Árnason, U. (1977). The relationship between the four principal pinniped karyotypes. Hereditas, 87, 227–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Árnason, . and Widegren, B. (1986). Pinniped phylogeny enlightened by molecular hybridizations using highly repetitive DNA. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 3, 356–65.Google Scholar

Bajpai, S. and Gingerich, P. D. (1998). A new Eocene archaeocete (Mammalia, Cetacea) from India and the time of origin of whales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 95, 15464–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barnes, L. G. (1972). Miocene Desmatophocinae (Mammalia: Carnivora) from California. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences, 89, 1–76.Google Scholar

(1984). Whales, dolphins and porpoises: origin and evolution of the Cetacea. University of Tennessee Department of Geological Sciences Studies in Geology, 8, 139–54.

(1987). An early Miocene pinniped of the genus Desmatophoca (Mammalia: Otariidae) from Washington. Contributions in Science, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, 382, 1–20.

Barnes, L. G.(1989). A new enaliarctine pinniped from the Astoria Formation, Oregon, and a classification of the Otariidae (Mammalia: Carnivora). Contributions in Science, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, 403, 1–26.Google Scholar

Barnes, L. G. and Sanders, A. E. (1996a). The transition from archaeocetes to mysticetes: late Oligocene toothed mysticetes from near Charleston, South Carolina. [Proceedings of the Sixth North American Paleontological Convention.] Paleontological Society Special Publication, 8, p. 24. Baltimore, MD: Paleontological Society.Google Scholar

Barnes, L. G., and Sanders, A. E.(1996b). The transition from Archaeoceti to Mysticeti: late Oligocene toothed mysticetes from South Carolina, USA. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16(suppl. to no. 3), p. 21A.Google Scholar

Barnes, L. G., Goedert, J. L., and Furusawa, H. (2001). The earliest known echolocating toothed whales (Mammalia; Odontoceti): preliminary observations of fossils from Washington State. Mesa Southwest Museum Bulletin, 8, 91–100.Google Scholar

Berta, A. (1991). New Enaliarctos∗ (Pinnipedimorpha) from the Oligocene and Miocene of Oregon and the role of “enaliarctids” in pinniped phylogeny. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 69, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berta, A. and Sumich, J. L. (1999). Marine Mammals: Evolutionary Biology. London, : Academic Press.Google Scholar

Berta, A. and Wyss, A. R. (1994). Pinniped phylogeny. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 33–56.Google Scholar

Berta, A., Ray, C. E., and Wyss, A. R. (1989). Skeleton of the oldest known pinniped, Enaliarctos mealsi. Science, 244, 60–2.

Boyden, A. and Gemeroy, D. (1950). The relative position of the Cetacea among the orders of Mammalia as indicated by precipitin tests. Zoologica, 35, 145–51.Google Scholar

Clementz, M. T., Hoppe, K. A., and Koch, P. L. (2003). A paleoecological paradox: the habit and dietary preferences of the extinct tethythere Desmostylus, inferred from stable isotope analysis. Paleobiology, 29, 506–19.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowley, B. E. and Barnes, L. G. (1996). A new late Oligocene mysticete from Washington State. Paleontological Society Special Publication, 8, 90.Google Scholar

Davies, J. L. (1958). Pleistocene geography and the distribution of northern pinnipeds. Ecology, 39, 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, J. L.(1963). The antitropical factor in cetacean speciation. Evolution, 17, 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deméré, T. A., Berta, A., and Adam, P. J. (2003). Pinnipedimorph evolutionary biogeography. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 279, 33–76.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dockery, D. T., III and Lozouet, P. (2003). Molluscan faunas across the Eocene/Oligocene boundary in the North American Gulf Coastal Plain, with comparisons to those of the Eocene and Oligocene of Paris. In From Greenhouse to Icehouse: The Marine Eocene-Oligocene Transition, ed. Prothero, D. R., Ivany, L. C., and Nesbitt, E. A., pp. 303–40. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Domning, D. P. (1978). Sirenian evolution in the North Pacific Ocean. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences, 118, 1–176.Google Scholar

Domning, D. P.(1994). A phylogenetic analysis of the Sirenia. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 177–89.Google Scholar

Domning, D. P.(2001a). The earliest known fully quadrupedal sirenian. Nature, 413, 62–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domning, D. P.(2001b). Evolution of the Sirenia and Desmostylia. In Secondary Adaptation of Tetrapods to Life in Water, ed. Mazin, J.-M. and Buffrénil, V., pp. 151–68. Munich: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar

