Aboh, Enoch. 2006. If we see focus, you go left and I go right! Paper presented at the International Conference on Bantu Grammar. SOAS, London.Google Scholar

Adams, Marilyn Jager and Allan, Collins. 1979. A schema-theoretic view of reading. In Freedle, Roy O. (ed.), New directions in discourse processing, 1–22. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: a typology of noun categorization devices. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aissen, Judith L. 1992. Topic and focus in Mayan. Language 68: 43–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albridge, Edith. 2010. Clause-internal wh- movement in Old Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, Keith. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53: 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aoun, Joseph and Audrey, Y.-H. Li. 1993. Wh- elements in-situ: syntax or LF? Linguistic Inquiry 24: 199–238.Google Scholar

Aoun, Joseph, Hornstein, Norbert, and Sportoche, Dominique. 1981. On some aspects of wide scope of quantification. Journal of Linguistics Research 13: 67–95.Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Aristar, Anthony Rodrigues. 1991. On diachronic sources and synchronic patterns: an investigation into the origin of linguistic universals. Language 67: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Carl L. 1970. Notes on the description of English questions: the role of an abstract Q morpheme. Foundations of Language, 6: 197–219.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Barber, Charles. 1995. The English language: a historical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bartsch, Renate and Theo, Vennemann. 1972. Semantic structures: a study in the relation between semantics and syntax. Frankfurt am Main: Athenaum.Google Scholar

Barz, Richard and Anthony, Diller. 1985. Classifiers and standardisation: some South and South-East Asian comparisons. In Bradley, David (ed.), Language policy, language planning and sociolinguistics in South-East Asia, 155–184. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Behaghel, Otto. 1909. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25: 110–142.Google Scholar

Beida, . 1995. Hanyu fangyan cihui (The dialect lexicon of Chinese). Beijing: Yuwen Press.Google Scholar

Bisang, Walter. 1999. Classifiers in East and Southeast Asian languages: counting and beyond. In Gvozdanovic, Jadranka (ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide, 113–185. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bouton, Lawrence F. 1973. Some reasons for doubting the existence of a passive transformation. In Kachru, Braj B., Lees, Robert B., Malkiel, Yakov, Pierangeli, Angelina, and Saporta, Sol (eds.), Issues in linguistics: papers in honor of Henry and Rene Kahanée, 70–84. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. and Traugott, Elizabeth C.. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon. 2015. Handbook of Korean linguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C.. 1978. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2007. Wh- in-situ does not correlate with wh- indefinites or question particles. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 139–166.Google Scholar

Bussman, Hadumod. 1996. Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Butt, Miriam and King, Tracy Holloway (eds.). 1996. LFG-Workshop proceedings of the first LFG conference. Rank Xerox Research Centre, Grenoble, August.Google Scholar

Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der sprache. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan 1995. The semantic development of past tense modals in English. In Bybee, Joan and Fleischman, Suzanne (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 503‒507. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: the role of frequency. In Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard (eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics, 602‒623. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan 2006. Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan 2007. Diachronic linguistics. In Geeraerts, Dirl and Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics, 945–987. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of construction. In Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Grameme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 49‒69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan and Beckner, Clay. 2015. Usage-based theory. In Heine, Bernd and Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 827‒856. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere and Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cao, Guangshun. 1986. Zutangji zhong di que le zhe (On the particles di, que, le and zhe in Zutangji). Zhongguo Yuwen 3: 192–202.Google Scholar

Cao, Guangshun 1995. Jindai Hanyu zhuci (Particles in Modern Chinese). Beijing: The Yuwen Press.Google Scholar

Cao, Guangshun and Xiaorong, Yu. 2000. Zhonggu yijing zhong de chuzhishi (The disposal construction in the translated sutras in Medieval Chinese). Zhongguo Yuwen 6: 555–563.Google Scholar

Cao, Zhiyun (ed.). 2008. Hanyu fangyan dituji (yufa juan) (The maps of the Chinese dialects (grammar volume)). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Cardona, George. 1965. Gujarati reference grammar. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, constrastiveness, definiteness, subject, topics, and point of view. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Chao, Yuen-Ren 1979. Hanyu kouyu yufa (A grammar of spoken Chinese). Translated by Shuxiang, Lü. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Chen, Mengjia. 1956. Yinxu buci zongshu (A survey of Yin oracle bone inscriptions). Beijing: The Science Press.Google Scholar

Chen, Zhongmin. 2002. Lun Guangzhouhua xiaocheng biandiao de laiyuan (The origin of the tone sandhi of the diminutive in Cantonese). In Pan Wuyan (ed.), Dongfang yuyanxue (Eastern linguistics), 167–181. Shanghai: The Eastern Publisher.Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa L.-S. 1991. On the typology of wh- questions. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa L.-S. 2003. Wh- in-situ. Glot International 7: 103–109.Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa L.-S. and Huang, James C.-T. 1996. Two types of donkey sentences. Natural Language Semantics 4: 121–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheng, Lisa L.-S., James Huang, C.-T, Audrey Li, Y.-H., and Jane Tang, C.-C.. 1993. Three ways to get passive. MS, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Rooryck, Johan. 2002. Types of wh- in-situ. MS, Leiden University.Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheung, Samuel H.-N. 1977. Perfect particles in the Bian Wen language. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 5: 55‒74.Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998a. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter.” In Rothstein, Susan (ed.), Events and grammar (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 70), 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro 1998b. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1976. Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2: 303–351.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: essays in minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Chu, Zexiang, Jingsheng, Liu, Guofu, Long, Hui, Tian, Guilin, Ye, and Xianzhang, Zheng. 1997. Hanyu cunzaiju de lishixing kaocha (A diachronic investigation of the existential sentences in Chinese). Gu Hanyu Yanjiu (Studies in Classical Chinese) 4: 13–20.Google Scholar

