Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of Contributors
- List of Abbreviations
- 1 Ius Commune and the Principles of European Contract Law: Contemporary Renewal of an Old Idea
- 2 Good Faith
- 3 Offer, Acceptance, and the Moment of Contract Formation
- 4 The Battle of Forms
- 5 Agency
- 6 Threats and Excessive Benefits or Unfair Advantage
- 7 Interpretation
- 8 Third-Party Contracts
- 9 Payment
- 10 Specific Performance and Special Damages
- 11 Termination for Breach of Contract
- 12 Assignment
- 13 Capitalisation of Interest
- Appendix: The Principles of European Contract Law
- List of Cases
- Index
4 - The Battle of Forms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of Contributors
- List of Abbreviations
- 1 Ius Commune and the Principles of European Contract Law: Contemporary Renewal of an Old Idea
- 2 Good Faith
- 3 Offer, Acceptance, and the Moment of Contract Formation
- 4 The Battle of Forms
- 5 Agency
- 6 Threats and Excessive Benefits or Unfair Advantage
- 7 Interpretation
- 8 Third-Party Contracts
- 9 Payment
- 10 Specific Performance and Special Damages
- 11 Termination for Breach of Contract
- 12 Assignment
- 13 Capitalisation of Interest
- Appendix: The Principles of European Contract Law
- List of Cases
- Index
Summary
THE CASUS BELLI
A battle of forms arises where each of the parties to what they at least perceive as a contract have employed their own standard terms of trading or business. In the case of an anticipated sale of goods, the buyer's purchase order and the seller's acknowledgment of order will be on terms drafted in advance: perhaps by a representative trade association or by the parties' respective legal advisers. If all goes well the goods will be dispatched and paid for and nothing more will be heard of the matter. If this happy scenario does not ensue, however – perhaps, for example, the buyer feels that the goods do not conform to specification or are defective in quality – the parties may turn to their respective standard forms and point to terms therein which they consider to be resolutive of the dispute. In particular the seller may stand on a clause in its acknowledgment of order which excludes liability for the non-conformity alleged and point to another which neutralises any contrary term in the buyer's purchase order. For example:
We shall not be liable in respect of defects and we shall not be liable for loss of profits, detention or other consequential damage or expenses. It is a term of this acknowledgment of order that it shall represent the entire agreement between the Purchaser and the Vendor.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- European Contract LawScots and South African Perspectives, pp. 98 - 122Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2006