
Koster, S. 1970. Antike Epostheorien. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
Koster, S. . 1979. ‘Liebe und Krieg in der “Achilleis” des Statius’, WJA NF 5: 189–208Google Scholar
Kramer, L.S. 1989. ‘Literature, criticism, and historical imagination: the literary challenge of Hayden White and Dominick LaCapra’, in Hunt, L. (ed.), The New Cultural History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. 97–128Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. 1991. ‘Initium turbandi omnia a femina ortum est: Fabia Minor and the election of 367 B.C.’, Phoenix 45: 314–25Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . 1994a. Livy Ab Urbe Condita Book VI. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . 1994b. ‘“No second Troy”: topoi and refoundation in Livy, Book V’, TAPhA 124: 267–89Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . 1997. ‘Livy’, in Kraus, C.S. and Woodman, A.J., Latin Historians. Oxford. 51–81Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . 2019. ‘Fabula and history in Livy’s narrative of the capture of Veii’, in Baines, J., van der Blom, H., Chen, Y.S. and Rood, T. (eds.), Historical Consciousness and the Use of the Past in the Ancient World. Sheffield and Bristol. 345–58Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . forthcominga: ‘Urban disasters and other Romes: the case of Veii’, in Closs, V. and Keitel, E. (eds.), Urban Disasters in the Roman ImaginationGoogle Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . forthcomingb: ‘Livy’s Faliscan schoolmaster’, in Poulsen, A.D. and Jönssen, A. (eds.), Usages of the Past in Roman Historiography. LundGoogle Scholar
Kraus, C.S. (ed.). 1999. The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Texts. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Kremer, D. 2006. Ius Latinum. Le Concept de droit latin sous la république et l’empire. ParisGoogle Scholar
Krevans, N. 1993. ‘Ilia’s dream: Ennius, Virgil, and the mythology of seduction’, HSPh 95: 257–71Google Scholar
Krischer, T. 1971. Formale Konventionen der homerischen Epik. MunichGoogle Scholar
Kühn, W. 1971. Götterszenen bei Vergil. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Kuttner, A.L. 1995. Dynasty and Empire in the Age of Augustus: The Case of the Boscoreale Cups. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Labate, M. 2013. ‘Constructing the Roman myth: the history of the Republic in Horace’s lyric poetry’, in Farrell, J. and Nelis, D.P. (eds.), Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford. 205–27Google Scholar
Lamacchia, R. 1964. ‘Ciceros Somnium Scipionis und das sechste Buch der Aeneis’, RhM 107: 261–78Google Scholar
Lamarque, P. and Olsen, S.H. 1994. Truth, Fiction, and Literature: A Philosophical Perspective. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lane Fox, R. 1986. Pagans and Christians. LondonGoogle Scholar
Langdon, M.K. 2015. ‘Herders’ graffiti’, in Matthaiou, A.P. and Papazarkadas, N. (eds.), AXON: Studies in Honor of Ronald S. Stroud. Athens. 49–58Google Scholar
Latacz, J. 1975. ‘Zur Forschungsarbeit an den direkten Reden bei Homer (1850–1970): Ein kritischer Literatur-Überblick’, GB 3: 395–422Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. 1989. The Historical Method of Herodotus. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Latte, K. 1960. Römische Religionsgeschichte. MunichGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, R. 1961. The Iliad of Homer. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, M. 1983. ‘Iliadisches im 1. Buch der Aeneis’, Gymnasium 90: 203–39Google Scholar
Lavan, M. 2013. Slaves to Rome: Paradigms of Empire in Roman Culture. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Lavan, M., Payne, R.E. and Weisweiler, J. (eds.). 2016. Cosmopolitanism and Empire: Universal Rule, Local Elites, and Cultural Integration in the Ancient Near East and Mediterranean. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lawall, G. 1966. ‘Apollonius’ Argonautica: Jason as anti-hero’, YClS 19: 116–69Google Scholar
Lee, A.G. 1968. P. Ovidi Nasonis Metamorphoseon Liber I. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.J.N. 1964. The Similes of the Iliad and the Odyssey Compared. Parkville, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 1974. ‘Aeneas’ Antwort an Dido’, WS NF 8: 99–115Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. . 1976. ‘Die Lehre von der Entstehung der Tieropfer in Ovids Fasten 1, 335–456’, RhM 119: 39–64Google Scholar
Legras, L. 1905. Les Légendes thébaines en Grèce et à Rome. Étude sur la Thébaïde de Stace. ParisGoogle Scholar
Leinieks, V. 1986. ‘The similes of Iliad Two’, C&M 37: 5–20Google Scholar
Lesky, A. 1968. ‘Homeros’, RE Suppl. 11: 687–846Google Scholar
Levene, D.S. 1993. Religion in Livy. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Levene, D.S. . 2010. Livy on the Hannibalic War. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Levene, D.S. . 2019. ‘Monumental insignificance: the rhetoric of Roman topography from Livy’s Rome’, in Loar, M.P., Murray, S.C. and Rebeggiani, S. (eds.), The Cultural History of Augustan Rome: Texts, Monuments, and Topography. Cambridge. 10–26Google Scholar
Levin, D.N. 1971. ‘Apollonius’ Heracles’, CJ 67: 22–8Google Scholar
Levin, H. 1977. ‘The title as a literary genre’, MLR 72: xxiii–xxxviGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C.S. 1961. A Preface to Paradise Lost. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lieberg, G. 1966. ‘La dea Giunone nell’ Eneide di Virgilio’, A&R 11: 145–65Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. . 1971. ‘Vergils Aeneis als Dichtung der Einsamkeit’, in Bardon and Verdière (1971). 175–91Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J.H.W.G. 1979. Continuity and Change in Roman Religion. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Liebing, H. 1953. Die Aeneasgestalt bei Vergil. Diss. KielGoogle Scholar
Linderski, J. 1982. ‘Cicero and Roman divination’, PP 37: 12–38Google Scholar