Clark, John and Yallop, Colin. 1992. An introduction to phonetics and phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Claudi, Ulrike. 1985. Zur entstehung von genussystemen: Überlegungen zu einigen theoretischen aspekten, verbunden mit einer fallstudie des zande. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar

Clements, George N. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Kingston, John and Beckman, Mary (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 1: between the grammar and physics of speech, 283–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, Peter and Hermon, Gabriella. 1998. The typology of wh- movement: wh- questions in Malay. Syntax 1: 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1988. Topics, grammaticalized topics, and subjects. In Axmaker, Shelley, Jaisser, Annie and Singmaster, Helen (eds.), General session and parasession on grammaticalization, 265–279. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville. 2004. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra. 1976. An object-creating rule in Bahasa Indonesia. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 41–87.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1990. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1994. Semantic universals in classifier systems. Word 45:145–171.Google Scholar

Croft, William 1995. Intonation units and grammatical knowledge. Linguistics 33: 838–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William 1996. Typology and universals (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William 2001. Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 2008. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th edition). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dai, Qingxia. 1998. Zang Mian yuzu yuyan yanjiu (Studies in the Tibetan-Burmese language family). Kunming: Yunnan Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary. 2001. Lexical-functional grammar (Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 34). London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dayal, Veneeta. 2014. Questions and the vP phase in Hindi–Urdu. MS, Rutgers University.Google Scholar

Déchaine, Rose-Marie. 1993. Serial verb constructions. In Jacobs, Joachim, von Stechow, Arnim, Sternefeld, Wolfgang, and Vennemann, Theo (eds.), Syntax: an international handbook of contemporary research, 799–925. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2018. Evidentiality in Tibetic. In Alexandra Aikhenvald, Y. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 580–594. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 1999a. Demonstratives: form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diessel, Holger 1999b. The morphosyntax of demonstratives in synchrony and diachrony. Linguistic Typology 3: 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diessel, Holger 2006. Demonstratives. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 430‒435. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Dik, Simon C. 1980. Studies in functional grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ding, Shengshu. 1935. Shi foudingci “fu,” “bu” (An explanation of the negative markers fu and bu). Qingzhu Cai Yuanpei xiansheng liushiwu sui lunwenji (A paper collection in celebration of Cai Yuanpei at the age of sixty-five), 967–996. Beijing: Guoli Zhongyang Yanjiu Yuan Lishi Yuyan Yanjiusuo.Google Scholar

Ding, Shengshu, Shuxiang, Lü, Rong, Li, Dexuan, Sun, Xiechu, Guan, Jing, Fu, Shengzhang, Huang, and Zhiwen, Chen. 1961. Xiandai Hanyu Yufa Jianghua (Lectures on modern Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Djamouri, Redouane and Waltraud, Paul. 1997. Les syntagmes prépositionnels en yu et zai en chinois archaïque. Cahiers de linguistique-Asie orientale 26: 221–248.Google Scholar

Dong, Hongyuan. 2009. Issues in the semantics of Mandarin questions. Doctoral dissertation. Cornell University, New York.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1991. SVO languages and the OV: VO typology. Journal of Linguistics 27: 443–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language, 68: 81–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2003. Word order in Sino-Tibetan languages from a typological and geographic perspective. In Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy (eds.), Sino-Tibetan languages, 43–55. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2005. Relationship between the order and verb and the order of relative clause and noun. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 390–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Word order. In Shopen, Tomonthy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. I. Clause structure, 61–131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duanmu, San. 2007. The phonology of Standard Mandarin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duguine, Maia and Irurtzun, Aritz. 2014. From obligatory wh- movement to optional wh- in-situ in Labourdin Basque. Language, 90: e1–e28.Google Scholar

Durand, Jacques. 1990. Generative and non-linear phonology. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Ehlich, Konrad. 1979. Verwendungen der Deixis beim sprachlichen Handeln. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar

Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1990. Syntactic and pragmatic principles as arguments in the interpretation of runic inscriptions. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Historical linguistics and philology, 165–186. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fanselow, Gisbert. 2017. Partial movement. In Everaert, Martin and van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 437–492. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Feng, Chuntian. 1990. Shilun jiegou zhuci “di (de)” de yixie wenti (Some issues on the structural particle “di(de)”). Zhongguo Yuwen 6: 448–453.Google Scholar

Feng, Shengli. 1996. Prosodically constrained syntactic change in Early Archaic Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 323‒371.Google Scholar

Feng, Shengli 2014. Historical syntax of Chinese. In C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li, and Andrew Simpson (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 537–575. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1987. From verb to anaphora. Lingua 72: 155–168.Google Scholar

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt 1995. On sources of demonstratives and anaphors. In Barbara Fox (ed.), Studies in Anaphora, 169‒203. Amsterdm: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frazier, Lyn. 1979. Parsing and constraints on word order. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5: 177–198.Google Scholar

Gao, Ming. 1987. Zhongguo guwenzixue tonglun (A Conspectus of Chinese ancient characters). Beijing: Wenwu Chubanshe.Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk and Cuyckens, Hubert. 2007. The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy 1984. Syntax: a functional–typological introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy 1990. Syntax: a functional–typological introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy 1991. Serial verbs and the mental reality of “event”: grammatical vs. cognitive packaging. In Traugott, Elizabeth and Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. I: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, 81–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Gnanadesikan, Amalia Elizabeth. 1997. Phonology with ternary scales. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. 1966a. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.) Universals of languages (2nd edition), 73–113. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph (ed.) 1966b. Universals of language (2nd edition). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers? In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson and Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, Vol. 3: Word structure, 47–82. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Joseph, Greenberg, Ferguson, Charles A. and Moravcsik, Edith A. (eds.). 1978. Universals of human language, Vol. 3: Word structure. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane and Mester, Armin. 1988. Light verbs and θ-marking. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 205–232.Google Scholar

Grinevald, Colette. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Senft, Gunter (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guo, Xiliang. 1997. Guanyu xici “shi” chansheng de shidai he laiyuan de jidian renshi (The date and source of the copula shi revisited). In Hanyu shi lunwen ji (A collection of papers on historical Chinese linguistics), 106–123. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1985. Natural syntax: iconicity and erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel J.. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression. In Kayne, Richard, Zanuttini, Raffaella, and Leu, Thomas (eds.), An annotated syntax reader: lasting insights and questions, 312–327. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harris, Alice C. and Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hashimoto, Mantaro. 1976. Language diffusion on the Asian continent. Computational Analysis of Asian and African Languages 3: 49–65.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, Mantaro 1984. The Altaicization of northern Chinese, MS, National Inter-university Research Institute of Asian and African Languages and Cultures, U.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1984. Modifier–head or function–argument relations in phrase structure? Lingua 63: 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayward, Richard J. 1990. Notes on the Aari language. In Hayward, Richard J. (ed.), Omotic language studies, 425–93. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar

He, Wei. 1989. Huojia fangyan yanjiu (A study in the Huojia dialect). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

He, Wei 2004. Zuozhuan xuci yanjiu (Studies on the functional words of the Zuo Zhuan). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

He, Wei 2005. Shi Ji yufa tedian yanjiu (Studies in the grammar of the Shi Ji). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

He, Wei 2007. Hanyu yufashi duandai zhuanshu bijiao yanjiu (A comparative approach to the history of Chinese grammar with special reference to particular books in different periods). Kaifeng: Henan University Press.Google Scholar

He, Wei 2012. Zuozhuan yufa yanjiu (Studies in the grammar of the Zuo Zhuan). Kaifeng: Henan University Press.Google Scholar

Heffner, Roe-Merrill S. 1950. General phonetics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike, and Friederike, Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: a conceptual framework. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania 2007. The genesis of grammar: a reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Narrog, Heiko. 2011. The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Reh, Mechthild. 1984. Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar

Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-verbal predicate: theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hintzman, Douglas L. 1986. “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 93: 411–428.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hogg, Richard M., Blake, Norman, Lass, Roger, Romaine, Suzanne, Burchfield, Robert, and Algeo, John. 2001. The Cambridge history of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Holm, John. 1988. Pidgins and creoles, Vol. 3: Theory and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horvath, Julia. 1986. Focus in the theory of grammar and the structure of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Hu, Chirui. 2005. Dongjie shi de zao qi xingshi jiqi panding biaozhun (The earliest forms of the resultative construction and the criteria for judging them). Zhongguo yuwen 3: 214‒225.Google Scholar

Hu, Yushu (eds.). 1981. Xiandai hanyu (Modern Chinese). Shanghai: Shanghai jiaoyu chubanshe.Google Scholar

Huang, Borong (ed.). 1996. Hanyu fangyan yufa leibian (The classification collection of the grammars of the Chinese dialects). Qingdao: The Qingdao Press.Google Scholar

Huang, Dinghua. 1963. Minnan fangyan li de yiwen daici (Interrogative pronouns in the southern Min dialect), Zhongguo yuwen 4: 299–307.Google Scholar

Huang, James C.-T. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Huang, James C.-T. 1994. On lexical structure and syntactic projection. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium of Chinese Languages and Linguistics, 45‒48. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar

Huang, James C.-T. 1997. On lexical structure and syntactic projection. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 3: 45–89.Google Scholar

Huang, James C.-T. 2006. The macro-history of Chinese syntax and the theory of change. Invited lecture presented at Workshop on Chinese Linguistics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Huang, James C.-T., Audrey Li, Y.-H, and Li, Yafei. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huang, James C.-T., Audrey Li, Y.-H., and Simpson, Andrew. 2014. The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Huang, Nansong. 1994. Shilun duanyu zizhu chengju suoying jubei de ruogan yufa fanchou (On the grammatical categories of determining clauses as independent sentences). Zhongguo yuwen 6: 441–447.Google Scholar

Huang, Shuan-Fan. 1978. Historical change of prepositions and the emergence of SOV order. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 6: 212–242.Google Scholar

Huang, Xiaohui. 1992. Xiandai Hanyu chabi geshi de laiyuan ji yanbian (The origin and development of the superior comparative construction in Modern Chinese). Zhongguo yuwen 3: 213–224.Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard. 1992. So-called “double objects” and grammatical relations. Language 68: 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hulst, Harry van der. 1984. Syllable structure and stress in Dutch. Cinnaminson, NJ: Foris Publications.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. and Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3: 19–37.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman and Waugh, Linda R.. 1979. The sound shape of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil A. 1996. Question-word movement to focus and scrambling in Malayalam. Linguistic Analysis, 26: 63–83.Google Scholar

Jenks, Peter. 2018. Articulated definiteness without articles. Linguistic Inquiry 49: 501–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Jiang, Lansheng. 1989. Beidong guanxici “chi” de laiyuan chutan (A basic study of the lexical source of the passive morpheme “chi”). Zhongguo yuwen 5: 370–377.Google Scholar

Jiang, Lansheng 1995. Shuo “me” yu “men” tongyuan (On the same origin of “me” and “men”). Zhongguo yuwen 3: 259–273.Google Scholar

Jiang, Lansheng 1999a. Chusuo ci de lingge yongfa yu jiegou zhuci “di” de youlai (The genitive usage of locative words and the origin of the structural particle “di”). Zhongguo yuwen 2: 83–93.Google Scholar

Jiang, Lansheng 1999b. Cong yuyan shentou kan Hanyu binishi de fazhan (The development of analogy in the Chinese language as seen from language infiltration). Zhongguo shehui kexue (Social sciences in China) 4: 169–179.Google Scholar

Jiang, Shaoyu. 2005a. “Gei” ziju, “jiao” ziju biao beidong de laiyuan (The lexical sources of the passive morphemes “gei” and “jiao”). Yuyanxue luncong (Linguistic studies) 1: 159–177.Google Scholar

Jiang, Shaoyu 2005b. Jindai Hanyu yanjiu gaiyao (A survey of research on Modern Chinese). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar

Jiang, Shaoyu and Guangshun, Cao. 2005. Jindai Hanyu yufa shi yanjiu zongshu (A survey of studies about grammar of Modern Chinese). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Katz, Jerrold J. and Postal, Paul M.. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kayser, Alois (eds.). 1993. Nauru grammar. Yarralumla and Canberra: Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany.Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward L. 1985a. Passive in the world’s languages. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 243–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward L. 1985b. Relative clauses. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic Description, Vol. 2, 141–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward and Comrie, Bernard. 1979. Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy. Language 55: 333–351.Google Scholar

Kemenade, Ans van and Los, Bettelou (eds.). 2006. The handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar

Kemenade, Ans van and Vincent, Nigel (eds.). 1997. Parameter of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kidwai, Ayesha. 2000. XP Adjunction in universal grammar: scrambling and binding in Hindi/Urdu. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1979. Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic inquiry 10: 421‒41.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul 1992. Analogy. In Brown, Keith (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 56‒61. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul 2011. Grammaticalization as optimization. In Jonas, Diane, Whitman, John, and Garrett, Andrew (eds.), Grammatical change: origins, nature, outcomes, 14–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul 2013. Towards a null theory of the passive. Lingua 125: 7–33.Google Scholar

Kirsner, Robert S. 1976. On the subject of pseudo-passives in Standard Dutch and the semantics of background agents. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 387–415. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kiss, Katalin É. 1987. Configurationality in Hungarian. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar

Kong, Lingda. 1994. Yingxiang Hanyu juzi zizhu de yuyan xingshi (The linguistic forms affecting the independence of the sentence in Chinese). Zhongguo Yuwen 6: 434–440.Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jacklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kuteva, Tania, Heine, Bernd, Hong, Bo, Long, Haiping, Narrog, Heiko, and Rhee, Seongha. 2019. World lexicon of grammaticalization (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kytö, Merja and Pahta, Päivi. 2016. The handbook of English historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, Robin. 1971. Passive resistance. Chicago Linguistics Society 7: 149–162.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1982. Space grammar, analyzability, and the English passive. Language 58: 22–80.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1988. Usage-based model. In Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida (ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics, 127–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1994. Conceptual grouping and constituency in cognitive grammar. Linguistics in the Morning Calm 3: 149–172.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2013. Essentials of cognitive linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Langendonck, Willy van. 2007. Iconicity. In Geeraerts, Dirk and Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 394–418. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 1976. English phonology and phonological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lassadi, Boutheina. 2003. Optional wh- movement in French and Egyptian Arabic. Cahiers linguistiques d’Ottawa, 31: 67–93.Google Scholar

Lehman, Winfred P. 1973. A structure principle of language and its implications. Language 49:42–66.Google Scholar

Lehman, Winfred P. 1978. The great underlying ground-plans. In Lehman, Winfred P. (ed.), Syntactic typology, 3–55. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Levin, Beth and Hovav, Malka Rappaport. 1990. Wiping the slate clean: a lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 41: 123–155.Google Scholar

Levin, Juliette. 1985. A metrical theory of syllabicity. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Li, Audrey Y. H. and Shi, Yuzhi. 2000. Hanyu liangci xitong de jianli yu fushu biaoji “men” de fazhan (The establishment of the classifier system and the development of the plural “-men”). Contemporary Linguistics 2: 27–36.Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. (eds.). 1975. Word order and word order change. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. (ed.). 1977. Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1974. Historical change of word order: a case study in Chinese and its implications. In Anderson, John M. and Jones, Charles (eds.), Historical linguistics, 199–217. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1977. A mechanism for the development of copula morpheme. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Mechanism of syntactic change, 419–444. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. and Yuzhi, Shi. 1997. Lun Hanyu tibiaoji dansheng de jizhi (On the mechanism for the emergence of aspect markers in Chinese). Zhongguo yuwen 2: 82–96.Google Scholar

Li, Fanggui. 1993. Certain phonetic influences of the Tibetan prefixes upon the root initials. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philosophy 49: 15–36.Google Scholar

Li, Ping. 1987. Shi shuo xin yu he Bai yu jing zhong de dongbu jiegou (The resultative construction in Shi shuo xin yu and Bai yu jing). Yuyanxue luncong 14: 129–157.Google Scholar

Li, Rulong. 2001. Hanyu fangyanxue (The dialectology of Chinese).Beijing: The High Education Press.Google Scholar

Li, Xinkui, Jiajiao, Huang, Qisheng, Shi, Yun, Mai, and Dingfang, Chen. 1995. Guangzhou fangyan yanjiu (Research on the Guangzhou dialect). Guangzhou: Guangdong renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar

Li, Xuping and Bisang, Walter. 2012. Classifiers in sinitic languages: from individuation to definiteness marking. Lingua 122: 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, Yafei. 1993. Structural head and aspectuality. Language 69: 480–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, Yin. 2018. The diachronic development of the Chinese passive: from the wei … suo passive to the long passive. Language 94: e74–e98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, Yuming. 1996. Lingshu guanxi yu shuangbinju fenxi (Genitive relation and the analysis of the ditransitive construction). Yuyan jiaoxue yu yanjiu (Language Teaching and Research), 3: 62–73.Google Scholar

Li, Zhenhua and Changji, Zhou. 1999. Hanzi gujin yinbiao (Phonological dictionary of Chinese characters from ancient to modern). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar

Light, Timothy. 1979. Word order and word order change in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 7: 149–180.Google Scholar

Lightfoot, David. 2013. Grammatical approaches to syntactic change. In Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 495–508. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lin, Jonah T.-H. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar

Lin, Jonah T.-H. 2014. Light verbs. In Huang, James C.-T., Audrey Li, Y.-H., and Simpson, Andrew (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 73–99. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Lin, Jo-Wang. 1996. Polarity licensing and wh- phrase quantification in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar

Lin, Jo-Wang 2014. Wh- expressions in Mandarin Chinese. In Huang, James C.-T., Audrey Li, Y.-H., and Simpson, Andrew (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 180–207. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lin, Sue. 2018. Zaoqi Wuyu zhishici “ge” (The demonstrative “ge” in the Early Wu dialect). Fangyan 2: 221–230.Google Scholar

Lipák, Anikó. 2002. On the syntax of wh- items in Hungarian. Glot International 6: 293–301.Google Scholar

Lipka, Leonhard. 1990. An outline of English lexicology: Lexical structure, word Semantics, and word-formation. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Liu, Jian and Shaoyu, Jiang. 1990. Jindai Hanyu yufa ziliao huibian (Tang Wudai juan) (A collection of grammatical material (from the Tang to the Five Dynasties)). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Liu, Jian and Shaoyu, Jiang 1992. Jindai Hanyu yufa ziliao huibian (Songdai juan) (A collection of grammatical material (Song dynasty)). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Liu, Jian and Shaoyu, Jiang 1995. Jindai Hanyu yufa ziliao huibian (Yuan Ming juan) (A collection of grammatical material (Yuan and Ming dynasties)). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Liu, Linjun. 2009. A cognitive approach to topic constructions in Beijing Mandarin. Doctoral dissertation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.Google Scholar

Liu, Yuehua, Wenyu, Pan, and Gu, Ye. 2001. Shiyong xiandai Hanyu yufa (Practical Modern Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Lombardi, Linda. 1999. Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 267–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lord, Carol Diabe. 1989. Syntactic reanalysis in the historical development of serial verb constructions in languages of West Africa. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Lord, Carol Diabe. 1993. Historical change in serial verb constructions. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: The John Benjiamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Lu, Jianming. 1988. Xiandai Hanyu zhong shuliangci de zuoyong (The function of classifiers in Contemporary Chinese). In Jianming, Lu (ed.), Xiandai Hanyu Jufa lun (On the syntax of Contemporary Chinese), 120–134. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Lü, Shuxiang. 1963. Xiandai Hanyu danshuang yinjie wenti chutan (An approach on monosyllabic and disyllabic words in Modern Chinese). Zhongguo yuwen 1: 10–22.Google Scholar

Lü, Shuxiang 1979. Xiandai Hanyu yufa yanjiu Wenti (Issues in research on Modern Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Lü, Shuxiang 1984. Hanyu yufa lunwenji (Collected papers on Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Lü, Shuxiang 1985. Jindai hanyu zhidaici (Pronominal words in Modern Chinese). Shanghai: The Xuelin Press.Google Scholar

Lü, Shuxiang (ed.). 1999. Xiandai hanyu babai ci (The eight hundred words of Contemporary Chinese). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Lucy, John A. 2000. Systems of nominal classification: a concluding discussion. In Senft, Gunter (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 326–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ma, Zhen and Jianming, Lu. 1996. Xingrongci zuo jieguo buyu qingkuang kaocha (An investigation into the resultative uses of adjectives). Hanyu xuexi 1: 3–7.Google Scholar

Mallinson, Graham and Blake, Barry. 1981. Language typology. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Mayerthaler, Willy. 1980. Ikonismus in der Morphologie. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 2: 19–37.Google Scholar

Mayerthaler, Willy 1988. Morphological naturalness. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar

Mei, Tsulin. 1980. Sisheng bieyi de shijian cengci (The history of the tone shifts in differentiating meanings). Zhongguo Yuwen 6: 427–443.Google Scholar

Mei, Tsulin 1981. Xiandai Hanyu wanchengmao jushi he ciweide laiyuan (The origin of the perfective aspect construction and the perfect suffix in Modern Chinese). Yuyan yanjiu 1: 65–77.Google Scholar

Mei, Tsulin 1988. Ciwei “di,” “de” de laiyuan (The origin of the suffixes “di” and “de”). Shiyusuo jikan (The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philosophy) 1: 141–172.Google Scholar

Mei, Tsulin 1991. Cong Handai de dong sha dong si lai kan dongbu jiegou fazhan – jian lun zhonggu shiqi de shishou guanxi de zhongli hua (The historical development of the verb–resultative construction, with a note on the neutralization of the pre-verbal agent/patient distinction in Medieval Chinese). Yuyanxue luncong 16: 112–36.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In Greenberg, Joseph (ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. 4, 297–334. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith A. 2010. Explaining language universals. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 66–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moro, Andrea. 2006. Copula sentences. In Everaert, Martin and van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Vol. 2, 1–23. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mycock, Louise. 2007. Constituent question formation and focus: a new typological perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society 105: 192–251.Google Scholar

Noël, Dirk. 2007. Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14: 177–202.Google Scholar

Norman, Jerry. 1988. Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ohta, Tatsuo. 1987. Zhongguoyu lishi wenfa (The historic grammar of Chinese). Translated by Shaoyu, Jiang and Tianhua, Xu. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar

Park, Insun. 1992. Constituency problems in the auxiliary verb construction in Burmese. Paper presented at the Twenty-Fifth Annual International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Parker, Stephen G. 2002. Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1955. Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1974. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1 and 2: Principles of philosophy and elements of logic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David M. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 38: 157‒189.Google Scholar

Peyraube, Alain. 1986. History of the passive constructions in Chinese until the 10th century. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17: 335–372.Google Scholar

Peyraube, Alain 1997a. On word order and word order change in Pre-archaic Chinese. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 4: 105‒124.Google Scholar