Domning, D. P.(2001c). Sirenians, seagrasses, and Cenozoic ecological change in the Caribbean. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 166, 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domning, D. P.(2002). The terrestrial posture of Desmostylians. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 93, 99–111.Google Scholar

Domning, D. P. and Gingerich, P. D. (1994). Protosiren smithae, new species (Mammalia, Sirenia), from the late middle Eocene of Wadi Hitan, Egypt. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 29, 69–87.Google Scholar

Domning, D. P. and Ray, C. E. (1986). The earliest sirenian (Mammalia: Dugongidae) from the eastern Pacific Ocean. Marine Mammal Science, 2, 263–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domning, D. P., Morgan, G. S., and Ray, C. E. (1982). North American Eocene sea cows (Mammalia, Sirenia). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 52, 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domning, D. P., Ray, C. E., and McKenna, M. C. (1986). Two new Oligocene desmostylians and a discussion of tethytherian systematics. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 59, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domning, D. P., Gingerich, P. D., Simons, E. L., and Ankel-Simons, F. A. (1994). A new early Oligocene Dugongid (Mammalia, Sirenia) from the Fayum Province, Egypt. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 29, 89–108.Google Scholar

Emlong, D. R. (1966). A new archaic cetacean from the Oligocene of northwest Oregon. Bulletin of the Oregon University Museum of Natural History, 3, 1–51.Google Scholar

Estes, J. A., Tinker, M. T., Williams, T. M., and Doak, D. F. (1998). Killer whale predation on sea otters linking oceanic and nearshore ecosystems. Science, 282, 473–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fish, P. A. (1903). The cerebral fissures of the Atlantic walrus. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 26, 675–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flower, W. H. (1883). On the arrangement of the orders and families of existing Mammalia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1883, 178–86.Google Scholar

Flynn, J. J. and Nedbal, M. A. (1998). Phylogeny of the Carnivora (Mammalia): congruence vs. incompatibility among multiple data sets. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 9, 414–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Flynn, J. J., Neff, N. A., and Tedford, R. H. (1988). Phylogeny of the Carnivora. In The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 2: Mammals. ed. Benton, M. J., pp. 73–115. [Systematics Association Special Volume No. 35B.] Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Fordyce, R. E. (2002). Oligocene archaeocetes and toothed mysticetes: Cetacea from times of transition. Geological Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Publication, Secondary Adaptation to Life in Water, pp. 16–17. Wellington: Geological Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar

Fordyce, R. E. (2003). Cetacean evolution and Eocene–Oligocene oceans revisited. In From Greenhouse to Icehouse: The Marine Eocene–Oligocene Transition, ed. Prothero, D. R., Ivany, L. C., and Nesbitt, E. A., pp. 154–70. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Fordyce, R. E. and Muizon, C., de (2001). Evolutionary history of cetaceans: a review. In Secondary Adaptation of Tetrapods to Life in Water, ed. Mazin, J.-M. and Buffrénil, V., pp. 169–223. Munich: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar

Gatesy, J. (1998). Molecular evidence for the phylogenetic affinities of Cetacea. In The Emergence of Whales, ed. Thewissen, J. G. M., pp. 63–112. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gatesy, J., Hayashi, C., Cronin, M., and Arctander, P. (1996). Evidence from milk casein genes that cetaceans are close relatives of hippopotamid artiodactyls. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 954–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gatesy, J., Milinkovitch, M., Waddell, V., and Stanhope, M. (1999). Stability of cladistic relationships between Cetacea and higher-level artiodactyl taxa. Systematic Biology, 48, 6–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Geisler, J. H. (2001). New morphological evidence for the phylogeny of Artiodactyla, Cetacea, and Mesonychidae. American Museum Novitates, 3344, 1–53.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geisler, J. H. and Leary, M. A. (1997). A phylogeny of Cetacea, Artiodactyla, Perissodactyla, and archaic ungulates: the morphological evidence. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 17(suppl. to no. 3), p. 48A.Google Scholar