Lintott, A.W. 1971. ‘Lucan and the history of the civil war’, CQ 21: 488–505Google Scholar
Lipscomb, H.C. 1909. ‘Aspects of the speech in Vergil and the later Roman epic’, CW 2: 114–17Google Scholar
Litchfield, H.W. 1914. ‘National exempla virtutis in Roman literature’, HSPh 25: 1–71Google Scholar
Livrea, E. 1973. Apollonii Rhodii Argonauticon Liber Quartus. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. 1979. Magic, Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origins and Development of Greek Science. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. . 1987. The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. . 1990. Demystifying Mentalities. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. and Parsons, P. 1983. Supplementum Hellenisticum. Berlin and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Loraux, N. 1986. The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City, tr. A. Sheridan. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2005. ‘Virgil and founding violence’, Cardozo Law Review 27.2: 945–76Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. . 2009. Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. . 2010. ‘Rom immer wieder gegründet’, in Döring, R., Vinken, B. and Zöller, G. (eds.), Übertragene Anfänge: Imperiale Figurationen um 1800. Munich. 23–49Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. . 2013. ‘Foundation and closure’, in Grewing, F.F., Acosta-Hughes, B. and Kirichenko, A. (eds.), The Door Ajar: False Closure in Greek and Roman Literature and Art. Heidelberg. 83–102Google Scholar
Lucas, D.W. 1968. Aristotle: Poetics. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Luce, J.V. 1965/2009. ‘The dating of Livy’s first Decade’, TAPhA 96: 209–40 = Chaplin and Kraus (2009). 17–48Google Scholar
Luce, J.V. . 1977. Livy: The Composition of his History, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, W. 1965. Struktur und Einheit der Metamorphosen Ovids. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R. 1999. ‘Drayton’s chorological Ovid’, in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds (1999). 85–102Google Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. 1983. ‘Vergil and the politics of war’, CQ 33: 188–203Google Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. . 1987. Further Voices in Vergil’s Aeneid. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. . 1989. Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil’s Aeneid. OxfordGoogle Scholar
McInerney, J. (ed.) 2014. A Companion to Ethnicity in the Ancient Mediterranean. Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
McKay, G.A. 1963. ‘Hero and theme in the Aeneid’, TAPhA 94: 157–66Google Scholar
Mackie, C.J. 1990. ‘Quisquis in arma vocas: Turnus and Jupiter in the Aeneid’, Antichthon 24: 79–85Google Scholar
Mackinnon, L. 1982. Review of Shawcross (1982), TLS (3 December 1982), 1332Google Scholar
Macleod, C.W. 1982. Homer. Iliad: Book XXIV. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
MacMullen, R. 1966. Enemies of the Roman Order: Treason, Unrest, and Alienation in the Empire. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Malcovati, H. 1928. Caesaris Augusti Imperatoris Operum Fragmenta. TurinGoogle Scholar
Malloch, S.J.V. 2013. The Annals of Tacitus: Book 11. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Malmendier, U. 2005. ‘Roman shares’, in Goetzmann, W.N. and Rouwenhorst, K.G. (eds.), The Origins of Value: The Financial Innovations that Created Modern Capital Markets. Oxford. 31–42Google Scholar
Maltby, R. 1991. A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. LeedsGoogle Scholar
Marincola, J. 1997a. Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Marincola, J. . 1997b. ‘Odysseus and the historians’, Histos 1 (www.dur.ac.uk/Classics/histos/1997/marincola.html)Google Scholar
Marincola, J. . 1999. ‘Genre, convention, and innovation in Greco-Roman historiography’, in Kraus (1999). 281–324Google Scholar
Marincola, J. . 2010. ‘Eros and Empire: Virgil and the historians on civil war’, in Kraus, C.S., Marincola, J. and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and its Contexts. Oxford. 183–204Google Scholar
Marti, B. 1945. ‘The meaning of the Pharsalia’, AJPh 66: 352–76Google Scholar
Martin, J. 1974. Antike Rhetorik: Technik und Methode. MunichGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. 1984. ‘The politician Lucan’, G&R 31: 64–79Google Scholar
Martindale, C. . 1986. John Milton and the Transformations of Ancient Epic. LondonGoogle Scholar
Masters, J. 1992. Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. 1981. Lucan: Civil War VIII. LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
Mazzarino, S. 1966. Il pensiero storico classico, 3 vols. BariGoogle Scholar
Michels, A.K. 1981. ‘The insomnium of Aeneas’, CQ 31: 140–6Google Scholar
Mikalson, J.D. 1983. Athenian Popular Religion. Chapel Hill, NC and LondonGoogle Scholar
Mikalson, J.D. . 1991. Honor Thy Gods: Popular Religion in Greek Tragedy. Chapel Hill, NC and LondonGoogle Scholar
Mikalson, J.D. . 2003. Herodotus and Religion in the Persian Wars. Chapel Hill, NC and LondonGoogle Scholar
Miles, G.B. 1995. Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.F. 1991. Ovid’s Elegiac Festivals: Studies in the Fasti. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.F. . 1993. ‘Ovidian allusion and the vocabulary of memory’, MD 30: 153–64Google Scholar
Mineo, B. 2003. ‘Récit d’une crise: la fin du premier cycle historique de Rome, au livre V de l’Ab Urbe Condita de Tite-Live’, in Franchet d’Espèrey, S. et al. (eds.), Fondements et crises du pouvoir. Bordeaux. 337–51Google Scholar
Mineo, B. (ed.) 2015. A Companion to Livy. ChichesterGoogle Scholar
Minturno, A. 1564. L’Arte Poetica. VeniceGoogle Scholar
Moatti, C. 2015. The Birth of Critical Thinking in Republican Rome, tr. J. Lloyd. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Moles, J.L. 1987. ‘The tragedy and guilt of Dido’, in Whitby, Hardie and Whitby (1987). 153–61Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. . 1993. ‘Truth and untruth in Herodotus and Thucydides’, in Gill and Wiseman (2003). 88–121Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. . 1993/2009. ‘Livy’s Preface’, PCPhS 39: 141–68 = Chaplin and Kraus (2009). 49–87Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1987. On Pagans, Jews, and Christians. Hanover, NHGoogle Scholar
Momigliano, A. . 1975. Alien Wisdom: The Limits of Hellenization. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Monti, R.C. 1981. The Dido Episode and the Aeneid: Roman Social and Political Values in the Epic. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Morford, M.P.O. 1967. The Poet Lucan: Studies in Rhetorical Epic. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Morgan, L. 1998. ‘Assimilation and civil war: Hercules and Cacus’, in Stahl, H.-P. (ed.), Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. London. 175–97.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. . 1999. Patterns of Redemption in Virgil’s ‘Georgics’. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Morwood, J.H.W. 1985. ‘Aeneas and Mount Atlas’, JRS 75: 51–9Google Scholar
Morwood, J.H.W. . 1998. ‘Virgil’s pious man and Menenius Agrippa: a note on Aeneid 1.148–53’, G&R 45: 195–8Google Scholar
Moseley, N. 1926. Characters and Epithets. A Study in Vergil’s Aeneid. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Most, G. 2000. ‘Generating genres: the idea of the tragic’, in Depew and Obbink (2000). 15–35Google Scholar
Moulton, C. 1977. Similes in the Homeric Poems. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 1998. Italian Unification: A Study in Ancient and Modern Historiography. LondonGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, H. . 2007. ‘The civitas sine suffragio: ancient concepts and modern ideology’, Historia 56: 141–58Google Scholar
Mueller, L. 1884. Q. Enni Carminum Reliquiae. St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
Mueller, M. 1969. ‘Paradise Lost and the Iliad’, CLS 6: 292–316Google Scholar
Munson, R.V. 2001. Telling Wonders: Ethnographic and Political Discourse in the Work of Herodotus. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Münzer, F. 1921. ‘Ti. Sempronius Gracchus’, RE 2R 4: 1403–9Google Scholar
Münzer, F. . 1930. ‘L. Marcius Philippus’, RE 28: 1562–8Google Scholar
Münzer, F. . 1937. ‘Die römischen Vestalinnen bis zur Kaiserzeit’, Philologus 92: 47–67, 199–222Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1965. ‘Philodemus on the Good King according to Homer’, JRS 55: 161–82Google Scholar
Myers, K.S. 1994. Ovid’s Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Mynors, R.A.B. 1990. Virgil: Georgics. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. 1979. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Narducci, E. 1979. La provvidenza crudele: Lucano e la distruzione dei miti augustei. PisaGoogle Scholar
Nelis, D. 2001. Vergil’s Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. LeedsGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. 1995. Playing with Time: Ovid and the Fasti. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Newman, J.K. 1967. Augustus and the New Poetry. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1980. The World of the Citizen in Republican Rome, tr. P.S. Falla. LondonGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, W.S.M. 1980. ‘Cupid, Apollo and Daphne (Ovid, Met. 1.452 ff.)’, CQ 30: 174–82Google Scholar
Nilsson, M.P. 1955. Geschichte der griechischen Religion, 2 vols. MunichGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. 1995. Collected Papers on Latin Literature, ed. Harrison, S.J.. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. and Hubbard, M. 1970. A Commentary on Horace: Odes, Book 1. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. and Hubbard, M. . 1978. A Commentary on Horace: Odes, Book 2. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. and Rudd, N. 2004. A Commentary on Horace: Odes, Book 3. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nissen, H. 1883–1902. Italische Landeskunde, 2 vols. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Nissen, T. 1940. ‘Historisches Epos und Panegyrikos in der Spätantike’, Hermes 75: 298–325Google Scholar
Norden, E. 1915. Ennius und Vergilius. Kriegsbilder aus Roms grosser Zeit. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Norden, E. . 1934. P. Vergilius Maro: Aeneis Buch VI3. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
North, D.C. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Nowotny, H. 1994. Time: The Modern and Postmodern Experience, tr. N. Plaice. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, A.D. 1996. Why Does Tragedy Give Pleasure? OxfordGoogle Scholar
Oakley, S.P. 1997–2005. A Commentary on Livy, Books VI–X, 4 vols. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Oakley, S.P. . 1998. Review of Miles (1995), CPh 93: 279–86Google Scholar
Oakley, S.P. . 2015. ‘Reading Livy’s Book 5’, in B. Mineo (2015). 230–42Google Scholar
Obbink, D. 1993. ‘Dionysus poured out: ancient and modern theories of sacrifice and cultural formation’, in Carpenter, T.H. and Faraone, C.A. (eds.), Masks of Dionysus. Ithaca, NY. 65–86Google Scholar
Ober, J. 2001. ‘Not by a nose: the triumph of Antony and Cleopatra at Actium, 31 B.C.’, in Cowley, R. (ed.), What If? 2: Eminent Historians Imagine What Might Have Been. New York. 23–47Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R.M. 1965. A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5. OxfordGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, J.J. 1996. True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Oksala, T. 1973. Religion und Mythologie bei Horaz. HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
Orr, H.A. 2005. ‘Vive la Différence!’, NYRB (12 May 2005), 18–20Google Scholar