Peyraube, Alain 1997b. On word order in Archaic Chinese. Cahiers de linguistique Asie orientale 26.1: 3‒20.Google Scholar

Peyraube, Alain 2017. Periodization. In Sybesma, Rint, Bether, Wolfgang, Yueguo, Gu, Zev Handel, C. T. Huang, James, and Myers, James (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, Vol. 5, 346–349. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Pike, Eunice. 1954. Phonetic rank and subordination in consonant patterning and historical change. Miscellanea phonetica 2: 25–41.Google Scholar

Plank, Frans. 1979. Exklusivierung, reflexivierung, identifizierrung, relationale Auszeichnung zu einem semantisch-pragmatischen thema. In Inger Rosengren (ed.), Sprache und Pragmatik Lunder Symposium, 330–54. Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. Outline of classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Qian, Nairong. 1997. Shanghaihua yufa (The grammar of the Shanghai dialect). Shanghai: The Shanghai People Press.Google Scholar

Qian, Nairong 2014. Shanghai fangyan dingzhi zhishici “ge” (The definite demonstrative “ge” in the Shanghai dialect). Fangyan 1: 14–20.Google Scholar

Qiao, Quansheng. 2000. Jin fangyan yufa yanjiu (Studies in the grammar of the Jin dialect). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, and Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Rankin, Robert L. 2003. The comparative method. In Joseph, Brian D. and Richard, D Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 183–212. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar

Ratcliff, Robert R. 2005. Bukhara Arabic: a metatypized dialect of Arabic in Central Asia. In Csató, É. Á., Isaksson, B., and Jahani, C. (eds.), Linguistic convergence and diffusion: case studies from Iranian, Semitic, and Turkic, 141–159. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rimé, Bernard, Philippot, Pierre, and Cisamolo, Daniela. 1990. Social schemata of peripheral changes in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 38–49.Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Saeed, John I. 1987. Somali reference grammar. Wheaton: Dunwoody.Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul. 1973. Focus and relativization. Language 49: 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, Mark and Oehrle, Richard T. (eds.), Language sound structure: studies in phonology presented to Morris Halle by his teacher and students, 107–136. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Senft, Gunter. 1996. Classificatory particles in Kilivila. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Serruys, Paul L.-M. 1981. Toward a grammar of the Shang bone inscriptions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Chinese Studies, 313–364. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar

Shao, Jingmin. 1996. Xiandai Hanyu yiwenju yanjiu (Studies in interrogative sentences in modern Chinese). Shanghai: Huadong Shifan Daxue Chubanshe (The Eastern China Normal University Press).Google Scholar

Shao, Jingmin and Chunli, Zhao. 2005. Zhishi ba ziju he shengyin bei ziju jiqi yuyong jieshi (The causative disposal construction and absent passive construction: a pragmatic approach). Hanyu xuexi 4: 11–18.Google Scholar

Shen, Jiaxuan. 2006. “Wang Mian sile fuqin” de shengcheng fangshi (The derivation of “Wang Mian died his father”). Zhongguo yuwen 4: 291–300.Google Scholar

Shi, Youwei. 1984. Guanyu “dong + you” (On the “verb + have” construction). Yuyanxue luncong 13: 13–25.Google Scholar

Shi, Yuzhi. 1995. Lun Hanyu de dayinjie jiegou (On the structure of macro-syllables in Chinese). Zhongguo Yuwen 3: 230–240.Google Scholar

Shi, Yuzhi 2002a. The establishment of Modern Chinese grammar: the formation of the resultative construction and its effects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Shi, Yuzhi 2002b. Liangci, zhishi daici he jiegou zhuci (Classifier, demonstrative, and structural particle). Fangyan 2: 117‒126.Google Scholar

Shi, Yuzhi 2004. Han Ying shuangbin jiegou chabie de gainianhua yuanyin (The motivation of conceptualization for the differences in double-object construction between Chinese and English). Waiyu jiaoxue yu yanjiu (Foreign Language Teaching and Research) 36: 83–89.Google Scholar

Shi, Yuzhi 2010. Hanyu yufa (Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Shi, Yuzhi 2016. Hanyu yufa yanhuashi (The evolutionary history of Chinese grammar). Nanchang: Jiangxi Education Press.Google Scholar

Shi, Yuzhi and Li, Charles N.. 1998. Lun zhuci “zhi” “zhe” he “de” de xingti (The rise and decline of the structural particles “zhi,” “zhe” and “de”). Zhongguo shehui kexue (Social Sciences in China) 6: 165–180.Google Scholar

Shi, Yuzhi and Li, Charles N. 2001. Hanyu yufanhua de licheng (A history of grammaticalization in Chinese). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and related constructions: a prototype analysis. Language 61: 821–848.Google Scholar

Shimura, Rioji. 1967. Chugo Hango no gobo to goi (A grammar of Medieval Chinese). In Tokuji, Ushijima et al. (eds.), Chugoku bunka sosho 1 (Series on Chinese culture, Vol. 1), 212–241. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar

Shopen, Timothy (eds.). 1985. Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 1984. The passive. a comparative linguistic analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna 1991. Functional grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Simpson, Andrew. 2017. Bare classifier/noun alternations in the Jinyun (Wu) variety of Chinese and the encoding of definiteness. Linguistics 55: 305–331.Google Scholar

Simpson, Andrew and Bhattacharya, Tanmoy. 2003. Obligatory overt wh- movement in a wh- in-situ language. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 127–142.Google Scholar

Simpson, Andrew and Biswas, Priyanka. 2016. Bare nominals, classifiers, and the representation of definiteness in Bangla. Linguistic Analysis 40: 167–198.Google Scholar

Simpson, Andrew, Soh, Hooi Ling, and Nomoto, Hiroki. 2011. Bare classifiers and definiteness. Studies in Language 35:168–193.Google Scholar