Geisler, J. H. and Sanders, A. E. (2003). Morphological evidence for the phylogeny of Cetacea. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 10, 23–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geisler, J. H. and Uhen, M. D. (2003). Morphological support for a close relationship between hippos and whales. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23, 991–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geisler, J. H., and Uhen, M. D.(2005). Phylogenetic relationships of extinct Cetartiodactyls: results of simultaneous analyses of molecular, morphological, and stratigraphic data. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 12, 145–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gheerbrant, E., Sudre, J., Iarochene, M., and Moumni, A. (2001). First ascertained African “condylarth” mammals (primitive ungulates: cf. Bulbulodentata and cf. Phenacodonta) from the earliest Ypresian of the Ouled Abdoun Basin, Morocco. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 21, 107–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gingerich, P. D., Haq, M. U.., Khan, I. H., and Malakani, M. S. (2001). Origin of whales from early artiodactyls: hands and feet of Eocene Protocetidae from Pakistan. Science, 293, 2239–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goodwin, M. B., Domning, D. P., and Lipps, J. H. (1998). The first record of an Eocene (Lutetian) marine mammal from Israel. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 18, 813–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howell, A. B. (1930). Aquatic Mammals: Their Adaptations to Life in the Water. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar

Hunt, R. M. Jr. and Barnes, L. G. (1994). Basicranial evidence for ursid affinity of the oldest pinnipeds. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 57–67.Google Scholar

Inuzuka, N. (2000). Primitive late Oligocene desmostylians from Japan and the phylogeny of the Desmostylia. Bulletin of the Ashoro Museum of Paleontology, 1, 91–123.Google Scholar

Kellogg, R. (1922). Pinnipeds from the Miocene and Pleistocene deposits of California. University of California, Publications in Geology, 13, 23–132.Google Scholar

Kellogg, R.(1936). A Review of the Archaeoceti. Carnegie Institute of Washington Special Publication, 482, 1–366.Google Scholar

King, J. E. (1983). Seals of the World. Ithaca: Comstock.Google Scholar

Koretsky, I. A. and Sanders, A. E. (2002). Paleontology of the late Oligocene Ashley and Chandler Bridge Formations of South Carolina, 1: Paleogene pinniped remains; the oldest known seal (Carnivora: Phocidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 93, 179–83.Google Scholar

Matthew, W. D. (1909). The Carnivora and Insectivora of the Bridger Basin, Middle Eocene. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, 6, 291–567.Google Scholar

Mazin, J.-M. (2001). Mesozoic marine reptiles: an overview. In Secondary Adaptation of Tetrapods to Life in Water, ed. Mazin, J.-M. and Buffrénil, V. D., pp. 95–117. Munich: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar

Mchedlidze, G. A. (1984). General Features of Paleobiological Evolution of Cetacea. New Delhi: Amerind.Google Scholar

McKenna, M. C. and Bell, S. K. (1997). Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

McLaren, I. A. (1960). Are the Pinnipedia biphyletic?Systematic Zoology, 9, 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, E. D. (1967). Controversy over diphyly in pinnipeds. Systematic Zoology, 16, 350–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, E. D.(1975). Parallelism and convergence in the evolution of the Otariidae and Phocidae. Rapports et Procès-Verbaux des Réunions, 169, 12–26.Google Scholar

Mitchell, E. D.(1989). A new cetacean from the late Eocene La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 46, 2219–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montgelard, C., Catzeflis, F. M., and Douzery, E. (1997). Phylogenetic relationships of artiodactyls and cetaceans as deduced from the comparison of cytochrome b and 12S rRNA mitochondrial sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 14, 550–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morgan, G. S. (1994). Miocene and Pliocene marine mammal faunas from the Bone Valley Formation of central Florida. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 239–68.Google Scholar

Muizon, C. (1982). Phocid phylogeny and dispersal. Annals of the South African Museum, 89, 175–213.Google Scholar

Nikaido, M., Matsuno, F., Hamilton, H., et al. (2001). Retroposon analysis of major cetacean lineages: the monophyly of toothed whales and the paraphyly of river dolphins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 98, 7384–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O'Leary, M. A. (2002). Mesonychia. In Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, ed. Perrin, W. F., Würsig, B., and Thewissen, J. G. M., pp. 735–7. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Okazaki, Y. (1995). A new type of primitive baleen whale (Cetacea; Mysticeti) from Kyushu, Japan. The Island Arc, 3, 432–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prothero, D. R., Manning, E. M., and Fischer, M. (1988). The phylogeny of the ungulates. In The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 2, ed. Benton, M. J., pp. 201–34. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Prothero, D. R., Jaquette, C. D., and Armentrout, J. M. (2001). Magnetic stratigraphy of the upper Eocene–upper Oligocene Lincoln Creek Formation, Porter Bluffs, Washington. In Magnetic Stratigraphy of the Pacific Coast Cenozoic, ed. D. Prothero, pp. 169–78. Santa Fe Springs, CA: Pacific Section of the Society for Sedimentary Geology.

