Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Contributors
- Introduction: The Big Picture
- PART I SCIENCE AND PLANNING
- 1 War on Nature as Part of the Cold War: The Strategic and Ideological Roots of Environmental Degradation in the Soviet Union
- 2 Creating Cold War Climates: The Laboratories of American Globalism
- 3 A Global Contamination Zone: Early Cold War Planning for Environmental Warfare
- 4 Environmental Diplomacy in the Cold War: Weather Control, the United States, and India, 1966–1967
- 5 Containing Communism by Impounding Rivers: American Strategic Interests and the Global Spread of High Dams in the Early Cold War
- PART II GEOPOLITICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT
- PART III ENVIRONMENTALISMS
- PART IV EPILOGUE
- Index
1 - War on Nature as Part of the Cold War: The Strategic and Ideological Roots of Environmental Degradation in the Soviet Union
from PART I - SCIENCE AND PLANNING
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Contributors
- Introduction: The Big Picture
- PART I SCIENCE AND PLANNING
- 1 War on Nature as Part of the Cold War: The Strategic and Ideological Roots of Environmental Degradation in the Soviet Union
- 2 Creating Cold War Climates: The Laboratories of American Globalism
- 3 A Global Contamination Zone: Early Cold War Planning for Environmental Warfare
- 4 Environmental Diplomacy in the Cold War: Weather Control, the United States, and India, 1966–1967
- 5 Containing Communism by Impounding Rivers: American Strategic Interests and the Global Spread of High Dams in the Early Cold War
- PART II GEOPOLITICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT
- PART III ENVIRONMENTALISMS
- PART IV EPILOGUE
- Index
Summary
One aspect of Cold War competition between the United States and the Soviet Union involved sparring over a range of environmental issues. Soviet political leaders claimed to manage resources in the name of the proletariat, whereas American officials spoke about the inviolability of private property. American specialists referred to great success in creating the legal framework to combat pollution; Soviet policy makers and scientists followed with the passage of statutes to demonstrate that the nation cared more about the citizen and the environment than the U.S. government did. Most observers agree that the United States won this Cold War battle owing to the successful implementation of the National Environmental Protection Act (1969), together with a series of clean air acts dating to 1955; the Clean Water Act (1972); and a variety of other legislative, juridical, and voluntary measures. Soviet policies and practices led to environmental degradation on a scale that may be exceeded only by current practices in China. The impacts on the environment and public health will continue to be felt for decades to come.
The Soviet environmental legacy is fields of toxic waste that continue to leak into the groundwater and costly, massive, failed white elephants – nature transformation projects and huge inefficient factories – that dominate the landscape. In some regions, pollution led to the formation of extensive tracts of land devoid of trees, where only the hardiest of grasses survive, what might be called industrial deserts.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Environmental Histories of the Cold War , pp. 21 - 50Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
- 5
- Cited by