Smith, Neil. 1981. Consistency, markedness and language change: on the notion “consistent language.” Journal of Linguistics 17: 39–54.Google Scholar

Song, Jae Jung (eds.). 2010. The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Song, Wenhui, Zhengjing, Luo, and Jingchao, Yu. 2007. Xiandai Hanyu beidong ju shishi yinxian de jiliang fenxi (A quantitative analysis of the presence and absence of agents in the passives of Contemporary Chinese). Zhuoguo yuwen 2: 114–124.Google Scholar

Spencer, Andrew. 1995. Morphological theory. Oxford: Blackwell Pulishers Ltd.Google Scholar

Stiebels, Barbara. 2002. Typologie des argumentlinkings: Ӧkonomie und Expressivität. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar

Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Sun, Chaofen and Talmy, Givón. 1985. On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: a quantified text study and its implications. Language, 61: 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sun, Xixin. 1997. Hanyu lishi yufa conggao (A collection of papers on historical Chinese grammar). Shanghai: Hanyu dacidian chubanshe.Google Scholar

Tai, James H-Y. 1985. Temporal sequence and Chinese word order. In Haiman, John (eds.), Iconicity in syntax, 49–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tang, Yuming. 1987. Han Wei Liuchao beidongshi luolun (A basic study on the passives of the Han, the Wei, and the Six Dynasties). Zhongguo yuwen 3: 216–222.Google Scholar

Tang, Yuming 1988. Tang zhi Qing de beidongju (Passives from the Tang Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty). Zhongguo yuwen 6: 459–468.Google Scholar

Tang, Yuming and Xifu, Zhou. 1985. Shilun Qin–Han beidongshi de fazhan (On the development of the passive in the Qin and Han dynasties). Zhongguo yuwen 4: 281–285.Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A. and Longacre, Robert. 1985. Adverbial clauses. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 2, 171–234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1982. From propositional to textual meanings: some semantic and pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Lehmann, W. P. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics,245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1994. Grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Brown, Keith (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 1481–1486. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1997. Lexicalization and gramaticalization. MS, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2007. The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 18: 523–557.Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2011. Grammaticalization and mechanisms of change. In Heine, Bernd and Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 44–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth and Heine, Bernd. 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Traunmüller, Hartmut. 1996. Sound symbolism in deictic words. Paper presented at Fonetik 96, Swedish Phonetics Conference, Nässlingen, May.Google Scholar

Trousdale, Graeme. 2008. Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In Trousdale, Graeme and Gisborne, Nikolas (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar, 33–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Trousdale, Graeme and Gisborne, Nikolas (eds.). 2008. Constructional approaches to English grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Tsao, Feng-Fu. 1990. Sentence and clause structure in Chinese: a functional perspective. Taipei: Student Books.Google Scholar

Tsujimura, Natsuko. 1999. The handbook of Japanese linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo. 1974. Analogy in generative grammar: the origin of word order. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of Linguistics, Bologna, 79–83.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo 1976. Categorial grammar and the order of meaningful elements. In Juilland (ed.), Alphone, Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, 615–634. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar

Vincent, Nigel. 1979. Word order and grammatical theory. In Meisel, Jürgen M and Pam, Martin D. (eds.), Linear order and generative theory, 1‒22. Amsterdam: John Benjiamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Voisin, Sylvie and Vittrant, Alice. 2012. Pluriactionnalité temporelle en birman et wolof: les cas de repetition extrême. Bulletin de la Société linguistique de Paris 107.1: 353–377.Google Scholar

Wahba, Wafaa A.-F. B. 1991. LF movement in Iraqi Arabic. In James, C.-T. Huang and May, Robert (eds.), Logical structure and linguistic structure, 253–76. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Wang, Guosheng. 1991. Daye Jinhu hua de “de”, “ge” he “de ge” (The particles “de,” “ge” and “de-ge”). Zhongguo yuwen 3: 211–215.Google Scholar

Wang, Li. 1943(1985). Zhongguo xiandai yufa (Modern Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuanguan.Google Scholar

Wang, Li 1980. Hanyu shigao (A history of the Chinese language). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar

Wang, Li 1978. Tongyuan zi lun (On cognates in Chinese). In Yuyanxue lunwen ji of Wang Li (The collected linguistic papers of Wang Li), 533–546. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar

Wang, Li 1989. Hanyu yufa shi (The history of Chinese grammar). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshu Guan.Google Scholar

Wang, Li (ed.). 1997. Tongyuan zidian (A dictionary of Chinese cognates). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar

Wang, Tongshang and Yuzhi, Shi. 2019. Jindai Hanyu “chi” zi beidongju xingshuai de yuanyin (The motivations for the rise and decline of the “eat” passive in Modern Chinese). Gu hanyu yanjiu (Research on the Ancient Chinese Language) 2: 40–50.Google Scholar

Wang, William S.-Y. and Sun, Chaofen (eds.). 2015. The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Wh- in-situ, subjacency, and chain formation (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Watters, John. 1979. Focus in Aghem. In Hyman, L. (ed.), Aghem grammatical structure (Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 7), 138–189. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Wei, Pei-chuan. 1999. Lun xianqin hanyu yunfu de weizhi (On positions of the operator in Old Chinese). In Peyraube, A. and Chaofen, S. (eds.), Linguistic essays in honor of Mei Tsu-Lin: studies on Chinese historical syntax and morphology, 259–297. Paris: École des hautes études en sciences sociales.Google Scholar

Woodworth, Nancy. 1991. Sound symbolism in proximal and distal forms. Linguistics 29: 273–299.Google Scholar

Wu, Fuxiang. 2003. Zai lun chuzhi shi de laiyuan (On the source of the disposal construction). Yuyan yanjiu 3. 1–14.Google Scholar

