Book contents
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Context
- Part II Methods
- Part III Substantive Contributions
- Part IV Issues and Implications
- 21 Replication of Experimental Research: Implications for the Study of Public Management
- 22 The Experimental Turn in Public Management: How Methodological Preferences Drive Substantive Choices
- 23 Changing How Government Works: The Transformative Potential of an Experimental Public Management*
- 24 Conclusions – Towards an Experimental Public Management
- Appendix Recommended Reporting Guidelines for Experiments in Public Management, a Checklist1
- Index
- References
24 - Conclusions – Towards an Experimental Public Management
from Part IV - Issues and Implications
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2017
Book contents
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Context
- Part II Methods
- Part III Substantive Contributions
- Part IV Issues and Implications
- 21 Replication of Experimental Research: Implications for the Study of Public Management
- 22 The Experimental Turn in Public Management: How Methodological Preferences Drive Substantive Choices
- 23 Changing How Government Works: The Transformative Potential of an Experimental Public Management*
- 24 Conclusions – Towards an Experimental Public Management
- Appendix Recommended Reporting Guidelines for Experiments in Public Management, a Checklist1
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Experiments in Public Management ResearchChallenges and Contributions, pp. 495 - 508Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Angrist, J. D. and Pischke, J. S. 2015. Mastering ‘Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boutron, I., John, P., and Torgerson, D. J. 2010. ‘Reporting methodological items in randomized experiments in political science’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 628(1), pp. 112–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, A., Arceneaux, K., Boudreau, C., Dowling, C., Hillygus, S., Palfrey, T., Biggers, S., and Hendry, D. 2014. ‘Reporting guidelines for experimental research: a report from the Experimental Research Section Standards Committee’, Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1(1), pp. 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, F. and Mittone, L. 2005. ‘Experiments in economics: external validity and the robustness of phenomena’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 12(4), pp. 495–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. 2011. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schulz, K., Altman, D., and Moher, D. 2010. ‘CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials’, The British Medical Journal, 340:c332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by