Otis, B. 1963. Virgil: A Study in Civilized Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Padilla Peralta, D. 2019. ‘Citizenship’s insular cases, from ancient Greece and Rome to Puerto Rico’, Humanities 8: 134Google Scholar
Page, D.L. 1941. Select Papyri. III: Poetry. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Page, T.E. 1893. ‘Translations of the Aeneid by Rhoades and Sergeaunt’, CR 7: 415–18Google Scholar
Page, T.E. . 1896. Q. Horati Flacci Opera: Odes. LondonGoogle Scholar
Paoletti, L. 1963. ‘Lucano magico e Virgilio’, A&R 8: 11–26Google Scholar
Parker, R. 1997. ‘Gods cruel and kind: tragic and civic ideology’, in Pelling, C. (ed.), Greek Tragedy and the Historian. Oxford. 143–60Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. 1964. Orazio Lirico. Studi2. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Pausch, D. 2011. Livius und der Leser: Narrative Strukturen in ab urbe condita. MunichGoogle Scholar
Pavlock, B. 1990. Eros, Imitation, and the Epic Tradition. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Payne, M. 2018. ‘Fidelity and farewell: Pindar’s ethics as textual events’, in Budelmann and Phillips (2018). 257–74Google Scholar
Pearson, L. 1975. ‘Myth and archaeologia in Italy and Sicily—Timaeus and his predecessors’, YClS 24: 171–95Google Scholar
Pease, A.S. 1920–3. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Divinatione, 2 vols. Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
Pease, A.S. . 1935. P. Vergilii Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Pease, A.S. . 1955–8. Cicero: De Natura Deorum, 2 vols. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Pellam, G. 2014. ‘A peculiar episode from the “struggle of the orders”? Livy and the Licinio-Sextian Rogations’, CQ 64: 280–92Google Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R. 1988. Plutarch: Life of Antony. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R. . 1999. ‘Epilogue’, in Kraus (1999). 325–60Google Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R. . 2002. Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies. LondonGoogle Scholar
Perkell, C. 1989. The Poet’s Truth: A Study of the Poet in Virgil’s Georgics. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Perkins, D. 1992. Is Literary History Possible? Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Perowne, S. 1968. Roman Mythology. LondonGoogle Scholar
Perret, J. 1977. Virgile: Énéide I–IV. ParisGoogle Scholar
Peter, H. 1902. ‘Die Epochen in Varros Werk De gente populi Romani’, RhM 57: 231–51Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Picard, G.-Ch. 1954. Les Religions de l’Afrique antique. ParisGoogle Scholar
Pietrusinski, D. 1978. ‘L’Apothéose d’Auguste par la comparaison avec les héros grecques chez Horace et Virgile’, Eos 66: 249–66Google Scholar
Pigna, G.B. 1554. I Romanzi. VeniceGoogle Scholar
Podlecki, A.J. 1971. ‘Some Odyssean similes’, G&R 18: 81–90Google Scholar
Polleichtner, W. 2005. ‘The bee simile: how Vergil emulated Apollonius in his use of Homeric poetry’, GFA 8: 115–60Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander. 1967. The Odyssey of Homer: Books I–XII, ed. Mack, M.. London. Originally published 1772Google Scholar
Porte, D. 1985. L’Étiologie religieuse dans les Fastes d’Ovide. ParisGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. 2004. ‘Homer: the history of an idea’, in Fowler, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge. 318–37Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. 1962. The Art of Vergil. Image and Symbol in the Aeneid, tr. G. Seligson. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Powell, B.B. 2002. Writing and the Origins of Greek Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Prag, J.R.W. and Quinn, J.C. (eds.). 2013. The Hellenistic West: Rethinking the Ancient Mediterranean. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Preisendanz, K. 1932. ‘Tanit’, RE 2R 8: 2178–215Google Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. 1965. The Poetry of the Aeneid: Four Studies in Imaginative Unity and Design. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. . 1979. Virgil’s Poem of the Earth: Studies in the Georgics. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. . 1985. ‘Possessiveness, sexuality, and heroism in the Aeneid’, Vergilius 31: 1–21Google Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. . 2000. Review of Morgan (1999), Vergilius 46: 155–62Google Scholar
Quinn, K. 1963. Latin Explorations: Critical Studies in Roman Literature. LondonGoogle Scholar
Quinn, K. . 1968. Virgil’s Aeneid: A Critical Description. LondonGoogle Scholar
Quint, D. 1993. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Quint, D. . 2011. ‘Virgil’s double cross: chiasmus and the Aeneid’, AJPh 132: 273–300Google Scholar
Rahner, H. 1963. Greek Myths and Christian Mystery, tr. B. Battershaw. LondonGoogle Scholar
Rawles, R. 2018. Simonides the Poet: Intertexuality and Reception. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rawson, E. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. LondonGoogle Scholar
Rawson, E. . 1991. Roman Culture and Society: Collected Papers. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ready, J.L. 2011. Character, Narrator, and Simile in the Iliad. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Redfield, J. 1975. Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Redfield, J. . 1979. ‘The proem of the Iliad: Homer’s art’, CPh 74: 95–110Google Scholar
Reed, J.D. 2007. Virgil’s Gaze: Nation and Poetry in the Aeneid. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Reeve, M.D. 1995. ‘Conclusion’, in Pecere, O. and Reeve, M.D. (eds.), Formative Stages of Classical Traditions: Latin Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Spoleto. 497–511Google Scholar
Richards, I.A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J.S. 1995. ‘The Roman mind and the power of fiction’, in Ayres, L. (ed.), The Passionate Intellect: Essays on the Transformations of Classical Traditions Presented to Professor I. G. Kidd. New Brunswick, NJ. 117–30Google Scholar
