Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:31:48.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Public Speaks: “Teach Both”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Michael Berkman
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Eric Plutzer
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

The people, as a rule, do not believe in the ape theory.

William Jennings Bryan (1924)

Understanding how the Gallup poll induced such opinions about the creationism issue in this case provides an object lesson as to how an illusion of public opinion can be generated in public opinion surveys generally.

George Bishop (2005)
  1. But we decide which is right.

  2. And which is an illusion?

  3. The Moody Blues (1967)

Opponents of evolution have claimed for nearly a century that public opinion is on their side. The proponents of the nation's first anti-evolution laws in the 1920s were confident that these laws would be popular with voters and reflected majority sentiment. In the latter half of the twentieth century, state legislators and school board members could also claim citizen support for policies that mandated “balanced treatment” for evolution and creationism and, later, that mandated the teaching of intelligent design or curricula that emphasized “gaps” in the theory of evolution. As we noted in Chapter 1, both populists like Bryan and strict constructivists like Scalia have made strong normative cases for following the wishes of the majority, even against the strong objections of scientific or pedagogical experts. Thus, it is essential to understand the policy preferences of ordinary citizens.

In this chapter, we marshal evidence from more than a quarter century of surveys of the American public concerning evolution. We will begin with the public's policy preferences – what Americans say that they want taught in public schools. This review will show that the majority of Americans favor teaching students a biblical perspective on the origins of life on earth. For most, creationism should be taught alongside evolutionary biology – what many refer to as “balanced treatment.” However, a fairly sizable minority say they want biblical perspectives to supplant scientific treatments of the origin of species.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×