Part I - Setting the scene
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2016
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Bregman, A. S. 1994. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Casey, M. 2009. Soundspotting: A new kind of process? In Dean, R. T. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Computer Music. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2006. Jonathan Harvey’s Mortuos Plango, Vivos Voco. In Simoni, M. (ed.) Analytical Methods of Electroacoustic Music. London: Routledge, 111–43.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2010. Wind chimes: An interactive aural analysis. In Gayou, É. (ed.) Denis Smalley: Polychrome Portraits. Paris: INA/GRM, 35–57.Google Scholar
Couprie, P. 2012. EAnalysis: A new electroacoustic music analysis piece of software, in Proceedings of the Electroacoustic Music Studies Network Conference, Stockholm 2012 (www.ems-network.org/spip.php?rubrique48).Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 1986. The relation of language to materials. In Emmerson, S. (ed.) The Language of Electroacoustic Music. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handel, S. 1989. Listening: An Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. 1996. Liner notes, Articles indéfinis (CD), Empreintes Digitales: IMED 9627.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. 1998. Sound, space, sculpture: Some thoughts on the ‘what’, ‘how’ and ‘why’ of sound diffusion. Organised Sound 3(02), 117–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, B. 1987. The niche hypothesis: How animals taught us to dance and sing. Whole Earth Review 57.Google Scholar
Landy, L. 1994. The ‘something to hold on to factor’ in timbral composition. Contemporary Music Review 10(2), 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, L. 2007. Understanding the Art of Sound Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, L., Hall, R. and Uwins, M. 2013. Widening participation in electroacoustic music: The EARS 2 pedagogical initiatives. Organised Sound 18(2), 108–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licata, T. (ed.) 2002. Electroacoustic Music: Analytical Perspectives. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
MIM. 1996. Les Unités Sémiotiques Temporelles – Élements nouveaux d’analyse musicale. Marseille: Édition MIM – Documents Musurgia.Google Scholar
The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians. 2001. Ed. Sadie, S. and Tyrrell, J., 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Norman, K. 1996. Real-world music as composed listening. Contemporary Music Review 15(1–2), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, S. 2003. L’analyse des musiques électroacoustiques: modèles et propositions. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 1977. Traité des objets musicaux: essai interdisciplines. Paris: Seuil (2nd edn; orig. 1966).Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1996. The listening imagination: Listening in the electroacoustic era. Contemporary Music Review 13(2), 77–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, D. 1997. Spectromorphology: Explaining sound shapes. Organised Sound 2(2), 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, D. 2007. Space-form and the acousmatic image. Organised Sound 12(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoresen, L. 2007. Spectromorphological analysis of sound-objects: An adaptation of Pierre Schaeffer’s typomorphology. Organised Sound 12(2), 129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windsor, L. 2000. Through and around the acousmatic: The interpretation of electroacoustic sounds. In Emmerson, S. (ed.) Music, Electronic Media and Culture. Aldershot: Ashgate, 7–35.Google Scholar