Richardson, N.J. 1983. ‘Recognition scenes in the Odyssey’, PLLS 4: 219–35Google Scholar
Richardson, N.J. . 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume VI: Books 21–24. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, A. 2017. Virgil’s Ascanius: Imagining the Future in the Aeneid. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Roman, L. 2001. ‘The representation of literary materiality in Martial’s Epigrams’, JRS 91: 113–45Google Scholar
Roman, L. . 2006. ‘A history of lost tablets’, ClAnt 25: 351–88Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 1994. Stazio: Achilleide. MilanGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. 1914a. ‘Romulus’, RE 2R 1: 1074–104Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. . 1914b. ‘Rea Silvia’, RE 2R 1: 341–5Google Scholar
Ross, D.O. Jr. 1987. Virgil’s Elements: Physics and Poetry in the Georgics. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. 2014. ‘Autochthony in ancient Greece’, in McInerney (2014). 241–55Google Scholar
Runciman, D. 2003. ‘The concept of the state. The sovereignty of a fiction’, in Skinner, Q. and Stråth, B. (eds.), States and Citizens: History, Theory, Prospects. Cambridge. 28–38Google Scholar
Runciman, S. 1951. A History of the Crusades. Volume I: The First Crusade and the Foundation of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. 1995. Kalender und Öffentlichkeit: Die Geschichte der Repräsentation und religiösen Qualifikation von Zeit in Rom. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. . 2001. ‘Antike Religionen als Kommunikationssysteme’, in Brodersen, K. (ed.), Gebet und Fluch, Zeichen und Traum: Aspekte religiöser Kommunikation in der Antike. Münster. 13–30Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. . 2008. ‘Religion: Rome’, Brill’s New Pauly 12: 489–96Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. . 2011. ‘History’, in Stausberg, M. and Engler, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. London and New York. 285–309Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. 1981. Criticism in Antiquity. LondonGoogle Scholar
Rütten, F. 1912. De Vergilii Studiis Apollonianis. Diss. MünsterGoogle Scholar
Rutz, W. 1984. ‘Lucan 1964–1983’, Lustrum 26: 105–203Google Scholar
Ryberg, I.S. 1955. Rites of the State Religion in Roman Art. RomeGoogle Scholar
Said, E.W. 1978. Orientalism. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Sailor, D. 2006. ‘Dirty linen, fabrication, and the authorities of Livy and Augustus’, TAPhA 136: 329–88Google Scholar
Salmon, E.T. 1982. The Making of Roman Italy. LondonGoogle Scholar
Salter, C.H. 1974. ‘Dryden and Addison’, MLR 69: 29–39Google Scholar
Scheid, J. 1990. Romulus et ses frères: le collège des frères arvales, modèle du culte public dans la Rome des empereurs. RomeGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2004. ‘Human mobility in Roman Italy, I: the free population’, JRS 94: 1–26Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. . 2009. ‘When did Livy write Books 1, 3, 28 and 59?’, CQ 59: 653–8Google Scholar
Schetter, W. 1978. Das römische Epos. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 1990. Simulacrum et imago. Gli argomenti analogici nel De Rerum Natura. PisaGoogle Scholar
Schindler, C. 2000. Untersuchungen zu den Gleichnissen im römischen Lehrgedicht: Lukrez, Vergil, Manilius. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, P.L. 1973. ‘Cicero De Re Publica: Die Forschungen der letzten fünf Dezennien’, ANRW 1.4: 262–333Google Scholar
Schmit-Neuerburg, T. 1999. Vergils Aeneis und die antike Homerexegese: Untersuchungen zum Einfluß ethischer und kritischer Homerrezeption auf imitatio und aemulatio Vergils. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Scholes, R. and Kellogg, R. 1966. The Nature of Narrative. New York and OxfordGoogle Scholar
Schrijvers, P.H. 1978. ‘Le regard sur l’invisible: étude sur l’emploi de l’analogie dans l’oeuvre de Lucrèce’, in Gigon, O. (ed.), Lucrèce, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 24. Geneva. 77–114Google Scholar
Schröder, W.A. 1971. M. Porcius Cato: Das erste Buch der Origines. Ausgabe und Erklärung der Fragmente. Meisenheim am GlanGoogle Scholar
Schultze, C.E. 1995. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Roman chronology’, PCPhS 41: 192–214Google Scholar
Scott, W.C. 2009. The Artistry of the Homeric Simile. Hanover, NHGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 1989. ‘The proems of Lucretius and Empedocles’, GRBS 30: 269–96Google Scholar
Seeley, T.D. 2010. Honeybee Democracy. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Serres, M. 1991. Rome: The Book of Foundations, tr. F. McCarren. Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D.R. 1965–8. Cicero: Epistulae ad Atticum, 7 vols. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D.R. . 1977. Cicero: Epistulae ad Familiares. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Sharrock, A. 1991. ‘Womanufacture’, JRS 81: 36–49Google Scholar
Shawcross, J.T. 1982. With Mortal Voice: The Creation of ‘Paradise Lost’. Lexington, KYGoogle Scholar
Shay, J. 1994. Achilles in Vietnam: Combat Trauma and the Undoing of Character. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Sherwin-White, A.N. 1973. The Roman Citizenship2. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Silk, M.S. 1985. ‘Heracles and Greek tragedy’, G&R 32: 1–22Google Scholar
Simpson, V. 1975. ‘The annalistic tradition in Vergil’s Aeneid’, Vergilius 21: 22–32Google Scholar
Sirluck, E. 1967. Paradise Lost: A Deliberate Epic. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Skard, O. 1965. ‘Die Heldenschau in Vergils Aeneis’, SO 40: 53–65Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. 1968. Enniana. LondonGoogle Scholar