Wu, Yunji. 2000. Hunan fangyan de daici (Pronominal words in Hunan Province). Changsha: Hunan Normal University Press.Google Scholar

Wunderlich, Dieter. 1997. Cause and the structure of verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 27–68.Google Scholar

Wunderlich, Dieter 2006. Argument hierarchy and other factors determining argument realization. In Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., Comrie, B., and Friederici, A. D. (eds.), Semantic role universals and argument linking: Theoretical, Typological, and Psycholinguistic Perspectives, 1–25. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Xu, Dan. 2006. Typological change in Chinese syntax. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xu, Jialu (ed.). 1995. Wenbai duizhao zhuzi jicheng (The translation of famous ancient books into Contemporary Chinese). Guangxi: Guangxi Education Press.Google Scholar

Xu, Jie. 1999. Liangzhong baoliu binyu jushi ji xiangguan jufa lilun (Two constructions of preserving objects and the related theories). Contemporary Linguistics 1:16–29.Google Scholar

Xu, Jie 2004. Yuyishang de Tongzhi Guanxi yu Jufashang de Shuangbinyu Jushi (The semantic relationship of co-reference and the syntactic construction of double objects). Zhongguo yuwen 4: 302–313.Google Scholar

Xu, Jie and Ying-Che., Li 1993. Focus and two non-linear grammatical categories: negation and question. Zhongguo yuwen 3: 81–92.Google Scholar

Xu, Liejiong. 2015. Topic prominence. In Wang, William S.-Y. and Sun, Chaofen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 393–404. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Xu, Liejiong and Langendeon, Terence. 1985. Topic structures in Chinese. Language 61: 1–27.Google Scholar

Yan, Sen. 1993. Lichuan yangyan yanjiu (Studies in the Lichuan dialect). Beijing: The Social Science Document Publisher.Google Scholar

Yang, Bojun. 1981. Gu Hanyu Xuci (Functional words in Classic Chinese). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar

Yang, Bojun and Leshi, He. 2001. Guhanyu yufa jiqi fazhan (The grammar of Classical Chinese and its development). Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.Google Scholar

Yang, Chengkai. 1996. Hanyu yufa lilun yanjiu (Studies in Chinese grammar theory). Shenyang: Liaoning Education Press.Google Scholar

Ye, Guoquan and Zhidong, Tang. 1982. Xinyi fangyan de bianyin (The tone sandhi in the Xinyi dialect). Fangyan (Dialect) 1: 47–51.Google Scholar

Yen, Sian L. 1986. The origin of the copula shi in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 14.2: 227–241.Google Scholar

Yuan, Jiahua. 2001. Hanyu fangyan gaiyao (A survey of Chinese dialects). Beijing: Philology Press.Google Scholar

Yue, Anne O. 1998. Zhi in pre-Qin Chinese. T’oung pao 84.4‒5: 239‒292.Google Scholar

Yue, Anne O. 2015. The Yue language. In William, S.-Y. Wang and Sun, Chaofen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, 173–188. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yue-Hashimoto, Anne. 1993. The lexicon in syntactic change: lexical diffusion in Chinese syntax. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2: 213–254.Google Scholar

Yue-Hashimoto, Anne 1995. Guangdong Kaiping fangyan de “de” zi jiegou (The “de” construction in the Kingping subdialect of Cantonese). Zhongguo yuwen, 4: 289–297.Google Scholar

Zec, Draga. 1988. Sonority constraints on prosodic structure. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University .Google Scholar

Zhang, Bojiang. 2001. Lun “ba” ziju de jushi yuyi (On the meaning of the “ba” construction). Language Research 1: 28–40.Google Scholar

Zhang, Bojiang 2006. Guanyu “suoqu lei shuangbinyu” (On the so-called “take”-type double object). Yuyanxue luncong 33: 298–312.Google Scholar

Zhang, Huiying. 1997. Hanyu fangyan daici yanjiu (Studies on pronominal words in Chinese dialects). Fangyan 2: 88–96.Google Scholar

Zhang, Huiying 2001. Hanyu fangyan daici yanjiu (Studies in pronominal words in Chinese dialects). Beijing: The Yuwen Press.Google Scholar

Zhang, Ning. 1998. The interactions between construction meaning and lexical meaning. Linguistics 36: 957–980.Google Scholar

Zhang, Yujin. 2001. Xizhou Hanyu yufa yanjiu (Studies in the grammar of the West Zhou Dynasty). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Zhou, Chiming. 1958. Hanyu de shidongxing fuhe dongci (Causative verb compounds in Chinese). Wen shi zhe 4: 175–226.Google Scholar

Zhu, Dexi. 1982. Yufa jiangyi (Lecture notes on grammar). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar

Zhu, Dexi 1983. Zizhi he zhuanzhi: Hanyu mingcihua miaoji “de, zhě, suǒ he zhī” de yufa gongneng he yuyi gongneng (Self-referred and other-referred: the grammatical and semantic functions of the four nominalizers “de, zhě, suǒ and zhī”). Fangyan [Dialects] 1: 16–31.Google Scholar

Zhu, Minche. 1958. Xianqing liang Han shiqi de dongbu jiegou (The resultative construction in the period of Pre-Qin and Two Hans). Yuyanxue Luncong Vol. 2, 17–30. Shanghai: Xinzhi chubanshe.Google Scholar

Zhu, Minche 1990. Zhuzi yulei zhong de dongci buyu – jian tan dongci houzhui (The resultative constructions and verbal particles in Zhuzi yulei). In Wang Li xiansheng jinian lunwen ji (A collection off papers in honor of Wang Li), 240‒251. Beijing: Shangwu yinshu guan.Google Scholar

Zsiga, Elizabeth C. 2013. The sounds of language: an introduction to phonetics and phonology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold M. 1982. Stranded to and phonological phrasing in English. Linguistics 20: 3‒57.Google Scholar