from PART ONE - THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2017
INTRODUCTION
Democracy and equality of citizens are the fundamental values of the European social and economic order. This axiological assumption is generally reflected in extensive legal regulations organizing the social and economic life in the European Union (EU). For the purposes of this chapter, a detailed analysis of those foundations intend to be limited to the manifestations of the democratic values in the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) adjudication in the selected issues of the European antitrust law where, under private enforcement against practices violating the prohibitions of the European antitrust law, equal participation and citizen's access to the proceedings before the courts, based on the principle of freedom of choice of all concerned, are ensured.
Competition, understood as an ideal position equilibrium, which confirms the optimal allocation of recourses and the protection of consumer's interests, is essential for the social welfare. Yet the conditions for optimal competition and its further functioning are not guaranteed only by the free market and economic mechanisms. Historically, there were two ways of dealing with competition law regulation. Looking at the gradual transformation of the European law in the field of competition law, both dominant approaches, that is the Anglo-American one, following the case-by-case logic, and the European (continental) one, that takes more policy-based attitude, were adopted. The foundation of the European antitrust law can be identified in Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),1 which respectively address the issue of “undertakings” distorting the internal market by agreements, decisions of associations of undertakings or by concerted practices,2 and the abuse of their “dominant position”. Whenever both prohibiting agreements and abuses of dominant position affect the trade between EU Member States under the Treaty, they are enforced by the European Commission and by the National Competition Authorities (NCA). Both EU highest courts as well as national courts can adjudicate the EU competition law.
In the context of the private litigation, Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (until the 2003 reform of the European antitrust law) were rarely invoked by private parties to claim damages and injunctions.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.