Skutsch, O. . 1972. ‘Readings and interpretations in the Annals’, in Skutsch, O. (ed.), Ennius, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 17. Geneva. 3–37Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. . 1985. The Annals of Quintus Ennius. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Smith, C.J. 2011. ‘Citizenship and community: inventing the Roman Republic’, in Terrenato, N. and Haggis, D.C. (eds.), State Formation in Italy and Greece: Questioning the Neoevolutionist Paradigm. Oxford and Oakville, CT. 217–30Google Scholar
Smith, J.Z. 1987. ‘The domestication of sacrifice’, in Hamerton-Kelly, R.G. (ed.), Violent Origins: Walter Burkert, René Girard, and Jonathan Z. Smith on Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation. Stanford, CA. 191–205Google Scholar
Smith, R.A. 1997. Poetic Allusion and Poetic Embrace in Ovid and Virgil. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Snyder, J.M. 1980. Puns and Poetry in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1972. ‘The world of the dead in Book 6 of the Aeneid’, CPh 67: 31–41Google Scholar
Sparrow, J. 1973. Dido v Aeneas, the Case for the Defence: The Sixth Jackson Knight Memorial Lecture. AbingdonGoogle Scholar
Speaight, R. 1958. The Vergilian Res. LondonGoogle Scholar
Spelman, H. 2018. Pindar and the Poetics of Permanence. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Spelman, H. . 2019. ‘Schools, reading and poetry in the early Greek world’, CCJ 65: 150–72Google Scholar
Spence, S. 1988. Rhetorics of Reason and Desire: Vergil, Augustine, and the Troubadors. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Spence, S. . 2002. ‘Pietas and Furor: motivational forces in the Aeneid’, in Anderson, W.S. and Quartarone, L.N. (eds.), Approaches to Teaching Vergil’s Aeneid. New York. 46–52Google Scholar
Spingarn, J.E. 1938. A History of Literary Criticism in the Renaissance2. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Spingarn, J.E. . (ed.). 1908. Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century, 3 vols. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Stadter, P.A. 1972/2009. ‘The structure of Livy’s History’, Historia 21: 287–307 = Chaplin and Kraus (2009). 91–117Google Scholar
Stanford, W.B. 1963. The Ulysses Theme: A Study in the Adaptability of a Traditional Hero. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Steadman, J.M. 1959. Milton’s Epic Characters: Image and Idol. Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
Steadman, J.M. . 1967. Milton and the Renaissance Hero. Oxford.Google Scholar
Steadman, J.M. . 1975. ‘The arming of an archetype: heroic virtue and the conventions of literary epic’, in Burns and Reagan (1975). 147–96Google Scholar
Steadman, J.M. . 1976. Epic and Tragic Structure in Paradise Lost. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Stehle, E. 1989. ‘Venus, Cybele, and the Sabine women: the Roman construction of female sexuality’, Helios 16: 143–64Google Scholar
Stem, R. 2007. ‘The exemplary lessons of Livy’s Romulus’, TAPhA 137: 435–71Google Scholar
Stephens, S. 2004. ‘Whose rituals in ink?’, in Barchiesi, A., Rüpke, J. and Stephens, S. (eds.), Rituals in Ink: A Conference on Religion and Literary Production in Ancient Rome. Munich. 157–60Google Scholar
Steuart, E.M. 1925. The Annals of Quintus Ennius. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, T.R. 2000. ‘Parens Patriae and Livy’s Camillus’, Ramus 29: 27–46Google Scholar
Stewart, D.J. 1972–3. ‘Mortality, morality and the public life. Aeneas the politician’, Antioch Review 32: 649–64Google Scholar
Stewart, O. 2017. ‘Citizenship as a reward or punishment? Factoring language into the Latin settlement’, Antichthon 51: 186–201Google Scholar
Stockton, D. 1979. The Gracchi. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Stübler, G. 1941. Die Religiosität des Livius. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Suerbaum, W. 1967. ‘Aeneas zwischen Troja und Rom. Zur Funktion der Genealogie und der Ethnographie in Vergils Aeneis’, Poetica 1: 176–204Google Scholar
Swedenberg, H.T. 1944. The Theory of the Epic in England, 1650–1800. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Syed, Y. 2005. Vergil’s Aeneid and the Roman Self: Subject and Nation in Literary Discourse. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Syme, R. . 1958. Tacitus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Syme, R. . 1964. Sallust. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Syme, R. . 1978. History in Ovid. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R.J. 1982. ‘Aeneas and the gates of sleep’, CPh 77: 51–5Google Scholar
Tarrant, R.J. . 2012. Virgil: Aeneid Book XII. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Taussig, M. 1993. Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
Terrenato, N. 2019. The Early Roman Expansion into Italy: Elite Negotiation and Family Agendas. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Thalmann, W.G. 1984. Conventions of Form and Thought in Early Greek Epic Poetry. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. 2000. Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science and the Art of Persuasion. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R.F. 1982. Lands and Peoples in Roman Poetry: The Ethnographical Tradition. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R.F. . 1988. Virgil: Georgics, 2 vols. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R.F. . 1991. ‘The “Sacrifice” at the end of the Georgics, Aristaeus, and Vergilian closure’, CPh 86: 211–18Google Scholar
Thomas, Y. 1996. «Origine» et «Commune Patrie». Étude de droit public romain (89 av. J.C.–212 ap. J.C.). RomeGoogle Scholar
Thornton, A. 1976. The Living Universe. Gods and Men in Virgil’s Aeneid. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Tillyard, E.M.W. 1938. ‘Milton and the English epic tradition’, in Seventeenth Century Studies Presented to Sir Herbert Grierson. Oxford. 211–36Google Scholar
Tillyard, E.M.W. . 1954. The English Epic and its Background. LondonGoogle Scholar