Ray, C. E. (1977). Geography of phocid evolution. Systematic Zoology, 25, 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Repenning, C. A., Berta, A., and Wyss, A. R. (1990). Oldest pinniped. Science, 248, 499–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sanders, A. E. and Barnes, L. G. (2002). Paleontology of the late Oligocene Ashley and Chandler Bridge Formations of South Carolina, 3: Eomysticetidae, a new family of primitive mysticetes (Mammalia: Cetacea). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 93, 313–56.Google Scholar

Savage, R. J. G., Domning, D. P., and Thewissen, J. G. M. (1994). Fossil Sirenian of the west Atlantic and Caribbean region. V. The most primitive known sirenian, Prorastomus sirenoides Owen, 1855. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 14, 427–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheffer, V. B. (1958). Seals, Sea Lions, and Walruses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Shimamura, M., Yasue, H., Ohshima, K., et al. (1997). Molecular evidence from retroposons that whales form a clade within even-toed ungulates. Nature, 388, 666–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shimamura, M., Abe, H., Nikaido, M., Ohshima, K., and Okada, N. (1999). Genealogy of families of SINEs in cetaceans and artiodactyls: the presence of a huge superfamily of tRNAGlu-derived families of SINEs. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 16, 1046–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simpson, G. G. (1945). The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 85, 1–350.Google Scholar

Tedford, R. H. (1976). Relationship of pinnipeds to other carnivores (Mammalia). Systematic Zoology, 25, 363–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thewissen, J. G. M., Williams, E. M., Roe, L. J., and Hussain, S. T. (2001). Skeletons of terrestrial cetaceans and the relationship of whales to artiodactyls. Nature, 413, 277–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Uhen, M. D. (1998). Middle to late Eocene basilosaurines and dorudontines. In The Emergence of Whales, ed. Thewissen, J. G. M., pp. 29–61. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uhen, M. D.(1999). New species of protocetid archaeocete whale, Eocetus wardii (Mammalia, Cetacea), from the middle Eocene of North Carolina. Journal of Paleontology, 73, 512–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uhen, M. D.(2002). Evolution of dental morphology (cetacean). In Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, ed. Perrin, W. F., Würsig, B., and Thewissen, J. G. M., pp. 316–19. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Uhen, M. D.(2004). Form, function, and anatomy of Dorudon atrox (Mammalia, Cetacea): an archaeocete from the middle to late Eocene of Egypt. University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology Papers on Paleontology, 34, 1–222.Google Scholar

Uhen, M. D. and Gingerich, P. D. (2001). New genus of dorudontine archaeocete (Cetacea) from the middle-to-late Eocene of South Carolina. Marine Mammal Science, 17, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valen, L. M. (1966). Deltatheridia, a new order of mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 132, 1–126.Google Scholar

Vrana, P. B., Milinkovitch, M. C., Powell, J. R., and Wheeler, W. C. (1994). Higher level relationships of the arctoid Carnivora based on sequence data and “total evidence”. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 3, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Waddell, P. J., Okada, N., and Hasegawa, M. (1999). Towards resolving the interordinal relationships of placental mammals. Systematic Biology, 48, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weber, M. (1904). Die Säugetiere. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar

Wortman, J. L. (1894). Osteology of Patriofelis, a middle Eocene creodont. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 6, 129–64.Google Scholar

(1906). A new fossil seal from the marine Miocene of the Oregon coast. Science, 24, 89–92.CrossRef

Wozencraft, W. C. (1989). The phylogeny of the Recent Carnivora. In Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution, ed. Gittleman, J. L., pp. 495–535, Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Wyss, A. R. (1987). The walrus auditory region and the monophyly of pinnipeds. American Museum Novitates, 2871, 1–31.Google Scholar

Wyss, A. R.(1988). Evidence from flipper structure for a single origin of pinnipeds. Nature, 334, 427–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wyss, A. R.(1994). The evolution of body size in phocids: some ontogenetic and phylogenetic observations. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 69–76.Google Scholar

Wyss, A. R. and Flynn, J. J. (1993). A phylogenetic analysis and definition of the Carnivora. In Mammal Phylogeny: Placentals, ed. Szalay, F. S., Novacek, M. J., and McKenna, M. C., pp. 32–52. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar