Book contents
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Context
- Part II Methods
- Part III Substantive Contributions
- Part IV Issues and Implications
- 21 Replication of Experimental Research: Implications for the Study of Public Management
- 22 The Experimental Turn in Public Management: How Methodological Preferences Drive Substantive Choices
- 23 Changing How Government Works: The Transformative Potential of an Experimental Public Management*
- 24 Conclusions – Towards an Experimental Public Management
- Appendix Recommended Reporting Guidelines for Experiments in Public Management, a Checklist1
- Index
- References
22 - The Experimental Turn in Public Management: How Methodological Preferences Drive Substantive Choices
from Part IV - Issues and Implications
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2017
Book contents
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Context
- Part II Methods
- Part III Substantive Contributions
- Part IV Issues and Implications
- 21 Replication of Experimental Research: Implications for the Study of Public Management
- 22 The Experimental Turn in Public Management: How Methodological Preferences Drive Substantive Choices
- 23 Changing How Government Works: The Transformative Potential of an Experimental Public Management*
- 24 Conclusions – Towards an Experimental Public Management
- Appendix Recommended Reporting Guidelines for Experiments in Public Management, a Checklist1
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Experiments in Public Management ResearchChallenges and Contributions, pp. 461 - 475Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Banerjee, A. V. and Duflo, E. 2012. Poor Economics. Barefoot Hedge-Fund Managers, DIY Doctors and the Surprising Truth about Life on Less than $1 a Day. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Coser, L. A. 1975. ‘Presidential address: two methods in search of a substance’, American Sociological Review 40(6): 691–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A. 2010. ‘Instruments, randomization, and learning about development’, Journal of Economic Literature 48(2): 424–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, E. S. 2011. ‘Economics vs. psychology experiments: stylization, incentives, and deception’, in Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. (eds.). Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 58–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadellaa, S., Curry, D., and Van de Walle, S. 2015. ‘Hoe bestuurskundig is de bestuurskunde? Nederlandse bestuurskundigen vergeleken met hun Europese vakgenoten’, Bestuurskunde 25(3): 67–79.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. 2012. ‘Mere description’, British Journal of Political Science 42(4): 721–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. 2011. ‘Performance measures and democracy: information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(3): 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O., Jilke, S., Petersen, C., and Van de Walle, S. 2016. ‘Citizens’ blame of politicians for public service failure: experimental evidence about blame reduction through delegation and contracting’, Public Administration Review 76(1): 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jilke, S., Van Ryzin, G., and Van de Walle, S. 2016. ‘Responses to decline in marketized public services: an experimental evaluation of choice-overload’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(3): 421–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, A. (1964) 1998. The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioural Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Kaufman, H. 1960. The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R. 2011. ‘Campbell’s ghost’, in Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. (eds.). Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 525–30.Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R. and Palfrey, T. R. 1993. Experimental Foundations of Political Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. 1971. ‘Comparative politics and the comparative method’, American Political Science Review 65(3): 682–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lum, C. and Yang, S. M. 2005. ‘Why do evaluation researchers in crime and justice choose non-experimental methods?’ Journal of Experimental Criminology 1(2): 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvel, J. and Girth, A. 2016. ‘Citizen attributions of blame in third-party governance’, Public Administration Review 76(1): 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R. (2005). ‘Experimental methods in political science’, Annual Review of Political Science 5: 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, J., Langbein, J., and Roberts, G. 2015. ‘Policy evaluation, randomize controlled trials, and external validity: a systematic review’, Ruhr Economic Papers no. 589. Bochum: Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. 2001. Foreword: ‘On academic fads and fashions’, Michigan Law Review 99(6): 1251–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomassen, J.-P., Leliveld, M., Ahaus, K., and Van de Walle, S. 2015. Prosocial Compensation after Service Guarantee Violation in For-Profit and Public Settings. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Willis, D. 2014. ‘Professors’ research project stirs political outrage in Montana’, New York Times, retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2014/10/29/upshot/professors-research-project-stirs-political-outrage-in-montana.html.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by