Timpanaro, S. 1948. ‘Per una nuova edizione critica di Ennio’, SIFC 23: 5–58Google Scholar
Toll, K. 1997. ‘Making Roman-ness and the Aeneid’, ClAnt 16: 34–56Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo. 1954. Anna Karenina, tr. C. Garnett. Harmondsworth. Originally published 1878Google Scholar
Tombs, R. and Tombs, I. 2007. That Sweet Enemy: The French and British from the Sun King to the Present. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Toynbee, A.J. 1965. Hannibal’s Legacy: The Hannibalic War’s Effect on Roman Life, 2 vols. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Tracey, S.V. 1975. ‘The Marcellus passage (Aeneid 6.860–886) and Aeneid 9–12’, CJ 70: 37–42Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1991. Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Trimble, J.F. 2002. ‘Greek myth, gender, and social structure in a Roman house: two paintings of Achilles at Pompeii’, in Gazda, E.K. (ed.), The Ancient Art of Emulation: Studies in Artistic Originality and Tradition from the Present to Classical Antiquity. Ann Arbor, MI. 225–48Google Scholar
Trypanis, C.A. 1981. Greek Poetry from Homer to Seferis. LondonGoogle Scholar
Ungern-Sternberg, J. von 1998. ‘Die Romulusnachfolge des Augustus’, in Schuller, W. (ed.), Politische Theorie und Praxis im Altertum. Darmstadt. 166–82Google Scholar
Vahlen, J. 1928. Ennianae Poesis Reliquiae2. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Valmaggi, L. 1947. Q. Ennio. I frammenti degli Annali. TurinGoogle Scholar
Vandiver, E. 1999. ‘The founding mothers of Livy’s Rome: the Sabine women and Lucretia’, in Titchener, F.B. and Moorton, R.F. Jr. (eds.), The Eye Expanded: Life and the Arts in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. 206–32Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. 2015a. Livy’s Political Philosophy: Power and Personality in Early Rome. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Vasaly, A. . 2015b. ‘The composition of the Ab Urbe Condita: the case of the first pentad’, in B. Mineo (2015). 217–29Google Scholar
Versnel, H.S. 1987. ‘What did ancient man see when he saw a god? Some reflections on Greco-Roman epiphany’, in Van der Plas, D. (ed.), Effigies Dei: Essays on the History of Religions. Leiden. 42–55Google Scholar
Versnel, H.S. . 1994. Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion 2: Transition and Reversal in Myth and Ritual. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Vessey, D. 1973. Statius and the Thebaid. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Veyne, P. 1988. Did the Greeks Believe in their Myths? An Essay on the Constitutive Imagination, tr. P. Wissing. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Vian, F. and Delage, E. 1976. Apollonios de Rhodes: Argonautiques: tome I. ParisGoogle Scholar
Vicaire, P. 1960. Platon: critique littéraire. ParisGoogle Scholar
Vretska, K. 1976. Sallust: De Catilinae Coniuratione. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Wagenvoort, H. 1956. Studies in Roman Literature, Culture, and Religion. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Walbank, F.W. 1957–79. A Historical Commentary on Polybius, 3 vols. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Walcot, P. 1977. ‘Odysseus and the art of lying’, AncSoc 8: 1–19Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1987. ‘Time for Augustus: Ovid, Augustus and the Fasti’, in Whitby, Hardie and Whitby (1987). 221–30Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. . 1989. ‘Rome’s cultural revolution’, JRS 79: 157–64Google Scholar
Walter, A. forthcoming. ‘Ever Since Then’: Time in Ancient Aetiology, chapter 3Google Scholar
Walter, U. 2004. Memoria und Respublica: Zur Geschichtskultur im republikanischen Rom. FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
Wardman, A.E. 1960. ‘Myth in Greek historiography’, Historia 9: 403–13Google Scholar
Wardman, A.E. . 1976. Rome’s Debt to Greece. LondonGoogle Scholar
Wardy, R. 1988. ‘Lucretius on what atoms are not’, CPh 83: 112–28Google Scholar
Warmington, B.H. 1969. Carthage2. LondonGoogle Scholar
Warmington, E.H. 1935. Remains of Old Latin I: Lucilius and Ennius. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Waszink, J.H. 1957. ‘Zur ersten Satire des Lucilius’, WS 70: 322–8Google Scholar
Watson, G. (ed.). 1962. John Dryden: Of Dramatic Poesy, and Other Critical Essays, 2 vols. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Weicker, G. 1916. ‘Iris’, RE 18: 2037–43.Google Scholar
Weinstock, S. 1971. Divus Julius. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wender, D. 1978. The Last Scenes of the Odyssey. LeidenGoogle Scholar
West, D. 1970. ‘Virgilian multiple-correspondence similes and their antecedents’, Philologus 114: 262–75Google Scholar
West, G.S. 1979. ‘Virgil’s helpful sisters. Anna and Juturna in the Aeneid’, Vergilius 25: 10–19Google Scholar
West, M.L. 1971. Hesiod: Theogony. OxfordGoogle Scholar
West, M.L. . 1985. The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, M. (eds.). 1987. Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. BristolGoogle Scholar
White, H. 1978. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Whitman, C. 1958. Homer and the Heroic Tradition. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2016. Battling the Gods: Atheism in the Ancient World. LondonGoogle Scholar
Wigodsky, M. 1972. Vergil and Early Latin Poetry. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
Wilamowitz, U. von. 1932. Der Glaube der Hellenen, 2 vols. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Wilders, J. 1995. The Arden Shakespeare: Antony and Cleopatra. LondonGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, J.B. 1994. ‘The Iguvine Tablets: problems in the interpretation of ritual text’, in Malone, C. and Stoddart, S. (eds.), Territory, Time and State: The Archaeological Development of the Gubbio Basin. Cambridge. 152–72Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L.P. 1946. Horace and his Lyric Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Williams, G.W. 1968. Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Williams, G.W. . 1969. The Third Book of Horace’s ‘Odes’. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Williams, G.W. . 1980. Figures of Thought in Roman Poetry. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Williams, G.W. . 1983. Technique and Ideas in the Aeneid. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Williams, R.C. 1917. The Theory of the Heroic Epic in Italian Criticism of the Sixteenth Century. Diss. Johns HopkinsGoogle Scholar
Williams, R.D. 1971. ‘Dido’s Reply to Aeneas (Aen. 4. 362–387)’, in Bardon and Verdière (1971). 422–8Google Scholar
Williams, R.D. . 1972. ‘The pageant of Roman heroes: Aeneid 6.756–853’, in Martyn, J.R.C. (ed.), Cicero and Virgil: Studies in Honour of Harold Hunt. Amsterdam. 207–17Google Scholar
Wilson, B. 2004. The Hive: The Story of the Honeybee and Us. LondonGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C.H. 1979. ‘Jupiter and the fates in the Aeneid’, CQ 29: 361–71Google Scholar
Winkler, A. 2018. We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won their Civil Rights. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Winkler, J.J. 1990. The Constraints of Desire: The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Winter, J.G. 1910. The Myth of Hercules at Rome. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. 1974. ‘Legendary genealogies in late-republican Rome’, G&R 21: 153–64Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1979. Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature. LeicesterGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1984. ‘Cybele, Virgil and Augustus’, in Woodman and West (1984). 117–28Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1995. Remus: A Roman Myth. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 2002. ‘History, poetry and Annales’, in Levene, D.S. and Nelis, D.P. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Leiden. 331–62Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 2015. The Roman Audience: Classical Literature as Social History. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wissowa, G. 1899. ‘Agis’, RE 1: 821Google Scholar
Wissowa, G. . 1900. ‘Cornelius Nepos’, RE 2R 7: 1408–17Google Scholar
Wissowa, G. . 1912. Religion und Kultus der Römer2. MunichGoogle Scholar
Wistrand, E.K.H. 1981. The Policy of Brutus the Tyrannicide. GöteborgGoogle Scholar
Wlosok, A. 1967. Die Göttin Venus in Vergils Aeneis. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Wofford, S.L. 1992. The Choice of Achilles: The Ideology of Figure in the Epic. Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, D.M. (ed.). 1953–82. The Complete Prose Works of John Milton, 8 vols. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. 1973. ‘A note on Sallust, Catilina 1.1’, CQ 23: 310Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 1988. Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies. LondonGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 2003. ‘Poems to historians: Catullus 1 and Horace Odes 2.1’, in Braund and Gill (2003). 191–216Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. and West, D. (eds.). 1984. Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, L.B. 1910. Reminiscences of Ennius in Silius Italicus. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Woolf, G. 2012. Rome: An Empire’s Story. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wyke, M. 2002. The Roman Mistress: Ancient and Modern Representations. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Yonge, L.D. (ed.). 1882. Essays of John Dryden. LondonGoogle Scholar
Yunis, H. (ed.). 2003. Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Zanker, P. 1988: The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, tr. A. Shapiro. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 1986. ‘Theater of self and society in Athenian drama’, in Euben, J.P. (ed.), Greek Tragedy and Political Theory. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. 101–41Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. . 1996. Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Culture. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. 1983. ‘Catullus, Ennius and the poetics of allusion’, ICS 8: 251–66Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. . 1989. ‘Romane memento: justice and judgment in Aeneid 6’, TAPhA 119: 263–84Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. . 1995. Cicero: De Re Publica. Selections. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. . 1997. ‘Rome and its traditions’, in Martindale, C (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge. 188–203Google Scholar
Ziegler, K. 1966. Das hellenistische Epos: Ein vergessenes Kapitel griechischer Dichtung2. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Zissos, A. and Gildenhard, I. 1999. ‘Problems of time in Metamorphoses 2’, in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds (1999). 31–47Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Denis Feeney, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Introduction by Stephen Hinds, University of Washington
  • Book: Explorations in Latin Literature
  • Online publication: 05 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680226.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Denis Feeney, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Introduction by Stephen Hinds, University of Washington
  • Book: Explorations in Latin Literature
  • Online publication: 05 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680226.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Denis Feeney, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Introduction by Stephen Hinds, University of Washington
  • Book: Explorations in Latin Literature
  • Online publication: 05 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680226.020
Available formats
×